October 31, 2005

My Mistake

On last Saturday's NARN show, Brian "Saint Paul" Ward and I said that the Minneapolis mayor's race was basically a joke, a run-off between two candidates who are, at day's end, merely different types of DFL machine hack.

Which is true.

But we'd be mistaken, as Minnesota Democrat Exposer notes, to think this doesn't have impact on other races in Minnesota:

Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak said last night during his debate with Peter McLaughlin on KSTP that 70% of the people who committed a murder in Minneapolis in the past year were on parole from Hennepin County.


Click here to watch the video.

Hennepin County Attorney and U.S. Senate candidate Amy Klobuchar must have loved Rybak's comments.

But they're comments that need to be made.

And then held against Klobuchar.

Hennepin County's drive-through criminal justice system - put on display last summer in an incident in which a man accused of shooting a man five times in the arm, face, chest and groin was released on bail several times from Hennepin County custody - and proceeded to violate his bail several times (thankfully not hurting anyone in the process) - is a disgrace, the very definition of "catch and release" justice.

Posted by Mitch at 06:39 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Worst Fears

The Strib's current piece, "What Killed Reece Miekle" - currently in part two of five - is a wrenching, draining read for any parent. The story - in which a family's middle child dies of a mysterious blood ailment that I'm hoping we learn about by episode five - is any parent's worst nightmare.

Worse still is the realization that I know the mother, Leona Miekle (nee Hoy, if memory serves) from high school. Although Reece died over a year ago, please send the family your thoughts and prayers.

Oddly, that's twice in ten years that people I've known in high school have turned up in the Twin Cities media after losing children to mysterious diseases.

Posted by Mitch at 12:44 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

In This Era...

...when blogs and talk radio make the news market chaotic almost to the point of anarchy, it's good that we have the sober, responsbible mainstream media around to give us unbiased, unvarnished, opinion-free truth.

Thank goodness for the MSM!

Posted by Mitch at 12:30 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Alito and the Elephant In The Family Room

As I was driving in to work today, I listened to NPR's coverage of the Alito nomination. As always, I don't have a digital recorder in my car (note to self...) so I'll have to paraphrase. However, I think the following paraphrase is conceptually accurate as can be:

President Bush bla bla Samuel Alito bla bla bla abortion bla bla bla abortion abortion abortion abortion bla bla bla bla spousal notification bla chilling effect bla bla abuse of women bla bla bla abortion abortion abortion abortion bla bla bla.
It would seem that Alito's views on spousal notification - the imperative to notify a husband if a wife is getting an abortion - is going to be a major contention in this nomination.

Good.

Glenn Reynolds sounds off on the topic.

Says Reynolds:

I'm not sure about Pennsylvania, but in many states her spouse -- even if he's not the father of the child -- would still be on the hook for child support. Likewise, if he didn't want children, but she disagreed, lied to him about birth control, and got pregnant. And he certainly couldn't force her to have an abortion if she did so, even if his desire not to have children was powerful, and explicitly expressed at the outset. (The usual response -- "he made his choice when he had sex without a condom" -- never comes up in discussions of women and abortion.)
While I'm softer on abortion than a lot of conservatives - I am personally pro-life, and have actually become more militant about it over the years, but I think it should be a state decision, not a matter of federal judicial fiat - there are three issues that, to me, beg further discussion, both in society and at the SCOTUS:
  1. One person's "right" can not infringe on another person's "right". Yet the "right" to "a woman's choice" infringes, in many cases, on father's choices; the choice on becoming a parent commensurate with a woman's choice (a choice that legally obligates the father to 18 years of servitude) or, by the same token, the choice to keep the child (for whose support he'd otherwise be legally obliged, were the child not aborted).
  2. The ethics of the whole thing. While I find abortion abhorrent in almost every way (while seeing the occasional, rare medical justification for it), it'd go a long way if the pro-"choice" crowd were to drop the conceit that they're just excising a piece of tissue - a lump of plasm that, outside the mother, can be viable before six months' gestation, but if it's not born yet, magically remains a...just tissue? If they were to just say "there are two ethical sides to this", admitting that there are rational reasons for a reasonable person to push back at their logic, it'd go a long way. But of course, it's not a long way that the NOW and NARAL want anyone to go.
  3. Oh, and then that whole pesky there's nothing in the Constitution about privacy or penumbras that would make either a federal issue bit...
Glenn continues:
So where's the husband's procreational autonomy? Did he give it up by getting married? And, if he did, is it unthinkable that when they get married women might give some of their autonomy up, too?

The problem here is that you can say "my body, my choice" -- but when you say, "my body, my choice but our responsibility," well, it loses some of its punch.

Bingo.

Before I post this, let me head off the inevitable first response, that childbirth is a rigorous, dangerous process for women. It is indeed; but in the great scheme of human procreation, it's only the beginning. Following the nine months of pregnancy and few hours or days of delivery are a lifetime of effort, pain, joy and expense that lead a child from being a life support system for a pair of lungs and digestive tract, to a fully formed, well-adjusted human being. These activities are fundamentally unisex - or at least they need to be, as studies and research and, not incidentally, a couple of million years of human experience have shown.

If the Alito nomination exposes the elephant in the family room, so much the better.

Posted by Mitch at 12:12 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

What You Must Be Outraged About!

Last weekend on the NARN show, Rocket Man noted that the media (indeed, most lefty pundits) seemed to have had their post-Fitzgerald-indictment stories written in advance.

He has more today - a hilarious example of it, in fact.

Posted by Mitch at 08:48 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Stoked

While I was a lukewarm supporter of the Miers nomination, largely for procedural reasons (it's the President's prerogative, dadgummit!), I'm genuinely excited about Alito.

And even more excited about not only his long-term prospects - as Ed notes...:

I expect that the Democrats will get 30-35 votes in favor of a filibuster once Alito gets out of committee. If they do consider a filibuster, too many of them will realize that Stevens might get replaced during this term (he's 85 years old). They need that potential stop on Senate business to protect a genuinely liberal seat on the Court -- and enough of them won't agree to tossing it aside before the 2006 elections, when they might narrow the gap in the Senate, in order to keep Alito off the bench. They also won't want to fight over obstructionism again during the next cycle, or the Democrats might well lose more Senate seats in the midterms.
...but over the potential political fuel this gives conservatives. A brutal confirmation fight will provide ample rope for conservatives to hang red-state liberals from during the next election cycle.

This part of the base is, shall we say, motivated.

Posted by Mitch at 08:43 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Undisputed

The lowly Bears are in undisputed possession of first place in the NFC North after tipping the Lions 19-13 in overtime yesterday.

While I follow the NFL only in the breach, in fact "the breach" happens when the Bears are in contention. They aren't, of course, not really, so I'm not really following 'em yet.

If this turns into a Cinderella worst-to-first run, I'll maybe even watch a game or two. However, it won't - partly because Da Bearss aren't that good, and partly because if I do, it's likely to jinx the team's efforts. Because it is all about me, of course.

Yes, I am a fair weather fan. Damn proud of it! Why waste time on losers? I didn't buy any Enron stock, I never owned a pet rock, I don't have a Betamax rotting away in my attic, and I never wasted a minute of my life actively rooting on a loser! While I've been a nominal Bears fan since I was probably six or so, I can honestly say I haven't watched a single full game of theirs since their post-Ditka meltdown.

Anyway - Go Bears! And make it quick!

Posted by Mitch at 07:44 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Nothing Is Sacred

Back in elementary school, when I'd occasionally get sick, the big treat - the thing that made it all worthwhile - was the present I'd get toward the end of the afternoon; Mom and/or Dad would bring home a quart of Seven-Up and a MAD magazine.

Seven Up hasn't changed. MAD, unfortunately, has.

MAD was, of course, never sophisticated stuff - which is why it was the favorite humor mag of eight-year-olds nationwide.

I read my first issue in probably thirty years over the weekend.

Ugh.

While their cover parodies of current pop entertainment have always been dumb in a gloriously juvenile way that still gets a chuckle on, reading their "Wife Swap: Simpsons and Family Guy" bit was a little depressing; the writing, always slapdash, has gotten downright perfunctory.

Big deal, right? Right! It still drew a slapdash, gloriously juvenile chuckle. And it was at least non-political.

Now, when I was a kid it's entirely possible that MAD was awash in trite political commentary which either went over my head or, living in a Democrat household as I was, didn't catch my attention. Duly noted.

But two pieces in the MAD I read beat the reader over the head with all the subtlety of Don Martin drawing Linda Carter.

A pictorial, "Green Army Men for the Iraq War", showed updated plastic soldiers; "Abu Ghraib Guard" held a dog collar; "Sergeant Sexual Harrasser", a square-jawed lothario, pinched a shapely female clerk on the butt.

Mkay. The bit's a squib. It's MAD. No big.

But two pages later, the unforgiveable. A full page cartoon...

...by Ted Rall.

Never again.

Posted by Mitch at 05:39 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Feeling The Need To Gargle With Pine Sol

The comment thread in this post on Cathy in the Wright this past week may be the most disturbing thing I've read in quite a while.

Posted by Mitch at 05:16 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

October 29, 2005

Pray...

...that the First Mate kicks her run-in with pneumonia, and soon, and decisively, so that Cap'n Ed can quit loafing around the hospital, exposing patients to God-knows-whatever that putrid Notre Dame jersey is carrying. Those poor people have enough trouble.

Seriously - prayers for the FM. Get well soon. And make him wash that damn jersey.

Posted by Mitch at 04:46 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Libby

Wow. An indictment. Maybe even a serious one.

Well, have a trial - complete with all that "innocent until proven guillty" mumbo jumbo) and let's see what happens.

Interesting, though, that the ink was barely dry on the indictment before Libby was out of the VP's office. Unlike, oh, I dunno, the entire upper management of a certain self-appointed world pseudogovernment I could name...

Posted by Mitch at 11:12 AM | Comments (26) | TrackBack

October 28, 2005

Everybody Hates Pundits

Kevin M at local leftish-blog "Insomnia Report" dishes the smack on amateur pundits like...well, all of us.

It's actually a fairly interesting and thought-provoking piece.

Which isn't to say I think Kevin's premise is necessarily entirely sound:

The blog will never come into its own as a mode of ex-
pression unless its practitioners choose to discard some of their cherished illusions. Not everyone can be a pundit. What’s more, most of those who have already laid a legitimate claim to the title should give it up.
Most people who golf or play hockey or play Texas Hold-em are never going to be world champions; why should they bother?

Because it's enjoyable on the one hand, and good exercise on the other. Which is, in the end, the only reason I blog; it's fun, and it's good for me; I look back on what I was writing nearly four years ago, and I can see that my style has improved quite a bit (you all, as always, can be the judge), as has my reasoning. And the blog has put me in touch with a lot of interesting, smart people who've enriched my life immensely.

As for the notion that some people just shouldn't be pundits - well, that's what the market's there for. More on this later.

Being a pundit is a horrible fate, after all, and I can’t for the life of me figure out why so many seem so eager to pursue it. Is it noble just to spout off?
Not necessarily, but it can be useful, is generally harmless, and is a fairly self-limiting vice in any case; if one merely "spouts off" without some sort of redeeming substance, one rarely draws a crowd, or at least a crowd that will stick around long.
When you’re a pundit, every sentence you write is a potential noose. You begin your career with breath-taking freedom. You can be a wag, you can be a prick, you mock the powerful and you can belittle all the awful fuckers who disagree with you. This stage, fun as it may be, ends quickly and you’re left saying the same thing over and over and over again.
The early days of the conservative blogosphere spawned a lot of rantblogs; I won't name names, but quite a few marginally-talented writers built followings based largely on the overheatedness of their brick-throwing and the pseudo-cleverness of their dismissals. It's gotten tiresome, and I don't read 'em anymore - which isn't to say I don't dip into the genre out of pique, frustration or satirical aggression - but again, more later.
It was your illusion of infallibility that brought you to this point. You can say what you like, perhaps, but you better not contradict yourself and you better not slip out of the costume you’ve knitted for yourself. If you’re the spiteful, brick-batty kind, you better not want to get all winsome and thoughtful. If you think you’re funny, you better not try to be smart or deep or wise. If you’re painted yourself into a corner with your all-encompassing ideology, you’ve got your work cut out for you if you ever want to relent, recon-
sider or admit that the world is a more complex place than an angry essay makes it.
I think this is an answer to the wrong question.

The trap that Kevin describes is there - as long as you put your finger in it and observe that you're trapped. We all know of bloggers who've painted themselves into deep corners - the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler and Rachel Lucas jump to mind.

But there's nothing about being a self-appointed pundit, in and of itself, that disqualifies one from stepping outside the role to do other things, other than being addicted to traffic and insecure about the chances of your audience following you.

I've said it many times; when I started this blog, it was aimed at an audience of one. If my audience dropped back to just me, I'd still keep blogging, since that's always been the whole purpose. Of course, the fact that an audience two orders of magnitude larger than I ever expected to draw has stuck with me through whatever my mood has prompted me to produce is a pleasant surprise, one that's brought some wonderful things to my life - but it's not a consideration as I write stuff, either.

But I know not everyone sees it that way; traffic can indeed be a drug.

A blog is, in many hands, little more than a tool towards a
more secure thoughtlessness, a path back to a flat earth. With your computer and five or six like-minded commenters, the world becomes just as you like it, under your omniscient command, and you can fight the battle for truth and justice on terms that are all in your favor.
Kevin says this like it's a bad thing!

And yet how many non-essential human activities - things that don't provide food and shelter and raise the children - are exactly that as well? Humans are always looking for ways and spaces to exert control, to shape a reality that they're at least a little bit on top of. People band together behind sports teams, read novels, play computer games, do arts and crafts, get into relationships, volunteer for political campaigns - all to find some little piece of the world over which they have some say. Blogs are just an extension of that; if someone's attempt to gain some control over one's own life resonates with other people on the 'net, what's the problem?

Mr. M compares a couple of politically diametric sites, including yours truly's, about which he says:

... may be better than most of its ilk, but I think it can still be used to illustrate what I’m talking about. When its author chooses to write about his life, or music, or other subjects that similarly concern him, he can be engaging, thoughtful and compelling. He is a good writer and, at times like this, he shows a true sense of humor. However, when he’s doing what he usually does–complaining about liberal editorials in the daily paper or getting peeved about the Democrat outrage du jour–his talents and sensitivity vanish in favor of what seems to me to be knee-jerk fury. Sometimes, when I read him in his too-common pissed-off mode, I feel that even he is bored with the act. I’m sure he’s expressing his beliefs honestly, but I can’t help but wonder whether
he sometimes thinks he’s dug himself into a hole.
The short answer: Absolutely not.

The long answer: Go back to February, 2002, and start reading. Read all 6,000-odd posts. There are some streaks in there; streaks of writer's block, others where I was casting about for new ideas, others where the material poured out with no effort. I'm a single parent - there are mornings where I don't feel like writing. I've been doing it a while, so there are subjects that bore me; I could quit fisking Nick Coleman any time now. I work a fairly demanding day job - there are days when between parenting and work, I don't have time to dig into a story, or write with the care and detail that I'd like to. That's life; my goal, failing all of the above (and I do, often!) is to write something I enjoy every day.

Which isn't to say that there aren't things I'd love to do differently. We'll get back to that; we've got some business to take care of, first:

Of
course, around here the right-wing blogs are like a circle jerk. They root for each other even when no one else will, a built-in cheering section to make the questionable seem obvious and the doubtful appear brave.
Not quite sure how to swat at this idea, other than that I know I have to. One person's "circle jerk" is another person's lively, ebullient social circle, a free association of equals who've clustered together over a number of shared interests - politics, blogging, the shared rigors of being a conservative in, let's face it, a frequently intolerantly-leftist area. We bounce ideas off each other, we feed each other tips and sources, we chide and razz each other, and occasionally we swarm. Do we cheer each other on? Sure. That's what friends are for. And I've made some great, wonderful friends through this little exercise.

That that friendship is built on a base of amateur punditry doesn't make it anyting but a friendship.

That aside, Mr. M moves to the point that actually grabbed my attention:

Part of this tendency, I think, is apparent in the way many of these sites seem content to engage the most simplistic and debased forms of their opponent’s arguments, rather than the substantive and nuanced ones. It is a simpler thing to shoot holes in a whiny screed or a paragraph-long letter to the editor than it is to counter the hated position itself. This blogger, at least, seems to have the wit and ability to construct coherent, plausible and thorough positions, but he most often chooses not to. Perhaps there isn’t a readership for it, perhaps he doesn’t have the time. Whatever the reason, it’s a pity.
I thanks Mr. M. for the compliments - and agree, to a point. It is a pity - sometimes.

Would I like to dig into every subject I write about in the depth that Mr. M and I both prefer? Absolutely. Do I feel better about the things I write where I'm able to do that? Sure.

As far as I'm concerned, is this blog a place where I dig solemnly into every subject with reason, diligence and thoroughness? Nope! There are times when I let my temper have a free-fire zone; there are other times when I let unfettered joy run rampant, regardless of reason or propriety, style or reason, and others where I probably poke facile, cheap fun at things I think are stupid.

Whatever this blog has done in terms of traffic and influence - and, to my amazement, it's done a lot - at the end of the day it's still Mitch Berg's sounding board; the good, the bad and the ugly, pretty much raw and unedited.

If I were supporting my family with my blogging, would I write more deeply and carefully and fully? Absolutely. And I'd do it somewhere else; "Shot in the Dark" isn't a literary magazine or a journalism site. It's limits - my limits - are the same limits any overworked single parent who's trying to write at 5AM will share; some days, the goal is to overcome the limitations; others, just to exist within them and still impart some of the passion I still feel for the whole thing - for writing, for being read, for being whatever kind of amateur pundit that end of the day I am.

Read the whole thing; it's actually a good piece (problems and disagreements and all).

Posted by Mitch at 12:28 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Dear KQRS

To: KQRS Radio
From: Mitch Berg
Re: Soul-crushing tedium

In regard to Brad Blanks, celebrity stalker/interviewer, please file under "Too Boring To Measure".

I actually find myself flipping over to the Patriot to listen to their commercials when Blanks is on.

Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thanks.

Posted by Mitch at 06:41 AM | Comments (23) | TrackBack

October 27, 2005

Note to President Bush

To: President Bush
From: Mitch Berg, GOP flunky and bag man
Re: SCOTUS

Mr. President,

OK, you might have dodged a bullet. Now, go out and do it right this time.

As to your next pick, the women of Sparta had a saying to their departing warriors: Come back with your shield, or on it.

You've got fifty million conservatives in this country who are dying to fix rhetorical bayonets, dive into the metaphoric trenches, and emerge with the (hopefully figurative) enemy's jugular veins stuck in between their teeth. All that stored energy's gotta go somewhere.

Get it right this time.

Mitch Berg
Middle-American

PS. If the whole Miers thing was actually chum to get all of us stirred up - Doh. Grrrr.

