Archive for April, 2010

Around The MOB: North Star Liberty

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

I’ve written about it in the past; blogging changed a big chunk of my life; when I started the blog, in 2002, I was a newly-divorced parent with a couple of young-ish kids. I hadn’t had a lot of time for a social life in quite a while. The blog, the NARN and finally the MOB opened up my social horizons in ways I’d never imagined.

I’ve also kept my day job and my radio and blogging lives pretty religiously separated.  There aren’t two people at my day job who know about the radio show or the blog; I don’t let on where I work to many outside my family and the NARN.

Indeed, in all my years of blogging, I’ve met very few who linked both worlds.

In the nineties, I was working as a technical writer – mostly writing instruction manuals for badly-designed software.  And one of the greats in the field was this guy, Matt Abe.  He was, for many years, the president of the local “Society for Technical Communication” chapter, the professional group where techwhirlies met, networked and looked for that next gig.  Matt had worked with a few friends of mine; everyone said he was a great guy and a great boss.

And then I left tech writing; the ideal tech writer is someone with a left-brained detail focus, and when it comes to details I’m the kind of look at that shiny object on the floor.

So I was pleasantly surprised when we held the first MOB party to find that not only was Matt Abe a blogger (not at all rare among tech writers) but a darned good conservative one; he runs Northstar Liberty, one of the essential conservative blogs in the Twin Cities, especially on (a subject obviously near and dear to my heart).

And he covers the waterfront, subject-wise; an excellent writer (doy, he does it for a living) and a much -better-than-average analyst:

After the passage of Obamacare, the debate on whether to allow video gaming machines to be installed at Canterbury Park and Running Aces may seem like just so much bread and circuses. Yet I spent some time recently researching this topic and exchanging some e-mails with the executive director of Racino Now. I learned a lot about Minnesota’s conflicted attitudes toward gambling, but the legislative debate all really boils down to money.

On the one hand, we have the “trouble in River City” crowd which opposes installing video gaming machines, ostensibly on moral and legal grounds, at two Twin Cities locations: the aforementioned racetracks where gambling is in progress as we speak. Yet these good folks are strangely silent on repealing the Minnesota State Lottery, or shutting down the Indian casinos or the racetracks, or office football and basketball pools. If gambling was such trouble (with a capital “T”), why not shut it all down?

The answer: money.

Read on, of course.

And make North Star Liberty a frequent stop on your rounds of the MOB.  But watch your comma splices when you do.

Three Degrees Of Stupid

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Ask any parent; teenagers are morons.  Even the supposedly-smart valedictorian ones supposedly bound for the Ivy League; indeed, if teenagers don’t get their stupidity out of the way, they wind up as Robert Gibbs.

But I digress; another group of teenage bobbleheads has incited a racial incident in Jersey:

For the second time in less than a month, a New Jersey teenager has been arrested for allegedly making a racist announcement over a store’s public address system.

The latest incident happened over the weekend at the Whole Foods Market on River Road in Edgewater, according to the Bergen Record.

A 14-year-old girl reportedly grabbed the microphone at the store’s courtesy desk and said, “All blacks leave the store.”

Now, let’s be clear; duh.  Duuuu-uuuuuu-uuuuuh.  If either of my kids did this, I’d kick their asses, and never stop kicking.

Which would, indeed, be a better idea than what actually did happen:

A store employee immediately called the police, according to the Record, and the girl and a 14-year-old boy who was with her were taken into custody moments later.

The girl is reportedly charged with bias intimidation and harassment.

“Intimidation”?  An idiot 14 year old girl?

I’m trying to think if there’s anything about this incident that couldn’t have been better handled by a couple of irate black customers pinning the little scumbags to the wall by their hair and giving them what-for until they were ready to slink away beneath their own shadows.

Now, I’ve never bought into the “the media made me do it” defense – but if you’re a not very bright teenager, you’ve literally spent much of your cognitive life in a society where Eric Cartman and Chris Rock say exactly that kind of thing, and it’s considered edgy comedy.

“But it’s just common sense…” is the response I expect – from people who don’t have teenagers.

At any rate – what does it say about our society that “a couple of kids saying something stupid and racist on an intercom” is “intimidation”?   It’s audible vandalism, of course, and it should be the sort of thing a store could sue the kids over; it damaged the image of WalMart and Whole Foods. 

But am I the only one wondering who would actually call it “indimidation?”

Pass The Trick Cigars

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

A new lefty group blog (pardon the redundancy; I don’t know that there’s ever been a lefty soloblog), MN Political Roundtable, rolled out last week.  The blog more or less apes the True North model – like TN, it claims to be based on ideology (if not principles) rather than allegiance to the DFL:

Welcome! Our goal is to respectfully further progressivism and air the moderate to liberal viewpoint. We are not a “Democratic Party” or “DFL” blog, although most (but not all) of us are Democrats.

Now, whenever a leftyblog rolls out, you have to ask yourself – is it going to be:

  • a front for some lefty group or another (a la the Minnesoros “Independent”)
  • a chromosomal garage  sale like – well, we all know who I’m talking about.
  • a gathering place for perpetually-enraged Triggers, like Norwegianity,
  • something better?

Well, there’s a little promise; among the writers are my old friend Erik Hare, the usually excellent if sometimes excessively victorian-vapour-prone Eric Austin, and the always-wrong-but-frequently-thought-provoking-and-usually-unembarassing Dave Mindeman.

On the other hand, their first “guest blog” post – chock full of preening condescension and “artistic” talent somewhere between Ken Weiner and Swiftee – says “chromosomal garage sale”.

Time’ll tell.

Happy Birthday, Max Weinberg!

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

It’s Max Weinberg’s birthday today.  The longtime drummer for Bruce Springsteen and Conan O’Brien is 59.

A native of Newark, Weinberg was a bit of a child prodigy as a drummer, playing with bar mitzvah bands from age seven, and performing with one of his early bands at the 1964 New York World’s Fair.  He attended Adelphi and Seton Hall, with a vague notion of becoming a lawyer – but drums was always his bag.  He played in a grab bag of bands in central and seaside New Jersey, before winning an audition to replace Vini “Mad Dog” Lopez (and his temporary replacement, Ernest “Boom” Carter, most famous for playing on the song “Born To Run”).  It wasn’t hard to improve on Lopez’ legacy; “Mad Dog” may have been the worst drummer ever to record a major label album.

Indeed, that’s a great introduction to Weinberg’s power as a drummer; compare the sloppy, swooping changes in meter on Lopez’ part on  “Kitty’s Back”, on The Wild, The Innocent and the E Street Shuffle to the metronomic steadiness on “Born In The USA” or The River’s “Jackson Cage”.  The E Street Band with Vini Lopez was like an inspired garage band, with some great players (David Sancious was another charter member), but it always felt like Springsteen’s voice was the main rhythm instrument.  With Weinberg, the band became professional, and very, very powerful.

Weinberg, with Springsteen and Tallent, on The River tour

Weinberg, with Springsteen and Tallent, on The River tour

Playing behind a band that’s ranged from seven to nine pieces over the years, the drummer’s key mission is to lock in the beat with the bass player and provide a stable beat for everything else to work over.  And it’s there – as part of the E Street Band’s rhythm section with Garry Tallent, that Weinberg is most notable; he’s been called “The American Charlie Watts”, because whatever he might lack in pure flash, he makes up in rock-sold steadiness, enabling Tallent to stretch out and play, while still keeping a bedrock-solid foundation for the band as a whole.

This was cutting loose...

This was cutting loose...

Which isn’t to say that Weinberg can’t rip it on the skins.  Weinberg was an accomplished session man, playing on Ian Hunter’s You’re Never Alone With A Schizophrenic, Meat Loaf’s Bat Out Of Hell, and plenty of other records in the seventies and eighties (and touring with 10,000 Maniacs after the E Street Band broke up.  But most of all, Max spent a whole second career, 16 years or so, as the leader of Conan O’Brien’s “Max Weinberg Seven”, playing to an audience that largely didn’t know Bruce Springsteen from Rick Springfield, playing a whole ‘nother style of music – jazzy jump blues slathered with barbecued R’nB.

Weinberg on the OBrien set.

Weinberg on the O'Brien set.

Weinberg was in effect the band’s front man; in a band that played mostly instrumentals, he was the band’s lead instrument.  It was a side you could have gone his entire E Street career and scarcely seen.  And it was a blast.

And it led to one of the more interesting show-biz compromises in history.  Weinberg was justifiably wary of jeorpardizing his O’Brien gig to go back with Springsteen full-time, after Bruce had cut the whole band loose in 1989 without any warning.  So Weinberg, Springsteen and NBC worked out an unprecedented schedule that allowed Weinberg a leave of absence from O’Brien’s show for E Street Band tours and, eventually, led to Weinberg’s son Jake serving essentially as an understudy drummer for the band.

