Financial Advisors: “NObama”
By Johnny Roosh
…and they can’t all be Republicans.
45.6% thought the [stimulus] plan was a bad idea. Meanwhile, 29.7% thought it was a good idea, and 24.7% were unsure.
“I think most of us are opposed to it because it’s a bailout in nature, and people are concerned about how it will be allocated,” said Eric Toya, vice president of Trovena LLC of Redondo Beach, Calif., which manages $400 million in assets. “It’s so anti-free-market-capitalism, which is what most financial advisers and the public believe in.”
…until they were told that they don’t believe in that any more by rockstars, the media and The Messiah.
“The fact that the size and price of the plan keeps growing should be a major concern,” said Greg Zandlo, president of The Zandlo Financial Group of Minneapolis, which has $50 million in assets under advisement.
What’s the difference between The New Deal and The New New Deal? Scale. Scope.
There’s only one thing worse than a liberal that doesn’t know what to do. A liberal that doesn’t know what to do and does it any way.
The survey also found that 36.4% of advisers did not have much confidence in Mr. Obama’s ability to fix the economy. Meanwhile, 31.5% said they had a “fair amount” of confidence, and 12.2% said they had a “great deal” of confidence.
About 15.5% of respondents said they had no confidence in Mr. Obama’s ability to fix the economy, the online survey found.
Which can only mean another “Fairness Doctrine” aimed at financial advisers is on it’s way.