Posted by Mitch at 07:16 AM | Comments (70) | TrackBack

A Bullet In The Head of the First Amendment

In Washington, naturally, comes the next salvo in the war on the alternative media:

In a stunning decision, a Thurston County, Washington judge forced organizers of Initiative 912 to report, as in-kind campaign contributions, favorable comments made by KVI hosts Kirby Wilbur and John Carlson.

Backers of I-912, which seeks to repeal a statewide gas tax hike, were required to place a dollar value on talk radio's supportive statements.

Critics of the ruling say it's a judicial attack on free speech, especially when related to pre-election campaigning.

Wonder if the teachers union and AFSCME have had any similar restrictions placed on them?

Brian Maloney:

As the election has drawn closer, Wilbur and Carlson now feel they can't even mention the issue. Given the judge's bizarre ruling, who can blame them?
Remember when "liberal" meant "supported freedom?"

Posted by Mitch at 06:59 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

October 26, 2005

Compare, Contrast

May, 2005: Chris Dykstra, in New Patriot, on Norm Coleman's investigation of the Oil For Food scandal:

British legislator George Galloway ran Norm Coleman around in circles Thursday. Gallowway spared no one, especially are very own Normy, who could only muster a squirmy smile in the face of such a barrage. At least someone put the lie to Coleman's stupid posturing. Coleman obviously picked on the wrong guy to shore up his transparent attempt to advance his career by pounding the UN-is-a-bogeyman drum. A Galloway sampling:
"I met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him," Mr Galloway went on. "The difference is that Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns, and to give him maps the better to target those guns.

Now, I know that standards have slipped over the last few years in Washington, but for a lawyer, you're remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice.

"I gave my heart and soul to stop you committing the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq. Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong.

In the attendant comment thread:
ME: "No offense, but I have to ask: Did you watch/read the actual questioning from Coleman and Levin? I mean, *any* of it? Or did you just get the rundown from Kos?"

DYKSTRA: "Mitch - did you watch any of it? or just get the rundown on FR? Because I don't know how you can watch it, read about it or read the transcript and draw a different conclusion. "

Cuz I iz just a dum wingnut, I gues.

Or...not?

Christopher Hitchens, naturally, delivers the news with a rhetorical kick to Galloway's tender bits:

1) Between 1999 and 2003, Galloway personally solicited and received eight oil "allocations" totaling 23 million barrels, which went either to him or to a politicized "charity" of his named the Mariam Appeal.

2) In connection with just one of these allocations, Galloway's wife, Amineh Abu-Zayyad, received about $150,000 directly.

3) A minimum of $446,000 was directed to the Mariam Appeal, which campaigned against the very sanctions from which it was secretly benefiting.

4) Through the connections established by the Galloway and "Mariam" allocations, the Saddam Hussein regime was enabled to reap $1,642,000 in kickbacks or "surcharge" payments.

Here's the whole thing, in convenient PDF format!

Hitch, with emphasis added by me:

The evidence presented suggests that he lied in court when he sued the Daily Telegraph in London over similar allegations (and collected money for that, too). It suggests that he lied to the Senate under oath. And it suggests that he made a deceptive statement in the register of interests held by members of the British House of Commons. All in all, a bad week for him, especially coming as it does on the heels of the U.N. report on the murder of Rafik Hariri, which appears to pin the convict's badge on senior members of the Assad despotism in Damascus, Galloway's default patron after he lost his main ally in Baghdad.
In closing:
Yet this is the man who received wall-to-wall good press for insulting the Senate subcommittee in May, and who was later the subject of a fawning puff piece in the New York Times, and who was lionized by the anti-war movement when he came on a mendacious and demagogic tour of the country last month. I wonder if any of those who furnished him a platform will now have the grace to admit that they were hosting a man who is not just a pimp for fascism but one of its prostitutes as well.
Good question.

Mr. Dykstra?

Galloway was"running circles" around Norm Coleman during last May's hearings; he was pulling out all the rope Norm was giving him.

(By the way - has anyone gotten a recording of that stupid stoopid Wendy Wilde song, to the tune of "Mr. Postman", about the whole Coleman/Galloway thing? The one where she scolds Coleman for persecuting the poor benighted Galloway? Because that could become a real collector's item, if ya know what I mean).

Posted by Mitch at 12:14 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Cooking and Conspiracy-Theory Politics: An Experiment

One of my favorite recipes in the world is this one, for scratch-made Margherita Pizza, from the "Delicious Dish Splendid Table" website. With a little practice, it's a light, delicious veggie pizza that makes a perfect appetizer or light dinner 'za.

I list it here both to pass it on to fellow Margharita 'za fans, and to see if regular commenter PB can find a way to divert the attendant comment thread to a discussion of Bush Administration conspiracy theories.

Enjoy the pizza and the rhetoric!

Posted by Mitch at 12:05 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

WWFDDD?

According to this report in the Toronto Sun, twenty members of the Cuban National Chorus - an acclaimed state-run choir that tours Cuba-friendly western countries - have defected in Toronto.

More than 20 members of Cuba's world-famous national chorus are singing songs of freedom today after defecting in Toronto.

Members of the National Chorus of Cuba dodged security officers and jumped into waiting cars, some on Sunday and others yesterday, said Cuban exiles who planned the defections.

This is great news.

Not, of course, without its attendant pain:

"These people are scared for their lives," said Ismail Sambra, president of the Cuban Canadian Foundation. "They are worried about their families back home.

"It took a lot of planning to get this far."

The singers, who are hiding out at the homes of Cuban exiles in the city, are expected to apply for refugee status today in Toronto.

Gaining their freedom is worth any danger they may face, the singers said.

Ernesto Cendoya-Sotomayor, 27, a baritone, said he left his wife and young daughter behind.

"Cuban police will probably tell my family I am a traitor to the revolution," he said. "They will put pressure on my family."

An unsubstantiated rumor says that University of St. Thomas (St. Paul) President, Father Dennis "Hanoi Dennis" Dease, is gathering a posse to go to Toronto and drag the freedom-seeking Cuban singers back onto the bus (registration required; links to story about Cuban baseball player who defected to the US while playing against the U of St. Thomas; Dease demanded the man, Manuel Chaoui, return, forbade St. Thomas students from assisting the freedom-seeking Cuban, and even searched the dorms for the fleeing Cuban).

For the record; any defecting Cuban who needs a place to stay is welcome at the Berg house, 24/7.

Via Varifrank and Night Writer)

Posted by Mitch at 07:03 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

You Know Who You Are. Maybe.

We were driving north on Fairview yesterday, my car in front of yours. As we got to Selby - a cramped little intersection - the car in front of me turned into the right turn lane - but only partly, leaving me a cramped narrow lane to get through to cross Marshall. Traffic was blasting past in the oncoming lane, and the intersection is famous for people running red lights, so a proceeded with caution until I got past the car.

You leaned on your horn. I looked in my rear view mirror; you and your Saab 9000 were riding my back bumper, close enough to leave your license number dented into the paint.

I stepped on the gas; you stayed a couple of feet behind me, jiggling back and forth like you were trying to find a way to pass, even though there was only one lane and plenty of oncoming traffic.

We got to Marshall, where there's a left-turn only lane and a right and thru lane. I pulled into the right and thru lane. You gunned your engine and sailed past - in the left-turn only lane. You blasted across Marshall.

Since you were driving a Saab, I made a silent bet with myself. Sure enough, bumper stickers. And you're a clever little fellow, too: "Buck Fush" (tee friggin hee). "Kerry/Edwards" (get over it), and "Somewhere in Texas a village is missing its idiot" (but yet you had Minnesota plates!).

You were doing at least 50 as you went through the Fairview/94 underpass (speed limit 30, on a road that swoops broadly under I94, and is one of Saint Paul's most diabolical speed traps). "Please, please, please let there be a cop on the other side..." I prayed to myself. But to no avail, as you sailed out of sight on the other side of the underpass.

The funny part? I came up on the other side of the underpass, and pulled up to the light at University. For all of your honking and tailgating and gunning and speeding - you were right there, in the left turn lane, right next to me. I looked across at you - thirtysomething, kind of stale looking, with a big tacky beard and that dull, lobotomized expression people get when listening to Eddie Schultz.

The funnier part? The center light blinked green; as the left turn light stayed red! For all your honking and screaming and tailgating, I got where I was going faster than you!

The metaphors were inescapable, and kept me smiling all the way home.

Posted by Mitch at 06:57 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Post-Election Wrapup

Michael Yon on the election.

He met some Minnesota National Guards:

We stopped at another station, and met Minnesota National Guard (now the 720th MPs) soldiers. Captain Aaron Krenz said their responsibilities included the Karrada and Mada-an districts, and 119 polling sites. All was quiet, but unlike in Sadr City where the people had made long lines before the polls opened, in these polling sites, he said, many people waited until the afternoon.

The Minnesota National Guardsmen, who might have been in pitched combat if this were January, were lounging about in lawn chairs, wearing full kit, ready to fight if the Iraqis needed help. But no calls were coming. Apparently the only help anyone needed was for lunch delivery. I later heard people saying the Iraqis didn’t want anyone except Iraqis coming near the polling sites; they wanted to show this was by Iraqis for Iraqis. It was their party.

Read the whole fascinating, encouraging thing.

It's a decent antidote to all the "Woot woot! 2000th death!" celebrations in the fantasy-based media.

Posted by Mitch at 06:06 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

October 25, 2005

The Blog Family Tree

Via Doug, I see that the Kommissar over at Politburo Diktat is putting together a blog family tree. If you have a blog and are interested, go to this post, and leave a comment listing:

  1. your blogfather, or blogmother, as the case may be. Just one please - the one blog that, more than any other, inspired you to start blogging. Please don’t name Instapundit, unless you are on his blogchildren list.
  2. Include your blog-birth-month, the month that you started blogging, if you can.
  3. Identify your blog as Left, Right, or Other
  4. If you are reasonably certain that you have spawned any blog-children, mention them, too.
Then, check out the results.

Believe it or not, Andrew Sullivan is my blogfather. I listed my only known blogchild, Doug's Bogus Gold, which is flattering as hell.

By the way, my extended blog family is a fun one, so far:

III. Andrew Sullivan (Oct. 00)

  • James Joyner (Jan. 03)
    1. Kate McMillan (Feb 04)
      • Ashes of Tyranny (May 05)
      • Karen
    2. Joseph Marshall
    3. Candace
  • Attila Girl (Mar. 03)
    1. Little Mr. Mahatma
  • Discarded Lies
  • La Shawn Barber (Nov. 03)
  • Sissy Willis (Dec. 03)
    1. Pat's Baker (May 05)
  • Steve Silver
  • Pete (Alois)
  • Blue Goldfish (Jan. 03)
  • Jay Currie
    1. Debby Estratigacos
  • Free Frank Warner (Oct. 03)
  • Tom, MudandPhud (Apr. 04)
  • Mr. Blonde's Garage (Dec. 01)
  • Chris Hallquist
  • Edwin McCabe (Feb. 05)
  • Mitch Berg (Feb. 02)
    1. Bogus Gold
It'll be a fun family reunion!

Posted by Mitch at 07:33 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

I See Dumb People

There was a time when the mainstream media - like our hometown paper, the Star/Tribune - could plop any old crap on a page, and assume people would just buy it.

They were the newspaper, after all!

And some people in management in the mainstream media - notably the Strib -seem to be either awash in nostalgia for those days, or just assume that people haven't gotten any smarter or better-informed.

Those are the only two possible explanations for this morning's editorial from Cox News' Tom Teepen.

I left out the adjective for the editorial. What fits? the piece is factually-incorrect, snide, paternalistic, condescending, and deeply, deeply stupid.

Apparently in Tom Teepen's world, presidents aren't supposed to keep promises to the people who vote for them:

It's nice to have friends in high places. When George W. Bush was first running for the presidency, a pooh-bah of the National Rifle Association, wrongly thinking he would be heard only by fellow denizens of Gunland, was taped boasting that with Bush in the White House, the NRA wouldn't have to bother lobbying. It would be like having one of the lobby's own officers as president.
"Gunland"?

So the Constitutuion, and the Second Amendment, doesn't apply to the whole nation?

Oh, no matter. Tom Teepen apparently feels it's unreasonable for a group that was actively attacked by the Clinton Administration, and was organization non grata in the Gore campaign, shouldn't throw it's support beyind Bush - or that Bush shouldn't actively court the votes of three million NRA members, and keep his promises to them when elected.

I mean, if the anti-gun movement is so attractive to so many of Tom Teepen's fellow non-"Gunland" residents, they could certainly have turned out enough votes to push Algore over the top. Right? Because that's how laws are made in the US?

It has turned out that way. Having said he favored an extension of the ban on military-style semiautomatic weapons, the president didn't lift so much as a pinky to accomplish that and the ban expired.
Unstated context; the NRA spanked the President hard for his frankly wrong-headed miscue on the "Assault Weapon" ban. Thank God. The "Assault Weapon" ban was among the more dull-witted diversions of the Clinton years; good riddance.

Next, Teepen slides off into active misinformation:

Now Bush has championed and, with flourish, signed legislation that exempts the firearms industry from the reach of civil justice in all but a few very narrowly drawn and unlikely circumstances.

An industry that exists solely to manufacture products that have no other purpose except to kill and wound is thus granted a privileged shelter from lawsuits enjoyed by no other business.

This is garbage.

The bill doesn't exempt gun manufacturers for any liability that any rational person would recognize; if the barrel of your pistol explodes, if the manufacturer breaks BATF laws in building, marketing or selling a weapon, if shoddy workmanship renders a gun unsafe - you know, actual liability - a gun manufacturer is no less liable than any other company. So when Teepen asks...:

Is this a precedent for the political purchase of legal safe harbors, and never mind what misfeasance or negligence might be implicated?
...the answer to a modestly well-informed person (i.e., a person who expressly mistrusts the mainstream media) is obvious; no. The law sheilds gun manufacturers from liability caused by criminal or negligent activity that occurs even though the product works exactly as designed, advertised and claimed.

Guns are not toys. Paging Hollywood; they're not lifestyle accessories. Hello, marketers of gangsta hip-hop; telling generations of wanna-be thugz that gats are fly and glamorizing the gangsta life will lead to problems.

Would Tom Teepen support allowing people to sue Hollywood, or MTV, or video game companies, or the television networks, for deaths and injuries caused by copycats mimicking things they saw on TV or in the movies? The proper use of a firearm is disclaimed as strongly as the proper perspective in dealing with entertainment.

Granted, the larger number of suits against firearms makers and dealers have been more harassing than meritorious, and it would be one thing if the courts were falling for them.
But Teepen surely must know that any industry is one stupid, error-prone, or ideologically-blinkered judge away from a precedent that will cripple it permanently. Remember when advocates of property rights and individual responsibility could relax, knowing that no judge or jury would let a lawsuit against cigarette companies go forward, because people use cigarettes voluntarily, and the tobacco works exactly as advertised and disclaimed?

All it took was one trial, here in Saint Paul, to fix that.

But in fact most have flopped. No body of menacing case law is creeping up on the industry. The "need" for protection exists only as symbolic, so the gun lobby can show its muscle to memberships that are constantly fed scare stories that gun-banners are on the verge of kicking in their doors and confiscating their weapons.
Been to DC, or Chicago, lately?
In short, the legal system is already solving whatever potential problem nuisance suits once seemed to pose. Gratuitous filings are becoming notoriously futile.
See the lamentations of every anti-tobacco jihadi, circa 20 years ago.

Teepen unwittingly clobbers his own argument:

The few successful suits have been confined to especially egregious cases, like that of the D.C. snipers. The families of six ambush victims and two survivors won a $2.5 million settlement from the manufacturer of the Bushmaster rifle and from Bull's Eye Shooter Supply in Tacoma, Wash., the dealer that had been unaware the rifle had been stolen and couldn't account for some 200 other missing weapons.
And nothing about the new law would change that!
The firearms lobby likes to grouse that there are laws aplenty to keep the gun trade on the up and up. That's not really so, but to whatever degree it is true, the claim loses any purchase in an administration with no zest for enforcement.
Which is yet another deeply, abidingly stupid statement (although, as we'll see, far from the last in this piece, as close to the end as we are!). The murder rate has been dropping for years; more importantly, the murder rate among law abiding citizens with no criminal, drug or alcohol abuse records is vanishingly small. And I've heard nobody yet complain that the Administration is going too easy on criminals. Have you?

The closing sentence achieves something that's a rarity even for mainstream media columnists; the Erroneous Trifecta!

With semiautomatics back in circulation ["Semiautomatics" were never out of circulation! - Ed.], with the states increasingly permitting concealed weapons [which have been associated with, at worst, no crime - Ed.] and passing shoot-first, ask-later laws [Ditto! - Ed.], and now with this industry privilege, the gun lobby is finally nearing its goal: an OK Corral that runs coast to coast.
Huh?

Really?

The gun industry wants a national shoot-out?

Seems like that'd be both bad for business and, if proven, probably legally actionable.

I don't think the new liability shield law would protect the industry from willfully promoting a national bloodbath. Lawyers?

Tom Teepen: you'd best hope some future administration passes a "Lying Pundit" shield, or you're going to be in huge trouble someday.

Posted by Mitch at 12:52 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Você Pode Ter Meu Pistola Quando Você O ergue De Minha Mão Fria, Inoperante

Brazilians decisivelyl rejected a national gun ban supported by - natch - their nation's elites.

Reading the piece, from an English-language Brazilian newspaper, it's interesting to see all the anti-gun assumptions that even their media uncritically accept as fact.

Interesting, but not surprising or unfamiliar.

The good news:

Sao Paulo, Brazil: From sprawling cities plagued by violence to the backwaters of the Amazon, Brazilians voted decisively yesterday to keep gun sales legal in the country with the world’s highest death toll from firearms.

In the nationwide referendum, about 64% rejected banning arms sales, the electoral court said, with more than 90% of the expected 122 million votes counted.

Media preconceptions? Why, sure!
Only 36% supported the ban, even though more than 36,000 people were killed by guns last year in Latin America’s largest country.
"Even though" Brazil has the world's second-highest per-capita gun violence rate, and the highest absolute death toll, Brazilians want their guns.

You'd have to be a news reportere not to see the absurdity in that statement.

We didn’t lose because Brazilians like guns. We lost because people don’t have confidence in the government or the police, Denis Mizne of anti-violence group Sou da Paz said.
Duh.

"The patient isn't coughing because he enjoys hacking up phlegm. He's coughing because it's a symptom of a disease!".

Guns aren't intrinsically "likeable" to everyone (although I enjoy recreational shooting quite a bit), any more than a hammer or screwdriver is "likeable". A gun is a tool you use to do a job - in this case, defend yourself from Brazil's surging mass of drug-dealing scum - the ones who are doing the killing.

Many voters had expressed concern before the vote that a ban would leave them defenceless against heavily armed criminals. Public confidence is low in a police force widely considered inefficient, abusive and corrupt.
Now, I'm interested in this next set of quotes:
This referendum . . . is not going to end violence, said Assis Augusto Pires (60), who voted against the ban in Sao Paulo’s wealthy Jardim Paulistano district, where high walls, electrified fences and private guards protect residents.