Jacob Weinberg with Nils Lofgren and Springsteen

Jacob Weinberg with Nils Lofgren and Springsteen

Anyway – happy birthday, Max Weinberg!

What The Hell Do We Do About The MNGOP Platform?

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

One of the most useless exercises at any business is the process of “writing a mission statement”.  If you have a business that has a chance at success, the mission is pretty self-evident.  “The Mission of Muffy and Ian’s Kites ‘n Koffee is to provide better coffee and kite supplies to the consumers of West Buyaloopup, Oregon”.   

Most management know better than to ask me for a mission statement anymore – because for the past fifteen years, I’ve told ’em all the same thing; there’ve been two mission statements in all of history that serve as templates for all others:  Baron Manfred Von Richthofen (“My mission is to patrol my sector and shoot down anything I see.  All else is bullsh*t”) and Conan the Barbarian (“The greatest joy mission is to drive my enemies before me and hear the lamentation of his women”).

The simple fact is, for most businesses the mission is bone simple, to the point of self-explanatory.  It’s true for most entities, whether people (“My mission is to be the best person, father and citizen I can be”), families (“The mission of the Berg family to make sure Bun and Zam grow up to be good people and citizens”), blogs (“the mission of Shot In The Dark is to drive liberals before it and hear the lamentation of whatever liberals’ distaff community is determined to be; all else is bullsh*t”), organizations (“The mission of the Minnesota Organization of Bloggers is to provide a social outlet for bloggers and blog readers”), or whatever.

With political parties, it’s just as simple; the mission of a political party is to embody the principles that reflect their members’ vision of what government is supposed to be.    All the thousands and millions of ’em.

The Minnesota DFL platform actually does a fine job of conveying that vision.  It states a long list of principles – most of them launching from the notion of “society” doing something, or government fully-funding this or that.  The DFL platform presents a grandiloquently statist vision – a high-level “to-do” list for big government – in elegantly-crafted wrapping paper.

The Minnesota GOP platform [danger – PDF file], on the other hand, is a dog’s breakfast of talking points.   It’s circulated in tabloid form at precinct caucuses; I’ve seen people try to make heads or tails of it, watched their eyes glaze over, and put it down, eyes rolling.   The document is literally written by committee – not just any committee, but one of the biggest committees in all of Minnesota.  At every year’s precinct caucuses, thousands of resolutions get forwarded for consideration to BPOU, Congressional District and finally State scrutiny; few actually get into the platform…

…but “few” of thousands still makes for a huge platform.  There are nine sections to the platform, each with 15-20 planks.  It comes to nearly 20 pages.

And it includes an amazing assortment of things – from lofty ideals (“…policies that reflect that every innocent human being, born and unborn, has an inalienable right to life from conception to natural death”) to practical principles (“Improving the quality of education by maximizing parental choice through expanded support for charter schools, school choice programs, parental rights to home school their children and more competitive and accountable public school systems”) to bald-faced sops to special interests (“Making the Eddie Eagle Gun Safety Program available annually in every Minnesota
elementary and middle school “) to low-level exercises in social micromanagement (“…pornographyblocking software should be installed on all computers having internet access in publicly financed institutions “) to things that principled conservatives should find abhorrent, if they thought about it (” The Minnesota legislature should pass legislation increasing the legal age for gambling in Minnesota to 21 years of age”) to stuff that just doesn’t make sense (“Opposing efforts to put all land and water under the control of the federal government” – I don’t think even Obama has suggested trying this yet). 

It’s time to put the platform on a diet – and make it focus on the things that a political party should focus on; the principles that should guide the party’s members, and especially the party’s candidates and elected officials.

A small group of conservative GOP activists – who shall remain nameless for the moment – have written a rough draft of a statement of princples; they intend, at some point or another, to introduce it as at least the beginnings of a discussion to replace the current War And Peace-sized platform with something a bit more accessible and to-the-point.

Here it is:

Individuals, businesses and the country succeed and prosper when government stays out of the way of the people – those who act on their own initiative, and who lead the way with integrity, responsibility, charity, hard work, humility, courage, gratitude and hope. 

Goverment has a role in our society – but that role is carefully enumerated in the United States Constitution.  The Republican Party of Minnesota believes that a good government does not eclipse roles that are best carried out by families, houses of faith, charitable organizations or businesses.

We, the members, candidates and elected officials of the Republican Party of Minnesota, support the following principles:

1) America is a great nation; we have been a “Shining City”, an exemplar of virtues for all other nations and their people.  The greatness of the American nation, the virtues of its people, and the success of the American experiment are a beacon of hope for the whole world.

2) Liberty is essential for our society to advance and prosper.  The freedom to explore advances in culture, business, faith, science, and government politics improves all of our lives; on the other hand, excessive government regulation and control hinder that development. The ability and freedom to disagree with each other and our government must also be
protected; any hindrance to the free market of ideas will sap the ability of America to advance and to better herself.

3) We have more hope and trust in the individual than the government to solve society’s problems, and to lead us into the future.  We value and protect the freedoms and the rights of the individual in preference to those of government.

4) Faith is where we derive our moral compass and come to understand the eternal rules of order and rights in which our creator has ordained. We believe each person needs to be free in order to explore their faith.

5) Life is sacred; it must be protected and defended from government control.

6) The Family is among our society’s most important institutions.  Government must not be allowed to infringe on the sanctity of the family.

7) The Pursuit of Happiness is essential to our existence, we support equal opportunities,  not equal results.

8 ) Charity comes best from the heart of individuals, and cannot be forced or coerced via taxation and regulation.

9) All citizens are equal before the law.

10) The law abiding citizen must be trusted to defend their life, family and property.

These are the principles we, the people of this nation and the members of this party, believe lead to a just society, a secure nation, and a better future for our children.

The committee struck out someone’s suggestion for a final line; “…, and to hear the lamentation of their women, and all else is bullsh*t”, but otherwise I like it.

Comments?  Feedback?  Leave a note in the comment section (and be advised that while all commentary is welcome, this is MN GOP business, and thus limited to the grownups; criticism is fine, but addlepated anti-Republican buncombe will be mutilated for the sole amusement of the blog owner.  While my comment section is generally the most open forum anywhere in the American media, this thread will be controlled.  Deal with it).

Oprah Don’t Surf

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Oprah?  A diva?  Who’da thunk it?

On the appointed day and time, two limos pulled up and Oprah went into Deborah Gore Dean’s shop across Wisconsin Avenue. After waiting 30 minutes, Colasante walked over and found his famous client berating Dean. He told Oprah and her entourage (secretary, pilot, hairdresser, makeup man, guards) that he had other appointments scheduled and she needed to honor her timetable.

“Oprah does not walk,” she told him, referring to herself in the third person. “Who is this guy?” Then she started screaming at her staff, but finally agreed to cross the street and come through his front door.

“I just don’t feel it,” she told him. “The vibrations aren’t right.”

“You’ll feel them once you see the paintings we’ve assembled for you,” he said, pointing up the stairs where Court’s art was hanging.

“Oprah does not do stairs,” she said.

Things went rapidly downhill from there: Colasante’s partner hissed that maybe Oprah could use the exercise (unclear who heard), and she stormed out in a huff without buying anything.

It’s from Kitty Kelley’s new book on Oprah, by the way.  It’s the book you might not be hearing about, because everyone’s scared of Oprah:

No telling what else Kelley has unearthed or who gets to hear it: Her book has an initial printing of 500,000 copies, but she said some major news organizations have refused to schedule interviews for fear of Oprah’s power and displeasure.

Ms. Kelley – obviously, you need to come to the one media organization in America that won’t chicken out in the face of Oprah and her masses of droogs.  Come on the Northern Aliance.  I booked you 26 years ago for your book on Sinatra, so you know perfectly well I’m up for it.

By the way; while I’m sure it’s not a complete reflection of their own characters, much less of larger social trends, I think it’s interesting to note that while the babbling diva and top-flight Obama supporter Oprah acts like 18th-century French royalty, refers to herself in the third person and tramples people, especially “servants”, like crabgrass, Rush Limbaugh leaves 1000% tips and is apparently renowned by waitstaff as the best customer there is.

Again, not drawing broad conclusions.

Honest.

On the appointed day and time, two limos pulled up and Oprah went into Deborah Gore Dean’s shop across Wisconsin Avenue. After waiting 30 minutes, Colasante walked over and found his famous client berating Dean. He told Oprah and her entourage (secretary, pilot, hairdresser, makeup man, guards) that he had other appointments scheduled and she needed to honor her timetable.”Oprah does not walk,” she told him, referring to herself in the third person. “Who is this guy?” Then she started screaming at her staff, but finally agreed to cross the street and come through his front door.

“I just don’t feel it,” she told him. “The vibrations aren’t right.”

“You’ll feel them once you see the paintings we’ve assembled for you,” he said, pointing up the stairs where Court’s art was hanging.

“Oprah does not do stairs,” she said.

