Submitted without comment, here’s Governor Walz’s appearance last Sunday on Fox.
Did I say “submitted without comment?” You know me better than that.
He does not come off well.
I’d like to make sure as many Minnesotans as possible see this – not only for the Presidential tilt, but as people assess the DFL’s performance this past six years.
The number of antisemitic incidents in the U.S. has surged over 200 percent this past year, as Israel’s war against Hamas sparked an outpouring of Jewish hatred on college campuses and elsewhere.
From October 7, 2023, to September 24, 2024, the U.S. saw more than 10,000 antisemitic incidents, an increase of over 200 percent from the same period a year before, which saw 3,325 incidents, according to preliminary data released by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a left-wing antisemitism watchdog…
…On college campuses, roughly 1,200 antisemitic incidents took place, a 500 percent increase from the year before, when the ADL had recorded about 200 of them. Earlier this year, anti-Israel demonstrations and tent encampments formed on college campuses nationwide, especially after Columbia University’s anti-Israel encampment received national attention and required the NYPD to break it up.
Antisemitic activity and outright advocacy for the extermination of Israel were common around the encampment sites. A prominent example was the Jew-free zones at the University of California, Los Angeles. A judge ruled in August that UCLA must stop aiding and abetting the antisemitic campus activists who attempted to prevent Jews from passing by certain parts of campus unless they disavowed Israel. UCLA initially decided to fight the ruling but quickly pulled its appeal.
Outside of college campuses, rallies across American cities often featured terrorist banners and chants calling for the destruction of Israel. The ADL found that more than 3,000 antisemitic incidents occurred at anti-Israel demonstrations, where protesters chanted in support of Hamas and other terrorist groups.
The potential of a Harris/Walz administration that continues passive-aggressively coddling Iranian aggression seem to be prompting the Israelis to swing for the proverbial fences, to try to resolve the issue before Harris screws it all up, if worse comes to worst.
Vice President Kamala Harris‘s husband assaulted his ex-girlfriend, three friends have told Dailymail.com.
The Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, 59, allegedly struck the woman in the face so hard she spun around, while waiting in a valet line late at night after a May 2012 Cannes Film Festival event in France.
One of her friends told DailyMail.com that the woman called him immediately after the incident, sobbing in her cab, and described the alleged assault.
Thing is, I’m all about people being innocent until proven guilty.
But given that Emhoff – a guy who knocked up his nanny during his first marriage, not to mention the new allegations – is being actively promoted as the model for modern masculinity – it
But given that Emhoff – a guy who has admitted to knocking up his nanny during his first marriage, to say nothing of these allegations – is being actively promoted as the very model of modern masculinity (by institutions that have little institutional knowledge of the concept), it’s certainly worth validating.
In short, I have revised my opinion about the debate. Not about what happened–I thought Vance was clearly better than Walz, but that it wouldn’t matter. Now I think it very well might, not because Vance won the debate but rather the manner in which Walz lost it.
Walz lost it by looking deranged at times and like a liar. The visuals mattered and Walz’s dancing around on his personal lies mattered even more.
So I was wrong…I think. The aftermath of the debate has the potential to be devastating to Tim Walz.
The ghosts of Richard Stockdale and Richard Nixon are calling back from the great beyond thanking Walz for making them no longer the easiest “presidential debate flop sweat” joke.
President Biden blamed Hurricane Helene on climate change and said anybody who disagreed must be brain dead.
Formerly, hurricane were “acts of God” which Were Not covered under ordinary insurance, special coverage was required, whereas damage resulting from actions of other people Were covered.
So . . . does this mean all our insurance premiums are going up, because hurricanes are now torts?
Mossad has developed, over almost 80 years of fighting for Israel’s survival, an almost superhuman reputation.
As with much of Mossad’s history, it’s an awe-inspiring display of what intelligence people call “fieldcraft – the nuts and bolts of running intelligence and clandestine unconventional warfare operations.
But I’m going to suggest there’s a group whose fieldcraft makes Mossad look about as subtle as a P Diddy houseparty.
And they are (we are told) operating among us even as we speak.
The Phantom Menace: We are told in one breath that American “white supremacists” are a mass of pasty, addled losers with sub-90 IQs, living in their parents basements, who live in their parents basements, stock shelves at Dollar General and have permanent Cheeto-dust stains on their fingers and the t-shirts that stretch to try to cover their obesity-stretched frames.
Indeed, some of the times they’ve come out into the open, they’ve seemed to fit that stereotype:
And yet since then, the record has been a little more muddled.
