Mark Dayton’s latest ad claims that, while Minnesota schools have “failed”, that “Mark Dayton was a teacher”, and that he “knows what needs to be done” to fix education.
Does he, then?
By that, do they mean teachers should only show up 1/3 of time when they’re teaching, and quit in the middle of the year?
Or do they mean the state should push the same kind of alternative licensure that put Dayton in the classroom in the first place.
Or do they just mean that we taxpayers should just shut up and give them all the money the union demands via the DFL?
Since I just went to school in North Dakota – a state that spends much less per student, and gets better results – I need this explained to me.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.