Sending jets over an apparently still-hinky-about-lowflying-airplanes Manhattan?
Tone deaf.
An administration official says a presidential Boeing 747 and a fighter jet flew low near ground zero in New York City Monday because the White House Military Office wanted to update its file photo of the president’s plane near the Statue of Liberty.
Sending the most expensive to build-and-run jet in the world (and a military escort plane,itself not cheap) out for what amounts to a flying Glamor Shot…:
This official said the White House Military Office told the Federal Aviation Administration that it periodically updates file photos of Air Force One near national landmarks, like the statute in New York harbor and the Grand Canyon.
…in the middle of an economic downturn?
Tone duh-f.
I mean, the Sorosphere has all sortsof Photoshop “geniuses”, right?
K-rod,
here is the quote from the New York Post, one of the papers approached to buy the recording from a representative of the anonymous friend.
“The lawyers said the shooter used a camera with a hard-disc drive that he later destroyed, drilling into the device and tossing it into a lake. ”
So, we have an “anonymous friend” who made a recording on an unspecified date, at an unknown location, unverified by anyone. An “anonymous friend” who not only refuses to make the original available so it could be examined for fakery, but who destroys that original; and who comes up with ridiculous excuses for why the secret service isn’t around.
A cheesy accusation, a sleezy attempt to get money through an attorney who subsequently disowns their own client. Oh, and lets not forget that the sleeze who supposedly filmed Ms. Biden claims to be a drug user, which certainly raises questions about reliability.
I couldn’t find a single newspaper, foreign or domestic, that was willing to pay a thin dime for this trash, nor a single reputable news source that called it credible. REPUTABLE news sources reqire multiple forms of confirmation before they go with a story; this story has NONE.
The only reason to believe this story is because you desperately want to believe it, and derive pleasure from maligning someone.
Apparently for K-rod, this is one some kind of faith based initiative where he doesn’t need to prove a slur to repeat it, he just has to BELIEVE.
Mitch Berg Says:
April 28th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
“Is it my imagination or is DG drinking from Peev’s cup? ”
Ironically, while they are not remotely the same person, there is a connection, going waaaay back. ”
Yeah, like my connection to you goes way back. I’m guessing you are having a good laugh about now. At least, I hope so.
Granted, Dog gone, the story is not as well-placed as the investigation into whether or not McCain had an affair with a lobbyist (that was sarcasm), but certainly the issue should be of at least as much interest to the public as Sarah Palin’s daughter’s teenage dramatics.
Please. What else you gonna talk about when Sarah Palin comes up? All she has going for her is hotness. She’s an idiot with no experience. She’s Spiro Agnew with tits.
What else you gonna talk about when Sarah Palin comes up? All she has going for her is hotness. She’s an idiot with no experience.
But to be fair to Governor Palin, the left will say the same thing about every conservative woman. Because wimmins are supposed to be intellectually barefüt, pregnant, and voting Democrat. It’s the first rule of zealotry (besides “take a really crazy-sounding stage name”); apostates – every black, latino, asian or woman who defects – must be destroyed first.
She’s Spiro Agnew with tits.
Game misconduct!
Terry:
“I can’t figure out why you would believe the lawyer’s story about ‘drilling a hole in the cammera and throwing it in a lake’, but not believe him about what was on the camera’s disk.”
Because either way, his story lacks credibility. He could be lying about what he did with the camera. If he is lying about what he did with the camera, he is not a credible witness and I have reason to not believe his account of what is on the tape.
If he did destroy the camera, the only remotely plausible explanation would be to prevent anyone from proving his recording was a fake.
whoa.
I really hit a nerve with Dogcrap and dickheadDFL.
Settle down there boys, before you hurt yourselfs.
Is this some kind of competition to see who is the #1 crazymoonbat on SitD?
#1 DickheadDFL, #2 Peev from Penisblog, #3 AssClown, #4 DogCrap
Keep up the long winded foaming at the mouth rants and you might prove to be #1 crazymoonbat.
“That is just Mitchspeak, for ‘I don’t want to believe that’? Do you think LTC Beaver is lying? Do you have evidence for that?”
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
DogCrap:
“doesn’t need to prove a slur to repeat it”
Put up or shut up, boy, now provide a quote from me “repeating it” or STFU.