In Rio de Janeiro’s Rocinha shantytown, scene of a raging gangland turf war, Carlos Eduardo Ferreira, a 40-year-old electrician, said he was voting for the ban.

I am for the ban; I am for life. I’ve already seen kids hit by bullets here, he said.

So even though gun control is predominantly a cause of the privileged, and a 2/3 majority in a poor nation like Brazil would seem to indicate considerable support among the peasantry, it's interesting that the token pro-gunner in this piece is an upper-class fortress-dweller, while the anti is poor 'n plucky.

Fancy that - even though as the article notes a few grafs later...:

The ban failed in all 26 states and the federal district of Brasilia. Rural areas rejected it overwhelmingly.
...that the poor were the ban's biggest opponents.

The press is trying to cast it as a referendum on the current President, who is embroiled in a number of scandals, and who treat guns with the same patronizing ignorance as a typical Code Pinko:

I think that for an ordinary person to have firearms is not going to give security, so I voted ‘Yes’, [President] Lula said.

Many blamed the loss on a bribes scandal that has weakened Lula’s government and hurt his popularity.

Right.

2/3 of a huge, mind-warpingly and nearly-ungovernably diverse nation vote as one to reject a gun ban - over something as temporal, wonky and commonplace as a bribery scandal?

It's those crazy peasants and their "don't shoot me down like a dog" and their "where are the police when I need 'em?"

Don't they know their place?

Posted by Mitch at 12:07 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

That Buzzing You Hear Is The Rending Of Garments All Over Highland Park

It's the third anniversary of the death of Paul Wellstone.

Three years ago, I noted both the genuine bipartisanship of the mourning, as well as observing that some seemed to be slipping the surly bonds of reason.

Today - well, the unreasonableness seems to have taken complete hold.

I can excuse people keeping their little green stickers on their cars, or their green signs on their lawns or peering out from their living room windows. It's a little worrisome on a personal level - when people wallow in grief for that long, it's probably because they enjoy the pain, one way or the other.

But on the Channel 4 news this morning, they had a piece shot at the Paul and Sheila Wellstone Community Center, which included a series of paintings, apparently of Paul and Sheila Wellstone standing in front of groups of sitting disciples amid pastoral settings, the sun itself beaming approvingly above them, as the followers are warmed by the presence of their avatar...

Gack! It was reminiscent in every way of Russian Orthodox icons on one extreme - or the hagiographic portraits of the likes of Hussein, Kim Jong Il, Castro or Stalin on the other.

He was a Senator; a personable and charismatic but not especially effective one, and one who reflected the collective id of the sixties generation that spawned him.

Which is what a good deal of the chest-beating and garment-rending, of course, is about.

Posted by Mitch at 06:51 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Barone on Fitzgerald

Michael Barone on Fitzgerald's efforts:

It is a general principle of law that when the government wants to criminalize acts other than traditional common law crimes like murder or theft, it must set out with great specificity the conduct that is forbidden. To visit the rigors of criminal indictment, trial and punishment on someone who has done nothing that is specifically forbidden is unjust -- the very definition of injustice...In the absence of a violation of the underlying espionage acts, any indictment here arising from the course of the investigation would be, in my view, unjust and an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. It would also be, as the liberal commentator Jacob Weisberg has pointed out, a long step toward something like the British Official Secrets Act -- a precedent that would staunch the flow of information from the government to the press and the people.
And, lest we forget (or, if you're a left-of-center blogger, lest you never know in the first place), let's remember this about the people who are the cruxes (cruxi) of the matter:
That leaves the question of whether Rove, Libby or someone else will be indicted for perjury, obstruction of justice or making false statements in the course of the investigation. But why should there be indictments if there was no crime?

True, Rove and Libby did seek to discredit Joseph Wilson -- as they should well have done. As the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded in a bipartisan report in July 2004, just about everything Wilson said publicly about his trip to Niger was untrue. He said that he had discredited reports that Iraq sought to buy uranium in Niger. But the CIA people to whom he reported concluded that, if anything, he substantiated such reports. He said that he pointed out that certain other intelligence reports were forged. But the forgeries did not appear until eight months after his trip. He said his wife had nothing to do with his trip to Niger. But it was she who recommended him for the trip. And on and on.

And Blanton, from Red State, , notes:
Lawyers close to the Plame investigation say that Fitzgerald will indict Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson for obstruction of justice and perjury. In addition, Wilson will be indicted for outing his wife, who was a covert CIA agent. Additional charges are being considered against Valerie Plame for her role in selecting her own husband for a government assignment in a concerted political effort to undermine the administration.

Now, that's actually not true. But, given the media's handling of this matter, this post should be treated with the same credibility that the media is presenting statements of "lawyers close to the Plame investigation." In point of fact, there are several lawyers on this site who have kept up with the material and they are probably as close to the investigation as the ones being quoted in the media, which is to say not very close at all.

If Fitzgerald indicts Joe Wilson, it'll be interesting to see how fast the left's coverage of Fitzgerald will turn from laudatory to homicidal.

Posted by Mitch at 05:03 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

The Puff Continues

The Pioneer Press' Hot Dish blog serves up...

...well, cold, puffy softballs re Al Franken:

Lately, Air America Radio has had some ups and downs -- things are going fine in Cincinnati [Actually, they're a slightly better grade of crappy than elsewhere - Ed.], but not so great in Washington D.C. [Just stay it, dude; Air America is *gone* in DC - Ed.] At least one thing remains constant -- Air America personality Al Franken's outspokenness. The host of "The Al Franken Show" is known for his biting humor that finds its way into his many talents -- host, political commentator, writer, comedian -- and on Tuesday, he's voicing his opinions on the small screen. Franken, who was raised in St. Louis Park, will promote his new book, "The Truth (with Jokes)," with appearances on NBC's "Today" show and CNN's "American Morning" on Tuesday morning followed by a stop by Comedy Central's "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart" Tuesday night. His book tour will eventually hit the Twin Cities -- he's scheduled to sign copies on Dec. 4 at the Edina Barnes & Noble in the Galleria.
Suppose he'll be answering questions about Gloria Wise?

Posted by Mitch at 04:46 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part XIV

It was October 25, 1985. A Friday, the end of my first full "work" week in the Twin Cities.

Well, I was learning that looking for a job was hard work, anyway.

A bit of background; my first radio job was at KEYJ in Jamestown, ND, in 1979, starting the summer before my junior year of high school. My first boss, Bob Richardson, had a great philosophy; the community kept him in business, so he was going to give back by (among other things) teaching the young 'uns how to do radio. He made a pretty strict point of keeping a couple of high school or college kids on the part-time staff. And it was a great part-time job. Bob was gruff enough to make Lou Grant run yipping up a tree, but a kid coming out of his station knew a lot about how radio was done. High school kids could find themselves covering the news (I did), calling play by play, learning sales or engineering or pretty much anything you could do in a station. Many people went on from KEYJ to big careers.

In 1980, a couple of slick late-twentysomething weasels who'd been knocking around the business for a few years bought the station, changed the call letters to KQDJ - and, a few weeks, later, fired most of us locals and brought in a bunch of their own people. It was a valuable lesson at 17 - never get attached to a job. It was a lesson I learned 10 years before most of the workforce; it was a crappy feeling at the time, but it's served me well.

I went on to work at a couple more stations during college - KDAK in Carrington, ND and then back to KQDJ, which was under new management. But while it was still a decent part time job, the horizons were decidedly narrower. Part time announcers...announced. Part time. No play by play, no news - and barely any disc jockeying; much of the nighttime lineup was via satellite. I began to learn the misery of so many radio gigs in the eighties and nineties - the "Live assist" job, better known as "watching the needle bob" in those days when a radio station still needed to have a live human in the building when it was on the air.

So I was pretty well sick of radio by the time I got out of college. I figured (except for one brief, miserable job interview for a news gig in Fargo) that my radio days were over.

==========

Another long day on the road; I made plans to meet my host for a demonstration later in the day. More on that later.

I started out the day with another job interview, again over in Edina, but this one - a switch! - a solo interview with one person!

The gig was with a personnel service; I'd be working as a recruiter. The interviewer was a late-twenty-something guy who looked like he'd already been eaten and crapped out; pale, ulcerous, he looked like a poster child for excessive job stress. Immaculately dressed and wearing tinted glasses, he also seemed to be doing fairly well in the headhunting business.

We talked for half an hour. I was slowly learning - I thought - the big lesson of job hunting; tell them what they want to hear.

At the end of the interview, he looked at my resume, grimaced like he had something wrong with his stomach, and groaned as much as said "Are you sure you want to do this?"

Huh? "I beg your pardon?"

"Well, it's just that you're from a small town. Maybe you should find a job that's more suited to that sort of background"

I sat, more or less shocked into silence. "OK...any suggestions?" I asked, not really listening to the reply. I politely waited for him to finish, and took my uncomfortable leave.

Driving away, I punched the steering wheel the way I wished I'd punched the interviewer. I resolved that my jitters and inferiority complex about being just off the turnip truck had to turn into something else. I sprouted a huge chip on my shoulder that day; no more passive-aggressive Scandinavian nice guy. It served me well in coming months.

I killed a few hours in a library, and went to my next appointment, to check out another "Roommates Wanted" lead. I'd been to a few of these the previous week; this was the last remaining ad.

========

The stop was a huge improvement; the guy, a late-twentysomething who I remember only as "Dave", was a nice enough guy, who'd had a roommate bail on him; he needed someone to help share the rent in a two-bedroom basement apartment in South Minnepolis, and pronto. $212.50 a month, all utilities except phone paid, $175 deposit, preference to people who wanted to get moved in in time to pay October rent. I peeled off $175 and made a reservation on October 1.

Apartment? Check. Now there was the little matter of a job.

========

My host - a college friend - had parents who ran a mission in the inner city of Minneapolis. Among their goals was to get the pr0n industry out of the inner city.

Mildly libertarian as I was, I had a qualm or two about the goal of forcing legal businesses out of town, and the infringement on property rights - but I figured after a week and a half of squatting on the couch for free, I owed everyone some shoe leather.

Everyone was picketing the Rialto Theatre, an old theatre at the corner of Lake and Chicago that had long since gone to seed; it was an XXX theatre, along with peep shows and a bookstore.

Outside, my host's parents were joined by two dozen other people; I was one of about four males there, the only one under age 50, one of two taller than 5'10. One could say I stood out in the crowd.

I picked up a sign, and started pacing in the oval with the rest of the protesters, mostly older women. The traffic raced past on Lake; some people honked; others gave one figure salutes and taunts. Someone leaned out of one of the upstairs windows and dropped a water balloon - or at least I remember hoping it was water - which landed on the sidewalk between a couple of protesters, splattering several. However, having a 6'5 guy in a bandanna and a battle jacket was making the response a tad more polite than it usually was on a Friday night, some of the marchers told me.

Another sign that I was conspicuous? A reporter (who I later learned was Alan Costantini, long-time reporter at KARE11, which at the time was still WUSA11) crossed the street with a cameraman and a microphone. "Mind if we ask you a few questions?" So I did my first standup interview, there on Lake Street, looking a little goofy and disheveled in my Union Jack bandanna.

After Costantini left, I realized - "Crap! Networking opportunity lost!

As I mentally kicked myself, I heard a sonorous voice. "Excuse me, sir. I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions".

It was a shorter guy, with longer, non-TV hair. He carried a professional-grade cassette recorder - the kind only radio reporters and anthropologists carried.

"Sure", I replied. "But I have a question for you, first. I'm just down from North Dakota, and I need a job, and I've worked in radio, and I was wondering if you could take me to your leader?"

The guy's eyes widened. "North Dakota? Where?"

"Jamestown".

"Ah. I'm from Casselton", a little town 15 miles west of Fargo.

He introduced himself as Tom Myhre, and we did an interview. I must have done a good job; at the end, he snapped off the cassette and handed me a business card. "I'll tell my executive producer, Bruce Huff, about you. Call him on Monday, OK?" I wrote the name on the card as Tom went back to his car.

I finished out the protest, and we adjourned to someone's house for pizza and pop and the 10PM news, where I got to watch my weird-looking mug try to equivocate about property rights and the neighborhood's right to deal with nuisances.

And I nearly wore the card out, checking and re-checking it, memorizing the phone numbers and names and addresses.

And before I went to bed that night, I took out my old portable typewriter and re-wrote a resume that read less like a 1930's perfume ad and more like a radio guy. I was ready for Monday.

Posted by Mitch at 04:15 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 24, 2005

Quote Of The Day

In re the vote fraud scandal in Milwaukee, Learned Foot from KAR has this:

"If you don't have evidence, you don't have fraud," said Colon.
Foot responds:
Got that? It's only wrong if you get caught.
So let's recap this past two weeks:
  • Empty, content-free indictments that will be trashed by the first impartial judge that gets a chance to rule on them (read: Delay): cause for endless bloviating celebration on the left.
  • Trucks full of evidence - but no indictment? "Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia, Winston".

Posted by Mitch at 07:13 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Above The Rules?

The far left has decided that November 2 is a national Moonbat holiday.

Not only that, they've decided to make it a school holiday, too.

Someone at Protest Warrior sent me a heads-up; the Minneapolis Left has broken into Grampa's liquor cabinet again.

This is from an email sent to local pro-Dictatorship groups:

Urgent solidarity needed! [I love that - "Urgent Solidarity". What's the next level down - "Laconic Solidarity?" - Ed.]

Students are being threatened with failing classes for walking out on November 2nd

*** Help mobilize our defense! ***

As of October 19th, nearly 1,000 high school students across the Twin Cities had signed the "November 2nd Walkout Pledge," and we expect that number of grow substantially in the remaining 12 days before November 2nd. This tremendous response to Youth Against War and Racism's call to action has taken place in the face of threats to fail students who miss tests that day.

Wow - a thousand high school kids signed a pledge to...get out of school for a day?

Wow! This must be serious!

By an unfortunate coincidence, many Twin Cities schools scheduled a finals day on November 2nd, the anniversary of Bush's "reelection" [A "re-election that, ironically, happened on the same day as his re-election! - Ed] and the day chosen for nationally coordinated student walkouts against the war and military recruitment in schools. But other students who miss class that day for reasons school administrators deem legitimate will not be fail their classes. They will get to take a make-up final.
Right. Because skipping school to go to a bogus political rally is not a legitimate reason.
Is it too much to ask that anti-war students who choose to participate in this justified act of protest, who are taking action to secure a decent future for our generation, also be given make-up tests?
No, the students who are demonstrating to return Iraqi and Afghan children their age to the Sixth Century would be asking a bit much for this sort of special treatment.

Seriously. If an NRA convention or pro-war rally comes to town, and I tried to take my kids out of school, I'd have some 'splainin' to do, and they'd be on the butt end of some consequences.

But I'll tell you what; I'd almost be willing to support these 1,000 little morons' day off, if they can pass a simple little quiz;

  1. Find Afghanistan or Iraq on a map (2 points).
  2. Name the ousted rulers of both countries (2 points).
  3. Describe, in 100 words or less, what "Halabja" means (5 points).
  4. The United States took four justifications for invading Iraq to the United Nations. Name them (4 points).
  5. How many commercial airliners were turned into cruise missiles on September 11, and name their targets (5 points).
  6. On what day and year did "September 11" happen? (2 points)
. Get over 70% (14 points) right? Off to the protest you go!

I suspect that'll whittle the field among the petitioners down to two digits.

We feel confident that, with enough community pressure, we can convince school districts across the Twin Cities to provide make-up tests for the hundreds or thousands of students who participate in this walkout. Here is the plan and several ways that you can help:

1. Press Conference and Protest

Tuesday, Oct. 25, 5:00 PM

807 Broadway St NE, Minneapolis

Protest Warrior notes that they'll be there, too. If you're a like-minded person, meet them (and someone from PW, feel free to leave details in the comment space!).
Outside the Minneapolis School Board meeting, students will stand beside parents, community leaders, and elected officials to demand an end to military recruitment in our schools and to demand school districts across the Twin Cities do not punish or fail student who participate in the walkout. We will be announcing the thousands of signatures we have received on petitions to kick military recruiters our of our schools.
Y'know, I wonder what'd happen if a high school's Young Republicans tried to gather signatures...
On the day after our press conference, we are asking community supporters across the Twin Cities to call the District Superintendents of several area school districts, to urge them to allow students who choose to walkout against war and military recruitment on November 2nd be allowed to take make-up tests.
Note to the Saint Paul Public Schools - controlled as you are by the Volvo-driving, alpaca-wearing, perpetually-indignant Highland Park set, I suspect the idea must be crossing one or another of your "minds". Do us all a favor. Don't.
3. Help distribute NEW walkout leaflets in high schools!

Thousands of Twin Cities students have heard about the walkout and want to participate, but are understandably scared they will be punished and failed. [Let's hope so! Ed] We need to let these students know that we have their backs! We need to let them know that they will NOT be left defenseless if they choose to walkout, and that we are already mobilizing to defend them. We are producing tens of thousands of new leaflets explaining all this, and we need your help to pass them out. [Note to moonbats; please, please hand me one. Oh, I pray, get me one.]

4. Be ready, after November 2nd, to defend students facing repression

We hope that all our efforts leading up to the walkout will be adequate to convince school administrators that it is in their own best interests to avoid punishing or failing students who choose to walkout on November 2. However, we have to be prepared act immediately and decisively to defend any youth activist facing persecution. Please be ready.

So you'll "convince" them it's in their "best interests", huh?

That sounds interesting.

Stay tuned.

Posted by Mitch at 12:55 PM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

The Perversion That Dare Not Speak Its Name

Let's call this straight; of everyone involved in "Das Booty", the Vikings' Sex Cruise of a few weeks back, it's the bar staff - the waitresses and bartenders who were working in the bar, below decks, where most of the debauchery was taking place - whose voices have the greatest danger of being squashed between those of the Vikings, Al and Alma's boat company, and the politicians and lawyers involved on all sides.

At least until the facts start coming out, and every plaintiff's bar lawyer in America calls up with a contingency offer.

Let me say this: If a Viking - or anyone - were to harass my daughter the way the Viking apparently did with the twenty-something women working on those cruise boats, a lawsuit would only the the last of their problems.

As it should be.

Let me also make it known that while I generally think Nick Coleman is among th worst columnists working in America today, he has his occasional good moment.

And with material like this to work with:

"Her life has been totally disrupted by the stupidity and thoughtlessness of the Vikings. She told me she has dreams about it every night, and that she can't stand it."
...even a puff-merchant like Brian Lambert could could across like Jack Anderson.

But Nick just can't make it to the end of his most recent column on the subject without letting his faux-populist roots show.

This is the sort of story that a "community columnist" is supposed to knock through the uprights, as it were, especially a columnist whose claimed goal is to "afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted". And Coleman even gets most of it right. Read the column. You be the judge.

"My daughter saw it all, but she has been told not to talk and she won't even answer my questions anymore," Emily says. "One guy offered her $100 to 'dance' for him. If this was in a restaurant, she could have run away, and she would have. But on a boat, you're trapped.