Things went rapidly downhill from there: Colasante’s partner hissed that maybe Oprah could use the exercise (unclear who heard), and she stormed out in a huff without buying anything.

How accurate is Kelley’s version? Dean, who declined to be interviewed for the book, said she doesn’t discuss her clients. Winfrey spokeswoman Lisa Halliday declined to comment.

“Kitty got it just right,” Colasante told us this weekend. “I was somewhat dumbfounded to see this side of Oprah. I’ve been in business 37 years, and I’ve never seen anyone behave that way before — least of all anyone well-known, who are generally pussycats. We had a wonderful time with Barbra Streisand.” (He eventually sold two of the three Court paintings.)

No telling what else Kelley has unearthed or who gets to hear it: Her book has an initial printing of 500,000 copies, but she said some major news organizations have refused to schedule interviews for fear of Oprah’s power and displeasure.

But Kelley told us she’s still a fan. “I love her — she is a biographer’s gift. I started the book the same way I ended up, with a great deal of respect for her.”

Fact-Checking Is For Squares, Man

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Last year, I noted that nothing in the world turns a bunch of “hard-boiled”, skeptical journalists into uncritical fanboys and giggly fangirls faster than a bit of attention from one of the superstars of their own field.

And so a crowd of the Twin Cities’ finest “journalists” suspended all judgment and skepticism last year when Seymour Hersh claimed that Dick Cheney was running a covert hypersecret assassination squad, “Joint Special Operations Command”; none of them could apparently be bothered to check that JSOC had existed for thirty years, and has founded by  Jimmy Carter, whose vice president Walter Mondale was sitting in the room with them, lapping up Hersh’s very presence.

It’d be easy to jump from that to “the media just doesn’t fact-check liberals”.

And unlike a lot of easy jumps, Mark Hemingway notes it’s pretty much correct.

Hemingway remembers the Hersh bit, too…:

In March of last year, New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell that a “covert executive assassination ring” had been run out of Vice President Cheney’s office.

Of course, Hersh has long had a “loose relationship with literal truth,” according to a 2005 article by Chris Suellentrop in New York Magazine. Columbia Journalism Review once offered this pointed critique of one of his books: “Hersh’s attributions generally fall short of normal journalistic yardsticks. More important, many of his conclusions are weakly substantiated by his research and highly questionable.”

Despite Hersh’s unreliability, his suggestion Cheney was assassinating people at will was dutifully parroted by the activist Left and receptive members of the media.

(Note to Mr. Hersh, his people, and his legions of media fanboys; where is that book?)

This week President Obama publicly ordered the assassination of a U.S. citizen, Muslim Cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. Unlike Hersh’s scurrilous charge, this presidential directive is a matter of record — not a wild rumor.

Make no mistake: al-Awlaki is a bad guy. He’s been definitively linked to the 9/11 hijackers, and more recently the recent Fort Hood massacre, not to mention the failed underwear bombing plot this past Christmas.

But he’s also a U.S. citizen, and thus entitled to basic constitutional protections. So where are the denunciations of Obama’s extraordinary decision from those who spent eight years decrying Bush and Cheney’s wartime expansion of executive power?

Denunciations?

The “journalists” are all busy on their blackberries trying to get tickets to the Helen Thomas swimsuit shoot.

The Narrow V

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Larry Kudlow breaks with current conservative orthodoxy by claiming that not only are we in a recovery, but in fact it’s a pretty good one:

Sometimes you have to take out your political lenses and look at the actual statistics to get a true picture of the health of the American economy. Right now, those statistics are saying a modest cyclical rebound following a very deep downturn could actually be turning into a full-fledged, V-shaped, recovery boom between now and year-end. Conservatives shouldn’t trash it.

I’m aiming this thought especially at many of my conservative friends who seem to be trashing the improving economic outlook — largely, it would appear, to discredit the Obama administration.

The real point, of course, is that you don’t have to trash what’s going on right now to trash the Administration:

At this point it’s impossible to project a long-lived economic boom, such as we had following the deep recession of the early 1980s. For one thing, tax rates will rise in 2011 for successful earners and investors, quite unlike the Reagan cuts of the 1980s. So it’s possible that entrepreneurs and investors are bringing income, activity, and investment forward into 2010 in order to beat the tax man in 2011. This would artificially boost this year’s economy, stealing from next year’s economy.

Recall that when Hillary Clinton took her Rose Law Firm bonus in December 1992, rather than January 1993, she knew full well that her husband Bill would raise the top tax rate in 1993. So the fourth quarter of 1992 grew at nearly 4.5 percent, but the first quarter of 1993 saw less than 1 percent growth. The temporary growth spurt for all of 1992 was 4.3 percent, but activity dropped to 2.7 percent the following year.

In other words, “Irrational lack-of-suicidal-depression?”  The economy is getting its spending done while it can still afford to?

We won’t know for sure until next year – but the Administration’s sandbagging on numbers for next year indicates they’re both preparing the field for a bad 2011 and wanting to claim that things are “better than expected” in time for the 2011 races.

And – today’s putative “V” notwithstanding – this could turn out pretty bad:

It could happen again in 2010 and 2011. Although the Obamacons deny it, tax-rate incentives matter a lot.

And at some point, monetary policy will tighten, with higher interest rates on top of higher tax rates. That, too, could slow growth markedly next year. And then there’s the dozen tax hikes in the Obamacare health takeover, and a possible VAT attack from Paul Volcker, all of which will work against growth in the out-years.

Clearly, we are not operating a supply-side, free-market model today. What I wish for is sound money and lower tax rates, which would promote sustainable economic growth. Instead, we’re getting easier money and higher tax rates, which could mean a temporary boom today and disappointingly slow growth after that.

There is one big hope, here:

But then again, who knows? Maybe the tea-party revolution overturns the obstacles to future growth and the boom is sustained. Free-market populism and a return to Reaganism, along with an anti-federal-spending coalition that is the most powerful force in politics today, could right the economic ship.

That’s the big question; does the American people have the attention span to spend 2-6 years to amputate the tentacles the Obama Administration is shooting into the economy?

What A Difference A Year Makes

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

In downtown Saint Paul, someone with a bone to pick with Republicans went nuts with graffiti about a year ago.  He or she vandalized a couple of lampposts with black magic marker, saying:

HANG
THE
GOP

They’ve sat, unmolested, since probably the winter of ’08-’09 (and somehow never got investigated by the FBI).

Today, I noticed that of them had been countervandalized:

HANG in
THEre,
GOP

I’m sure someone’s going to be contacing the ACLU for stifling their artistic expression.

New, Improved Packaging!

Monday, April 12th, 2010

I can’t believe I missed this one last week; Lori Sturdevant asks:

Is DFL Senate majority leader growing more conservative on the job?

That’s easy.  No.

But Pogemiller’s no idiot.  I mean, he doesn’t have to be smart in the classical sense to keep winning a seat in his district, but he’s not dumb, either.  He can see which way the wind is blowing.

And in a year when the dominant sentiment is “throw the taxing, spending bums out”, having a statement like I think it’s simplistic and naive to say people can spend their money better than the government” on one’s record can’t be good electoral mojo.

So it makes perfect sense that someone like Pogy would enlist some willing flaks – that’d be Sturdevant – to try to paper over that long record of “all of your money are belong to us”-type statements, made back when it looked like Obama’s shirt-tails were going to stretch all the way into the next century.

But underneath it all?  It’s gonna be the same old story.

By the way, I’m going to put that quote on a sign to take to the Tea Party.

Along with Cy Thao’s classic “When you win, you get to keep your money, when we win, we take your money”.

Wonder if Sturdevant’s gonna write a piece about Thao’s newfound financial libertarianism?

Bread, Circuses and Healthcare

Monday, April 12th, 2010

I haven’t been to the Twins stadium yet. I hear it’s pretty neat; for all the taxpayermoney that went into it, and after the ramdown that Henco taxpayers got that led to the taxing and spending, it’d better

“Candice”, from the tack-spitting conservative blog Randomly Candice, observes:

The only place I’ve ever watched baseball was the Metrodome. Though over the past few years, I began to HATE going to games there. The ONLY things I liked about the ‘dome were the Dome Dogs, that awesome windtunnel effect when you left the game, it’s close proximity to 35W and 20+ years of baseball memories. I wanted a new stadium. During the ‘Great Minnesota Stadium Debate’ I felt torn, we needed a new ballpark, one that wasn’t shared with the Vikings and monster truck rallies. I wanted a stadium that captured the essence of baseball, not the feeling of claustrophobia while walking the concourse trying to make my way to my seat. But I didn’t want it paid for with taxpayer money. I didn’t think that was asking too much.

I read the paper, watched the news, and instead of seeing civil compromises, it felt like I was watching hostage negotiations. “Give us the money or we’re selling the team to [some guy] and he might move it to [randomly chosen city].” These guys were better than mexican drug cartel kidnappers!! The state really had no other option but to cave and let Hennepin county cover the $392 million tab. (Thanks Tim Pawlenty!!)

