To: Members of the MNGOP Judicial Elections Committee
From: Mitch Berg, Uppity Peasant
Re: Weasel Words
JEC,
First things first; I’m an elected party officer, so I’ll support our party’s endorsed candidates. So – yaaaay, Ms. McDonald.
Of course, Ms. McDonald’s candidacy has turned into a Bolivian Goat Rodeo; the DFL and Media (ptr) on the one hand are caviling and gamboling about the story like happy little pixies. And some of the Ron Paul clacque – who were non-factors in this year’s caucuses, for the most part – have latched onto the whole episode as a way to try to stick it to the state GOP.
Now, I’ve asked a number of members of the JEC – in this space, in other online fora, and in person – to explain…:
- Why the committee voted to endorse Ms. McDonald, if they did, and…
- …more importantly, why the committee voted to suppress the “minority report” – supported by the committee chair – that would have informed delegates about Ms. McDonald’s legal issues.
The “answers” I’ve gotten have been, to be charitable, weasel words. The kind of thing that would shame a punch-drunk fourth-grader. Silence, or idiotic little cutiepie resopnses (“Ask Chairman Downey!”).
So far, I’ve thought of this whole episode as incompetence on the part of the JEC – and knowing a few of the people who are on the JEC and/or heavily involved in JEC business, it’s not a stretchy theory.
The other possibility that jumps out at you, seeing some of the people involved? It was an intentional sandbagging of the GOP by people who have a bone to pick with the party’s leadership.
The more I hear about this sorry episode, the more I’m leaning toward “sabotage”.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.