"She wants to get over it, but she isn't getting over it. She sees this when she closes her eyes at night. It's not like I can say, 'It's OK, Honey. I went through this when I was your age, and you'll endure.' I have never been to an orgy when I didn't want to be there."

Emily laughed at that point, clarifying for me that she has never been to an orgy, voluntarily or otherwise.

Compelling stuff.

And then...:

When millionaires behave badly, the innocent often end up slimed.
Huh?

So we're blaming "millionaires"? Buncombe; if you put the managing partners at an accounting or law firm on a boat, the odds of an orgy breaking out would be somewhere down below James Lileks' chances of posting up Allen Iverson. And if you put the board of directors of, say, Minnesota Public Radio or the regents of the University of Minnesota in a limo (does Volvo make a stretch limo?) with a case of champagne, do you supposed they'd pull over and whiz in someone's azaleas on their way to a party?

This isn't about "millionaires"; there's no "millionaire culture" that prompts people with seven digits in their bank account to act like slime.

No. This is about the dual loopdielands of our nation's predominant urban culture, and the culture of the professional athlete, as they mix and splatter on the innocent bystander.

Professional athletes are all too often sidetracked at an early age (early teens, sometimes earlier) where expectations and consequences are grossly warped, compared to those that most of us live with; many coast through high school and "college" scarcely cracking a book, never holding a real job, never having to learn to show up for work or class on time (or suffering consequences for it); they're treated as exceptional long before they're mature enough to handle it.

As to the dominant urban culture - well, there's nothing that happened on Das Booty that you can't see over and over with a one-hour swerve onto MTV or BET (only the women in the videos are paid to bump and grind on cue; they do it for a living). The ultimate value system of the dominant urban culture - whether in South Minneapolis or at Lakeville High School - is "Life Ain't Nothin' but Benzos and Hos. The culture glorifies excess, violence, and a consequence-free life. It denigrates work (except for athletes), learning, intelligence (beyond the animalistic "street" level) and ethics.

At the downmarket end of the scale, the two cultures' clash has led to illegitimate births in most major cities; to unemployable punks gathering in gangs and turning much of Minneapolis into a free-fire zone; to a subculture that is working overtime to disassimilate itself from the ethical, moral and intellectual life of this nation.

At the upmarket end? Professional athletes devoid of ethics, of any moral guide outside their own desires, spoiled rotten from adolescence, who believe the world revolves around them (and those are the one in ten thousand that are talented enough to make it to the bigs; the tens of thousands left behind at college, high school and the playground with no social or job skills; they're not partying on Lake Minnetonka).

When will someone in the local media have the nerve to call it straight? It's not the money that causes the problem; it's the view of the world.

I hope the subjects of Coleman's piece are in court, soon, on the plaintiff's side of the room, with a firm grip on the parts of the Vikings involved that cause the problem in the first place.

I'm talking, of course, about their stunted sense of ethics, right and wrong, and morality, of course.

Posted by Mitch at 12:38 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Pay No Attention To The Code Behind The Curtain

The war against drunk driving long since slipped the surly bonds of reason, and became a holy quest; to the supporters of groups like MADD, like supporters of any holy war, no excess is too excessive, no atrocity is too over-the-edge.

We've talked about the idiotic - and expensive - efforts to lower the Blood Alcohol Content level from .1 to .08, which serve only to criminalize social drinking, since the vast majority of accidents involve drivers whose BAC is well over .1.

But we've spent less time on the enforcement side. Fact is, DUI is a cash cow for county government, raising jillions of dollars in fines, fees and forfeited property, and requiring the extra manpower that is manna from heaven for empire-building local bureaucrats. Wog has documented many of the excesses of the law enforcement system in the chronicle of his last 18 months or so.

Of course - we can trust law enforcement to at least supply valid data - things like blood alcohol content measurements from field tests. Right?

Kathy from Cake Eater Chronicles has a story that might make you wonder.

Like virtually any electronic device, breathalyzers are controlled by internal software - usually low-level, flash-card code (although usually compiled down from higher level code, rather than the "assembly" code of the old days, although real geeks might question the difference between assembler and C++, at which point I tell them to go talk amongst themselves in Klingon).

And goodness only knows what secrets that code holds:

A Florida court will hear arguments on Friday in a case where the accuracy of a breathalyser is being scrutinised because the manufacturer has refused to release the source code.

Lawyers representing more than 150 defendants who have been charged for driving under the influence of alcohol in two Florida counties will file the request.

They argue that they have a right to see the source code of the alcohol breath analyser that was used to determine their clients' guilt.

"None of the [software] programs that was used here is approved," said Robert Harrison, a lawyer representing some of the defendants.

"The question is whether the difference [between these programs] is material or not. Without seeing the source code, we do not know."

Cathy notes:

Police have been modifying breathalyzers (read jerryrigging) for years and the evidence from said modified breathalyzers has still been admitted into court. It's about time someone took issue with the breathalyzers themselves---and their source code. Even if this examination proves there is nothing wrong with the way the breathalyzers work, the overall point is important---that the defendant has the right to examine "its accuser" in court. Even if its accuser is a machine. Because it's important to remind the courts that those accused of DWI are actually, you know, protected by the Constitution, even though they'd like to think otherwise.
Unfortunately, the confluence of Holy Antialcohol Warriors and rapacious bureaucrats - with the probably-unwitting connivance of a media will never expose the seamy underbelly of the war against drunk driving - have no time for impediments like "rights".

Things I Detest Almost Beyond Reason

  • Ed, Edd and Eddie - There have been many cartoons that have gone beyond "I don't get it", and swerved into actively pissing me off; Cat/Dog, Cow and Chicken, Tom Meets The Mayor, The Oblongs all irritate me to one degree or another. I never liked Ren and Stimpy, and even Spongebob Squarepants' endless repetition starts sanding my nerve endings to a raw pulp after a few minutes. But Ed, Edd and Eddie is the worst cartoon on the air today, or maybe ever; it combines artistic ineptitude (it looks like it's drawn by people with crayons taped to their noses), the most grating voice-overs in history (I could describe the irritating traits, but then I'd just get angry, and worse, it might tempt some of you to watch, which would defeat my goal), and writing that - how to describe it? - is desperately unfunny. Wanna get me to talk? Stick me in a room with this garbage on a permanent loop.
  • "Babe", by Styx - The rule, of course, when grading music by Styx - the seventies arena pomp-rock warhorse - is this: If it's sung by Dennis DeYoung - the singer with the high, whiny voice who sang "Come Sail Away", "Babe" and "Mr. Roboto", as opposed to Tommy "Blue Collar Man" Shaw or John James "Miss America" Young - dock a grade point. If it's written by Dennis DeYoung, dock another. If Dennis DeYoung plays both the Fender Rhodes Piano and the foofy synthesizer in the song, dock another grade point. If Dennis DeYoung sings about the rigors of life on the road as a huge rock star, dock another. If Dennis DeYoung's song involves science fiction (starships, robots) or deep openings of the heart, dock yet another. By my count, then, "Babe" starts with a solid "F", even before we start taking apart the oozy-sappy lyircs, gloppy harmonies and just general awfulness. It was as if all the poison of the worst of seventies pop-art-rock came gushing out in a huge, collective spasm of cultural vomiting, leaving a bucket of "Babe". This song is associated with most of the worst memories from my senior year of high school
  • Those EHarmony ads.
  • Expending much energy describing my irritation with a musician - and then hearing a song I not just like, but genuinely love. I have never been able to stand much of John Mayer's oeuvre - but I heard a song of his on the radio the other day that was just stunningly good. I have no idea what it was. Argh!
  • People for whom it's not enough to plaster a car with moronic bumper stickers; they have to create foot-tall messages out of colored tape that cover entire trunks or side panels.
  • The all-purpose use of the word "dude".
That'll do for now.

UPDATE: James Young, not John Young. Side note: How pathetic is it that I don't remember my daughter's social security number - but I can remember the names of all five original members of Styx? I said original, mind you, fully aware that Tommy Shaw didn't replace Chuck Curulewski until 1976.

I need coffee.

Posted by Mitch at 06:06 AM | Comments (22) | TrackBack

October 22, 2005

What Did They Do To Deserve This?

According to the fine journalists at North Korea Times, the US talk radio industry is helping train new Iraqi talk show hosts.

Several leading names in U.S. talk radio are helping hone the skills of women working in Iraq's emerging radio industry.
And who are those "leading names"?
Air America's Laura Flanders,
Huh?

[Scraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatch]

Laura Flanders? What on earth is she going ot teach them?

"Right. Open the awnvelope from Medier MAHttahs, read the pahts that ah highlighted for you..."

Monica Crowley of WABC and MSNBC
Well, now we're talking, anyway...

Posted by Mitch at 09:26 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

The Whole Damn System's Out Of Order

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's got a blog.

Courtesy of her pal Algore...

Posted by Mitch at 08:57 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

October 21, 2005

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part XIII

Monday, October 21 1985. Beginning my second week in the Twin Cities.

It was starting to dawn on me that the city wasn't necessarily going to carry me in on its shoulders.

9AM job interview in Edina. It was another "group interview", this time for a gig selling Encyclopedia Brittanica, door to door through the suburbs. I went because I figured I should - any kind of job interview was better than nothing, and it's all good practice. Right?

I sat for two hours, listening to the ins and outs of the job, and finally figured "Even I'm not this desperate". I left without accepting a position.

I had a few hours to kill before my next appointment, to check out a "roommate wanted" ad over by Powderhorn Park, in south Minneapolis. I found my way in to Uptown Minneapolis, and killed an hour at the old Odegaard's books, at the new Calhoun Square. In a state full of Waldenbooks and B. Daltons, I'd never imagined such a thing - a big, huge store where you could browse, read, sit! I dragged myself away and chugged slowly down the decaying morass of West Lake Street, getting to the appointment just in time.

The ad said they were looking for a Christian guy, to pay 1/4 of the rent for a room in an upstairs duplex just off Powderhorn Park, a pretty little urban park surrounding a curious little lake, right in the middle of a neighborhood that was well on its way toward becoming one of Minneapolis' biggest, nastiest crack dens. I didn't know this at the time.

I rang the doorbell, and the guy - six-footish, late twenties, wearing a full beard and mustache, answered. He showed me around the place - kitchen privileges, one bathroom, smallish but cozy bedroom, not much storage (not that it mattered to me), $175 a month, heat included. "Nice", I said. "I'm interested!".

"Well, we gotta talk first. Let's go take a drive".

Unusual.

We walked out to his Chevette, climbed in, and took a turn around the neighborhood. "So - where are you at with your faith".

"Um..." - Huh?

Now, bear with me a bit, here. I'm pretty articulate about a lot of things. Religious faith is not one of them. I certainly have a lot of it, but expressing it is one of those things I pay ministers to do in church.

"What do you mean?" I asked.

Wrong question.

"Look, me and my roommates are charismatic Catholics. We need to make sure you're in kind of the same place on your religious journey as we are. So - have you ever had a charismatic experience?"

"Well, I haven't - but then, I've never seen anything that says one needs to, to be a Christian".

"But you do!", he said, emphatically.

"But what about...", I started, quoting a verse from Corinthians that says, in about as many words, that each of us is called to faith with different gifts; speaking in tongues is one of many; mine was...

"Look, I'm just covering my ass here", he said, turning back up the street to the duplex.

Wasn't aware there was a biblical injunction to cover your ass, I thought, and have wished for twenty years that I'd said.

I am pretty sure I shook my head visibly as I took my leave and walked to the car. I'd imagine he did the same.

Then it was back to Burnsville for more job hunting. It was looking like it was going to be along, dry autumn.

Posted by Mitch at 06:33 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

If In New York...

...anytime in the four or five weeks after November 12, make sure you check out Sheila O'Malley's new play.

At $19 a ticket, it's gotta be the best entertainment value available for a night in NYC (that doesn't involve throwing things at people). And it'd be great if the play got extended from overwhelming demand, ifyaknowwhatI'msaying...

Posted by Mitch at 12:56 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Top 12 Reasons I Read "Nihilist In Golf Pants" So Rarely

"Twelve is one more than eleven".
-- Nigel Tufnel. I think.

12. Sisyphus' name has too many vowels. If his name only had fewer of the accursed vowels...

11. Who do they think they are - the Fraters' B-squad?

10. Because Miami Steve would kick Ronnie James Dio's ass.

9. Because Mr. Nihilist works for a big, evil corporation.

8. Because beating them at Keegans' Trivia Night isn't nearly big enough a thrill anymore.

7. Hell - Patti Scialfa would kick Ronnie James Dio's ass.

6. Because he's not actually a Nihilist. Although he does wear golf pants (when he wears pants). Half is not good enough.

5. I'm too busy waiting for Michele Bachmann to come out against pro sports team sex scandals; this only proves that heterosexual sex is the greatest danger facing our society. What is this world coming to?

4. Nihilist is a blasphemer. [Aretha on] "Don't you be blasphemin'!" [/Aretha off]. (Note to "JB": Aretha Franklin is known as the "Queen of Soul". You're a country fan, so you might mistake her for Snoop Dogg. Think of her as a black Wynonna Judd that you can dance to)

3. NIGP lacks the measured, Buckleyesque meter of Tom Swift's Friday Funnies (NSFW).

2. "Fuzzy Niestche" is a clumsy attempt to slur the blessed memory of the '65 Packers, with Fuzzy Thurston and Ray Nitschke. Have these people no shame?

and the Number One reason I read "Nihilist In Golf Pants" so rarely:

1. I'm usually too busy reading Powerline.

Oh, I'm lying. Read Nihilist in Golf Pants daily. What they lack in musical knowledge (or indeed, music literacy or comprehension) they make up for in...uh...spunk.

Posted by Mitch at 12:49 PM | Comments (13) | TrackBack

A Pattern

Which of the following doesn't belong?

  1. A friend and political associate of Mike Hatch - a county attorney in southern Minnesota - files charges against former MNGOP chair Ron Eibensteiner based on a "scandal" in which Hatch himself would seem to have had a rather prominent role.
  2. Former US Attorney and perennial DFL Senate hopeful David Lillehaug, acting as a figurehead for a group of well-heeled, left-leaning suburban megachurches, files a suit against the Minnesota Personal Protection Act with a DFL-leaning pet judge in Saint Paul, resulting in a ludicrous ruling that stymied the will of the people's elected representatives for nearly a year.
  3. A strongly Democrat-leaning county attorney in Texas files a nearly content-free indictment against - in theory - Tom Delay, not coincidentally resulting in one of the most effective GOP congressional leaders losing his leadership position because of GOP rules.
Answer: None of them. They're all the same; Democrats using the courts to end-run petty impedimenta like elections.

Let me head off the first, specious but inevitable response; if it were Republicans abusing the legal system for purely political means the way the Democrats are today, yes. Yes, I would be upset, and I'd be telling my party so, and exactly why. Just as I am about their abuse of spending, today.

That the Dems are using the courts to end-run the electoral process is nothing new; FDR was famous for it. That they're using it to harass Republican leaders - well, buckle up, everyone. It's going to be an ugly year.

Posted by Mitch at 12:31 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

TPaw Endorses Jeff Johnson

Governor Pawlenty has endorsed Representative Jeff Johnson for next year's Attorney General race.

“Jeff Johnson will make an excellent attorney general for Minnesota,” Pawlenty said. “I worked closely with Jeff in the House and have seen the quality of his work and his character. I know the Attorney General’s Office under his leadership will be focused on the protection and betterment of Minnesotans, not on politics. I’m proud to say that Jeff is also a personal friend and I’m proud to announce today that I am an enthusiastic supporter of his campaign for attorney general.”
As am I. After eight years of Mike Hatch's grandstanding and partisan sniping (of which more in an upcoming post), it'll be good to have someone in the AGO who wants to actually go after criminals, as opposed to feather his cronies' nests.

While nobody cares about my endorsement - and justifiably so - I'm going to agree with the governor; I firmly support Jeff Johnson for Attorney General, and I urge every Minnesota Republican - and every non-Republican who cares about ethics and the proper role of government - to do the same.

The thought of Matt Entenza as AG for the State of Minnesota should make your blood run cold.

Full press release below the fold.

The entire news release:

With the 2006 election just over a year away, Governor Tim Pawlenty today officially endorsed state Representative Jeff Johnson, R-Plymouth, for Minnesota attorney general.

“Jeff Johnson will make an excellent attorney general for Minnesota,” Pawlenty said. “I worked closely with Jeff in the House and have seen the quality of his work and his character. I know the Attorney General’s Office under his leadership will be focused on the protection and betterment of Minnesotans, not on politics. I’m proud to say that Jeff is also a personal friend and I’m proud to announce today that I am an enthusiastic supporter of his campaign for attorney general.”

Pawlenty is the latest Minnesota Republican leader to publicly endorse Johnson’s campaign, which he launched in February. Johnson also has the backing of:

  • Ninety of the state’s 97 Republican legislators, including House Speaker Steve Sviggum, House Majority Leader Erik Paulsen and Senate Minority Leader Dick Day.
  • The last four Minnesota Republican Party chairmen: Ron Ebensteiner, Bill Cooper, Chris Georgacas and Bob Weinholzer.
  • Republican Party of Minnesota National Committeeman Brian Sullivan, who is serving as co-chair of the Johnson for Attorney General Finance Committee.
  • Republican Party of Minnesota National Committeewoman Evie Axdahl.
  • The last three Republican-endorsed candidates for Minnesota attorney general: Tom Kelly, Charlie Weaver and state Senator Tom Neuville, along with the last elected Republican Minnesota attorney general, Douglas Head.
  • Congressman Jim Ramstad.
  • Former Minnesota Governor Al Quie, the honorary chairman of Johnson’s campaign.
  • Hundreds of Republican activists and party leaders throughout the state of Minnesota.
“I am honored to have Governor Pawlenty’s support,” Johnson said. “I share his values, admire him as a leader and person and look forward to campaigning with him.”

Johnson, 38, serving in his third term in the Minnesota House, is an assistant majority leader and chairman of the Civil Law & Elections Committee. Outside of the Capitol, Johnson is a small business owner and a private-practice attorney, specializing in employment law. He lives in Plymouth with his wife, Sondi, and their two sons.

Kick ass, Jeff.

Posted by Mitch at 12:11 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

October 20, 2005

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part XII

Unspoken - to most people - among my motivations for moving to the Twin Cities was a craving to get into the Twin Cities music scene. Whatever it was.

Sunday, October 20, I drove downtown to try to find it.

In '84 and '85, Minneapolis' musical output was peaking. For white-boy punks like me, the likes of the Replacements and Hüsker Dü were breaking out of the regional ghetto, even getting on the national charts.

And then, there was Purple Rain. To a guy who was used to playing in high school gyms and divey bars, the "First Avenue" in Purple Rain - Prince's one good movie, and it was a great one - was irresistable; a kaleidoscope of colors, styles, attitudes; people break dancing in the balconies!; a stage with actual lights and a sound system that sounded like it worked; Apollonia running out of a cab and straight into your gig!. Even the seamy, seedy underbelly of Minneapolis music looked good. Jeebus, I was so looking forward to being in a music scene with a seamy underbelly! At gigs in North Dakota, the seamy underbelly was someone selling angel dust in the parking lot.