And she notes the problem that is going to hurt a lot of the current tax-hawkery that’s going around, if we’re not careful:

My problem with this lies in the fact that now that Target Field has been built, and the 2010 season has started, many people are forgetting how it came to be. Don’t get me wrong, I am so in love with this ballpark that I can’t really put it into words. I’m excited for the season and I cannot wait to get to a game. (Especially since I will be getting tickets from uncle Mark, who has seats in the first row right above the Twins dugout!! *brag*) I also know that the whole baseball experience will be better for thousands of Minnesotans each summer. I LOOOOOVE that!!

What I don’t love is that now that we have this beautiful ballpark there’s a feeling of “Well, it’s over and done with, can’t change it now, lets enjoy the hell outta it!!” But there’s the sickening feeling in the pit of my stomach because this isn’t the end, it’s the beginning.

She’s referring to the queue of teams that’ll be lining up for their own stadiums and arenas – but it’s actually much worse than that.

Protesting against something that hasn’t happened yet.  But people will adapt to anything (especially when the IRS and the MN Dept of Revenue gives you no choice but to adapt).  Worse than that – turning something back is ten times as hard as stopping it in the first place.

Which is, of course, why the Administration and the Democrats in Congress rammed Healthcare down has hard as they did; something that’s in place is vastly harder to roll back than a mere proposal.

I Don’t See a V

Monday, April 12th, 2010

As much as many of my colleagues and clients revere the dissertations of Larry Kudlow, I think he may be extrapolating a wee bit too much at this early juncture.

Sometimes you have to take out your political lenses and look at the actual statistics to get a true picture of the health of the American economy. Right now, those statistics are saying a modest cyclical rebound following a very deep downturn could actually be turning into a full-fledged, V-shaped, recovery boom between now and year-end. Conservatives shouldn’t trash it.

I’m aiming this thought especially at many of my conservative friends who seem to be trashing the improving economic outlook — largely, it would appear, to discredit the Obama administration.

To assert that Republicans may deny that Obamanomics is working at their own peril misses at least a few critical points. It’s also premature.

Capitalism recovers, that’s what it does. Free enterprise by definition, finds a way over, around or through whatever obstacle is thrown at it; be it world wars, epidemics, market bubbles and even an administration hell bent on putting it on a short leash.

The economy is showing signs of recovery no doubt, but it lacks a few factors key to a V-shaped recovery and I think Mr. Kudlow, with all due respect, is suffering from premature jubilation.

Let’s begin with the March employment numbers recently released by the Labor Department. Those numbers were solid. People say small businesses are getting killed by taxes and regulations from Washington, but the reality is that the small-business household employment survey has produced 1.1 million new jobs in the first quarter of 2010, or 371,000 per month. If that continues, the unemployment rate will drop significantly.

But it probably won’t continue, Larry.

On the contrary, politically speaking, unemployment will ultimately be the Achilles heel of the Obama administration.

I could stop right there.

Growth of the GDP and the Dow may serve to buoy consumer sentiment but high unemployment will continue to weigh heavily and a couple months’ reversal does not a trend make.

Much of the “recovery” to date is simply a regression to the mean of sorts, which is to say that much of the crisis was manifested in a national overreaction, by employers cutting inventory and staff more severely than was necessary and by the stock markets overselling. The recovery thus far is simply employers and the markets seeking equilibrium.

For a V-shaped recovery there will need to be found a new rung on the ladder and right now I don’t see it.

Past recoveries, at least of the V-shaped ilk, had catalysts. In the case of the Great Depression, it was World War II, the and the young entrepreneurs that survived it.

More recently, In the nineties, it was computers, the internet, and the wireless industries who created jobs and at the same time bolstered productivity.

After the recession of 2001-2002 it was the housing boom then bubble and the leveraging-up that it afforded the consumer eager to fill those homes with stuff. Alas, maybe that one was a false recovery in retrospect.

This time around, that catalyst has failed to materialize. Apple’s release of the new iPad isn’t quite enough, not to mention the fact that sales have been sub-par. This era of “green jobs” the president keeps talking about is a distraction at best; political bullshit at worst. Moreover there are still factors that could hold us at this rung on the ladder and possibly even knock us down one or two in what could be the dreaded “W” recovery.

The biggest fear among business leaders, save a protracted 30’s style depression, is 70’s style inflation, which will hide in the wings until the consumer starts spending. To say that Obamanomics is working at this point belies that fact that the extreme monetary policies implemented to pull our system from the brink have not yet been retracted to any semblance of normalcy.

Our economy is still lying in a gurney with a big federal IV bag pushing meds into it’s wrist and the patient, now trying to get up out of bed, is a bit dazed. Soon she will realize she can only walk so far down the ICU hallway without taking it with her lest she pull the needle out.

Assuming we get our economy out of the ICU, we have escalating energy costs, due in part to the weak dollar, and soon to be multiplied by a return of demand as the global economy struggles to recover.

Also there are to be continued and excruciatingly persistent pressures on real estate values, which have always been an emotional, if not substantive, source of consumer confidence and optimism as well as the de facto basis for most personal wealth and the ability to obtain credit. Once real estate values begin to recover in earnest, which is to say an increase in the proportion of non-distressed transactions, there will be a wave of baby boomers, nearing retirement and divesting themselves of homes too large, too expensive and that represent too much of their illiquid net worth. They will take advantage of the $500K capital gains deduction before Obamanomics forces closure of the loophole.

Next up, we have the President’s health care “reform”; nobody wants it but everybody will have to pay for it. To what extent this will undermine the economy is not known but insurers and providers alike are scrambling to figure out what needs to happen when the first elements of the assault come ashore in September. Many large employer’s cost estimates do not bode well for jobs growth.

Lastly, we have the nearly unbearable weight of a federal government hell-bent on gorging itself under the guise of a crisis, the long-term deleterious effects of which have long since reached a fatal tipping point. Taxes must go up and anyone that thinks higher taxes lead to sustained economic recovery surely isn’t paying them and is suffering from the same form of delusion that put Obama in the White House.

So Larry, it’s too soon to be calling this a “V”, and I’m glad to see that later in your piece, that you agree:

…at some point, monetary policy will tighten, with higher interest rates on top of higher tax rates. That, too, could slow growth markedly next year.

…hence the “W” moniker.

…then there’s the dozen tax hikes in the Obamacare health takeover, and a possible VAT attack from Paul Volcker, all of which will work against growth in the out-years.

Clearly, we are not operating a supply-side, free-market model today. What I wish for is sound money and lower tax rates, which would promote sustainable economic growth. Instead, we’re getting easier money and higher tax rates, which could mean a temporary boom today and disappointingly slow growth after that.

We have become an economy unto ourselves; an economy driven by service industries and consumption and right now consumers are not yet convinced that the Obama administration has solved everything and that they should go back to what they were doing. Even if they if they did, they haven’t the means or the desire to do so and are not yet prepared for what is coming.

As long as unemployment stays high and the consumer suffers malaise, Republicans, if they so chose, will have plenty of legitimate economic fodder to lob at the Obama administration for years to come.

Sign O’ The Times

Monday, April 12th, 2010

PJ O’Rourke once observed that social change happens wherever the babes are.

Wags over the years have noted evidence in Ukraine…

…and Lebanon…

…and there’s evidence all around us

I’m not the one to say conclusively if that’s right or not.  But if it is…

…then the left is screwed blue.

(more…)

Getcher Cameras

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Ever wanted to take your shot at being a TV reporter of sorts?

This Thursday – April 15, at the Tea Party – is your big chance:

Tea Party TV — the go-to place for news on the Tea Party Movement — will be streaming comprehensive coverage of the Tax Day Tea Party events. They are inviting citizen reporters to help cover those events. Last year, more than 800 citizen reporters submitted videos and photos to PJTV as they reported on the tax day events in their home towns. This year, 900 citizen reporters have signed up already. You may want to add your voice to these rallies.

Click here to find out how.

It’s especially important to have lots of video and pix of the Tea Party; the left has sent ringers with outrageous, racist, homo/xenophobic signs to other Tea Party events, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure they’ll do it again.

(Not sure if the group in that last link is legit or not; investigation is underway).

Around The MOB: National Debt Busters

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Sorry about the week off from the MOB tour.  No way around it last week!

Today’s stop, National Debt Busters is written by someone tersely named “Skydancer”, whose mission seems to have been, since 2007, focusing on the national debt.

They’ve been posting roughly weekly for three years – and now that the topic is Agenda Item #1 for the entire loyal opposition, I’m going to register my hope that they kick things into high gear.

Typical fare:

Ever since Barack Obama became president and began advocating such big-dollar federal programs as an economic stimulus and health care reform, Republicans have gained increasing political traction with warnings to voters about the growing national debt.

