Let’s Count Those Endorsements

By Mitch Berg

Let’s see – Obama’s gotten Castro, Qaddafi, Hamas…

…and now, Kim Jong-Il?

The Chosun Sinbo, the mouthpiece of North Korea’s Japanese front organization Chongryon and often for the North Korean regime itself, has announced its preference for Obama over McCain, whom it calls “a variant of Bush” and “nothing better than a scarecrow of neoconservatives,” which is a bit odd considering that the Bush Administration’s giveaway diplomacy is better for Kim Jong Il than even Clinton’s awful performance.

The blogger – from the “One Free Korea” blog, heretofore unknown to me – throws in a key caveat (I’ve added emphasis):

The Republicans’ efforts to capitalize on the Hamas endorsement made me slightly squeamish, because there are separate issues here that shouldn’t be mixed. It isn’t fair for anyone to imply, based on an unwanted endorsement, that a candidate in any way supports the endorsing entity’s ideology or actions. It is fair to ask whether the endorsement suggests that the endorsing entity knows something about the candidate. Why would Hamas or Kim Jong Il both believe that if Obama is elected, his policies would mean boom times for evildoers? Are they wrong?

I don’t want to presume that Obama solicits or appreciates the endorsement of these dictators – no more than I appreciate the usual howler-monkeys on the left drawing significance from some right-fringe wackjob endorsing a GOP candidate.

But what do these dictators know that Obama’s supporters – especially the ones who aren’t sporting “Che” paraphernalia – don’t?
(Via CW)

5 Responses to “Let’s Count Those Endorsements”

  1. Chuck Says:

    I think you hit on the difference between some right-wing nutjob supporting a Republican, and a brutal dictator supporting a Democrat. John McCain isn’t going to do anything for a right wing wacko. But far left/far right dictators or terrorist groups must feel they can reach-out to Obama and get a benifit from him.

  2. Terry Says:

    This is not so much an endorsement of Obama as it is his commitment to ‘soft power’ foreign policy. These countries are run by gangs of self-interested individual. Soft power diplomacy means that the workers will suffer but the self-selected rulers will keep there palaces and privileges.

  3. Troy Says:

    Wow! I never knew there was a hidden meaning to this exchange:

    Kim Jong Il: Now you see, the changing of the worrd is inevitabre!
    Lisa: I’m sorry, it’s what?
    Kim Jong Il: Inevit, inevitabre.
    Lisa: One more time.
    Kim Jong Il: [shouts] Inevitabre! Things are inevitabrey going to change! Goddamnit, open your fucking ears!

    (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0372588/quotes)

    So, it’s seems Barack had Kim at “change”.

  4. Badda Says:

    Love
    That
    Movie

  5. Chuck Says:

    Yeah, it was like the reverse of most comedy. When they poked fun of conservatives, it was actually pretty mild. Not really insulting. But they went all out on the left. I think it’s the first time that Michael Moore saw how so many people view him.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->