The Planted Debate: Update
By Mitch Berg
So not only was every single questioner [1] at Wednesday’s GOP debate a Clinton plant (to say nothing of CNN and YouTube owner Google being in the bag for the Democrats), but apparently every member of the hall staff, the catering staff, and the limo drivers that brought the candidates from the airport were also Clinton, Obama, Gravel or Edwards volunteers.
I’m waiting to see if Ron Paul might actually be a Clinton staffer.
[1] Seriously – dimes’ll getcha dollars that the “gun nuts” were plants (no real conservative would toss a shotgun through the air), and the “bible-waver” was a performance artist and Kucinich supporter. No, I have no evidence – but the fallout from this debate shows that not only can’t I make it up fast enough, it’d be futile to try.
November 30th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
Not fair, Mitch. Not every questioner was a Clinton plant; at least one was an Obama plant, and another an Edwards plant.
December 2nd, 2007 at 1:49 pm
Funny, both of you. But really seriously, I thought many of the candidates’ careful responses told me they’re more into appealing to gun owners than being personally into guns.
December 2nd, 2007 at 8:44 pm
Hey, even if every single question was a plant, why not address the substance of the questions? It’s very Clintonian of you to deflect the subjects at hand with Vast Left Wing Conspiracy rhetoric. LOL. I know. I know. If it’s not filtered through the RNC (via Fox and Patriot Radio), it ain’t news. It’s liberal bias.
You guys should hear yourselves sometimes.
December 2nd, 2007 at 9:15 pm
they’re more into appealing to gun owners than being personally into guns
That’s no disqualification in my book.
I don’t care if someone doesn’t care to own or use guns; it’s a right, not an obligation.
I DO care that the President is a constructionist who takes the “individual right” view of the Second Amendment.