Much of the Minnesota DFL establishment leaped to trying to blame “white supremacists” for the Minneapolis riots of 2020.
And while this was obviously true, a few chilling facts remain:
Although here in the Midway, and as far as I saw East Lake Street and Uptown, were coated six inches deep in graffiti, I don’t recall seeing a single swastika or “14 Words” reference.
Although the Allianz soccer field sits in the middle of an area that was heavily burned, looted and vandalized, and was (and is) protected by not so much as a shrubbery, there wasn’t so much as a Sharpie mark on it.
So apparently the mouth-breathing incel defectives destroyed two neighbhorhoods – and then disappeared without leaving so much as a footprint.
Which brings us to today.
WIthout A Trace: We are the most videotaped society in history. People record the the most mundane of life’s activities. And if there’s something exciting – a car crash, a fight, someone acting out in some way – it seems almost inevitable that someone will break out their phone and start recording .
So when a series of WNBA stars started complaining about the wave of racism accompanying the surge of people actually becoming interested in the league – perhaps the most “niche” of all sports…:
“The WNBA is a competitive league with some of the most elite athletes in the world,” read the statement. “While we welcome a growing fan base, the WNBA will not tolerate racist, derogatory, or threatening comments made about players, teams and anyone affiliated with the league. League security is actively monitoring threat-related activity and will work directly with teams and arenas to take appropriate measures, to include involving law enforcement as necessary.”
and describing what they’ve encountered…:
“We’ve seen a lot of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia throughout the course of our country,” [Connectict Suns coach Stephanie] White said. “Sport is no exception, and it’s unacceptable. The thing that frustrates me the most is that we — I say we because I work in television as well — what we in the media have to do a better job of (is) not allowing trolls and social media to become the story. I feel like we have allowed trolls in social media to frame the narrative of what the story is. We have to do a better job. I applaud our team for maintaining their professionalism.”
Now, I have little doubt that there’s bad behavior in the hellscape of online and social media fandom. Social media doesn’t just foster bad behavior, it rewards it.
But some of the WNBA players say they’re encounting open racist behavior, at games, in public, in the open.
And yet in a society, and sport, where it’s hard to go to a concession stand without someone doing a TikTok, with stands full of people for whom women’s hoops is as much an ideological commitment as a sport, there doesn’t appear to be any video evidence of this kind of behavior. And we know how important that is, legally speaking.
So – are White Supremacists a bunch of doughy retrograde losers? Or operatives who do their work and dissappear into the ether without leaving a trace?
Being corralled into a staged propaganda exercise?
I’ve never been a big Tim Walz fan. Quite the opposite.
But is anyone else getting some…1930s vibes?
Or perhaps more appropriately to Walz’s time in Omahongkong:
I can’t be the only one that finds that photo a little #weird in and of itself, in addition to the historical allusions (especially when you add in Walz’s “One Minnesota” slogan), can I?
People can vote for whoever they want to. It’s still a fairly free country.
But I have a fair number of people in my social circle – co-workers, high school classmates, former teachers and professors – who are declaiming that they’re voting for Harris and Walz “to save democracy”.
And I read that and try to grasp how much one must ignore – willfully or not – to believe that Harris and Walz support the American republican (small-r) system of popular, federalist government:
Supports (and gained power in part thru) big tech censoring dissent
Actively suppressed dissent (Walz’s snitch lines and thoughtcrime database, as well as Harris’s coziness with Big Tech and Big Media with their record of censorship so bald-faced that even Mark Zuckerberg is feeling ashamed)
Supports repealing the free market – the most human economic system for the most people in all of human history – via price controls and rent control
Harris supports undercutting federalism and the separation of powers via:
proposing bringing the SCOTUS under control of the executive branch
further ratcheting up power to the administrative state
abolishing the Electoral College
abolishing the filibuster – one of the last ditch tools in thwarting the impune tyranny of the majority
further centralizing power in the Executive Branch
Indeed, *defying* the checks and balances of our system of enumerated powers (the Harris/Biden administrations’ unilateral “forgiveness” of student loans, and withholding of Congressionally-mandated support to Israel)?
Supports abolishing private healthcare
Openly seeks to disarm the law-abiding by executive decree (since they’ll never get it through Congress), and expressed contempt for the Fourth Amendment in pursuing that?
Wants to ramp up the power of the administrative and regulatory state – with “stochastic” implications of violence.
Actively working to make the border more or less irrelevant – and the nation’s shared ideals along with it.
