Hillary: Channelling Richard Daley
By Mitch Berg
Michelle Malkin points us to an LATimes story that…
…digs into Hillary’s finances and uncovers more mysterious Chinatown donors with dilapidated addresses in NYC and jobs unlikely to put them in the position of maxing out campaign contributions. They include dishwashers, waiters, contributors who deny making contributions, and another who “admitted to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money.” And more:
Dishwashers, waiters and others whose jobs and dilapidated home addresses seem to make them unpromising targets for political fundraisers are pouring $1,000 and $2,000 contributions into Clinton’s campaign treasury. In April, a single fundraiser in an area long known for its gritty urban poverty yielded a whopping $380,000. When Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) ran for president in 2004, he received $24,000 from Chinatown…
…Of 74 residents of New York’s Chinatown, Flushing, the Bronx or Brooklyn that The Times called or visited, only 24 could be reached for comment.
Will Hillary accuse the Times reporters of “stalking” now?
Obviously, the LATimes is a racist conservative tool.
I like the use of the adjective “ephemeral:”
Like many who traveled this path, most of the Chinese reported as contributing to Clinton’s campaign have never voted. Many speak little or no English. Some seem to lead such ephemeral lives that neighbors say they’ve never heard of them.
Predictions: Hillary will come out swinging at the Times, her Asian-American acolytes will accuse the paper of racism and ethnic bigotry, and those “ephemeral” donors will never be found.
I suggest one of Chicago’s cemetaries.





October 19th, 2007 at 10:54 pm
Michelle Malkin has always impressed me. I always look forward to reading her articles in the Washington Times.
This sort of corruption really burns my butt. I use a simple rule of thumb: whatever the dimocrats accuse the Republicans of doing; the dimocrats are certanly the guilty party. (Pun intended.)
It looks to me that this it very much like all those grave yard residents that vote dimocrat too. So it sounds like standard operating procedure for Hillary. I am not surprised. Perhaps those long dead voters should be listed as donors as well.
You can also bet your last dollar that if a Repiblican had been even suggested to have done something like this, he/she would have been raked over the coals by the rest of the media.
Let’s not forget the congressman that was caught with a voting machine in the back seat of the car with a bunch of un-punched ballots and a larger number of “votes” for Al Gor – when HE, not Bush tried to steal a presidential election. Not to mention the voting compuers that once first powered-up registered 10,000 votes each for Kerry/Edwards. Hence the term: “Vote often.”
More buried stories.
Ain’t double standards fun? And so it begins… the race to 2008.