The Ultimate “Public-Private Partnership”

By Mitch Berg

Liberals will occasionally try to sound “moderate” by claiming to favor “partnerships” between government and business.

These “partnerships” usually amount to one of a couple of things:

  • The worst of both worlds; the inefficiency of government combined with the lean capitalization of a business
  • The government picks a winner

In neither case do things work out well, as a general rule.

Except with this example, perhaps the most successful public private “partnership” in all history.

Just saying; if my financial planner hasn’t put a ton of money into Glock USA and Sturm Ruger, we’re gonna have to talk.

2 Responses to “The Ultimate “Public-Private Partnership””

  1. Joe Doakes Says:

    When Arizona wanted to enforce the border, the Obama Administration claimed it lacked the manpower to process all the illegals, the federal government would grind to a standstill doing nothing but sending home wet-backs. Now they want to expand background checks to include every person who touches a firearm? How could they possibly do it?

  2. Troy Says:

    From a current official in state government:

    “Knowing that “More Real? Art in the Age of Truthiness” was the featured exhibit at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts (MIA), I squeezed in a museum visit following a shorter than expected meeting in the Whittier Neighborhood. Since public health prides itself on being data-driven and evidence-based and since I’m interested in how art can enhance public health, I easily justified this visit during the work day as part of my personal celebration of Public Health Week.”

    So you see, Joe Doakes, they could simply stop justifying work-time visits to art institutes for a while and do some “real” work instead. I’m not saying that would actually happen, but it’s possible.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->