On March 24, 2010, House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, published an op-ed in the Des Moines Register that was timed to coincide with a March 25 visit by Obama to Iowa City, Iowa. Obama visited Iowa City to tout the health care bill two days after signing it into law.

Boehner’s column — titled, “Why Republicans will fight to repeal health-care takeover” — was a broadside against the newly signed bill, featuring a wide range of statistics. In it, he asserted that the health care bill “is a recipe for further fiscal disaster at a time when our national debt ($12.7 trillion today) is on track to exceed the size of our entire economy (about $15 trillion) in just two more years.”

That struck us as a huge amount, so we decided to take a closer look.

This, he does.

Make National Debt Busters a stop in your fiscal rounds of the MOB

They STILL Think We’re Getting Out Of Control

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Today, the Northern Alliance Radio Network brings you the best in Minnesota conservatism from 9AM-3PM.

  • Volume I “The First Team” –  Brian and John or some combination thereof kick off from 11-1.
  • Volume II “The Headliner”Ed is off on assignment.  I’ll be up from 1-3.  In addition to the usual “week in review” stuff, I’ll be talking with State Auditor candidate Pat Anderson, with Diane Anderson (who’s running for the MN House in Ed’s district), with Daniel Reynolds of the Young Republicans, and Toni Backdahl about this coming week’s Minnesota Tea Party.Yes, it’s gonna be huge!
  • The King Banaian Show! – King is on from 9-11 on AM1570, Business Radio for the Twin Cities!  We’re broadening the franchise; two stations, now!
  • And for those of you who like your constitutionalism straight up with no chaser, don’t forget the Sons of Liberty, from 3-5!

(All times Central)

So tune in to all six hours of the Northern Alliance Radio Network, the Twin Cities’ media’s sole guardians of sanity. You have so many options:

  • AM1280 in the Metro
  • streaming at AM1280’s Website,
  • On Twitter (the Volume 2 show will use hashtag #narn2)
  • UStream video and chat (at HotAir.com or at UStream).  (Er, not this week – Ed’s got the camera)
  • Podcast at Townhall, usually by Monday
  • Good ol’ telephone – 651-289-4488!
  • And make sure you fan us on Facebook!

Join us!

The Little Girl Who Cried “Fear”

Friday, April 9th, 2010

I’ve told the story before.  One of the most illuminating lectures I’ve ever gotten on human nature was from my 11th grade history teacher, Mr. Dudley Butts – who was perhaps the most “Big Lebowski”-ish football head coach I’ve ever met. 

He’d been drafted during the Vietnam War; he was proud to point out that he’d been stationed in Washington DC, and the Viet Cong never attacked the Capitol on his watch; mission accomplished. 

And he told us that during basic training, as they were doing any of the things that mimicked killing people – at the rifle range, while doing bayonet drills and hand-to-hand combat practice – the drill sergeants never referred to their targets as humans.  They were always collections of not-quite-human memes; “gooks” and “charlies” and “slopes” and so on.  It took him a while to realize this wasn’t just the mark of a bunch of bigots with sergeant stripes; there was a method to it.  It was much easier to train people who’d spent 18 years of their lives being taught “thou shalt not kill” to kill if you taught them to kill something that wasn’t really human. 

Likewise, the theory goes, it’s easier to convince people you’re right if you get them to believe that your opponent isnt’ operating from rationalism or intelligence.

The Alinski-schooled left has known this for decades, of course.  Which is why over my years of blogging the left has followed such utterly predictable memes in referring to conservatives – “ignorant wingnuts” in their parlance.  Christians are “extremists”; Second Amendment activists are “crazy gunnies”; they never get exercised and motivated, they “Melt down” or “whine”.  Above all – or, in terms of plausibility and intelligence, below all – they never operate from bases in rationality, experience, knowledge of history or cognitive processes of any kind; the only conservative motivation is “fear”. 

I’ve never accused Lori Sturdevant of being much more than a willing water-girl for the DFL and all it stands for.  I didn’t expect any different from her “coverage” of the Bachmann/Palin rally.    I wasn’t disappopinted:

Minnesotans who tuned in to Wednesday’s Minneapolis rally on behalf of U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann and featuring former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin heard a lot about “freedom” and “liberty.” Those words are taking on a new partisan edge in this election year, not unlike the tinge acquired by the words “family values” a few years back.

Well, let’s shoot for accuracy, here – and we’ll have to do the shooting, because Sturdevant certainly won’t; the “partisan edge” to “family values” was pretty much entirely a product of the left and media (ptr). 

It’s a digression – but then, so was Sturdevant’s reference.  Offsetting penalties. 

Onward:

Those words also seem to be acquiring new definitions in the mouths of Republican politicians. Freedom seems to have a lot to do with the ability to avoid buying health insurance, thereby forcing others to pick up the tab for one’s hospital stay, should one’s good health run out.

Right.  That’s the motivation behind the Tea Parties and all of conservatism, Lori; getting someone else to pick up your tab.

It has nothing to do with believing in limited government, let alone the sense that for most people, Obamacare “fixes” something that needed a tune-up, not a complete overhaul.

Liberty, on the other hand, seems to be about building new nuclear power plants, drilling for oil just about anywhere, paying little or no taxes, and avoiding health and safety regulations in one’s business life.

Oooh, can I play?

Liberalism seems to be about being ashamed to be an American, being thankful to Mother Government for allowing you to exist, and shutting up and doing what your lords and betters tell you to do!

Liberty is also evidently compromised or diminished when the federal government takes emergency action to limit the collapse of major banks and prevent the demise of the nation’s homegrown auto industry.

Well, yeah.  As a matter of fact, it is; when there is no freedom to fail, then there is truly no freedom to succeed.  Badly run businesses should fail; in a true free-market economy, no business ever gets to be “too big to fail”. 

Those countercyclical rescue efforts came in for repeated scorn, from Bachmann, Palin and their warmup man, Gov. Tim Pawlenty — although many of the moves were initiated by a president they supported, George W. Bush.

“A President they supported?”  I can’t speak for Pawlenty, Bachmann or Palin, but I don’t know a single genuine conservative who supported Bush’s Kennedyesque spending. 

Let’s step aside for a moment, here.  When it comes to analyzing dissent, there are really two types of commentators; the ones that painstakingly develop taxonomies that shoehorn all of human nature’s wondrous complexity into implausibly neat but inevitably-pejorative, utterly-unnatural and completely self-serving boxes to make themselves sound all academic and serious, and everyone else:

Times of major economic and social change seem to spawn two kinds of political leaders in America — those who seek to help people overcome their fears and adapt, and those who play on fear and offer the vague promise that unsettling changes can be slowed or reversed.

Which is, of course – pardon a rare disgression into Old English – festering, reeking bullshit.

All political motivation is a complex mixture of education, tradition, self-interest, fear, communitarianism, and all manner of base and noble impulses.  Every person’s motivations are different; I’m a conservative because my study of history shows that statism is a cancer, and that limited government leaves the most room for humanity’s most noble natures to emerge, because the Constitution is fundamentally libertarian-conservative and if we don’t follow the Constitution then what the hell do we follow, because I “fear” the competence and motivations of this nation’s current “elite” and what it’ll do to the country I’ll leave my offspring, and because it is my right and duty as a free American citizen to fight for what I believe within our political process.

Likewise, Lori Sturdevant is a liberal because she’s been painstakingly indoctrinated into being a petty statist and D-list elitist, all of the “cool” people in her field have always been liberals, and she fears all of us peasants.

I mean, as long as we’re oversimplifying and caricaturing those we disagree with…

 Bachmann and Palin demonstrated Wednesday why they are among the nation’s leading exemplars of the latter category. Their success, this year and in 2012, will depend in large part on Americans staying fearful for a lot longer than Americans typically do.

I saw no fear on Wednesday.

But I read it all throughout Sturdevant’s column on Thursday.

Like Mr. Butts’ drill sergeants, Sturdevant is trying to tell her audience that her enemies – all us Teabaggers, Gunnies, Taxpayers-Leaguers, Wingnuts, God-Botherers, Bitter Gun-clinging Jeebus freaks and the whole lot – aren’t really as human as they are.

Weserübung

Friday, April 9th, 2010

It was seventy years ago today that World War II came to Norway and Denmark.

As with the previous episode in this series, the Invasion of Poland, history has spawned all kinds of myths about this campaign.

Norway and Denmark, like many other smaller European nations, had actively embraced the idea of neutrality as their best defense against huge potential enemies like Germany, the USSR and, believe it or not, France and the UK.  Indeed, that was what “neutrality” meant, in the full legal sense of the term, for countries that embraced it; they could not distinguish between liberal democracies like Britain and fascist dictatorships like Germany; they had to treat all nations as the same, and all belligerents in a war as equally culpable.

This, believed the Danes and Norwegians, was their best shot at avoiding war; taking absolutely no side in the conflict.

