Attention Ron Reagan
By Mitch Berg
Lets’ dignify your absurd allegations with speculation – more than they deserve.
All it proves is that a conservative with Alzheimers is a better president than a liberal.
That is all.
By Mitch Berg
Lets’ dignify your absurd allegations with speculation – more than they deserve.
All it proves is that a conservative with Alzheimers is a better president than a liberal.
That is all.
This entry was posted by by Mitch Berg on Monday, January 17th, 2011 at 6:53 am and is filed under History And Its Making. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Shot in the Dark is a
WordPress joint.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
January 17th, 2011 at 9:35 am
Was Ron wearing his tutu at the time?
January 17th, 2011 at 9:38 am
Whenever the subject of tutu-wearing Ron Reagan Jr. comes up, I can’t help but picture Sr. thusly.
January 17th, 2011 at 9:40 am
Blood is thicker than water.
Liberalism is thicker than blood.
Lou Holtz, the legendary Gopher football coach (for a year and a half) used to have a schtick in which he’d outline those things that he told his players are important in life: He’d start with 1) God, then 2) Your family, 3) Your country, 4) Schoolwork, 5) Football…
He worked “social” into the list, but I’ve forgotten how.
For Ron Reagan Jr. (which goes a long way towards explaining “liberal leverage”–why they influence events in ways far beyond their numbers) the list would be: 1) Liberalism. 2) Political party. 3) Being a good citizen of the world. 4) Career. 5)…
January 17th, 2011 at 9:45 am
I always found it interesting that the only one of President Reagan’s children to turn out normal was his adapted son.
January 17th, 2011 at 10:16 am
Chuck, I “adapted” my son too. He’s a hard-core 20-something conservative.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:03 am
Reagan left office in ’89 and was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s in early ’94. Someone claiming to have observed symptoms of Alzheimers 4-5 years prior to the diagnosis may indeed be wrong–though such a claim would not appear ‘absurd.’
January 17th, 2011 at 11:09 am
No Gav, but someone claiming to have observed symptoms of Alzheimers 20+ years after the fact would appear sleazy, overly dramatic and possibly politically motivated.
Don’tcha think?
January 17th, 2011 at 11:19 am
Frank Sinatra Jr., only with less credibility.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:01 pm
How long will it be before Eric and/or Andrew publish their book?
January 17th, 2011 at 8:38 pm
Angryclown thinks you’d welcome the excuse for Iran-Contra. Of course, you wingnuts probably thought that was a great idea.