I went downtown that night; I had to make it an early one, because I had a 9AM job interview the next morning. but I had to get to the First Avenue and see what the fuss was all about!

Eyes darting between the road and the map, I found my way downtown. I took the first parking spot I could find - it was on Eighth Street over by the Normandie Inn, probably a mile from the First Avenue, but I didn't want to take any chances. I parked, plugged the meter (it was at the end of the evening that I read the meter and noticed that they were not enforced on Sundays, to a dollar's worth of chagrin), and started walking.

First stop - Northern Lights records, on Hennepin and Seventh. I walked inside and took my first deep drag of the gloriously skanky, funky miasma of a big-city underground record store. Heaven!

I browsed the aisles, seeing vinyl wonders that never made it west of Saint Cloud; Throbbing Gristle! Black Flag! Pigbag! Pure farging heaven!

There was a bulletin board in the back, crammed with posters for bands looking for people, people looking for bands, bands looking for gigs; I tore off a couple of phone numbers, carefully put them in my wallet, and killed a couple of hours in dank, skeezy style.

Finally, it was closing time. I bought a copy of the new Replacements album (Tim, still one of my favorites, partly because of its association with this whole time, mostly because it's just a freaking great record), walked out and turned down Seventh.

And then I saw the sign - the same big, black edifice from the movie, the "First Avenue and Seventh Street Entry".

It was a Sunday night; I don't think any bands were playing in the Entry; the Main Room had a DJ playing music and vids (I remember some Sonic Youth song, although not the name - not that it makes a lot of difference - and the vid for the Replacements' "Bastards of Young"). Nobody was on the floor. The balcony had a couple of tables full of people, drinking and smoking and talking. Not a break dancer to be seen.

I walked through the door, around the edge of the huge dance floor, past a couple of pinball machines, and the little pizza bar that used to be just off stage left, on the ratty, dark carpet, past innumerable sparsely-populated stools. I looked around the joint - at the dingy rafters, the large but oppressively flat-black stage, the tile floor and the ratty risers. And I thought...

..."It's just a bar".

Just a big, dark, dirty, smoky bar!

I laughed. What did I expect, Graceland? I certainly should have known better than to expect Apollonia, break dancers; I was less crestfallen than mentally kicking myself for falling for a movie image.

I kicked myself a few more times, ordered a beer, and plotted my band's first gig on the mainroom stage. And how I was going to put that band together.

After I got a job, of course.

Posted by Mitch at 12:33 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Yet Again...

...I did not win the Powerball. Of course, I never buy tickets - but more about that in a bit.

I've at least managed to avoid scenes like this:

I'm one of those eleventh-hour buyers, I only buy when the pot is just silly huge and the real reason is I just don't like being left out, but once I have my ticket I'm so sure I'm gonna win. I even told Molly I'd buy her a pony. What was I thinking?? The first thing she said when she wandered out of bed this morning was "Did you win? Can I have a pony?"

"No, Mol, we didn't win..."

What she heard: "I don't love you."

Ugh. No good.

Of course, I never buy Powerball tickets. I tell everyone that I'm even for life; when the scratchoff games first came out (I think it was in 1990) I bought four; all of 'em busted. The fifth ticket I bought was a $5 winner. I figured "I'm going to retire at break-even, which is better than 99.9996% of lottery players do". And I have stuck by that for the past fifteen years.

With one exception.

Back when I first got married, my family - my eventual-ex-wife, my stepson, daughter Bun in 1991 and son Zam in 1993 - were poor.

"How poor were you?"

My ex and I made $18,000 in 1991. Together. I donated plasma to buy diapers and groceries, twice a week for the better part of a couple of years. And even with that, we fell behind; the monthly tapdance with the landlord never got any easier, the NSP bill never got any lower...

One Tuesday afternoon in the summer of 1992, I was standing at a SuperAmerica on Snelling Avenue. I was buying $5 in gas. I had $7 to last until my next Plasma Hut run (which I couldn't do until the next day). My next paycheck at the worst temp job ever (#2 in the linked piece) was four days away.

As I was waiting to pay for my gas, a clear, crisp voice in my head said "Buy a Lotto Ticket!".

Huh?, I thought.

"Buy a Lotto Ticket".

Now, I believe in miracles. I've actually experienced one (and will write about it someday). I figured - hey, stranger things have happened.

So I plunked down a buck from my tiny stash for a Lotto ticket.

It busted, of course.

That crisp voice must have meant to buy a Gopher Five.

Posted by Mitch at 12:10 PM | Comments (14) | TrackBack

Fearless Predictions

  1. The indictments against Tom Delay will get thrown out of court faster than Colin Farrell getting tossed from a Young Life meeting.
  2. The tossing of the indictments will make page C-24 of the NYTimes and the WaPo.
  3. Patrick Fitzgerald's got nothing on anyone inside at the White House. Oh, he's going to toss around some indictments, but nobody at the White House is going to be even close to trouble.
  4. Joe Wilson will host a reality TV show in 2006; Valerie Plame will be a regular bit player, with one of those thin rectangles over her eyes.
  5. By this time next year, there will be a pullout from Iraq. By the media. There "won't be a story" there anymore; while there'll be a low-level insurgency, it will neither pose a credible threat of civil war nor of toppling the Iraqi government. The Iraqi economy will have passed out of "Dead Cat" territory, and even most of the Sunni will have turned on the terrorists. And that, of course, won't be a story.
Just hunches.

UPDATE: Colin Farrell, not Colin Firth. Farrell, Firth, whatever. It's not like either of them gets my name right...

Posted by Mitch at 06:56 AM | Comments (47) | TrackBack

October 19, 2005

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part XI

On October 19, 1985, I was wrapping up my first partial week in the Twin Cities, after moving here on Tuesday the 15th.

It had been a long, long week.

  • After spending Wednesday trolling through want ads for both roommates and jobs, I had a couple of bites. Thursday was a big day!
  • You should be getting the impression by this point in the series that I was pretty much straight off the turnip truck. At no time was this more evident than my first Thursday in the Twins, the 18th. I had to get from Burnsville, in the far south 'burbs of Minneapolis, to the northeast end of Roseville, a north suburb of Saint Paul. And I had to be there by 8AM. I maneuvered out onto Cedar Avenue, and drove north to 494...
  • ...and instantly felt like Jed Clampett going out on the 405 for the first time. People were barrelling along at 70 miles per hour, practically bumper to bumper (by my bucolic rural experience); I hit my target heart rate by the time I got to Portland Avenue, then doubled it...

  • ...just in time to run smack into my first traffic jam. Almost literally I was trying to find a place to merge into the center lane, and turned my head to see a river of red brake lights around Diamond Lake Road. I had to slam on my brakes and shimmy into the breakdown lane, probably two feet behind the car in front of me. I broke into a cold sweat.
  • I'd left plenty of time to get to Roseville, though - which is a good thing, because my habit of always, always getting lost in the 'burbs, which had started on Tuesday, was already firmly established. Oh, I got to Highway 36 and made the turn toward east Roseville just fine - but I didn't notice until I was even with the lane that "Rice Street" was the same as the highway number I was looking for. I had to cloverleaf around...
  • ...and come back to my first "group interview". It was with a financial services company, for an all-commission telephone sales job. Even right off the turnip truck, the job screemed "scam" to me, and the "interviewer" (an early-thirtysomething who fairly screamed "snake oil" - let's call him "Mr. Oily") seemed like a used-car salesman who'd just gotten paroled for fraud. There were 24 of us in the room. At the end of a 45 minute presentation about the company, Mr. Oily asked everyone to write down a number between 1 and 10, with 10 being very interested in the company and 1 being not so much. I hedged on the number. "Everyone who wrote a six or less, you're free to go", he said with an air of almost spiteful finality. About half of the room got up, seemed confused, and walked out the door past Mr. Oily's almost-angry glare. "Now, for the rest of you...", he continued, and talked for another hour about the gig. I figured I'd have written a "3" before, but my curiosity got the better of me - and what little common sense I had at that time of my life drove the number down to a negative 10. I slipped out of the building during a break, feeling vaguely guilty about walking away from a potential job.
  • I next drove to an appointment with someone in the "Roommates" column in the Strib. It was for a house on 33rd and Colfax, deep in the heart of what later became Minneapolis' crack alley. On the way there, I noticed that it was just south of "Little Tin Soldier". Now, for those of us who grew up playing Avalon Hill wargames in North Dakota, "Tin Soldier" was legendary; a store that sold games, and actually had tables where you could find other people to play the games with!. Jeeeeeeez. How perfect! I made a mental note to return after I saw the place...
  • ...to which I got, right on time. It was a nice place, a four-bedroom house with three other twenty-something guys. I thought it was perfect - but they seemed to grow disinterested when I told 'em I didn't have a job yet. Mental note to self...
  • ...and then, off to Tin Soldier, where I killed a happy couple of hours, in hog heaven, awash in military history books, games, miniatures - I felt like a kid in candyland. Friday morning - a day of job hunting and phone calls. I landed another interview for Monday!
It was Friday night. I think I made spaghetti for my host, just about the only thing I knew how to cook (besides bitchin' grilled cheese). The week was over; no more job hunting until the Sunday Strib came out.

It was time for a weekend in the Cities!

Posted by Mitch at 12:32 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Skol!

Norway's Crown Prince, Haakon, visits the Twin Cities today:

Minnesotans will get a chance to cast their eyes on His Royal Highness Crown Prince Haakon during his two-day visit to the state today and Thursday.

The prince's trip here — his only official visit to the United States this year — is a part of Norway's centennial, which commemorates the country's peaceful break with Sweden 100 years ago.

Peaceful break?

Crap. That's gonna leave a mark on my lucrative side business selling Norwegian Revolutionary War memorabilia on Ebay.

Posted by Mitch at 07:52 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

Carlin?

I haven't liked George Carlin in decades. Coincidentally, he hasn't been funny in decades.

So when a friend sent me this bit - George Carlin on New Orleans - I thought "Cool! The dyspeptic old misanthrope is finally pulling his head out!:

Been sitting here with my ass in a wad, wanting to speak out about
the bullshit going on in New Orleans. For the people of New
Orleans... First we would like to say, Sorry for your loss. With that
said, Let's go through a few hurricane rules: (Unlike an earthquake,
we know it's coming)

#1. A mandatory evacuation means just that...Get the hell out.
Don't blame the Government after they tell you to go. If they hadn't
said anything, I can see the argument. They said get out... if you
didn't, it's your fault, not theirs. (We don't want to hear it, even
if you don't have a car,
you can get out.)

#2. If there is an emergency, stock up on water and non-perishables.
If you didn't do this, it's not the Government's fault you're
starving.

#2a. If you run out of food and water, find a store that has some.
(Remember, shoes, TV's, DVD's and CD's are not edible. Leave them
alone.)

#2b. If the local store has been looted of food or water, leave your
neighbor's TV and stereo alone. (See #2a) They worked hard to get
their stuff.
Just because they were smart enough to leave during a mandatory
evacuation,
doesn't give you the right to take their stuff...it's theirs, not
yours.

#3. If someone comes in to help you, don't shoot at them and then
complain
no one is helping you. I'm not getting shot to help save some dumbass
who didn't leave when told to do so.

#4. If you are in your house that is completely under water, your
belongings are probably too far gone for anyone to want them. If
someone does want them, let them have them and hopefully they'll die
in the filth. Just leave! (It's New Orleans, find a voodoo warrior
and put a curse on them)

#5. My tax money should not pay to rebuild a 2 million dollar house,
a sports stadium or a floating casino. Also, my tax money shouldn't
go to rebuild a city that is under sea level. You wouldn't build
your house on quicksand would you? You want to live below sea-level,
do your country some good and join the Navy.

#6. Regardless of what the Poverty Pimps Jessie Jackson and Al
Sharpton want you to believe, The US Government didn't create the
Hurricane as a way to eradicate the black people of New Orleans;
(Neither did Russia as a way to destroy America). The US Government
didn't cause global warming that caused the hurricane (We've been
coming
out of an ice age for over a million years).

#7. The government isn't responsible for giving you anything. This
is the land of the free and the home of the brave, but you gotta work
for what you want. McDonalds and Wal-Mart are always hiring, get a
damn job and stop spooning off the people who are actually working
for a living. President Kennedy said it best..."Ask not what your
country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

Thank you for allowing me to rant.

I only wish it had been Carlin. In fact, on Carlin's website, he says:
Occasionally, a couple of jokes on a long list might have come from me, but not often. And because most of this stuff is really lame, it's embarrassing to see my name on it.

And that's the problem. I want people to know that I take care with my writing, and try to keep my standards high.

Oh, George. George.

I've seen you in recent years. If those are your high standards, maybe you should start trolling material off the 'net.

Bummer.

Posted by Mitch at 07:04 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Perfection Sought

Many of the people who suffered are still suffering form the vapors over the US' toppling a sovereign nation with an unelected, terror-supporting, genocide-committing government that every significant government in the world believed was building WMDs...

...are getting the vapors now that the judiciary of a sovereign, incipient democracy is about to try Saddam Hussein:

In a report issued two days ago, Human Rights Watch raised concerns that the tribunal is not being impartial and independent. "The first trials before the tribunal will be "a litmus test for whether it is up to the task of delivering justice," it stated.
Where was Human Rights Watch, anyway, when Hussein was gassing the Kurds?

Busy!

Hussein has a team of defense attorneys and half of the world waiting to pounce on any irregularities in the trial - which, by the way, occurs in a sovereign nation that has every right to its own judicial process (but by most accounts is trying to build a good one anyway).

Of course, the story is from the WaPo - which doesn't bother with things like judging dictators:

"How can Saddam get a fair trial when there's no government in Iraq? How can they try him?" Ismail Makki, a Shiite Muslim from the southern Iraqi city of Basra, asked as he hawked fruits and vegetables in Amman, in neighboring Jordan.

"There's no water, electricity, or security," he yelled. "If he stayed in power, it would be better for us."

There were Germans that missed Hitler, too...

Posted by Mitch at 06:43 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

October 18, 2005

Rationalization Smashed

Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Cisco are making deals with the devil - helping the Communist Chinese government extend its total control over the Internet, to prevent it from being used as a means to undermine its total control over Chinese society.

David Kopel is not amused:

Today, the Financial Times reports on a letter which a leading Chinese dissident, Liu Xiaobo, has sent to Yahoo. Having spent time in prison for speaking the truth about China's ruling Communist Party, Liu "says Yahoo has enough market clout not to need to toady to authorities." He explains the corporate-communist deal: coporations make profits at the expense of human rights; the communists are given Internet control, and new means to squelch dissent. Thus:

“The collusion of these two kinds of ugliness means that there is no way for western investment to promote freedom of speech in China, and that in fact it greatly increases the ability of the Communist party to blockade and control the internet,” he writes.

“You are helping the Communist party maintain an evil system of control over freedom of information and speech,” he writes.

Simply put, there appears to be no way to be an ethical Internet company in China today, just as there was no way to be an ethical supplier of spy equipment to the USSR or Nazi Germany.

It's fascinating, though, the way big-corporate PR has been putting a soft face on the PRC for the past decade.
Corporations are generally supposed to maximize their profits, but there is a point at which a particular form of profit maximization becomes unethical. It's ethical for companies to make barbed wire, but it's not ethical for the company to sell barbed wire to a regime which the company knows will use the barbed wire to build concentration camps.

The American Internet companies which do business in China are assisting the creation of the world's most sophisticated architecture of repression. No company should make profits at such a terrible cost to human rights. After American companies left, the Chinese tyrants would undoubtedly find other, inferior, foreign companies to provide Internet services and assist with the suppression of liberty. It would be better, though, if China's architecture of repression were built by inferior, less efficient companies, rather than by the best minds of the world's best computer companies.

If expelled from China, an ethical company could further assist human rights by setting up major offices in free Taiwan.

Until the State Department made their life a living hell...

Posted by Mitch at 06:39 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Pay No Attention To The Pettifogger Behind The Curtain

Suck it up, conservatives. If some pettifogging Democratic party machine whore is filing bogus indictments against you (purely to exploit your own party's ethics rules!), if a major network passes forged papers to smear you, if the media spends years and millions trying to make a scandal out of...nothing, it matters not. As long as we, the media, can gin up some appearance of impropriety against you, you just gotta grin and bear it.

That's what the Strib says to conservatives in today's editorial.

Writing in the Weekly Standard, William Kristol and Jeffrey Bell sound out the newest meme those on the right are using to explain the legal troubles of Rep. Tom DeLay, Sen. Bill Frist, presidential adviser Karl Rove, vice presidential adviser Lewis Libby and assorted others: It "is a reasonable bet," Kristol and Bell write, "that the fall of 2005 will be remembered as a time when it became clear that a comprehensive strategy of criminalization had been implemented to inflict defeat on conservatives who seek to govern as conservatives." The short form of this meme was tried out on the Sunday talk shows: We are witnessing the "criminalization of politics."
It didn't start Sunday.

Joe Farah at WorldNetDaily makes a credible case that the IRS specifically targeted conservative organizations during the '90s. Campaign Finance Reform laws essentially try to make a bureaucratic crime out of grass-roots political advertisements - and since two of the biggest contributors to the left's efforts, unions and the media, are granted broad loopholes to the laws, it's impossible to rationally argue that the laws aren't aimed at quashing conservative opinion. Of course, the chorus is growing on the left to re-instate the "Fairness Doctrine", which would gut conservative talk radio.

But other than that? No, no criminalization at all.

The message seems to be that all those who now find themselves in hot water really didn't do anything wrong, other than engage in rough-and-ready, and successful, conservative politics. The spin suggests what's really wrong is that Austin, Texas, prosecutor Ronnie Earle, Washington special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service and half a dozen other agencies investigating various activities are part of a "comprehensive strategy" to bring down these icons of the right.
Well, leave aside the Ronnie Earle's prosecution will be shown to be groundless
before long, and were brought purely so that lefty talking heads could titter "indictment!" on the Sunday Methanefests and the nightly news, one might wonder.
This new "criminalization" concept suggests the problems that brought this cast of conservative characters to the attention of investigators are really no big deal: revealing the name of an undercover CIA agent as part of a larger effort to sell a phony case for war in Iraq,
She wasn't undercover, and the case wasn't phony. But what's a couple of 180 degree deviations from reality among friends?
violating Texas' campaign finance laws;
Oddly, the indictments exhibit a bit of a paucity of actual mentions of alleged wrongdoing by DeLay...
trading in securities in such a way that suggests use of insider information.
Let's make an appointment, shall we, to revisit the Frist "scandal" this time next year?

Like all the alleged Bush administration scandals that have come and (pretty invariably) gone over the past five years, nobody will remember it. Count on it.

The accusations, however, are indeed serious and need full investigations; no one gets a pass from the law. No one also should be judged guilty before the legal process runs its course.
Of Course!

