Andrew Breitbart caught in avalanche of douchebag effluvia:
And I’d be amazed if a majority of leftybloggers don’t consider this “reporting”.
To think I coulda spent a couple days covering these yapping little juveniles. (Assuming they would give press credentials to an unbeliever).
Was that Flash back in the corner sipping kool-aid?
Breitbart is scum, and ranks somewhere below Howard Stern’s writer Benjy Bronk.
Isn’t it amazing how Breitbart managed to release the picture that he claimed he wasn’t going to let out. Yeah, some accident. Because showing that around a radio station where you know there is video coverage is so consistent with protecting Weiner’s family.
I would think if you want press credentials, you should be able to get them from WWTC, couldn’t you?
If you want to cover Weiner, although he’s pretty much old news now that he’s resigned, those press credentials would be useful if you happen to visit family in NYC. I’m sure Angry Clown would make you feel welcome in the Big Apple as well.
My, how judgmental, and based, as always on absolutely nothing but bitter partisan vitriol.
It is interesting that Doggie would actually know who “writes” for Howard Stern. It helps explain the level that she seems to be constantly revealing in this forum.
Breitbart is scum
Read: Breitbart eats our lunch and does it with style.
Give it up, DG. You and Pen pretty unimaginatively parrot lefty chanting points non-stop – and on none are you more embarassingly badly-served than on this one.
Anthony Weiner, a married man and a US Representative, sent lewd pictures to women he not only had never met, but that he barely knew. He then lied about this and savaged his accusers as liars and conspirators against him — until the evidence of his lying was so strong that he was forced to admit the truth.
It would be hard to argue that Weiner had any legitimate expectation that his lewd pictures would remain private. In any case there is no evidence at all that the picture in question was purposely exposed by Breitbart; quite the opposite. His story that he was showing it to a person on a cell phone when a 2nd person took an image of it is quite plausible.
Yet according to Dog Gone it is Breitbart, not Weiner, who is “scum”. This is ideologically based, personal animus at its most extreme.
God put conservatives on the Earth to keep Lib/Progs from hurting themselves. Being on the Left means never having to abandon your high school idealism.
As the saying goes: if you’re yong and not a liberal, you have no heart. If you’re old and not a conservative, you have no brain.
Doggone is scum. There I said it.
Point of order: what the hell was even doing at the Netroots Retard Festival in the first place?
Semi-related: there are an awful lot of white people at Nutroots. And 2 black people.
Don’t you know, Mr. Foot, that college age young people from white middle class and upper middle class families are the only people capable of ruling this country?
Ad hominem tu quoque. The smarmy kid with the video camera needs somebody to read it to him.
It’s also pretty damn funny that Dog Gone thinks Breitbart should be concerned with “protecting Weiner’s family”. Weiner wasn’t concerned about “protecting Weiner’s family”.
I wonder if Doggie was this incensed when National Enquirer caught future felon John Edwards cheating on his dying wife? “It’s just about sex!”
Point of order: what the hell was even doing at the Netroots Retard Festival in the first place?
He loves confrontation. It always makes the other guys look so stupid.
In any case there is no evidence at all that the picture in question was purposely exposed by Breitbart
Heh. VERY true.
Got it from the horse’s mouth.
Actually, Kermit, I believe on that occasion Dog Gone rationalized the MSM’s failure to investigate the Edwards affair as an attempt to protect Elizabeth Edwards.
Anyone who treats the mainstream media as a reliable source in political matters is crazy. This afternoon I read a Reuters story about Obama wistfully recalling on this fathers day weekend that his own father had left his mother when he was two years old.
Stanley Anne Dunham was enrolled and taking classes at the University of Washington a month after Obama’s birth while Obama Sr. stayed at UH in Manoa. There is little if any evidence that Obama Sr. and Dunham ever lived as husband and wife after his birth. This is the historical record, no one disputes it, but Obama wrote in one of his memoirs that his father abandoned his family when he was two years old & no one ever corrects him or even asks him about it.
I suppose the press is trying to spare his feelings.
Got it from the horse’s mouth.
I AM NOT WORTHY!
Heh. It’s not often I get to gloat just a tad.
I question the taste of using the phrase “purposely exposed” in reference to any Weiner photo.
“Glitter” attack on Michelle Bachmann:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHkxt7x7HIA
There could have been anything in that bag — acid, human waste. I’m sure that was the intended message.
Wasn’t it just six months ago that a mad man walked up to Representative Giffords at a public event and put a few bullets into her head? Disgusting. I could never be associated with a movement that celebrated or supported this kind of “civil disobedience”. In this regard I will gladly claim to have better morals than the left.
And the retarded moron shouted “You can’t hide from the glitter” at Bachmann. She should be prosecuted for assault at the least.
And once again we get a fine example of which side of the political landscape resorts to violence, intimidation and fosters a cliimate of hate.
Kermit Says: “It’s also pretty damn funny that Dog Gone thinks Breitbart should be concerned with “protecting Weiner’s family”. Weiner wasn’t concerned about “protecting Weiner’s family”.”
That’s first thing that occurred to me.
Again DG, go lay by your dish!!
Pingback: Shot in the Dark » Blog Archive » “Look At Uuuuusssssss!”