That’s a Backfire
By Johnny Roosh
Methinks “No” isn’t the answer the Strib was looking for.
Instant Poll: Is the Shubert Theater project a good use of stimulus funds?
9 Responses to “That’s a Backfire”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 3rd, 2009 at 9:41 am
Hey, it’s not like we are borrowing trillions from the Chinese to subsidize the theater enthusists hobby.
June 3rd, 2009 at 9:43 am
We’re not looking for any answer, Johnny. Also: If you read the story, it points out the projects that got short-shrift in favor of the Shubert project. It’s not cheerleading.
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:21 am
It’s not the money so much as what was done with it. Seriously, moving a huge building one block so a mega-multi-complex could be built? Idiocy.
You want to tell me there wasn’t one good architect that could have figured out how to incorporate the Shubert in situ? The Shubert is a perfect emblem of Minneapolis DFL governance. Straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel.
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:43 am
Watch the “Gnat” references around Lileks.
June 3rd, 2009 at 11:17 am
Lileks retired “Gnat” when she turned 8-years-old.
Also, Darth Vader is Luke’s father.
June 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am
I have no doubt Lileks is familiar with the gnat reference.
June 3rd, 2009 at 1:42 pm
We’re not looking for any answer, Johnny. Also: If you read the story, it points out the projects that got short-shrift in favor of the Shubert project. It’s not cheerleading.
Oops. My bad. It’s not a Minnesota “Poll”
June 3rd, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Typical wingnut. Can’t retract an attack without making another one.
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:28 pm
angryclown said:
“Can’t retract an attack without making another one”
I think you, of all people, should be last in line to make that argument. *shrug*