The Good Citizen
By Mitch Berg
I’ve taken my shots at Dems’ “Get Out The Vote” efforts, in that they tend to be not so much educational (as have been the GOP GOTV efforts I’ve seen) as logistical. Democrat GOTV efforts were wonderfully summed up by the delightfully dissociative Jennifer Vogel in her classic article, “F*CK THE SUBURBS”, in some dismal little Seattle freebiezine a few years ago:
A poll volunteer approached and embarked upon a lengthy explanation. The African woman interrupted. “Kerry,” she said loudly. “I want Kerry.” That was that.
To sum it up: teach a [fill in the label of choice] the name you want filled in, tell them what that name is going to give them, and send them to the polls.
Which is fine, where “fine” equals “legal”. But is it what our democracy is supposed to be striving for?
The franchise is a vital part of democracy – but not as an end unto itself. It’s supposed to be the first step in a process that leads to good, publicly-minded people of whatever party being sent downtown, or to Saint Paul, or to Washington.
And if the only thing people know about the process is a name and a list of programs, then that’s what the people are going to send off to run your city, county, state or nation.
So while I proposed yesterday to have an all-day national three-for-one happy hour on election day, to keep idiots away from the polls, a little consideration (and spending Saint Patricks Day in downtown Saint Paul, among the raving-drunk pseudo-Oirish reminding me how awful and ugly a drunk populace is), leads me to a better idea.
It’s time to reinstitute the poll test.
In order to vote, everyone should get at least a “D”on a test to make sure they’ve been paying attention to their city, state, and world. The test is non-partisan, gender/race/culture blind, and only makes sure people are actually paying attention to what their government is and how it’s supposed to work.
Here’s an example:
- Who is your city’s current mayor? [If the mayor’s race is on the ballot (or any races below, for that matter) it’d be omitted]
- Does your city have a council, a commission, or a manager?
- What ward [precinct, city council district, whatever] do you live in?
- Who is your current city council representative?
- What county do you live in?
- Who is your current County Commission representative?
- Who is the Governor?
- Who is your State Representative?
- Who is your State Senator?
- Name at least four of your state’s constitutional offices and/or officers? (Hint: Governor [fill in the governor] is one of them).
- What are the three branches of our State and Federal government?
- What Congressional District do you live in?
- Who is your current congressional representative?
- How many Senators does your state send to the United States Senate? If guessing, get as close as possible to the actual number without going over.
- Name as many of your state’s current US Senators as possible.
- Name at least four cabinet departments or members: (hint: Secretary of State is one example).
- Who is the current President of the United States?
Now, should anyone who can’t get at least 60% of these questions correct even be voting?
No, I think that’s the kind of thing a citizen should be able to know to take part in our democracy. I mean, why should people vote for the control off offices and institutions they don’t understand?
Liberals will respond “That’s Racist!” Liberals also say “that’s racist” when their pad thai comes to them undercooked or when they get a parking ticket. What they’re really saying is that “our factory schools – the ones that kids outside the ruling class go to, the ones we want to mandate everyone go to, especially all those minorities, don’t teach the basic of citizenship” – in other words, who’s the racist, here?





March 18th, 2009 at 8:47 am
#16, Has Barry managed to seat 4 cabinet members yet?
March 18th, 2009 at 10:15 am
I suspect that a certain number of left-leaners might actually be on board with this. At least a couple of friends of mine who are left-leaners.
March 18th, 2009 at 10:51 am
Far too elaborate. How about this:
1) Can you name at least two candidates for (the highest office on the ballot)?
2) Can you name at least one candidate for each of the next highest offices on the ballot?
That would weed out a good 50% of those voting who have no business voting, IMHO. And yes, it would be racist, because a large number of those voting because they were told to vote for a certain somebody just happen to be minorities. So be it.
March 18th, 2009 at 11:46 am
I know the answers to all these questions. Since I live in Ramsey County, I don’t like the answers very much.
March 18th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Liberals believe that conservative voters are less intelligent and less well educated than liberals, yet they oppose any objective test of intelligence or education as a requirement to vote because it would reduce the number of liberal voters more than the number of conservative voters.
Another one of the crazy contradictions you have to believe to be a democrat.
March 19th, 2009 at 7:51 am
I’d be embarassed at getting so many wrong (meaning I know so few of these names), except that I live in St. Paul where the names change but the policies don’t.
Here, the correct answer always is “Generic Democrat.”
Cool – I aced it!
.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
How about this for a FAIR test – anyone who is already a citizen has to pass the US citizenship test to be able to vote.
Apparently former supreme court judge Sandra Day O’Conner (I’m a big fan of her career) has a new website to counter the lack of knowledge of basic civics that is a problem with our citizenry. I believe that when she premiered the website, she made the comment that only a third of the people in at least one poll were able to name all three branches of government – but able to name all three judges on American Idol.
All joking aside – I’d love to see what kind of test Mrs. O’Conner could come up with to qualify for voting rights.