Pop

By Mitch Berg

Mark Steyn lets a little air out of the Obama balloon.

He notes – correctly? – that Obama’s phenemonon is a media-driven event:

“I felt this thrill going up my leg,” said MSNBC’s Chris Matthews after one of the senator’s speeches. “I mean, I don’t have that too often.” Au contraire, Chris and the rest of the gang seem to be getting the old tingle up the thigh hairs on a nightly basis. If Obama is political Viagra, the media are at that stage in the ad where the announcer warns that, if leg tingles persist for more than six months, see your doctor.

Out there in the voting booths, however, Democrat legs stayed admirably unthrilled. The more the media told Hillary she was toast, and she should get the hell out of it and let Obama romp to victory, the more Democrats insisted on voting for her. The more the media insisted Barack was inevitable, the less inclined the voters were to get with the program. On the strength of Chris Matthews’ vibrating calves, Sen. Obama raised a ton of money – over $300 million – and massively outspent Sen. Clinton, but he didn’t really get any bang for his buck. In the end, he crawled over the finish line. The Obama Express came a-hurtlin’ down the track at 2 miles an hour.

…and continues the Manhattan-Project-level effort to sanity-check his rhetoric:

“I face this challenge with profound humility and knowledge of my own limitations…I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal … . This was the moment – this was the time – when we came together to remake this great nation.”

It’s a good thing he’s facing it with “profound humility,” isn’t it? Because otherwise who knows what he’d be saying. But mark it in your calendars: June 3, 2008 – the long-awaited day, after 232 years, that America began to provide care for the sick. Just a small test program: 47 attendees of the Obama speech were taken to hospital and treated for nausea. Everyone else came away thrilled that the Obamessiah was going to heal the planet and reverse the rise of the oceans: When Barack wants to walk on the water, he doesn’t want to have to use a stepladder to get up on it.

There are generally two reactions to this kind of policy proposal. The first was exemplified by the Atlantic Monthly’s Marc Ambinder:

“What a different emotional register from John McCain’s; Obama seems on the verge of tears; the enormous crowd in the Xcel Center seems ready to lift Obama on its shoulders; the much smaller audience for McCain’s speech interrupted his remarks with stilted cheers.”

The second reaction boils down to: “‘Heal the planet’? Is this guy nuts?” To be honest I prefer a republic whose citizenry can muster no greater enthusiasm for their candidate than “stilted cheers” to one in which the crowd wants to hoist the nominee onto their shoulders for promising to lower ocean levels within his first term. As for coming together “to remake this great nation,” if it’s so great, why do we have to remake it?

Read, naturally, the whole thing.

5 Responses to “Pop”

  1. nerdbert Says:

    : “‘Heal the planet’? Is this guy nuts?”

    Yes. Next blindingly obvious question, please.

  2. Mr. D Says:

    What’s the difference between Barack Obama and King Canute?

    King Canute knew his limitations.

  3. thorleywinston Says:

    Last night while I was studying in the library, I noticed that there were a couple of Obama supporters from the neighborhood who came in. One was wearing this ridiculous cowboy hat with an Obama 08 pin on the front and a white T-shirt with Obama’s head emblazoned on it.

    When McCain beats the Obamamessiah this fall, I suspect that there’s going to be a run on Flavor-aid in the stores . . .

  4. Chuck Says:

    There was a guy on University Ave, parked on the street in front of Wal-Mart, hawking Obama material. He had a shirt that said Obama is not a dope, or something to that affect (the word “dope” was definitely on it). He should check out Michelle Malkin’s site. See if he explodes.

  5. mefolkes Says:

    “What’s the difference between Barack Obama and King Canute?”

    “King Canute knew his limitations.”

    Actually that is right. The mockery of Canute was unjustified. He arranged the throne in the tideland episode as an object lesson, to silence his fawning courtiers, who had begun to disgust him. Obama really does think he can stop the tide.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->