And it’s one of histories great accidents that in Norway’s case it didn’t turn out to be true, at least legally.  Winston Churchill noted that much of the steel that ran Germany’s war machine came from iron ore mined in northern Sweden, and exported via train to Narvik, Norway, and thence shipped to Germany.  Churchill hatched a plan; to send a brigade of British soldiers to occupy Narvik first, and work out the diplomatic details with the Norwegians later.    And so in the days leading up to April 9, 1940, the British embarked a brigade of infantry onto a couple of cruisers and got ready to send them to Norway.

The Germans got there first.

They had engineered a pretty elaborate surprise attack; they put most of their troops on warships, fast cruisers and destroyers, rather than on regular transports and landing ships.  They also staged the world’s first major airborne assault, sending the paratroopers (Fallschirmjäger) to capture Norway’s major airport and, they hoped, King Haakon and his cabinet.

King Haakon VII

King Haakon VII

The German surprise attack wasn’t a complete surprise; British intelligence got some word out in advance.  A Polish submarine, the Orzel, which had itself escaped the conquest of Poland only eight months before, sank a transport off Lillesand, and a British sub damanged a cruiser full of troops.   And one group of German ships encountered the Norwegian patrol boat Pol the night before the invasion, as the ships were staging to launch their assaults in the morning.  They sank the Pol, whos captain became the first fatality of many the next day.

But it was a home-field game for the Germans; Denmark was on their own border, and Norway was much closer to Germany than to the UK or France.

Despite the three naval actions the day before, the word was slow in getting to the governments in London and Oslo; the Norwegian government, realizing they had no hope of preserving peace, ordered an alert – which, being far too late, did little good – and started packing up the nation’s gold reserves (which did succeed).

And so on the morning of April 9, a coordinated six-point assault with elements of six infantry and mountain divisions simultaneously invaded the six most important cities in Norway.  Two German battlescruisers carried elements of a Mountain Division to Narvik, well above the Arctic circle, destroying two of Norway’s ancient “battleships”, the Eidsvold and the Norge, leaving a few dozen survivors out of crews totalling 300 men.  Other ships landed troops at Trondhjem, Bergen, Kristiansand and Egersund; the biggest detachment sailed up Oslofjord to try to capture Oslo, link up with the paratroopers, and try to decapitate whatever command and control Norway had.

German tanks land in Oslo

German tanks land in Oslo

And so the Germans essentially drove into Denmark, and debouched from ships and planes into Norway.  The Danes, having a tiny military, indefensible terrain, and no real chance at defense, worked out an armistice quickly that enabled them to keep at least some small degree of autonomy under German rule – which would hold for the next couple of years.

Aircraft carrying German paratroopers flying over Copenhagen.

Aircraft carrying German paratroopers flying over Copenhagen.

For the most part, the strikes on Norway went off with surgical assurance and with little overt resistance; Norway had nearly disbanded her military, and had only very recently realized that pacifism needed some form of defense; they’d begun building a few new destroyers (to replace vessels commissioned in the 1890s), and bought fighter and anti-submarine planes from Britain and the US – although by April 9, only 12 British-built Gloster Gladiator biplanes were combat-ready.

Norwegian Gladiator (pilot; Dag Krohn).  Painting by Lars Lindgren.

Norwegian Gladiator (pilot; Dag Krohn). Painting by Lars Lindgren.

All 12 were destroyed by the end of the first day – although not before shooting down several German planes full of paratroopers first.

But for the key part of the German plan – the capture of King Haakon, his cabinet, the Storting (Parliament), the gold reserves and the legitimate government of Norway ?  The wheels came off, unpredictably, bright and early.

The biggest of the German invasion forces stormed into Oslofjord on the morning of April 9.   Lead by the heavy cruiser Blücher, the force included two other heavy cruisers, three destroyers, and eight other ships crammed with German infantry.   Norway had very few formal defenses – but the Oscarsborg fortress, sitting in at a narrowpoint in the fjord, was one of them.  The commander of the fortress, Colonel Birger Eriksen, sensing trouble, had put his troops on alert on his own initiative, disobeying an order to stand down.

Oscarsborg Fortress, in Oslo Fjord

Oscarsborg Fortress, in Oslo Fjord

And at 5:15AM, his searchlights illuminated Blücher; his fortress’ main battery, two 11-inch cannon that’d been installed in 1892, engaged the cruiser.

One of the two Oscarsborg 11 inch guns.

One of the two Oscarsborg 11 inch guns.

Two hits blew a turret off of the cruiser, and forced it to stop – leaving it a sitting duck for an 1890-vintage torpedo, fired from a glorified log flume on shore, which caused Blücher to tip over on its right side and sink, ablaze, killing 1,000 sailors and soldiers, including many specialists and administrators who were to take over the running of the Norwegian government.

Blucher, ablaze, capsizes in the Drobak narrows

Blucher, ablaze, capsizes in the Drobak narrows

This blocked the fjord, preventing the force from getting to Oslo long enough for the King, Cabinet, Parliament, and the gold supply to evacuate.

The Germans needed Haakon and his Cabinet; if they could be captured and induced to capitulate, it would mean that Germany controlled Norway’s legitimate government.  And so they sent an elite force of paratroopers in a convoy of commandeered civilian trucks to try to intercept Haakon’s convoy as it fled into the interior.

They nearly succeeded.  But at the village of Midtskogen Gard, they ran into a group of Royal Guards and “reservists” – hunting club members, really – who blocked them and, in a short, sharp battle, turned them back.

And so Haakon and his government managed to escape into the interior, where they led Norway’s tiny, hardscrabble Army in resistance for nearly two months, before evacuating from Tromsö aboard a British cruiser on June 7.

German soldiers marching in front of the iStorting/i (Parliament) in Oslo

German soldiers marching in front of the Storting (Parliament) in Oslo - the day after Haakon and the Government escaped.

Norway thus became the only country conquered by Hitler to never surrender to the Nazis.  Haakon, leading Norway’s legitimate government (no country ever recognized, even by the dubious standards of world diplomacy, Vidkun Quisling’s puppet regime) at the head of over 20,000 troops in exile, 50,000 troops in the underground, and the 22,000 men and hundreds of ships of Norway’s merchant marine.

It was five years to the day later that Haakaon returned to Norway at the head of his military (escorted by the US 99th Infantry Battalion, made up of Norwegian-speaking GIs from Minnesota, the Dakotas and Michigan) in 1945.

———-

As I’ve done throughout this series, I’m here to debunk myths.

There are several in re the war in Scandinavia.

No Pushover:  While the popular history has it that Norway rolled over quickly for the German attack, the fact is that not only did Norway never surrender (as noted above), but the campaign became a bit of a quagmire, at least initially, for Germany.  The initial invasion used six divisions and parts of a seventh, and still couldn’t conquer the whole country.

German troops and light tank, under fire from Norwegian troops in rural Norway.

German troops and light tank, under fire from Norwegian troops in rural Norway.

To make matters worse for the Germans, the British expeditionary force originally slated to invade Norway ended up arriving in Narvik after the Germans – to be seen as liberators and rescuers.  The British navy task force delivering them, led by the battleships HMS Warspite, wiped out the German naval force at Narvik, including ten destroyers – a blow from which the German destroyer force never recovered throughout the war.

German destroyers, wrecked at Narvikfjord

German destroyers, wrecked at Narvikfjord

The Allied ground force – including British, French, Norwegian and Polish-Army-In-Exile forces – drove the Germans out of the city, and held until evacuated in June.  The Norwegians operating outside Narvik, under General Fleischer, delivered the first tactical defeat suffered by the German Army in World War II.

Polish Podhalanska mountain troops with German POWs at Narvik

Polish "Podhalanska" mountain troops with German POWs at Narvik

Farther down-country, the Norwegians – again, mostly gun-club “reservists”, with French and British troops in support- delayed, and then halted, the German advance up-country during the campaign around Namsos, which was finally overcome only through the lack of Allied air support and, finally, the fall of France.

As the quagmire dragged on, the Germans got desperate, carrying out terror-bombing attacks on Nybergsund, Andalsnes, Molde, Elverum, Kristiansund, Namsos and Narvik.

Narvik blazes after German terror bombing

Narvik blazes after German terror bombing

The last Norwegian army unit fighting in Norway didn’t cease organized resistance until June 10; Norway resisted longer than than of any of Hitler’s other conquests.

June 7, 1945: Crown Prince Olaf returns to Oslo.  His bodyguard is noted Norwegian commando Max Manus - about whom more soon.

June 7, 1945: Crown Prince Olaf returns to Oslo. His bodyguard is noted Norwegian commando Max Manus - about whom more soon.

Resistance:  Tens of thousands of Norwegians escaped Norway; fifty thousand more fought in some capicity or another in the Resistance.  The Milorg achieved some spectacular successes, including the destruction of the German “Heavy Water” supply during the Vemork raid.  Germany stationed a total of eighteen divisions in Norway on occupation duty during the war – partly testament to the importance of Germany’s bases, which supported U-boat and air raids on convoys crossing the Atlantic and especially those supplying Lend-Lease supplies to the USSR – and also to the effectiveness of Norway’s resistance.  It was the highest ratio of occupation troops to civilians anywhere in Europe.