Remember the last time I kicked your ass and there was nothing you could do about it.
Bwwaaaahahahahahahahahaha
Whoa, are you libs Tone Deaf?
A tactic of the Liberal Fascists is to distract and change the subject.
Looks like I really hit a nerve with DickyDFL and DogCrap.
Settle down boys, before you hurt yourselves.
“That is just Mitchspeak, for ‘I don’t want to believe that’? Do you think LTC Beaver is lying? Do you have evidence for that?”
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Is this a competition to see who can be the #1 crazymoonbat on SitD?
#1 DickheadDFL; #2 Peev from Penisblog; #3 Flush; #4 AssClown; #5 DogCrap; #6 Stooj
Keep up the longwinded foaming at the mouth moonbat Liberal Fascist rants and you just might be the #1 crazymoonbat!!! Don’t give up!!!
DogCrap:
“doesn’t need to prove a slur to repeat it”
Put up or shut up; I simply asked you a question then you blew a gasket and had a meltdown, you never provided a quote of me repeating it so just STFU.
Remember the last time I kicked your ass and there was nothing you could do about it.
Bwwwaaaahahahahahahahahahaha
“#1 DickheadDFL; #2 Peev from Penisblog; #3 Flush; #4 AssClown; #5 DogCrap; #6 Stooj”
This from they guy who goes by K-Rod?
If he did destroy the camera, the only remotely plausible explanation would be to prevent anyone from proving his recording was a fake.
Wrong again, RickDFL! If it’s true that he destroyed the camera, he might have had a reason for doing so that had nothing at all to do with the video that he’s peddling.
“he might have had a reason for doing so that had nothing at all to do with the video that he’s peddling.”
Sure, anything ‘might’ have happened. The Illuminati ‘might’ have forced him to destroy the camera. Or maybe he belongs to a strange cult that requires him to destroy cameras. But neither is “remotely plausible”.
Can you provide a remotely plausible explanation (other than the one I suggested) for making a copy of the video then destroying the camera?
That depends on what your definition of “is” is, DickheadDFL.
Talk about Tone Deaf.
Since you get to decide what is ‘remotely plausible’, RickDFL, it’s kind of a loser’s game. However, if I was the lawyer, I would hint that the client had taken some nude pics of his underage girlfriend & destroyed the camera for that reason.
I hope you continue to demonstrate this new-found scepticism when it comes to the antics of SPalin’s family.
Terry: You can call anything you want ‘plausible’. People will judge your credibility accordingly.
Even if it were true that the taper did destroy the original b/c he had kiddie porn on there, that hardly seems to make him a credible witness. You really want to trust the veracity of a guy who a. had an underage girlfriend and b. takes pictures of her.
It doesn’t require a. or b. for the him to be in serious trouble when it comes to kiddie porn. That I hope we can all agree upon.
“Sure, anything ‘might’ have happened.”
With the exception of someone snorting coke, right, DickheadDFL, because that is just not ‘plausible’?
“With the exception of someone snorting coke” says K-please don’t laugh at my small – Rod.
Ashley Biden might have snorted coke. Anybody might have. I would not be surprised if you had blown a line or two before posting. What is not plausible is that she is the person who appears on a video a handful of people have seen and no can can check the authenticity of being sold for money by an anonymous taper through a shady lawyer who later quit.
RickDFL said:
“You can call anything you want ‘plausible’. People will judge your credibility accordingly”
I see you are providing some advice that you could use more than most, RickDFL.
Even if it were true that the taper did destroy the original b/c he had kiddie porn on there, that hardly seems to make him a credible witness.
and
But of course you didn’t ask if I thought he was a credible witness. You asked:”Can you provide a remotely plausible explanation (other than the one I suggested) for making a copy of the video then destroying the camera?” and I answered you.
“you didn’t ask if I thought he was a credible witness”
Fair enough. If he destroyed the camera to prevent detection of kiddie porn, do you think he would be a credible witness about who and what is on the tape?
Not enough info.
“Ashley Biden might have snorted coke.” – dickheadDFL
Well, DickheadDFL, I refuse to even make that accusation.
Heck, Biden has enough problems as it is. Slo Joe Biden is so incompetent that he thinks FDR was on TV calming the nation during the ’29 market crash. A warm bucket of piss would be a complement for him.