Because it's not the actual finding of guilt that is the goal of these indictments (and yes, this view will be completely borne out in the next year); it's to allow Paul Begala to yap "TOM DELAY HAS BEEN INDICTED" and to let Bob Schieffer intone "...the Senate Majority Leader is under investigation, in a constant drumbeat of negativity, throwing millions of tiny lumps of dung against the wall in the hope that enough lumps stick to enough voters to sway a seat or two in the '06 campaign.

And to allow the unpaid PR arm of the Democrat party, the media, to write gas like this:

But surveying the passel of legal troubles that now afflict those in power in Washington, it's not the criminalization of politics that should concern Americans, but the politicization of crime.
I'm putting it in my calendar. We're going to revisit this editorial next year.

Because it's not Democrat bias in the media that should concern Americans. It's that the media and the Democrats have become indistinguishable

The Smear Spreads

Last week, I wrote about Chris Hill, the former U of M student who was smeared in the 10/13 edition of The Nation as a "chickenhawk". We also interviewed Hill last weekend on the NARN show.

CBS News has picked up the story, virtually verbatim:

YAF official Chris Hill told The Nation that he had been a member of his university's Navy ROTC program and the moderator of a blog where he offered advice to aspiring soldiers on how to obtain a military commission.

But he chose to seek a master's degree rather than join the armed forces. Asked about this decision, he said, "But I know people over there, and that's a fact."

The insufficiently bright community has picked up on the slur (check out some of the comments in the linked thread; some of the people seem mighty upset at Mr. Hill, the chickenhawk.

The only problem, of course - as we found out last week on my blog and the show - is that Chris Hill is an Ensign in the US Navy, and a candidate for naval aviation. That'd make him a Seahawk, not a chickenhawk.

Neither The Nation nor CBS has corrected their gross error in fact yet.

Posted by Mitch at 06:15 AM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

Back To The Woodshed

Vikings Stadium off the table for another year?

Andy at Residual Forces thinks so:

It is unconfirmed so far, and shaky at best, but the stadium plea by Wilf and the Vikes is being shelved. Wilf never intended to just own an NFL team like his predecessor, and is taking the recent behavior and performance (or lack there of) of his team to heart and he is focussed on building a professional sports team that Minnesota can be proud of before he builds a stadium...rumor has it that Wilf will be pulling his pitch until 2007 or later...Not that this is a silver lining in any way, but there does seem to be one less pro sports team owner with their hand out right now. We may have even gained a guy who wants a good team rather than any team. He has even called local officials to personally apologize for his team’s behavior, and promised that this is not the Vikings he is content to own.
Of course, Wilf could have a stadium next year if he wanted one. Cash and carry, of course.

That'd involve doing it without the taxpayers, of course.

Posted by Mitch at 05:17 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

October 17, 2005

W00t!

For the first time ever - thanks to a 10,000-visit Instalanche on Friday - my Ecosystem Traffic Average is on the brink of the top 200:

Hey, it's fun. It won't last; my average will be back in the low 300s by the end of the week.

But it's a kick. Thanks, visitors!

Posted by Mitch at 12:36 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Henceforth And Forthwith...

...the "Vikings Sex Scandal" shall be known as:

Das Booty
That is all.

Posted by Mitch at 12:18 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Things I Have No Choice But To Believe Until Further Notice

The short list:

  1. OJ was framed. Nicole did it; it was a murder-suicide.
  2. In his 1984 classic "Sunglasses At Night", Corey Hart sings during the chorus "Don't trust the maaaan who don't waaaaanna shave no more....
  3. The moment the staff the the KQ Morning Crew says - even once - that the Vikings have a shot at the Super Bowl, the season is over. Every single winning season has been accompanied by Tom Barnard growling about how awful the Vikings are, up until about Week 12 (or even into the playoffs); once Barnard comes around and supports 'em, the wheels come off.
  4. John "The Rocket Man" Hinderaker of Powerline could race into a burning building to save a child who carried the cure for cancer in his teddy bear, win the Powerball and donate every nickel to cancer research, and quit the law to devote himself to researching the history of quaker hymnology; 25 years from now, someone from the Insufficiently Bright Community would will go "Man, that Hinderaker is such a hothead!" because he blew - once - at a local moron leftyblogger at the end of a day full of Kossacks trying to get him into trouble with his boss.
  5. When asked to provide an example of conservatives being inflammatory, members of the fantasy-based community are unable not to say "What about when Rush Limbaugh said "Feminazi?"; this 17 year old example is the closest they can get. And it's wrong anyway.
Apopos nothing, really.

Posted by Mitch at 12:17 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Steckel V. Tice

Mr. Cheer Or Die's Vikings Underground asks the question; who, if anyone, would win a matchup between Mike Tice's '05 Vikes and Les Steckel's '84 squad?

Go and vote (it's in the left margin).

The current results are...interesting.

Posted by Mitch at 07:11 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Two Elections

Strategy Page compares the two Iraqi elections so far:

The government is getting better at running national elections under the threat of terrorist attacks. The legislative elections last January had fewer than ten million people voting (69 percent of those registered), and over 40 people killed by terrorists opposed to the elections. This vote, on the new constitution, brought out over ten million, and left fewer than ten dead. There are several reasons for this progress. First, the government is getting better. There are more police, and more of them are trained and reliable. The government has used its experience well, and the country was basically shut down for yesterday's election, making it difficult for terrorists to move around.
By the way, I love the way the not-especially-bright left - I think it was Oliver Willis, in this case - spun that last part; "They're going to shut down the country to have an election", they say. Aren't these the same people who want to make election day a national holiday in the US, essentially, er, "shutting down the country?"
And apparently the terrorists did not move much, and attacked even less. But another reason for that was the effort by many Sunni Arab anti-government groups to get Sunni Arabs to vote against the new constitution. If the three mainly Sunni Arab provinces could get two thirds of the voters to go against the new constitution, the constitution would have to go back for more revisions and a new vote. Many Sunni Arabs decided that they could live with the new constitution, and turned out to vote that way. As a result, it appears that the Sunni Arabs did not stop the constitution.
That is huge; two Sunni provinces apparently approved the constitution. Oddly, nobody in the western media even considered that to be a possibility.
All of this is another major defeat for the al Qaeda and anti-government forces. These two groups have not been able to stop any elections, and their efforts are weaker with each round of voting. Al Qaeda's efforts to goad the Shia Arabs into a civil war with Sunni Arabs has not worked either, although it has caused a lot of ill-will and violence in areas where Shia and Sunni live close together.

The anti-government forces have little to sustain them. The October 15 election was just another of many major defeats. And every day, there are numerous lesser defeats. But some of the Sunni Arab terrorists will keep at it, and it will be years before this threat is completely gone from Iraq. That's been the pattern in other Arab countries over the past few decades.

If there's a worrisome aspect, it's the ability of the Arab Victomological establishment to nurse a grudge into a decades-long psychosis; they've had plenty of practice with the Palestinians. I expect an attempt to do the same with the Sunni, with the full (possibly but not universally ignorant) connivance of the Western media.

Posted by Mitch at 06:54 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Omission?

For a bit, I thought Mark Steyn was indulging in hyperbole in Friday's column about the media's reluctance to associate Islam with terrorism:

NPR's "All Things Considered" had one of those bland interviews between one of its unperturbable anchorettes and some Russian geopolitical academic type in which they chitchatted through every conceivable aspect of the situation and finally got around to kinda sorta revealing the identity of the perpetrators in the very last word of the geopolitical expert's very last sentence.
Surely hyperbole.

Right?

When the NPR report started, I was driving on the vast open plains of I-91 in Vermont and reckoned, just to make things interesting, I'll add another five miles to the speed for every minute that goes by without mentioning Islam. But I couldn't get the needle to go above 130, and the vibrations caused the passenger-side wing-mirror to drop off. And then, right at the end, having conducted a perfect interview that managed to go into great depth about everything except who these guys were and what they were fighting over, the Russian academic dude had to go and spoil it all by saying somethin' stupid like "republics which are mostly . . . Muslim." He mumbled the last word, but nevertheless the NPR gal leapt in to thank him...
Well, let's be fair (and inclusive): head-sawing terrorists are people too...

Posted by Mitch at 05:03 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Bride of Christ, Bride of Industry

Joe Carter is one of my favorite "Godbloggers" (a term I'm both uncomfortable with and would, were I one, shy away from, but they called their confab the "Godblogcon"; when writing about Rome, write as the Romans do...). He's been a guest on the NARN show several times; he's always a great read and a thought-provoking guy.

He wrote a piece the other day, the evangelical outpost: Industrialized Sex:
How Christians Can Restore True Intimacy
, which is, as usually, both highly opinionated and thought-provoking.

One of the thoughts it provoked, as it happens, is that one of his opinions is wrong. Of which more below.

The remainder of this post is rated "R" for the sort of subject matter and, possibly, language you normally find on Nerve.com or Blind Cavefish. And I mean a post-1990 "R", not a 1977 "R". We're clear on this, right? You've been warned. I don't wanna hear anyone squawking about Mitch working blue. Kids, and adults of delicate sensitivities; please flip to a different post.

No, really .

We're clear on this?

Second Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the contents of this post and my own life are purely coincidental, as are any differences. Unless expressly stated, nothing in this post is autobiographical.

OK. On to below the fold.

The timing of Joe's post - on the industrialization of sex, the turning of the whole act and aura of sex into a commodity - is perfect, of course; what is a better symbol of the debasement of sex than a bunch of overpaid buffoons flying prostitutes in for an orgy on a boat, after all?

That it shows how far the public ideal (forget about private practice for a moment; yes, I know Babe Ruth chased women through trains and Ty Cobb made Prince look like James Dobson; it's irrelevant, for now) for sex has eroded, even in most readers' lifetimes is obvious; that it shows some reserve of, well, reserve is mildly encouraging.

But only mildly. You don't need me to tell you that sex is an advertising hook, a commercial commodity (and only partly in the literal sense, prostitution; have you looked at what high school kids are wearing these days? Have you seen what gets on TV after 8PM?)

So yes; I'll go along with Joe when he quotes Wendell Berry:

It is odd that simply because of its ‘sexual freedom’ our time should be considered extraordinarily physical. In fact, our ‘sexual revolution’ is mostly an industrial phenomenon, in which the body is used as a idea of pleasure or a pleasure machine with the aim of ‘freeing’ natural pleasure from natural consequence.

Like any other industrial enterprise, industrial sexuality seeks to conquer nature by exploiting it and ignoring the consequences, by denying any connection between nature and spirit or body and soul, and by evading social responsibility. The spiritual, physical, and economic costs of this ‘freedom’ are immense, and are characteristically belittled or ignored. The diseases of sexual irresponsibility are regarded as a technological problem and an affront to liberty.

Industrial sex, characteristically, establishes its freeness and goodness by an industrial accounting, dutifully toting up numbers of ‘sexual partners,’ orgasms, and so on, with the inevitable industrial implication that the body is somehow a limit on the idea of sex, which will be a great deal more abundant as soon as it can be done by robots.

No argument so far.

In fact, of the 12 main point to Joe's thesis, I have to agree with the majority:

1. We should continuously point out that the term pre-marital sex is an oxymoron...Saying “I do” with the body may not carry the same consequences as it does in a marriage ceremony, but the effects on the soul are similar. [Hard to argue with that.]

2. Some people will claim that there is something valuable to be gained by having multiple sexual partners before settling down for lifelong monogamy. These misguided souls completely miss the point. Sex is not a technique to be mastered but a means of communicating...Having multiple sexual “partners” as a means of preparing for marriage is like mastering the art of lying in order to become a paragon of honesty. [Again, I agree - but we'll come back to this point later. There's a clinker here.]

3. The bookstores are filled with books and magazines that offer tips and advice on maximizing pleasure, providing multiple orgasms, and other ways to have “better” sex. This desire to improve and be more productive is a hallmark of industrialized sex. But there is no objective standard by which sex can be measured against. “Good” sex is not found by following a formula which will lead to the efficient maximization of sexual pleasure. Sex cannot be measured by the number of orgasms per hour (OPH) or any other idealized unit of measure anymore than a good conversation can be measured by the number of words spoken. [And we'll come back to this, too.]

4. How long should lovemaking sessions last? Ideally, from the beginning to the end...Watching the clock takes the focus off the proper object: one’s spouse. [True, and not really a contention.]

5. Although sex is not tied to the Gregorian calendar, it is cyclical, often following the natural rhythms of the female body. [Dude, I was married for ten years. Again, true.]

6. Having sex can lead to having children. Industrialized sex views this as a potentially unfortunate hazard that should be avoided. Deciding to have a child is a decision that should be made prayerfully and with God’s guidance. And the choice of using technology – whether a thermometer or the Pill – to avoid an untimely pregnancy is a matter between a couple and their Creator. But sex should never be completely stripped of its conceptive role. [I agree emphatically; while I support all family planning short of abortion, any view of sex that ignores the purpose it's really there for is flawed.]

7. Sex may be a joy and a sanctuary but it is also a marital duty...Denying our spouse food or sleep would be cruel and unjust. Withholding sex is no different. [Not really a contention.]

11. A last bit of advice for young people: You may foolishly decide that you need to “make your own mistakes” rather than rely on the hard-earned experience of those that have gone before you...With Christ there is redemption and the hope of restoration. But before you make a rash choice, weigh the cost. It is never worth the price of true intimacy. [Pretty true.]

12. Christian couples are not only joined in union with each other but are united within the body of Christ...The church, therefore, must take an interest in the sexual needs of couples just as it would in the other spiritual and physical needs. The community of believers needs to show that the Bride of Christ rejects industrialized sex. [Can't argue with that, either.]

There are biblical, moral and ethical grounds for all of the above; the Bible agrees with millennia of tradition in most human societies (and the exceptions exist and do nothing to sap Joe's point); none of the above should come as a surprise to anyone who takes Christianity seriously.

And this next point...:

8. While it hardly needs to be said, p*rnography has no place in marriage. Sex is intended to be viewed from the place of a first-person participant, not a third-person observer. One of the reasons pornography becomes addictive is because it leads to the attempt to fulfill an impossible desire. When observing p*rn, a person shifts from an I-Thou relationship to the place of the Other, forever outside, waiting to be invited in. That invitation never comes, leading to an endlessly frustrating search for fulfillment that can never be met.
Psychology aside - and Joe certainly paints with a broad brush in his description of it, a brush we're going to come back to shortly - any reasonable person should have serious ethical problems with the whole pr0n industry.

But let's look at the broad brush again. Joe's next two points are squishy. As it were.

9. Equipment belongs in the factory, not in the bedroom. If you need battery-operated tools to enhance your sexual experience you have a problem.
Am I the only one who's hearing Dana Carvey's "Church Lady"? "Lights off, door locked, missionary position?"

Says who? Show me any biblical authority on this, Joe!

As Joe himself said earlier, "Sex is not a technique to be mastered but a means of communicating". And yet isn't Joe reverting to technique here - in this case, proscribing rather than prescribing the techiques by which couples communicate?

How different is it than saying "books belong in the bookstore" or "if you need a third party to enhance your ability to talk with your partner you have a problem?" If it's between two consenting, healthy, married adults, then how Joe Carter's opinion on their choice of toy (or lack of it) any more appropriate than one on their child-rearing choices?

And this next one - a little foggier, perhaps, but again...:

10. Most of what gets classified under the category of sex has nothing to do with sex at all. Fetishes, sadomasochism, dominance and submission, etc., are always about something else (usually power) and never about intimacy and communication. Sort out your psychological issues on your counselor’s couch, not in your marriage bed.
Again - says who?

The Bible is, oddly, silent on each of these; and yet even if Joe is correct and each of these practices is "usually" about "something else" - so what?

Marriage is full of "something else"; couples where one partner's education, verbal polish, income or accomplishment are vastly different than the other's have "something else" to deal with, a great disparity in power. They find ways to work around the difference - or they don't. If the way they work around the differences in a healthy, functional way, then it's a good thing. If they work around them in a way that on the other hand harms either of them (and raises a generation of screwed up kids in the bargain), then not so much.

And a "counselor's couch" is nothing but a form of communication, in this case via a third party; it's a third cousin of sex, twice removed. And many counselors agree that it's less effective than actually just learning to communicate on one's own.

So if a couple, within a marriage, decides that they want to communicate about power, dominance and so on via sex, and we assume that they're both in the marriage for each other's good (and we certainly hope that for any marriage, don't we?), then whose business is it exactly how they do it?

Isn't saying "don't use sex to communicate about this" just about as nonsensical as saying "don't talk about this?" Aren't they the same thing within a couple?

As Joe disclaims his post, the whole thing is aimed at couples who have a Christian outlook on life; the principles are likely enough foreign enough to non-Christian (or at least non-religious) couples as to be very difficult to reconcile. But if one assumes that a couple is Christian, and thus operating in their spouses best interests, then who is Joe Carter or any other prospcriptive evanglical to tell them how that is best done? Marriages are between a couple and their creator; if their physical relationship makes them a better couple, not a worse one - and that is the goal, right? - then what is the problem?

Posted by Mitch at 05:00 AM | Comments (32) | TrackBack

Role Models

It was inevitable.

The best thing about the Viking Sex Cruise (beside the traffic I get by typing that phrase once a day)? Minnesotans can still be outraged by moral decadence.

I didn't think we had it in us.

Posted by Mitch at 04:56 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

October 16, 2005

The Greatest Day In The History Of Sports

Chicago 28, Minnesota 3.

Brian Urlacher had two sacks to lead the Bears to a 28-3 victory over a Vikings team reeling after allegations of drunkenness and sexual misbehavior on a charter cruise last week.
Booyah.

Life is that little tiny bit better today. The spirit of Mike Ditka looks down from above and smiles.

(Yes, I know he's still alive - but he is that big a deal...)

Posted by Mitch at 05:33 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (Or Yesterday), Part X

I woke up on the morning of October 15, 1985 knowing that I wasn't going to get any last-minute stalls like unplanned federal holidays. Nope, it was the REAL D-Day.

I went to the bank - open, today - and pulled out my cash. I loaded all my stuff back into my car, shook Dad's hand, hugged Mom goodbye, and drove off up Second Avenue, the street I'd lived on for 14 years. It was about 11AM. I saw Mom crying in the rear-view mirror. I kind of understood - and as I am four-eight years away from my own oldest leaving, I know I do, today.

Anyway, I turned onto main street. The freeway was off to the left.

I took a right. I wasn't done yet.

I topped up my gas tank, stocked up on munchies for the road, and took one last drive around town. I drove up main street; the old post office was in the process of being converted into some sort of senior citizen's home; the JC Penney's that had replaced my grandmother's old photography studio was shuttered (it had moved to a mall on the "South Hill"); most of the other old stores were either closed or reeling from years of lousy farm prices.

Up the hill, through the college one last time, then out on Airport Road to the long-cut to the freeway, the ten-mile back-road detour that led through durum fields and along the Northern Pacific tracks to the Ladish Malting Barley plant, a huge concrete monolith that looks like a three-times-larger, Soviet grain elevator. I used to bike out there all the time; it was a strip of Old Highway Ten, a road that used to link Billings with Chicago, but these days was mainly a utility road. It was a gorgeous fall day, chilly and windy, but with a deep blue sky and cumulus clouds that piled up in serried waves, 180 degrees across the sky from horizon to horizon.