Denmark resisted as well; indeed, given the more difficult terrain, the Danish resistance was especially crafty, adaptible and ferocious.  And both nations pulled off the incredible; during a three-week stretch in 1943, the Danish resistance managed to smuggle 86% of Denmark’s Jews to safety in Sweden, after word got out that Hitler was about to abrogate the terms of Denmark’s armistice and round the Jews up for extermination.

Another Danish fishing boat en route to Sweden with a cargo of Jewish refugees

Danish fishing boat en route to Sweden with a hidden cargo of Jewish refugees

Norway similarly got 75% of its Jewish population smuggled to Sweden, albeit in less dramatic fashion.  Both nations’ resistance groups are listed collectively among the “Righteous Among Nations” at Yad Vashem.

Exile: Among the Norwegians and Danes who escaped to fight onward, many distinguished themselves.  The Canadian government, using airplanes Norway had bought from the US but were not delivered, set up a training base for Norwegian pilots, “Little Norway”, near Toronto.  The Norwegian pilots served with distinction; 331 and 332 Squadrons, flying Spitfires, became among the highest-scoring squadrons in the Royal Air Force late in the war, flying air cover over the Normandy invasion, the liberation of Holland, and the crossing of the Rhein River.

Three 331 Squadron Spitfires at North Weald airfield.  The squadrons letter code FN was random - but happened to coincide with the squadron motto, For Norge - For Norway.

Three 331 Squadron Spitfires at North Weald airfield. The squadron's letter code "FN" was random - but happened to coincide with the squadron motto, "For Norge" - For Norway.

At sea, Norway’s huge merchant fleet was a huge part of the Allied effort to first keep Britain from starving, and then to support the invasion and liberation of Europe.  Beyond that?  Norwegian crews on British-built torpedo boats and gunboats, and two British-built submarines – the Uredd, lost in a minefield, and the Ula, which sank more enemy tonnage than any other Allied submarine in the Atlantic during World War II – vexed the occupiers up and down Norway’s long coastline.

HNoMS Ula, highest-scoring Allied submarine in the Atlantic in WWII.

HNoMS Ula, highest-scoring Allied submarine in the Atlantic in WWII.

Lessons Learned: Norway has always had a reputation for big-L “liberalism”, which it passed on to its descendants in Minnesota.

But it learned its lesson, too.  During the Cold War, when faced with an enemy historically even worse than Hitler (remember – Norway and Turkey were the only NATO nations to share borders with the USSR), they backed up their innate pacifism with a big stick.

NNoMS Kobben, which spent the Cold War watching Soviet ships and prowling the fjords.

NNoMS Kobben, which spent the Cold War watching Soviet ships and prowling the fjords.

Although the nation has about the same population as Minnesota, it built up a sizeable navy to defend its long, craggy coastline from invasion – and turned virtually its entire male population into an army.  Norwegians served in a system similar in many ways to that of Switzerland and Israel, keeping their weapons at home, ready for the worst.  The nation’s military was trained for guerilla warfare; a hypersecret branch of Norway’s special forces spent the Cold War years building the infrastructure to make another occupation of Norway a horrible and bloody thing for the next round of enemies.

L1

Norwegian Leopoard tanks on exercises in the Telemark, 1982.

For it’s part, the Danish military after World War II developed a reputation for fierceness; Danish troops serving in Bosnia/Herzegovina were reportedly among the most aggressive in smacking down Serb aggression.  It’s worth noting that Danish special forces – the Jaegerkorpset, among the most admired special opertions forces in NATO – accompanied the US in its initial invasion of Iraq, along with those of Poland, another nation that had learned the hard way that freedom needed fierce defense.

As we confront our nation’s own tribulations, we’d do well to remember the examples of the people of Norway and Denmark.

Strange Bedfellows

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Pawlenty and Obama, together against the teachers’ unions?

Matt Abe writes:

The Pawlenty administration and education reform advocates are finding themselves supporting some of the significant aspects of the Obama administration’s Race to the Top initiative, while many Democrats and the teachers unions, strong supporters of candidate Obama in 2008, oppose them, including:

  • Alternative teacher licensure – allowing non-traditional candidates like mid-career professionals alternative paths to becoming licensed teachers
  • Pay for performance – linking teacher pay to student performance, even more than Minnesota’s current, optional Q Comp program

Conservatives generally and the Pawlenty administration in particular have been advocating for these types of reforms since at least the late 1990s. From the nation’s first charter school laws to replacing the process-oriented Profile of Learning with knowledge-based academic standards, to Q Comp, Minnesota has often led the way in education reform, rather than let itself be dragged by Washington, D.C. educrats to improving its public school system.

I’m going to guess that if November goes badly, Obama will reverse course.

But right now?  It’s a start.

Malcolm McLaren

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Malcolm McLaren, punk-rock impresario behind the Sex Pistols, dead at 64.

McClaren’s longtime partner, Young Kim, said “He was a great artist who changed the world.”

And she’s probably right – except that McLaren was an artist in the post-Romantic, 20th-century sense of the term; he believed that destroying art was art.  It was a school of art that gave us a lot of really annoying, self-indulgent twaddle, and still cripples the world of art today.

But along the way?  Well, we’ll always have the Pistols:

It was McLaren who gave the name Sex Pistols to the group of young men hanging out at his store and helped pick out front man John Lydon (soon known as “Johnny Rotten.”) McLaren signed the group with EMI, and their first single, “Anarchy in the UK” came out in 1976.

The group would aggressively court controversy, becoming a household name after an expletive-packed appearance in a British television interview which drew a ban on the group’s live performances in the U.K.

After being dropped by EMI for bad behavior, the group later signed with Virgin. Their second single, “God Save The Queen,” whose title lyrics are rhymed with “fascist regime,” was released during Elizabeth II’s Silver Jubilee celebrations — was an auditory assault on the monarchy which sparked widespread outrage and saw members of the band attacked in the street.

Which, when I was a teenager in terminally-staid North Dakota, sounded like a lot of fun.

Now that I’m not a teenager, of course, the “Art-as-destruction” school of art, and the Pistols’ contrived rebellion, wear a bit thin on me.  Fortunately, the Pistols – provided that Glen Matlock rather than Sid Vicious was playing bass – were also, counterintuitively, a really, really good band.

Which, of course, wasn’t the point to McLaren:

McLaren professed a certain indifference to the talent of the band he managed, saying it never occurred to him that the group could ever be any good.

“What occurred to me was that it didn’t matter if they were bad,” he told the Times of London last year.

Sylvain Sylvain, whose group proto-punk group the New York Dolls McLaren managed before the Sex Pistols, told the AP that McLaren knew how to anticipate a trend.

“He had that vision — maybe it came from the clothing,” Sylvain said. “In the rag business you’ve got to be five to 10 years ahead of everybody.”

McLaren, like the punks and the hippies before them, decided that transient art didn’t have to leave one starving:

He helped create advertising campaigns for British Airways, went to Hollywood to make films alongside directors such as Steven Spielberg, and worked on shows with the BBC — the broadcaster which in the 70s had refused to play his group’s songs. He even wrote for the New Yorker.

And while McLaren also worked with Adam and the Ants and helped create the group Bow Wow Wow, his music career wasn’t limited to management. He had a regarded solo career in which he blended genres and acted as a kind of music curator. In the early 1980s, he had key songs in hip-hop, including the hit “Buffalo Gals,” and bringing different textures to the developing genre; in his career, he worked in electronica, pop — even opera.

RIP, Malcolm McLaren, the Great Rock And Roll Swindler.

Creative Distrust

Friday, April 9th, 2010

It’s an axiom of politics – all politics, really – that people get the government they deserve.

Kevin O’Brien at the Cleveland Plain Dealer thinks that people are finally starting to realize they deserve better:

For many a year now, officeholders of both major parties have worked hard to earn the distrust of ordinary Americans. It appears that they finally have succeeded.

If only ordinary Americans hadn’t been so inattentive. If only ordinary Americans hadn’t been so trusting. If only ordinary Americans hadn’t been so damnably nice, the country would be in a better position to manage its finances today.

But when have Americans not tried to look for the good in every situation? When have we not been slow to recognize the need to deal with forces, foreign or domestic, aligning against our best interests?

Somewhere along the way our media and current ruling class (PTR) got the idea that “unity” and “bipartisanship” and phony harmony was better than conflict in pursuit of our best interests.

Over the past year, this has gotten rocked on its heels:

This past year,

Hallelujah.

The people who are angry today are more in tune with this nation’s founders than ordinary Americans have been in decades.

“But wait! The founding fathers were smart!”

Er, yeah.  Smart enough to know that government needs to be taken out and beaten back down to size with baseball bats once in a while.

