When I left North Dakota in the eighties, it seemed like rural America was on the verge of drying up and blowing away.
Of course, it was a historically lousy time for farmers and farming – and a time when there just wasn’t much more than that to draw people to a small town, unless one specifically sought out the small-town life.
Which I, for one, certainly did not.
Anyway – times have changed. Not just in NoDak – perhaps you’ve heard, they found oil – but also in rural Minnesota:
Amid what has been described as a new “golden age” for farm profits and land wealth, the list of the 50 Minnesota counties with the fastest-growing incomes since 2005 includes only one big Twin Cities county. The state’s net farm income has nearly doubled, from $4.5 billion in 2010 to $8.2 billion in 2012.
The town of Jackson, in southwest Minnesota, was one of only four rural cities over 2,500 to suffer significant losses in numbers during this century’s first decade — then it landed a new employer from Europe offering 1,400 jobs.
Studying trends in retail, Craig and a colleague uncovered what they called “astounding” growth in consumer sales in regional centers such as Mankato and Brainerd, and “remarkable” increases in economic activity in many smaller communities — stiff reproofs to the “myth of rural decline and ghost towns.”
The spread of technology helps, of course. One of the worst things about small-town life, if you weren’t wired to appreciate it or didn’t live to spend your days in deer stands or on fishing boats, was the stultifying isolation. That’s much less a factor these days.
Oh, yeah – and I wrote about this almost seven years ago. Joel Kotkin’s been predicting this for a long time; as technology makes small towns, especially the exurbs, less isolated, growth will shift there. Cities will become playgrounds of the wealthy and warehouses for the poor; everyone else will be living in Watertown.
This is all well and good, except that I have sneaking suspicion that a good deal of this farm prosperity is the result of ethanol mandates and subsidies. And no sensible person can be in favor of that.
We are the Saudi Arabia of subsidies!
MNBubba – no doubt the subsidies play a role – but corn isn’t the only commodity with healthy sale prices.
And it’s more than just farming that’s driving the uptick – as Kotkin predicted, and I reported in 2007.
“but corn isn’t the only commodity with healthy sale prices.”
I concur, Mitch. While I was stationed at Grand Forks airplane patch in the early 70s, I worked open days and weekends in the sugar beet fields to make as much money on three 10 hour shifts as my bi monthly pay which was around $100. Other guys worked in the potato fields for the same reasons. I don’t see anywhere that the worldwide demand for those items has decreased.