Open Letter To Larry King
By Mitch Berg
To: Larry King
From: Mitch Berg
Re: Apologies
Mr. King,
For over two decades, I’ve mocked your USA Today newspaper column as a self-indulgent, stream-of-consciousness glob of senseless drivel. At one point or another, I may have thought to myself “it’ cant’ get any dumber than this”.
To my chagrin, I owe you an apology, Mr. King. To be fair to me, in my most toxic nightmares I had no idea that anyone had a column this really really stupid in them:
…you shouldn’t fret, dear hearts, if what you do doesn’t draw a big crowd or get written up in the papers. Be proud. If you’ve dedicated yourself to the tango, or playing drop-thumb banjo, or digging up ancient cities, or writing sonnets, you are beautiful, and please do not yearn for the bright lights. Those wombats reading the news off teleprompters are talking to the bedridden, the delusional and the criminal. The happy StairMaster president is on his way to a mansionette in Dallas, to be the decider of where to put the sofa. His successor, Mister Mambo, has cast his lot with Harvard and Yale and old Clinton hands, and soon enough, Lord knows, they will get the first of many comeuppances, and their shining faces will be chopfallen.
Mister Mambo?
As for me, I sat and wrote sonnets, including one about self-esteem.
Life is absurd. A man can count on that.
Here I am on the front page, standing alone,
Refusing to hide my face behind my hat,
Which, in my case, I do not even own.
MAN, 66, NABBED FOR PUBLIC EXPOSURE.
All I did was go take a leak in the bushes.
I didn’t run through the park with no clothes or
Flash anyone. Ridiculous. Absolutely atrocious.
The injustice! Some gumshoe at the P.D.
Was out to enhance his crime-stopping reputation
And now I am an outcast crying bootlessly
For the crime of emergency urination.
With fortune and men’s eyes I’m in disgrace
But you still love me and I refuse to hide my face.
Mr. King, I know what you’re thinking; there’s no way something like this would inspired by something as crass as public urination.
You, like I, would be wrong:
It was inspired, if you must know, by observing a man taking a leak in the bushes at a park where a Cuban band was playing, and a line of dancers formed impromptu next to the stage and did a lovely salsa step, so simple, graceful, slide slide turn slide, arms up, turn step step slide, and you had to think, O my God how beautiful we are. And beyond was the man disgracing himself, and he was beautiful, too.
Mr. King, I am so sorry. You read like Hemingway, taut and acerbic, compared to Keillor’s flabby drivel; indeed, while Jesse Ventura and Al Franken may be Minnesota’s greatest embarassments, Keillor must be closing in.
Please accept my apology. Write about toe corns and brooklyn bagel shops to your heart’s content. I have a newfound appreciation for your oeuvre.
That is all.





January 12th, 2009 at 8:45 am
Of course Keillor supports public urination. That’s what his column has been for years. Most of the time he tells us it’s just raining, though.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:14 am
Sonnet (Keilor dictionary): A poem of 14 unrhymed lines with no rythmic or narrative structure. See Webster definition of free verse.
At the very least the first 12 lines should set up a conflict that is resolved by the last pair of lines.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:18 am
Wait. . . public urination is crass?
January 12th, 2009 at 11:27 am
zomg! Keillor is a douche…a douche or a tool…I can’t decide! Someone help me.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:48 am
Douche. Definitely a douche.
January 12th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
Keillor, you ignorant slut.
January 12th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
That’s an insult to douches everywhere. At least a douche has a practical application.
January 12th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Yeah, you’re right..and a tool is useful too. Hmmm, how about useless waste of space? π
January 12th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
I thought Keillor’s poem has a certain flow to it. Kind of stream of consciousness. When you read a Keillor peece you know urine for a treat.
January 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Waste of space?!?!?!
He’s an oxygen bandit.
January 12th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Heβs an oxygen bandit.
That ain’t all, Badda. Word is he produces climate harming CO2.
January 12th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Dude was clearly experimenting with ecstacy. Pretty sure I haven’t seen any other Cuban-dude-golden-shower references in his work.
In contrast to Shiftee’s blog.