The United States has an intricate system of checks and balances, and a government structure based on a separation of powers, and a Bill of Rights that safeguards the rights of states and the rights of the people precisely because the greatest collection of political talent and philosophical insight ever assembled on this continent — and maybe anywhere on this planet — looked at the concept of government and said, “We need to make a really small cage for this thing, then be careful not to overfeed it.”

We seem to have lost the care-and- feeding instructions about a century ago. We let government out of its little cage and it has been consuming everything it can lay its paws on ever since. In the last 45 years, it has been on a real binge, and in the last year and a half, it has taken bigger bites than a lot of people thought possible.

What was the stupid old bumper sticker?  “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention?”

Well, outrage isn’t needed.  Just a whole bunch of the focused motivation that comes from a constructive response to anger.

I, Extremist, Part V

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

According to Janet Napolitano and most of the mainstream media, I’m an “extremist”; I’m pro-life, anti-tax, pro-Second-and-Tenth Amendment…

…which, to some, means “anti-government”; as if “wanting just the parts of government we really need” is in some way the same as wanting the government to be overthrown.

Here’s one of my “extremist” beliefs; that the government that governns best, governs least.  Of course, that was really Thomas Jefferson – who, let’s never forget, was also an extremist.

Look – most of the case for limited government boils down to this:  The Constitution really defines what government is supposed to do; defend the nation, look out for the “general welfare”, raise taxes for federal functions (which at one point meant “functions that were properly the province of the Feds, although that’s been bastardized beyond recognition for the past couple of generations),  sign treaties with foreign governments, interpret the Constitution and, since the end of the Civil War, make sure that “equality before the law” is a unform, national thing; above all, per the Tenth Amendment, to keep its hands off of everything else.

But you can hear that from the entire Libertarian Party, and a fair chunk of the libertarian wing of the GOP; that’s Conservatism 101 (or, if you’re talking with Keith Olberman or Nancy Pelosi or Janet Napolitano, “extremism”, but I digress).

There’s another, ethical reason to limit the size and power of government.  It does in unbendable fact what capitalism supposedly does; it arbitrarily picks winners.

Imagine that you’re a barber.  You live in, let’s say, Portland, Oregon, a city with nine other barbers.  Now, being plagued with hippies, it’s not the best town to be a barber.  But you get word that the guys from Phish are going to all get flattops; knowing what a bunch of “non-conformists” hippies are, you and your nine fellow barbers are getting ready for an avalanche of business.

As one of your items of business, you set up a PAC – call it “Portland Cares about Hair”.  You publicize photos of bad flat-tops.  “Portland must demand better”, the ads say.  And you go before the Portland City Commissariat Council, and convince them that bad flat-tops are something that government must prevent – so they should impose a license on the barber trade, with licenses going to would-be barbers who have passed a license exam issued by the “Board of Barber Examiners” – a panel of three barbers drawn from among the ten of you.  Which means that, as the hordes of hippies wander about looking for flat-tops, there are only ten shops to go to; all of the hippies who try to start their own barber shops are busted by the cops and fined for “barbering without a license”.

In other words, you and your nine barber friends have just used government to give you a better, more commanding market position.

Business does this all the time; the bigger the business, the bigger the likelihood they’ll get government to clamp down on the market for them:

Yes, that’s the largest investment bank on Wall Street calling for stricter regulation from Washington. Stoll has a pretty straightforward explanation:

What [Goldman CEO Lloyd] Blankfein and Mr. Cohn are now saying is that their desire for higher capital requirements isn’t related to concern about their ability to control Goldman‘s risk-taking (“Please, Mr. Government, supervise me more closely, allow me to borrow less money, and force me to take less risk”), but their ability to assess and judge the risks of their counterparties, the other firms they are doing deals with.

Why should Goldman have to pay for mitigating the risk of its deal-partners when the SEC or the Fed can do Goldman’s work for it — on the taxpayer dime?

This is further evidence of what I’ve been saying for months: just as tobacco regulation was a gift to Philip Morris, toy regulation was a gift to Mattel, and health-care “reform” was a gift to Big Pharma, financial reform will improve Goldman’s profitability, Obama’s populist rhetoric notwithstanding.

Government has no more business picking winners than it has defining who shall lose.  At least, it shouldn’t.

I know.  What an extremist I am.

Brave Sir Donkey Ran Away

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Vulnerable Democrats are afraid Obamacare is going to drag them underwater this fall:

Tough votes for Obama’s health care plan have further complicated the re-election prospects of dozens of already vulnerable freshman and second-term Democrats. There’s even a chance the party could lose control of one or both houses in the midterm elections.

And the nervous Reps are responding like Brave Sir Robin; they’re running away from their constituents:

In districts and states where the overhaul was most controversial, town-hall meetings have been replaced with tightly controlled business roundtables and other gatherings with voters.

In Nevada, first-term Democratic Rep. Dina Titus defended her vote for the health care bill in a newspaper piece she co-wrote and in a meeting with female doctors. Facing a vigorous GOP challenge from a Republican physician, she acknowledged treading carefully.

“It’s more of a teaching tour than a selling tour,” she said of her recent appearances.

Expect to see lots of tightly-controlled, “on message” events, and virtually no meetings with uncontrolled groups of peasants.  Er, voters.

The obvious answer is this; if the Dems are too cowardly to face the people and answer for the damage they’ve wrought, the Republicans will have to do it for them.  Have town-hall meetings, Republicans.

In fact, have ’em in front of your opponents’ offices.

Say It Isn’t So

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Back in 2006, when a collapse at the Sago mine in Utah killed 13, the left and media (as always, pardon the redundancy) blamed President Bush. The precedent was obvious; mine safety is the Presideht’s responsibility.

Today, after the worst mining disaster in 26 years, though, we learn that mine safety is apparently not the job of the President.

No.

It is, however, entirely related to management’s ostensible political sympathies.

As the left becomes more and more depraved in defense of the administration its’ hold on power, expect to find the plague, the Spanish Inquisition and auto accidents blamed on the Tea Party as well.

But just remember, Democrats – someday you’ll be out of power.  Maybe someday soon.  And you’re setting a crappy precedent for civility in dealing with the minority.  There’s that whole wind/whirlwind thing you might wanna think about.

Again, just saying.

What I Saw At The Rally

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

I’m feeling better and better about this November.

I was in the Press Pit at yesterday’s Bachmann/Palin rally at the Minneapolis Convention Center.

I’ll say this about the GOP; there was a time when most of the great speakers were Democrats; Ronald Reagan was something of an anamaly (and a few steps beyond being just a great stump speaker).

Ever watched video of a World War II airplane engine starting up?  The propeller starts to spin, as the starter cranks the engine over.  You know it’s spinning, as the spark plugs start to fire and you hear a few cylinders coughing, but you wonder when the airplane is going to take off.  And then, suddenly, it catches – and the propeller smoothly speeds up, and the engine takes on that hearty roar that catches you in the pit of your gut, and you just know that someone’s gonna get a bomb dropped on them.

That’s what watching Michele Bachmann speaking is like.  When she gets to the podium, you can tell she’s a ball of potential energy waiting to explode; she speaks without notes, and I suspect she goes onstage with a few ideas of where she wants things to go, and tries a few of them…

…and, imperceptibly, as the crowd warms up and as she, like that engine in the B17, catches on, suddenly she and the whole room just take off, and the plane lifts off the runway, you just know that a bunch of Sixth District liberals and sanctimonious state Dems and the national media are going to be dodging explosions the rest of the day.

And Sarah Palin?  When you hear the woman talk, you can see why the national Democrats and media (pardon the usual redundancy) have had to switch to full-time defamation mode, attacking her education, her family, her baby, her hobbies, her looks (and occasionally her term in office, although less-often substantively than, say, by filing and referencing disposable “ethics” complaints (attacks that Palin disposed of with grace and sharp, pointed humor – which is hard to see coming from most of her thud-witted competition).  If they had to take her on on the force of her personality and the power of her speaking, they’d be a third party. She spoke for about twenty minutes; while I compared Bachmann to a Rolls-Royce Merlin aircraft engine, Palin is more like a heat-seaking missile; she rocketed right off the rail toward her target.

Neither of them needed a teleprompter, by the way.

As to content?  Both of ’em borrowed from Reagan, addressing the character of the American people when challenged; the obvious subtext is, “we’re being challenged now”.

As to the crowd?  They said 11,000 tickets had been given away, including 1,000 at the door.  I stood up on my seat in the press pen – there were maybe 1,000 bleacher and floor seats, and the rest was standing room, and the place (Hall D at the Convention Center) was as packed as a good mosh pit.

Afterward, I wandered ovdr to the Hyatt, to see if there was any visible sign of the Dems’ purported counter-rally.

Other than a few black-clad hypstrz, I didn’t see a thing.  Not that I wanted to walk into the Hyatt to find out; I was feeling too good.

More later.

--> Site Meter -->