Compare And Contrast
By Mitch Berg
Romney: Referring to large assortument of qualified women as “binders”.
Obama: Misery for women.
Discuss.
By Mitch Berg
Romney: Referring to large assortument of qualified women as “binders”.
Obama: Misery for women.
Discuss.
This entry was posted by by Mitch Berg on Thursday, October 18th, 2012 at 5:09 am and is filed under Men and Women, President Obama. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Shot in the Dark is a
WordPress joint.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
October 18th, 2012 at 10:12 am
My liberal wife went nuts over Romney’s answer to the pay equality question, calling it sexist. She took offense that he made the comment that companies had to be more flexible for women to be home with the kids and make dinner, etc. My argument that however she chooses to look at it, women are typically the ones that need (or choose?) to be home early to handle those items, just ticked her off more. Of course, when I pointed out Obumbler’s hypocrisy in that his female staffers are paid less and are basically window dressing, she dismissed it and accused me of changing the subject. UGH! I love her dearly, but she is a challenge.
October 18th, 2012 at 11:02 am
BH, if your wife would possibly look at facts, and not just instantly dismiss any argument against her preconceived notions, you could have her look at some of the dozens and dozens of links here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11lsrw/feminist_myth_of_women_earning_072_to_a_mans_1/c6nmfiv
October 18th, 2012 at 2:29 pm
She’s a very smart woman, Bill, but when it comes to politics, she has her own facts! God I’m glad that she doesn’t read this blog.
October 18th, 2012 at 2:29 pm
Or, maybe I secretly wish that she would!