Gun Control And Racism, Part MCCXCIX

The goals of gun control, from the very beginning before the American Revolution, are rooted in racism. 

Every single gun control measure in this nation’s history has been passed against a backdrop of “making sure black people don’t kill white people” – from laws disarming slaves before independence, to the post-Civil-War era laws in Texas passed after black Union Army veterans kicked the Klan’s pointy-sheeted tushes, to the Gun Control Act of 1968, a knee-jerk response to the riots that wracked the nation’s inner cities after the assassination of Martin Luther King. 

Not long ago, we Real Americans celebrated the court case that pounded a spike through the head of Illinois’ civilian gun ban – the last in the country after the Heller and McDonald cases euthanized. 

But Illinois is still doing its best to t keep guns out of the hands of inconvenient minorities; over 90% of Illinois’ carry permits have been issued in counties that are mostly white:

Within Cook County, the top five concealed carry ZIP codes per capita are all predominately white, middle class and are in areas that have low crime rates. However, the most violent neighborhoods within the county — all of which are on the South Side of Chicago — are predominately black, where residents earn less than $48,000 annually and hold the fewest concealed carry licenses as a percentage of the population.

“But maybe it’s because fewer poor black people apply for permits”, a lefty might say.

And she’d be right – but not for the reasons they assume (with emphasis added):

Illinois residents say the disproportionate statistics all boil down to cost. Of right-to-carry states, Illinois has the highest registration and training fee, costing an applicant about $650 on average for fingerprinting, taxes and logistics — excluding the price of the gun.

“In these gangbang neighborhoods, people can’t afford the license. They’re making choices between food and medicine, and they can’t even guarantee they’ll get even that,” said Shawn Gowder, 49, who lives in Chicago’s Auburn Gresham neighborhood on the South Side, where two homicides have taken place in the last 30 days. “We need to arm ourselves and protect ourselves from these gangbangers, but we just can’t afford to do it.”

Tack on sixteen hours of training – the longest requirement in the US.  Go ahead – fit that in around work and family. 

Of course, “safety” legislation over the past 45 years have done a lot to price firearms, especially handguns, out of reach of poor people. Even a Soviet-surplus Makarov – just about the cheapest useful handgun on the market – will be close to $300, especially in a high-tax area like Chicago. 

If the same data trends occurred in banking and insurance, there might be outcries of “redlining,” denying a group of people access to goods or services because of the color of their skin or income levels. But there’s little public concern expressed so far about the possibility that poor blacks are being disenfranchised from the right to carry a concealed weapon.

“You really need to ask whether or not politicians are consciously trying to disarm certain groups of people,” said Dr. John Lott, a Second Amendment expert and president of the Crime Prevention Center. “Why do they want a law that primarily disarms blacks and gives guns to only well-to-do whites? Don’t they think it should be equal for everyone to protect their lives?”

Lott knows as well as you, me, and the poor people of Chicago that that’s a rhetorical question.

18 thoughts on “Gun Control And Racism, Part MCCXCIX

  1. Question. Since gun rights are based on the constitution (which courts have agreed with), can a high fee be considered a poll tax? Meant to keep poor people of color from excurcising their constitutional rights?

  2. Lott knows as well as you, me, and the poor people of Chicago that that’s a rhetorical question.

    I’m not so sure the poor people of Chicago know that it’s a rhetorical question, as they have been voting for the same people who consciously try to disarm them, for decades.

  3. Hope that fixes things.

    Great question by Chuck. The answer probably depends on how the courts define a right. All in all, I’d at least say that Minnesota’s fee to get a permit to purchase a firearm counts as a poll tax, no?

  4. There is no fee to obtain a “Permit to Purchase” in Minnesota – it just requires you filing the paperwork and showing ID at your local PD or Sheriff if not in a city, then waiting the 7-14 days for it to arrive.

    Whether the MN Permit to Purchase is useful or necessary is an argument that I’m willing to have – I think it is rather silly to have your local PD do a NICS check so you can go to the store and get another NICS check… but well no one ever accused government of being logical or reasonable.

  5. The Permit to Purchase might be free, but the Permit to Carry costs up to $100 to defray expense of processing, Minn. Stat. 347.714, Subd. 3f. Chicago’s is six times higher. Maybe their processing is that much more expensive?

    Even at $600 a pop, it’s cheaper than the lawyer’s fees and/or bribes required under the old system. As shown by the number of people grabbing permits.

  6. What if you had to pay the government a fee in order to launch a blog, or exercise your Fifth Amendment rights, or go to church?>/i>

    Don’t you worry… It’s coming.

  7. There seems to be some consistency checking that happens at submission time, but it missed the unclosed italics tag in that last correctly styled post because of the almost correct italics end tag:
    <i />
    in the middle of that comment.

  8. On the bright side, it seems that italics keep the trolls away. :^)

    Brad, thanks for the correction.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.