By, For And Of “The 1%”
By Mitch Berg
Why do Democrats yap so much about the “Koch Brothers”?
Because Berg’s Seventh Law is absolute and irrefutable, that’s why.
8 Responses to “By, For And Of “The 1%””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 25th, 2014 at 1:42 pm
It is indeed mind boggling that the lazy, low information voters supporting the Democrat party, haven’t yet figured out that it is now, by a huge margin, the party of big money.
June 25th, 2014 at 1:51 pm
I’m more surprised that Politico allowed such an article to be posted.
June 25th, 2014 at 2:26 pm
“But the DA document distributed in Chicago does call into question some of the plaintiff woe-is-us rhetoric bandied about by Democrats griping about the Koch brothers’ sophisticated efforts to use their checkbooks to manipulate American democracy.”
Plaintiff?
June 25th, 2014 at 9:02 pm
You’d think that the republicans would drag Soros out each time High-Pitched Harry Reid trills about the shadowy Koch brothers. It’s such an obvious and effective retort. I suppose The Maverick and the rest of his submissive ilk don’t want to rock the boat by appearing to be mean spirited …
June 26th, 2014 at 12:51 pm
PM: I bet that is an autocorrect (read, LAZY JOURNALIST writing his articles on his iPad while taking the DC metro line home to Arlington) that should have been “plaintive”.
June 26th, 2014 at 12:59 pm
Hah, I posted that last comment before I decided to read the journalist’s bio page on Politico:
“He grew up in Philadelphia, graduated from the University of Wisconsin–Madison and lives in Alexandria, Va., with his wife.”
Nailed it.
June 26th, 2014 at 1:00 pm
Except I mixed up the name of the city with the name of the cemetery. Close enough for IRS work.
June 26th, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Bill C-
It’s bad all the way down. what type of “woe-is-us rhetoric” is not plaintive? It’s a redundancy. My guess is that it wasn’t edited.