I slipped a cassette of John (nee "Cougar") Mellencamp's "Scarecrow" in the tape player as I gunned down the access road to the Spiritwood exit, a little truck exist off I-94 that really connects the freeway to, almost literally, nowhere. "Minutes to Memories" came on:

On a greyhound thirty miles beyond jamestown
He saw the sun set on the tennessee line
He looked at the young man who was riding beside him
He said I’m old kind of worn out inside
I worked my whole life in the steel mills of gary
And my father before me I helped build this land
Now I’m seventy-seven and with God as my witness
I earned every dollar that passed through my hands
My family and friends are the best thing I’ve known
Through the eye of the needle I’ll carry them home

Chorus:
Days turn to minutes
And minutes to memories
Life sweeps away the dreams
That we have planned
You are young and you are the future
So suck it up and tough it out
And be the best you can

In that adolescent way that music acts, that song (like the whole album, the best rock and roll album ever about small-town America) had been a hammer to my forehead all the previous summer.
The rain hit the old dog in the twilight’s last gleaming
He said son it sounds like rattling old bones
This highway is long but I know some that are longer
By sunup tomorrow I guess I’ll be home
Through the hills of kentucky ’cross the ohio river
The old man kept talking ’bout his life and his times
He fell asleep with his head against the window
He said an honest man’s pillow is his peace of mind
This world offers riches and riches will grow wings
I don’t take stock in those uncertain things
What were those "uncertain things?"

I mean, I knew all sorts of people who were happy living on the Plains - Blue-state fantasies aside, many of them were sharp, sometimes brilliant people. Many of my college professors had been leaders in their respective fields, hardly intellectual slouches - what did they know that I didn't?

How could my father, no dummy himself, be so happy there?

The old man had a vision but it was hard for me to follow
I do things my way and I pay a high price
When I think back on the old man and the bus ride
Now that I’m older I can see he was right

Another hot one out on highway eleven
This is my life it’s what I’ve chosen to do
There are no free rides no one said it’d be easy
The old man told me this my son I’m telling it to you

Chorus:
Days turn to minutes
And minutes to memories
Life sweeps away the dreams
That we have planned
You are young and you are the future
So suck it up and tough it out
And be the best you can

I'd have to figure it out later. I had a life to try to start.

-----

I stopped for gas and said hi to some friends in Fargo, and then kept going - and I was about to learn a key truth of life in the upper midwest. Over the years, I've driven that same route a couple of dozen times; while the Dakotas are beautiful driving, once you get between Fergus Falls and Saint Cloud, probably a 150 mile stretch, one gives up all hope of getting oxygen to one's brain. No radio, no scenery ("Ooh. More trees"). No nothing. I got a vague sense of ennui on my first trip. It's become an iron law of physics since then.

-----

It was strange; in 1985, there was a point where you could say "The Twin Cities metro starts here". There was a sign on I94 on the west edge of Maple Grove, MN, by a grove of trees in the middle of some farm fields. A mile from the sign was an abandoned barn. It had been there three years earlier, when the college choir bus had passed through town; it was still there. And over the next rise, you could see rows of beige suburban ramblers marching off toward the east along the freeway. The barn is long gone - since before 1990, I suppose - but for the first several years I lived in the metro, that barn was the sign that I was home again.

The road got wider; the traffic got busier. I was coming in just after the afternoon rush hour. The sun was just starting to amble down behind me as I made the broad ,swooping turn onto I494, the south bypass, which curls down past the southwest corner of the Cities, then swerves left through the Bloomington Strip, which even in those days before the Mall of America was a major commercial center. I'm sure my eyes goggled as I drove down the mainstreet of the south metro, past rows of tall, gray buildings and tall soundwalls that never seemed to end, to my just-off-the-turnip wagon consciousness at the time.

Then, the cloverleaf south onto 35E, the broad avenue across the Minnesota River into the leafy beige ocean of Burnsville...

...where I began a streak that lasted ten years. For that whole time, I never once found a place in the suburbs on the first try. The streak kicked off in style; I zigged when I should have zagged on some suburban side street, and ended up somewhere in Eagan (ironically, right by what are now the Patriot studios, although that meant nothing to me at the time). It took me 40 minutes and a phone call to unscramble things, and arrive at my college friend's house...

...where I met the couch that'd be my home for the next two weeks.

Posted by Mitch at 02:17 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Too Stupid To Fisk

It finally happened.

I've gone back and forth on fisking Nick Coleman.

I've fisked him with zeal and gusto.

I've fisked him with derision and contempt.

I've even fisked him with pity, and in one exercise in creative fatigue, even tossed the job to the audience

But for the first time ever - a column so stupid, it fisks itself.

I'm serious. I'm not going to write a damn thing. In a career of incontinent, invincible idiocy, Nick has out-done himself.

Read it. Laugh. Pity the subscribers who actually pay for this smug, self-adulatory tripe.

No. I can't add a thing.

Posted by Mitch at 12:22 PM | Comments (15) | TrackBack

Staged!

Hah!:

Controversy has erupted among the press corps in the last few days as news has spread that the now-famous picture of the "victorious" flag raising over Iwo Jima a couple weeks ago was staged. Many believe that, as the huge number of casualties mounted in the ill-fated and pointless invasion of this tiny island, the Roosevelt administration, desperate for a bit of pro-war propaganda, arranged to have the photo taken for dissemination to the world's news services.

It has been revealed that the picture was actually of a "recreation" of an earlier flag raising of a much smaller flag, though even that event has now been cast into doubt by the apparent attempt to mislead the press.

There is abundant evidence that the picture was not only unspontaneous, but orchestrated on orders from higher ups.

No Blood for...er, volcanic ash!

Posted by Mitch at 10:56 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Official Bias?

The MN Democrat Exposer - a man who's eaten the MN DFL's lunch more times than they'd care to remember - not only notes that the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Center is having Bill Clinton in to speak as part of their Carlson lecture series - no biggie - but that there's a bit of a pattern in their previous speakers:

...you have to go all the way back to 1988 to find a conservative on the list (Bill Buckley), and prior to that the series was pretty balanced. Since then, it has taken a sharp left turn.
It was about 1988 that the Institute seemed to take on the mission of being a liberal institution.

Posted by Mitch at 08:58 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

October 14, 2005

Viking Sex Cruise Redux

I entitled a post "Viking Sex Cruise" the other day, and got probably 1,000 extra visits.

Which is ironic, considering I'm not really a football fan, know little about the happenings on the Viking Sex Cruise, and have never really considered football players (since Walter Payton, Mike Singletary and Richard Dent, anyway) role models.

But if you happen to be googling to this site for information on the Viking Sex Cruise, check out Mr. Cheer Or Die's Viking Underground, where they actually follow this stuff.

Football, I mean.

(However, if typing things like "Viking Sex Cruise", "Minneapolis Hookers" and "Daunte Culpepper buffs up my ad rate, so much the better)

Posted by Mitch at 06:50 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

City Pages: Molehill In, Mountain Out

Saint Paul mayor Randy Kelly had a rough primary; his challenger (and former wholehearted fan) Chris Coleman got nearly twice as many votes in the city's qualifying primary.

So what?

I mean, there's no way to spin the primary as good news for Kelly - but the primary draws the most motivated of voters, and in Saint Paul this year the most motivated voters are the ones baying for blood over Kelly's courageous endorsement of George W. Bush last year.

The City Pages' Paul Demko tries to pile on.

Swiftee piles right back:

The fact is that of 161,538 registered voters, only 25,303 people managed to show up to cast a ballot for anyone...So why the blatently misleading propaganda?

Perhaps it's because the drubbing Kelly took was the work of the 10% of Saint Paul voters wh have been casting spittle flecked practice ballots since August of '04, and that come November the majority of people who have taken note of the unprecidented revival that has occurred in Saint Paul over the last decade (in the absence of a moonbat majority city council) will take the time to ensure that their city is not returned to the Che brigade of the DFL.

For all of the chest thumping that has been taking place, the left wing's sheep herders know that when people are given the means by which to make an honest assessment of the moderate political leadership that has guided Saint Paul for the last 12 years, their alternative looks bleak.

We'll be looking into how bleak in the coming week or two.

Read the rest of Swiftee's piece.

More - much, much more - to come.

(And the Friday Funnies are back, and with style!)

Posted by Mitch at 06:15 PM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

The Chickenhawk Debate: The Logical Result

I've been thinking about the "Chickenhawk" craze that so many of the less-bright leftyblogs are knotted up about - perhaps too much, since the whole thing (as commenter Marty in the post below correctly notes) is a purely ad hominem argument; they can't fight the pro-war argument, so they attack the proponents.

But as I'm given to putting lipstick on pigs, let's dig a little deeper into the logical end result of the "Chickenhawk" argument.

Hint: You lefties might want to change your tack right...about...now.

From 1940 until 1973, the policy of the United States was that defending this nation was a collective duty of the entire American people. To wit, the government used conscription - "Selective Service", "the Draft" - to populate the military. Every American male citizen above the age of 18 was considered to have a duty to contribute six years of his life to the defense of the United States. That duty was exercised in the form of an option - selection, "the draft" - to randomly select young men for two years' full-time service (and four more usually but not always in the inactive reserve, subject to recall).

The US was founded by people who were afraid of the idea of the standing military - so until the 20th Century, the US military was a tiny cadre that, in wartime, was reinforced by hordes of "Volunteers", troops from the various states. That's why the Civil War was fought by units named the "First Minnesota" and the "Fifty-Fourth Massachussetts"; literally, they were owned by the various states, and given over to federal control during the national emergency. That changed, at least a bit, after the Spanish-American War, when the National Guard was tied more closely into federal control than theretofore - but until 1940, the ideal was that the federal standing army was a small professional organization, supported in an emergency by hordes of volunteers who would serve for the duration, and then go back to their farms and towns. The "Citizen Soldier" was more than an aphorism - it was the ideal handed down by the founding fathers, paranoid as they were about the potential for government abuse of the a professional military.

In 1940, with industrial total war looming, waged by nations levying their entire populations into the war effort, the government policy changed; the idea of the statutory obligation to serve the nation emerged, along with the Selective Service Act to implement it. Millions of men were issued draft numbers, and called into service; the professional military and the National Guard trained them (mostly just well enough to do the job) and formed them into units and sent them overseas; they fought against similar armies from Germany, Italy and Japan. That was the way of industrial total war - the entire society was mobilized to fight for its every survival; the spectre of enemy tanks driving down main street was the motivator (and, in most of Europe including Germany, eventually the reality). It had its upside - World War II was truly America's last national priority, perhaps the last thing America will ever do that had total support of the whole nation (at least in part because everyone's brother, father or son was in the service). The downside? The US military, like any draftee military (and aside from elites like the Airborne and the Marine Corps, who were all volunteers anyway), was not especially well-motivated, was trained just well enough to do the job (most infantrymen learned their trade on the job - those that survived their first week in action) and had the problems an institution will naturally have when one corrals millions of people together by force, who are accustomed to freedom.

After World War II (and Korea), the observed nature of war slowly changed, from huge industrial nation-states throwing their entire efforts into kill-or-be-killed all-out wars, to the proxy wars and terror campaigns of the Cold War. The draft continued - partly as an exercise in social engineering (military service was a key part of racial integration), partly because the military was run by a generation of officers and civilian leaders whose idea of war was formed during World War II, and would not change until they passed from the scene.

Which, eventually, they did, ushered out in the aftermath of Vietnam.

In 1973, at the end of the Vietnam War, the nation's policy doubled back; while there's still a notion of obligation buried somewhere in the ideas behind current policy, the overriding policy is that our nation will have a "professional military" - an idea which goes way beyond the idea of a "volunteer military". A "Professional Military" is a one that treats study of the art of war not as an obligation to ones country that one does for a couple of years of one's life (as it is seen in Switzerland, Israel, Norway and many other countries), but as a profession with its own standards, career path, traditions; as Edwin Luttwak called it, a "Warrior Elite", which is exactly what our founding fathers were afraid of.

American society had grown to the point where "it" felt that it could tolerate a professional warrior elite whose existence was not seen to be incompatible with Democracy. The absence of military coups in the past 32 years might indicate it was a worthy risk.

So: For the past 32 years, the US military has been a professional organization, seeking people who want to voluntarily spend part of their lives (as long a part as they can be persuaded to spend) learning the art of war, rather than a mass of unwilling, coerced people who are taught (with fear of court-martial hanging over their heads) to do the job just well enough.

The military seems to prefer it that way - which is why the military leads the chorus in poo-poohing the idea of returning to the draft.

=====

So, all of you who cry "chickenhawk!" when someone who never served supports the war; since the military is voluntary and professional, and you're making an appeal to duty to serve in the military, that logically infers that you support bringing back the draft; the institution that your lefty forebears fought so hard to abolish is the only logical end-result of declaring that to support the war one has a duty to serve. (That, or you abjure the whole notion of defending the nation, and support pacifism to the point of capitulation).

And that draft, naturally, will call you liberals as readily as it will conservatives.

Is that really what all you who are bleating "Chickenhawk" want?

Posted by Mitch at 12:11 PM | Comments (35) | TrackBack

The Nation: "Accuracy Is For Peasants"

No slander is quite as dull-witted as the "chickenhawk" slur that some on the not-excessively-gifted wing of the American Left are frothing over - the notion that some supporters of the war didn't, or aren't, serving in the military. (Never mind for a moment that the vast majority of people actually in Iraq support the war, and a strong minority would like to see the "chickenhawk"-criers eaten by mice).

The Young Republicans and other similar groups come in for an extra jolt of froth; nothing makes a campus "radical" angrier than seeing a campus conservative under normal circumstances. I've questioned for a while now whether Campus Republicans go on to serve in the military in disproportionately higher numbers than the rest of the campus population (anyone have the numbers?), but it's irrelevant, since it's not an argument that's designed for the opposition to win in the first place; if 90% of war supporters suddenly donned BDUs and jumped on a C17 bound for Kabul, the bleating hearts would pule "SEE? 10% didn't go! Hypocrites!"

Whatever. It's a dumb argument on so many levels.

And that's even if the left reports the argument correctly.

Enter The Nation.

The Nation - the semi-official organ of the people who think Howard Dean isn't far enough to the left - in their piece "The Young Chickenhawks", "cover" a pro-liberation rally in Minnesota:

The even more zealous YAFers have made it clear that they not only support the war but are openly hostile to those who oppose it. Their rowdy prowar rallies have attracted plenty of press. In March 2003, CBS news reported on a YAF event held in Minnesota at which the chapter's executive director Chris Hill had strong words for antiwar activists: "The top of the antiwar movement is led by communists, and I will call them that," he said. "Unlike these communists, we have truth on our side.... We say to those who oppose this war, Go to France." Hill's YAF chapter has also publicly denigrated antiwar demonstrators as "cowards." All of this raises the question: If opponents of the war should go to France, shouldn't Hill--and other members of YAF and College Republicans--go to Iraq?
Right.

And if you don't go to medical school, you'd better not talk about health. If you're not a lawyer, you have no right to natter on about the law. If you're not a trained botanist, stay out of your garden.

The Nation digs into the various activists' pasts (emphasis added - please note both instances, they reappear later in this post)...:

Indeed, YAF chairman Erik Johnson, vice chairman Darren Marks and fourteen other national officials have posted brief autobiographies on YAF's website. According to these bios, not one of them has served in the military or has any intention to do so in the future. YAF official Chris Hill told The Nation that he had been a member of his university's Navy ROTC program and the moderator of a blog where he offered advice to aspiring soldiers on how to obtain a military commission. But he chose to seek a master's degree rather than join the armed forces. Asked about this decision, he said, "But I know people over there, and that's a fact." Does it undermine his group's prowar position if all the YAF higher-ups are unwilling to participate directly in the war? "I don't think so," Hill replied. "You don't have to be involved in something to believe in it."
...but still misses a few points.

Chris Hill copied me on an email he sent to The Nation:

Regarding your October 12th article in which you quoted me (The Young Chickenhawks), your reporting is ignorantly poor at best. You seem to make assumptions without taking people - namely me - at their word. I WAS in the Navy ROTC program because since then I have graduated and been commissioned an officer in the United States Navy. I am going into naval aviation (read: high potential for combat situations). It just so happens the Navy desires their officers to have a high level of technical proficiency, thus they send a few individuals to graduate school each year.

As a member of the Armed Force, I can make no public comments regarding the US's foreign policy, hence my hesitation to acknowledge my current position due to the fear of being misquoted or used for propaganda. I made no comments indicating I was not in the Armed Forces, I’m pretty sure I never used the words "and that’s a fact," and, by the way, I’ve never moderated a blog. I see now that even though I tried to remain silent on some issues, they were still used for propaganda.

I would appreciate an immediate correction, at it seems you desire to slander my name, the cause of conservative organizations in America, and the Armed Forces. Thank you.
Good luck on that correction, Ensign Hill.

But Chris' point is a good one; the hard left isn't going to let a little thing like facts get in the way of a good ripping yarn.

Anyway, the fact is that for the left to exercise their vaunted integrity, anyone crying "chickenhawk" had better be planning to move to a Moslem theocracy like Iran, or perhaps North Korea; since their appeasement policy would sentence millions of people to life under brutal dictatorships, they should be willing to live that life themselves.

Unless they're "chickendoves", of course.

I'm waiting to hear from Chris Hill.

Posted by Mitch at 07:10 AM | Comments (51) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part IX

It was D-Day, October 14, 1985. My late-night, inebriated promise of only 17 days before had come to this; it was time to load up the car and start going for the Twin Cities.

I got up early, and loaded up my '73 Malibu. My guitars, naturally, rode in the passenger seat, surrounded by blankets and a pillow. In the back, a gym bag, an army-surplus duffel, a guitar amp, and my interview suit (nee my graduation suit) in a laundry bag. And not much else.

I climbed into the car; not quite ready to head out yet. One last errand to run; withdraw my money from the bank.

And then I'd be ready to go.

I walked out the front door of Dad's house, and down to the street, where my car - in whose safety I was a lot less sure than before - sat. I started up, and drove over to Metropolitan Federal Savings and Loan to pull my money out and get on the road.

I parked on the street in front of the bank, checked my passbook inside my jacket pocket, walked up to the front door, and pulled.

And nearly wrenched my hand. The door didn't move.

Huh?

I focused on the door. Locked.

I looked through the window. It was dark inside.

A sign was taped to the door;

Metropolitan Federal Savings and Loan Will Be Closed On Monday, October 14, for the Columbus Day Banking Holiday.

We will re-open on Tuesday, October 15

I stood for a moment, slack-jawed, mind reeling. Huh? Closed? Whaaaa?

All the planning, and I hadn't remembered that it was Columbus Day.

Dejected, hoping it wasn't a sign from above, I drove home to Mom and Dad's place, broke the news, called my friend in Burnsville, and spent the evening laying very, very low.

Tomorrow, I thought.

Posted by Mitch at 05:19 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

American Civilization: Maybe Not Doomed?

