“Men’s Health” magazine has presented its list of the “100 Hottest Women Of All Time”.
I’m going to submit it for general comment.
Observations:
- Jennifer Aniston #1, but Scarlett Johannson #12? I smell publicist!
- Brigitte Bardot is #75 – behind Kim Kardashian (#26),Britney Spears (#4), and…Nicole Scherzinger? (# who cares)
- Six words: Sophia Loren is 47; Paris Hilton is 46.
But most importantly – there is no reference to Ingrid Bergman. Anywhere.
Discuss.
I mean, if you can find time to check it out during a busy work day, of course.
Men’s Health magazine runs a 100 Hottest WOMEN List? Based on the stories hyped and pictures on the covers I’ve seen at the newsstand, I’m shocked Men’s Health has any interest in rating women at all (IYKWIMAITYD-NTTAWWI). But that said, this is one of those lists of a kin with the one a few years ago that had W. Bush along with Hitler in the top 3 worst people in the history of the world. History to the non-educated yet credentialed class that write/edit magazines like Men’s Health starts just before they were born, e.g. around 1980.
I’ll have to look at the list later, but if it doesn’t have Diana Rigg on it, I call shenanigans.
I watched a silient movie on TCM last night. Whoever the actress was should be up there a ways. I don’t care if she was born about 1896.
Mr. D; Yea! Diana Rigg! Man how I used to lust after that woman and of course, I was addicted to The Avengers because of it!
A lot of beautiful women on that list. Madonna and Brittney over a “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” era Elizabeth Taylor? I don’t think so.
The list was obviously fixed by the same people who’ve conspired to keep the Chicago Bears from winning 44 of the last 45 Super Bowls.
I’m always a little wary of any list that purports to rank the “best of all time” in any category as they tend to be weighted heavily in favor of what or who was recently in the “news” before the list came out.
Personally I wouldn’t put Jennifer Aniston on my top 100 list of anything but “top 100 people who look like they need to eat a cheeseburger.”
Is Inger Stevens on the list? If not, it has no credibility whatever.
“The list was obviously fixed by the same people who’ve conspired to keep the Chicago Bears from winning 44 of the last 45 Super Bowls.”
The return of K.A.R: Obnoxious Packer Guy without the Hiaku, Notorious B.I.L.or the famed Marquette alumnus. Developing…
Who is Kim Kardashian ? I honestly don’t know, and can’t imagine why I would care.
I saw Scarlett Johannson in a movie last week. I think she might be a hobbit.
Damn you Mitch!
Sure, now the website is overloaded and won’t get by #100 Catherine Bach, (not that I have a problem with it), being a young buck when she was on Dukes of Hazzard, they started the list out right.
If CNN’s morning gal Robin Meade isn’t on there, then its a bad list.
And Giada Delaurentiis. And Angie Harmon.
They should provide their criteria, so that we could see if they really did anything more than put up some shots of women.
I mean Cameron Diaz is cute, but not Hottest ever. And Kim Kardashian, not hot. Paris Hilton, way too highly ranked, even if you think blonde skank is hot.
Some of the pictures they used were not the best examples either.
Any list like this that doesn’t have Sophia Loren and Elizabeth Taylor in its top 5 is not worth the time.
No Julie Christie? Bad List. Bad. Bad. Bad.
Paris Hilton and Jennifer Aniston? Is this a list of the hottest, or a few beautiful women among a bevy of women who are “often nearly or completely naked in public and thankfully not completely gross”?
And Foot is right. This is the work of the same people who have denied da Bears their deserved Super Bowl titles, and it’s the same people (I think the Bilderbergers) who have kept the Cubbies from winning the series. Maybe next year….
is there anyone one the list that is 18-25? Show some love to the younguns
ok scratch that, they put Megan Fox at #14, with a very nippy picture too, but Madonna at #5 wtf, she’s NEVER been hot. and Marilyn Monroe #3?! Why is she not #1?
Two words: Amy Smart.