100 Million Pauline Kaels
By Mitch Berg
Chad, writing at Fraters, on the overwhelming presumption of the left:
The biggest driver of liberal media bias is not a grand conspiracy to alter the news–although the Journolist disclosures show there was more coordination and conspiring going on than most would have imagined. The chief reason that the news is more often than not tinged with a leftist perspective is that the vast majority of people in the newsrooms, studios, and offices of the traditional media roughly share the same ideological mindset. And, since the people they work and live with generally have the same views they do, they assume that this mindset is shared by the majority of Americans. Well, at least the majority of reasonable Americans.
You see artifacts of this in the occasional moments when our institutional left talks about society when it thinks its among friends. “West Wing” – and its predecessor, the really dumb movie The American President – greeted references to abortion, guns, taxes, defense, and spending with the sort of blithe assurance that reql Americans accept the left’s ideas as the norm.
Journolist? More of the same:
When Avent says that Palin “has terrible positions on things like choice,” everyone on the Journolist knows exactly what he’s talking about and agrees with him. What reasonable person wouldn’t? The use of language is also telling. Now when I read Avent’s words about “choice” I know exactly what he’s talking about. But this isn’t how most people talk about abortion. And if you told the average American that Palin has “terrible positions on choice” they might well ask what the hell you’re talking about. A choice about what?
ABORTION! ABORTION! ABORTION! The semantic games that abortion supporters play betrays that fact that they know how unsettling the word is. If abortion is such a swell “choice,” why not come out and say that you’re pro-abortion. Heck, I’m willing to drop the “pro-life” label (at least when it comes to abortion) if the “pro-choice” crowd would be willing to be honest about what they really support. One side is anti-abortion and one side pro-abortion. Let’s stop playing word games.
In the interest of clarity, I’ve been doing this for years.
I’ve mellowed a bit from when I called choicers “pro-death”.





July 30th, 2010 at 9:23 am
“Pro-killing” fits snugly. Just don’t Photoshop a helmet on some lib’s sonogram jpeg.
‘
July 30th, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I wonder how an “undocumented immigrant” feels about “choice”.
July 31st, 2010 at 8:16 pm
I wonder how an “undocumented immigrant” feels about “choice”.
Funny you should mention that- I don’t see much “abortion on demand” in Latin America . . .
August 1st, 2010 at 1:38 pm
FWIW, with the exception of the silliness of the gun stuff, and the caricature of the eeeevil Republican Conservative Senator (I expected Dreyfuss to be muttering, “something something something Dark Side…”), I really liked The American President, and thought it was a fun and kinda touching story.
That said, I did have to turn up my Suspending Disbelief circuitry to 11, every time Dreyfuss or the gun stuff came on, when I think it really needed to go to around 50.