Why Electing Republicans Matters

By Mitch Berg

I echo some of my paleoconservative friends in their disgust at what passes for “Republican” these days.

And yet being in control – even unaggressive control by a very unconservative version of the party – has its benefits, if civil liberties matter to you:

A federal appeals court Wednesday tossed out New York City’s lawsuit accusing the gun industry of selling firearms with the knowledge they can be diverted into illegal markets.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a federal law provides the gun industry with broad immunity from lawsuits brought by crime victims and violence-plagued cities. A federal judge had allowed the lawsuit to proceed, though it had not yet reached trial.

New York is one of several cities that had sued gun makers. It said the industry violated public nuisance law by failing to take reasonable steps to stop widespread access to illegal firearms.

The lawsuit asked for no monetary damages. It had sought a court order for gun makers to more closely monitor those dealers who frequently sell guns later used to commit crimes.

Carnivore at TvM notes:

Yet another frivolous lawsuit against firearms manufacturers has been thrown out thanks to Congress passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act in 2005.

Control has its benefits.

Yet another reason not to stay home in November, if you’re a Republican – even if you are upset at McCain or Norm Coleman or whomever.

One Response to “Why Electing Republicans Matters”

  1. kel Says:

    not to mention
    Stevens (April 20, 1920.)
    Ginsberg (March 15, 1933), &
    Kennedy(July 23, 1936)
    are approaching their “Use by” dates

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->