And let’s not forget the notion that if you dissent obstreporously enough, professional rioters may “spontaneously” and with no collusion from Big Left whatsoever, nosirreebob, arrive in your neighborhood?
Subsuming American foreign policy to the power of alliances ?
Against that:
Mean tweets
A riot only rhetorically connected with Trump, which has been lavishly prosecuted.
It’s a cliché of modern Western life – “youth” rebel against their elders.
Since the dawn of western “youth culture” right around 70 years ago, that’s pretty much always meant a leftward tilt – and in much of the world, it still does.
If an election were held today, Canada’s Conservative Party would win in a landslide and bury the Liberals, led by Justin Trudeau. This may not seem impressive after ten years of Liberal rule; most governments wear out their welcome long before then. What’s unusual here is that Conservative support is strong in all demographics—and is strongest among youth. An astonishing 47 percent of those aged 18 to 34 would vote Conservative, and only 24 percent and 17 percent would vote Liberal and socialist, respectively. This represents a complete reversal of the upwelling of youth support that brought the Liberals to power in 2015.
Why has the electorate soured on the Liberals? First, nothing has been a greater turn-off to voters than contemporary progressive activism. Think of the constant bloviating about structural racism and colonialism, the “crisis of whiteness,” and self-accusations of genocide. Twenty years ago, you might have heard such things in a sociology department or undergraduate student lounge; now it emanates from Canada’s top political leaders and cultural institutions. One of the Trudeau government’s first moves was to announce a plan to “decolonize” Canada. In their own telling, the Trudeau Liberals manage a civil service and a military riven by systemic racism and white supremacy, respectively. Everyone knows that such claims are ridiculous, but few have dared say so in public. The predictable result is that only about one-third of Canadians have confidence in the federal government, and 70 percent now agree with the statement “Canada is broken.”
I can remember the general feeling of fatigue with what seemed like the ongoing collapse of the world that prompted so many people my age to vote for Ronald Reagan when we were in our 20s.
I can’t imagine the world doesn’t look a whole lot worse right now.
Vance calling the moderators on their fairly naked bias: After the moderators used their interstitial bits to finish Walz’s point for him while trying to “fact-check” Vance, Vance finally had enough, and beat them down pretty brutally.
“Misspoke”: Oh, yeah. Bias notwithstanding, the mods asked Walz to answer MPR’s reporting that he was not, in fact, in Hong Kong during the Tienanmen Square massare. And it was pretty glorious:
And his first answer was “I was born into a middle class family…”
No, really – although he’s spent his past eighteen years telling people every detail of that time in China, down to what he ate and which Communist-logo sweatshirt Gwen wore, he slammed on the brakes and phumphered away claiming that he was old knucklehead and had “misspoken”
Facts: Vance was able to shred Walz in detail on a few issues, including his signing of Minnesota’s radical abortion laws – which put Walz back on his heels (and showed us that Tom Emmer was in fact, a pretty effective debate prepper.
And the #1 highlight:
Walz was weird; Vance was not: Walz had his moments – but Vance never lost his cool, stayed on message. Walz did, and did not. Vance won on style and substance, and it wasn’t even close.
And this may have been the first Vice Presidential debate of my lifetime that might have an actual impact on the election.
In a very significant development — I am almost prepared to say the most significant development in the current presidential contest — it has recently been revealed that Brian D. Lozenski, an associate professor of urban and multicultural education at Macalester College and a leader in the development of Minnesota’s proposed ethnic studies curriculum, explicitly called for the “overthrow of the United States.” This goal has demonstrably shaped Minnesota’s ethnic studies standards, according to which students are taught as early as kindergarten that America is evil. The video recording of Lozenski was made two years ago but was taken down the day after it was spotted by Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center…
And for someone who’s made a bit of an art form out of concealing his radical nature under a couple of layers of Elmer Fudd-wear, it’s actually been kind of brazen of Walz.
But there’s not much point in trying to make Lozenski look like anything but a CRT Kommissar:
To make as explicit an assertion as did Lozenski is extremely rare; indeed, I have never seen or heard such an admission. The destructive intent of ethnic studies or CRT has been very apparent and much commented upon for many years by the conservative commentariat. But Lozenski’s open, cavalier articulation makes the destructive nature of ethnic studies virtually impossible to deny.
So the debate should be interesting, for a change.
John Kerry – who came waaaay too close to becoming President, and that’s after acknowledging what a disappointment Dubya was in retrospect – accidentally told the left’s truth:
JOHN KERRY: “If people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence”