Gas and Circuses

By Mitch Berg

Watching Obama’s cabinet appointments, it’d be tempting to ask “wow – with an overwhelming mandate like they had, why are they not going straight for the end zone, rather than suddenly and visibly racing for the center?”

The answer, of course – they didn’t have a sweeping mandate.  It was a clear victory, all right, but McCain (thanks largely, I think, to Sarah Palin bringing out a base that’d been sitting on its hands since February) actually got about as many votes as Bush did in 2004; he’d have beaten Kerry.  Obama swept into office on millions of new voters – and as Minnesota Third, Sixth and Senate races showed, his coattails weren’t especially sturdy; people apparently voted for Obama and nothing but the Obama.

So how does the left feel about this?

Charlie Quimby:

I’m not one of those who thought an Obama presidency would be the First Coming for the American Left, so I’m not going to indulge in much hand wringing over whether he has or hasn’t deviated from campaign promises. Anyone who can’t read reality between the lines of a campaign speech deserves whatever disappoint they feel.

For someone who follows politics, that just makes sense.  It crosses party lines; Ronald Reagan disappointed social conservatives by restricting his anti-abortion agenda to preaching from the bully pulpit, among many ecumenical examples; anyone who watches politics knows to be a little cynical or accepting of pragmatism, however you want to call it.

But among the less jaded, is it possible to catalog the extent to which Obama has been oversold -indeed, the extent to which Obama oversold himself?  The light worker, bringing enlightenment to the benighted; the messiah; the guy who’s going to solve your problems  by holding up his end of a quid pro quo that started when they went to the polls and put him in office.

How accepting are they going to be when he doesn’t levitate and make the flowers bloom in January?

25 Responses to “Gas and Circuses”

  1. angryclown Says:

    It’s really only you rightwing goofs who have oversold Obama with all the wacky “messiah” stuff. It just happens that he’s really popular. Which is actually a plus in an election, as you found out to your considerable dismay.

    As for running to the center, it’s kind of a foreign concept to you kooky Rovelings who, as members of a minority party, feel you can only win by picking out the 49% of the country you don’t like and spew hatred at them. Ever consider that, while the dems are at the top of the hill and you are at the bottom cutting each other’s throats over petty stuff, Obama may be working to lock in a Democratic majority?

    No, of course it didn’t. Well, anyhoo, if you’re still obsessing over the election, here’s a video I bet you’ll like:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKKG5BIaODw&feature=related

  2. J. Ewing Says:

    You are assuming that the general public will even be allowed to notice. The MSM has been in the tank for this guy from the get-go, and they aren’t about to allow anything he says or does to compromise their ideal vision of him. If they don’t report it, it never happened. The column–inches and face-seconds will drop and be replaced with more American Idol re-runs, or talk of them– anything to hide the reality we were told had to “change.”

    They will have a huge advantage, too, in the natural talent and ability of most liberals to believe that whatever they say or believe at the moment is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH, regardless of what they said or believed ten minutes ago. Nobody called attention to Obama’s manifest shortcomings during the campaign, they’re not about to admit to them now. That would be admitting a mistake, and liberals never, ever admit a mistake.

  3. Terry Says:

    More clown ravings. Obama was the one who said that when he was elected the rise of the oceans would begin to slow. When did Obama become a Republican?
    Clown’s second paragraph is incomprehensible. For God’s sake he regularly spews hatred at the 47% of the “Wingnuts’ “racists” “brownshirts” etc that voted for John McCain.
    introspection is not AC’s strong point.

  4. Slash Says:

    Mitch is right. Millions of voters don’t constitute a mandate.

    ACORN’s Mickey Mouse operation doesn’t count in November and it doesnt’ count in That One’s approval ratings now.

    He’s not really that popular.
    /jc

  5. Terry Says:

    Au contraire, Slash. Obama is incredibly popular with people who like to spend other people’s money.

  6. Master of None Says:

    Is it me, or is AC sounding more and more like the peever?

  7. angryclown Says:

    Teary hallucinated: “For God’s sake he regularly spews hatred at the 47% of the “Wingnuts’ “racists” “brownshirts” etc that voted for John McCain.”

    Angryclown does not like racists, wingnuts or racist wingnuts, Teary. And he likes to mock them, that is true. But it turns out Angryclown isn’t running for president. That’s kinda where your – what shall we call it, logic? – breaks down. Obama has managed to claim a mandate from lots of different voters, while keeping you extreme rightwing kooks isolated and irrelevant. Normal people think that’s a good thing.

  8. billhedrick Says:

    AC is kinda desperate, it’s feckless to “speak truth to power” when you are on the same side as the power. He’s reduced to kicking crippled puppies, not a pretty thought.

  9. Terry Says:

    “while keeping you extreme rightwing kooks isolated and irrelevant.”
    47 out of one hundred people voted against your guy, AC. That’s not isolated. That’s not irrelevent.
    That’s just 2 percent fewer people than voted for Clinton in 1996 and 4 percent more than voted for Clinton in ’92.
    There goes your ‘logic’, funnyman!

  10. BradC Says:

    There goes your ‘logic’, funnyman!

    As we have all learned by now, mangy clown’s goal on this blog is not to apply logic to…well…anything, really.

  11. Bike Bubba Says:

    It’s terribly interesting to me that even after a fairly convincing victory in the polls, AC and Penigma still insist on leading most of their “arguments” with a personal attack.

  12. Terry Says:

    You are only saying that, Bike Bubba, because you are a hate-spewing nutwing.

  13. swiftee Says:

    Normal people think that’s a good thing.

    http://hk.youtube.com/mershm

    When did you ever get a normal person to take you seriously enough to tell you what they think, AssClown?

    Pffft. Sit down, have another beer and STFU, ya goof.

  14. Troy Says:

    The brake lights came on when angryclown said:

    “Normal people think …”

    Whoa there, angryclown! You aren’t my ‘go to guy’ when it comes to what circus people think, much less “normal” people.

  15. Slash Says:

    What’s “fairly convincing” about 8.5 million under-informed suspicious “voters”?

    Mitch is right, there’s no mandate here. Clown better keep blustering to hide that fact.

    Chambliss just proved that Georgia is basically a center-right state.
    /jc

  16. Terry Says:

    Right-o, Slashman, and they were stupid voters too!
    http://tinyurl.com/6bp6ta

  17. Terry Says:

    “It’s really only you rightwing goofs who have oversold Obama with all the wacky “messiah” stuff. ”

    You know those clueless nimrods who come out of the restroom with a six foot long streamer of toilet paper stuck to their heel? And then they walk around like that all day, totally clueless as to why people seem to be laughing at him? Angry Clown reminds of one of those guys:
    http://prn.newscom.com/cgi-bin/pub/s?f=PRN/prnpub&p1=20081130/NYSU003&xtag=PRN-prnphotos-77258&redir=preview&tr=1&row=1

  18. angryclown Says:

    Bike Babbler said: “It’s terribly interesting to me that even after a fairly convincing victory in the polls, AC and Penigma still insist on leading most of their “arguments” with a personal attack.”

    Angryclown leads birthday greetings to small wingnut children with a personal attack. Angryclown creates personal attacks in his sleep. To observe that Angryclown has made a personal attack is like noting that Swiftee has shit his pants in a drunken stupor.

  19. Mitch Berg Says:

    Slash,

    Glad to see you’ve dropped the Colbert act in favor of your traditional misdirection.

    Didn’t say Obama didn’t have a mandate. Merely that it was neither overwhelming nor sweeping.

    And the point (if I may be so bold) of this post was a response to Charlie Quimby…

  20. billhedrick Says:

    AC, that’s why you’re who you are, a loud and furious person of no substance, that we give you attention is kinda sad.

  21. angryclown Says:

    Sen. Craig had a mandate in the MSP men’s room.

  22. swiftee Says:

    I didn’t think the personal attack on small children started until you had successfully lured them into your tiny clown van, AssClown.

  23. Dog Gone Says:

    I have no hopes of dramatic events, much less miraculous ones, transpiring from our prez elect; so it would surprise me to find anyone else does. I expected him to be centrist all along; I think many people did. It would be refreshing if Obama didn’t fit neatly into existing categories of liberal or conservative.

    I do have hopes of a change in the trend from “imperial presidencies” with the entry into office of an individual who has a greater depth of knowledge of the constitution than our current embarassment, “W”. I would love to see the balance of power restored between the three branches of government. (Color me a fan of the thinking of conservatives like Andrew J. Bacevitch, which seems to track similarly to that of Obama on occasion.)

    Which may be naive on my part. It will remain to be seen if Obama is any better at resisting the impulse to expand his office than his recent predecessors.

  24. Bike Bubba Says:

    Yes, AC, I realize that’s your MO. It says a lot about why you apparently cannot put forth a decent argument, even when your cause is pretty straightforward.

    Ugh, Swiftee.

  25. Terry Says:

    Dog gone, why did you think he would be a centrist?
    Rhetoric or his voting record?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->