"The Simple Life" augurs in:

The fish-out-of-bottled-water show started in 2003 with Hilton and Richie - both accustomed to plush lifestyles - spending the spring in the town of Altus, Ark., doing farm chores and working at the local dairy and gas station.

The series continued for two more seasons, including an "intern" edition in the business world.

Today, I'm proud to be an American.

Posted by Mitch at 05:14 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Dropped From The Menu

Time to stop drinking cow urine:

The agent that causes mad cow disease, scrapie and chronic wasting disease in deer and elk may sometimes be spread through urine, Swiss researchers reported on Thursday.

They found that, under certain conditions in mice, the deformed brain proteins known as prions that transmit the disease could be found in urine.

I'm told tonic water is actually a better mixer.

Posted by Mitch at 05:09 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

October 13, 2005

Greetings, Voyeurs!

I'm seeing a real uptick in traffic today. Part of it is from Germans, reading my fairly facile take on the Gerhard Schröder's riff on the US today.

But by far the bulk is for my piece the other day, "Viking Sex Cruise". Google is shuffling a zillion hits my way over that search string.

Reminds me of something Red wrote the other day; she gets amazing traffic from a post she wrote years ago mentioning the child of Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love. Obsessives the world over unite in their curiosity about their late idol's child - and Sheila is the beneficiary.

I suppose if I were to be really cynical, I could write a post where Frances Bean is playing Texas Hold-em and hears about the Vikings Sex Cruise while discussing the Terry Schiavo case with Chai Vang and a Vicodin-jacked Lynndie Englund.

But that'd just be cheap traffic.

Posted by Mitch at 06:29 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Things I Can Neither Forgive Nor Forget

I'm a Christian, and I take seriously my Lord and Savior's command to forgive those who transgress against me. I really try hard.

But there are times, places and events that make forgiveness (to say nothing of forgetting) very, very difficult.

I'm not talking about things like 9/11, here - forgiveness without atonement is meaningless.

No. Nothing that serious.

But serious enough.

To wit - the list:

  • The Val Kilmer version of The Saint. The original TV series, starring Roger Moore, is to James Bond what Veronica Mars is to Raymond Chandler; a sharp, witty (in the Oscar Wilde sense) and sometimes tongue-in-cheek reading of a classic genre. Perhaps the only time I ever genuinely enjoyed watching after-school TV was a brief stretch of time when Channel 11 in Fargo played Saint reruns; I ate 'em up. Kilmer's version, unfortunately, not only reeked on every level, but didn't even make a cursory effort to recapture any of the wit and charm of the original. Loathsome, unforgiveable, and possible grounds for physical violence.
  • "Squad Leader", the PC Game. The original "Squad Leader" was an Avalon Hill company board game that simulated - in intense detail - squad and vehicle level combat in World War II. Each cardboard chit represented a squad of infantrymen, a vehicle (truck, tank, glider, jeep, whatever), a support weapon (heavy machine gun, bazooka, mortar, cannon) or vehicle or weapon crew. Very complex, yet with an elegant game system that made it surprisingly playable (a major achievement in tactical-simulation board games), "SL" as its cultlike legion of devotees called it, was an instant classic; military history afficionados broke it out everywhere, in basements and classrooms and dorm lounges and (a former Airborne Ranger friend tells me) in bivouacs on deployments around the world. Over a decade after its parent company tanked, "SL" (and the franchise's ultimate release, "Advanced Squad Leader", or ASL) still commands a thriving aftermarket and draws game geeks to tournaments around the world. But the computer game that rented the "SL" name was perhaps the most misbegotten piece of software ever released; years in development, it junked the boardgame's squad/team/crew/vehicle scale for an unworkably baroque single-man scale that tried, with horrible results, to split the difference between a tactics game and a first-person shooter. That alone would be enough to render the game a travesty of its heritage, even if it had a usable user interface. But the user interface was a complete abomination; the must un-usable game I've ever played. Which may have been good news for the game's programmers; so hard was it to play, it was supremely difficult to master the "game" to the point where one could criticize its higher-level problems. Dreadful.
  • "Tiffany"'s cover of "I Think We're Alone Now". The original - the highlight of Tommy James' career - was as glorious an ode to teenage lust as has ever been written. "Tiffany" - or, more likely, her producers - combined a vapid Euro-synth pop background with their young (16 at the time) star's voice, an instrument so feeble as to make Hillary Duff sound like Aretha Franklin by comparison; the progeny of this effort was a cover that briefly made me flirt with hating the incandescent original.
That's it.

For now.

Posted by Mitch at 12:32 PM | Comments (19) | TrackBack

Schröder: Perspective

After Gerhard Schröder's remarks - scolding the US for not embracing the smothering balm of Mother Government, blaming that attitude for the havoc of Hurricane Katrina - commenter Chriss notes something I'd missed completely:

Horrific hurricane strikes the Gulf Coast and, while more people died than could have or should have, the toll is (I think) less than 2,000 people. A heat wave (a heat wave, mind you, not a tornado, flood, hurricane or earthquake but a freakin' heat wave) hits Europe and 35,000 people die, nearly 15,000 in France... mostly because people couldn't be bothered to interrupt their precious vacations.
Smack. That'll leave a mark.

They also have a lot of trouble with cold waves, as I recall; a few winters back, didn't most of the Continent suffer horribly from what amounted to the kind of snowstorm that most of the US would have shaken off with ease?

Schröder and Chirac seem oddly silent about these disasters; perhaps they only count when there's a Republican to bash on?

Posted by Mitch at 12:11 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Die Staat Is Unsere Mutter!

Gerhard Schroeder leaves office in full hissy:

"I do not want to name any catastrophes where you can see what happens if organised state action is absent. I could name countries, but the position I still hold forbids it, but everyone knows I mean America,".
In other words; build a rapacious social welfare state, or Mother Nature's gonna gitcha!

David states the verdict well:

worstchancellorever.JPG

Posted by Mitch at 06:05 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part VIII

My last Sunday night in Jamestown, October 13, 1985.

Mom made dinner. Took a drive around town. Suddenly felt very nostalgic.

I called down to the Twin Cities, telling one of the friends who'd volunteered a couch that I'd be there tomorrow afternoon. I got the directions to the apartment - it was in Burnsville, a big 'burb about 10 miles south of Downtown Minneapolis. I marked the exact location on the map, and memorized exactly how to get there.

I pictured the route in my mind; the long churn down I94, followed by the slow, curvy glide of the 494 South Metro bypass, to the gastric-shunt-straight blast down 35W, to Cliff Road, then over to River Hills Drive...I could recite it in my sleep. I thought.

I went to bed early that night.

Posted by Mitch at 05:20 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Next UN Project

Tom emails regarding this photo:

"I wonder if their next ad will be Santa with Lyndie Englund..."

Or maybe with the Vikings...

Posted by Mitch at 05:19 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

October 12, 2005

It Was Five Years Ago Today...

...that Al Quaeda bombed the U.S.S. Cole, a Burke-class destroyer docked in Aden harbor in Yemen.

Stars and Stripes talks about the attacks...:

The Cole incident was one of a series of terrorist attacks in the 1990s that were not adequately answered by the United States, said Marc Genest, an associate professor of strategy and policy at the Naval War College.

“Measured responses against terrorist organizations are seen as a sign of weakness, not strength,” he said.

Genest said the overall lesson from the Cole is that not responding to terrorists’ attacks only emboldens them.

“The time to attack terrorists is at the very beginning of their strategy,” he said.

In the five years since the attack, the Navy has drawn other lessons from the Cole attack:

  • It has established mobile security forces that set up tight security perimeters around ships.
  • The number of masters at arms, who secure ships, has jumped from about 2,000 to 9,700 since the attack.
  • The Navy and law enforcement now share intelligence on possible terrorist threats.
...and their aftermath:
For Sharla Costelow, faith in God has helped her get through the last five years without her husband, Chief Petty Officer Richard D. Costelow, she wrote in an e-mail.

“I often fall back on what many people would say to me … ‘God will never give you more than you can bear,’” she wrote. “There were many days I thought, ‘Yeah, right, what would you know?’ But, the fact is, I can look back and see how true that is, because I have made it through.”

Costelow credits her three sons with keeping her going after the attack and continuing to give her life direction now, she wrote.

“There are still times that it is difficult to deal with the pain of watching my boys grow up without a father,” Costelow wrote. “I know I could have remarried just to give them a father again, but I’d rather do this on my own than to marry for anything other than love.”

She wrote she is proud that the chief’s mess aboard the Cole was renamed after her husband. Her children love visiting the ship because it helps preserve memories of their father and give them a sense of who they are, she wrote.

The Cole attack never got its due; the Clinton Adminstration did its best to scuttle away from confrontation with Al Quaeda, and spun the story into the memory hole within relatively few news cycles. Then came the election, and, 11 months later, September 11.

Never forget.

Posted by Mitch at 06:49 PM | Comments (21) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part VII

It was Saturday night, October 12, 1985. Two days until the big move.

The best rock and roll bar in Jamestown had closed the previous summer; there really were no decent bands playing that night. No matter, though, I thought; I'd go up to the college and visit my friends. Surely, I thought, my last night in the Twin Cities would draw someone out for a night on the town. Right?

Not so fast.

School up at my alma mater, Jamestown College, had been in session for about six weeks. Most of my friends - the ones who hadn't graduated or dropped out - were thoroughly involved in class work. A brief thought on the part of a couple of them to throw a "going away party for Mitch" came in a distant fourth to "a date", "another party" and "studying".

I walked up to the North Hill, up the steps, to the college. I wandered through my old dorm, around the chapel (the HQ of the music department which, majors aside, is where I spent most of my time in college). Most of my friends - Rich Larson, Beth Erickson, Ray Zentz, Joe "Spanky" Knowski, Scott Massine - were either occupied, or too trashed from a week of school (and/or a Friday night of binge-drinking) to want to do much. I ran into a few, of course - Rich Larson (on his way to a date), Ray Zentz (practicing one instrument or another); I think I may have even run into this person, to whom I'd handed over the school paper, although memory fails me at the moment.

I hung around for half an hour, amazed at all the Freshmen who had no idea who I was, my attitude souring by the minute, until I walked out of the student union, back to the stairs that descended the North Hill, and back into town.

By the way - you caught that? I called it the "North Hill". Jamestown is in the valley of the James River, at its confluence with Pipestem Creek. There are three major parts to Jamestown; the "Valley", below the river bluffs; the "South Hill", mostly stores and cheap hotels and some humongous trailer parks and the State Hospital; and the "North Hill", home of the college, the city hospital, and some of the town's nicest real estate, especially "Skyline Drive", with its gorgeous overlook of the river valley, the dam (a big reservoir upstream from the town) and the rest of the city. Of course, neither "North Hill" nor "South Hill" are hills; they are the level of the prairie itself. The town is below ground level. Such is perception in a place like that.

"Ratzen fratzen "friends". If I could count all the "going away parties" I'd been to for the other rat bastards, I could probably buy a round at my own party, for @#$#@^%' s sake", I grumbled, feeling sorrier and sorrier for myself as I went. "I'm so @#$#@^%@# glad I'm moving..."

There was one more hope for the evening. I walked back down the hill...er, you know...and back toward the middle of the little town, across from my grandmother's old house, to The Club.

The Club was a room in the basement of J.I. Stocking, a guy who'd graduated from high school and college about five years earlier than I. He and a couple of his classmates - John Johnson and Pat Flannery - had built a semi-replica english hunting lodge in the basement, complete with a kegerator, dartboard, comfy sofas, the works. The room was J.I's, but the idea was Pat's. Pat was the sort of eccentric genius that every small town seems to breed. He was a model builder; more than that, he was a "scratchbuilder"; he'd build models out of lost and founds, bric-a-brac, bits and pieces of found treasure.

What kind of models? Whatever caught his fancy. One day it was a scale cutaway model of the Captain Nemo's submarine Nautilus. Another week it'd be "every experimental German jet aircraft of the '30s and '40s that was ever committed to blueprint", out of bits and pieces of plastic; another month, it'd be a working replica of an eighteenth-century nine-pounder naval gun, firing homemade cannon balls (this was an interesting one; yes, it worked). He built 'em all. Sometime just out of high school, a company in Los Angeles got wind (so the story went) of Pat's talents, and hired him to come to LA to work on a show they were working on, "Project UFO". The series was cancelled shortly before Pat was going to start his job building UFO models; no matter, he turned his talents to building more...stuff.

One weekend in, I think, 1979 or 1980, boredom overtook him, and he built The Club; he built (reportedly in one manic binge) a kegerator, a wine rack ( from scratch, natch), a bar, panelling...I think the only thing bought in a store was a dart board.

The Club met three nights a week. You'd drop a couple of bucks in the stein by the kegerator, you could drink and eat peanuts and talk sci-fi until 1AM (house rule - same closing time as the bars). It was a good, cheap, regular buzz.

I walked down to The Club, walked down the narrow stairway, pitched in a couple of bucks, and laid into a beer with gusto. It was warm, the conversation was geeky and well met, and pretty soon the evening was starting to work itself out. "Who cares if my college pals are a bunch of total let-downs? I'm leaving!" I smiled a sloppy smile and handed my mug to J.I., behind the bar, who had tap duty that evening. A few other people - John's brother Mark, and Mike Fischer, who'd just moved back to North Dakota from Los Angeles, where he'd worked making lenses in an optometry shop (among his clients; Jello Biafra of the Dead Kennedys).

I looked around the room after a while; Fischer, Pat, John and Mark had all left Jamestown at one point or another, and all had returned. J.I. had always been in Jamestown. I tried to think of any from our little circle of people who had left and stayed gone; I couldn't.

The evening kept on; I kept drinking. As 1AM came around, I walked out onto Fourth Avenue, and started walking home to my Mom and Dad's place. I wondered, as I shuffled down the street (not terribly drunk, mind you; I had quite a tolerance built up after a summer of three nights a week at The Club and a couple more at Fred's and an odd night or two out drinking with the friends) and wondered:

I know what it is that makes people wanna leave this place. The big question is, what is it that makes people want to come back?
Was there some inexorable gravity that tugged people, plans and dreams be damned, back to this little dip in the drift prairie? Something I didn't know about, but that would jump out at me in six or nine or twenty-four months, and send me packing back to this cold little outpost on the Plains?

I got to Dad's place - everyone was long asleep - and went to bed.

Posted by Mitch at 06:37 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Good Timing?

On the one hand, winters in southern Minnesota are very overrated. I moved here nearly twenty ears ago, and I have yet to see a winter that was remotely challenging by North Dakota standards.

That being said, this is good news:

Government forecasters today predicted a warmer than normal winter, offering hope to much of the Midwest and West as concern grows about the rising costs of heating during cold-weather.

The National Weather Service said there is a 60 percent chance of warmer than normal weather in the Dakotas, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, north Texas, northern New Mexico and southern and eastern Colorado.

States adjoining that area...also have a chance of being warmer than usual.

It's just a money thing, got it?

Posted by Mitch at 12:36 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Attention Search Parties

It's been a week since Katie at Yucky Salad posted.

Your public is getting restless, maam.

Posted by Mitch at 12:26 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Threesies

Another meme via Red:
Three Things I Do Not Understand

  1. The enduring popularity of Will and Grace.
  2. Statistics.
  3. Why "System Of A Down" has sold a single CD.
Three Things On My Desk (Work edition)
  1. Two empty liter bottles of water.
  2. A blessedly idle telephone
  3. Clutter.
Three Things I'm Doing Right Now
  1. Dreading paying bills.
  2. Eating some soy nuts.
  3. Thinking about waking up the kids and getting the day started.
Three Things I Want To Do Before I Die
  1. Bike through Europe.
  2. Skydive.
  3. Ski (downhill).
Three Things I Can Do
  1. Learn to crank out a tune on almost any musical instrument, very quickly.
  2. Find a joke (albeit often bad, sarcastic or cutting) in almost every situation.
  3. Keep my cool when everything is falling apart.
Three Ways To Describe My Personality
  1. Impatient.
  2. From "The Far Side"
  3. Boundlessly loyal.
Three Things I Can't Do
  1. Tie a cherry stem with my tongue.
  2. Watch Gone With The Wind
  3. Work up any enthusiasm for the NBA.
Three Things I Don't Think You Should Listen To, Ever
  1. I have nothing in this category. Listen to everything - all music, all poetry, all speeches, everything you can listen to - and make up your own mind.
  2. Except "Asia", the early-eighties supergroup featuring the loathsome Steve Howe and John Wetton.
  3. And We Built this City, by "Starship".
Three Things I Say
  1. "What the f*****g f*****g f**k?"
  2. (In bad Yiddische accent, to kids) "My fingers for you to da bone I voik, and for vat? Such disrespect!". They love that, I tell ya.
  3. "It's Showtime"
Three Things I'd Like To Learn
  1. What love is all about.
  2. How to homebrew a really good stout.
  3. CSS.
Three Beverages I Drink Regularly
  1. Water
  2. Summit India Pale Ale
  3. Coffee (from Java Drive on Snelling).
Three Shows I Watched As A Kid
  1. Hogan's Heroes
  2. The Odd Couple
  3. I kid you not, Upstairs Downstairs when it was on Masterpiece Theatre with Alistair Cooke. Loved it. I also watched every epi of Alistair Cooke's America, on the first run and at least three times in rerun.
Three Things I Wish People Would Learn To Do
  1. Quit interrupting.
  2. Admit that they are not good drivers.
  3. Forgive.

Posted by Mitch at 05:58 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

Bat Spittle Crazies, Delivered To Your Door

MDE and I got a write-up on Democrat Underground the other day.

And by "Write-up", I mean "writing" in the same sense that a two-year-old "paints" with an airbrush.

"MN Democrats Exposed is a typical hypocritical right-wing blogger. Although he protecst [sic] his identity like it's a state secret, he won't allow anonymous posts to his rumor-mill.
This sounds like the same moron who whined to half the leftyblogosphere when I altered his puerile, off-topic, harangueing, insulting comment for my own amusement.

Buddy? Tough! When you crap on someone's carpet, they are not bound to be hospitable or respectful!

Mitch Berg, another pathetic right-wing blogger and chickenhawk buddy of MDE, is cut from the same cloth.
The ham-fisted, neanderthal pace...the clunky command of style...the hamfisted, broad insults (this guy can't finish a sentence without "pathetic" in it. Hmmmmm)...it sounds like one of the morons who kept pestering me with half-literate drivelments last spring. A couple of them got threatening, so I published their work IP addresses. I hope it gave 'em a scare, truly.
They think their mission in life is to expose anyone who uses a work computer for posting to the internet.
Nope, my mission in life is to raise my kids to be a couple of good human beings. If someone threatens me on my blog, exposing them is less "Mission" than "avocation".

Hint to the DU writer: "Avocation" is not an ingredient in guacamole.

They are the self-appointed guardians of employers everywhere. And if Berg doesn't like your comments, he'll alter them without informing readers."
Actually, if you get grossly rude, insulting or threatening, yes. I'll mock you, I'll alter your comments for the amusement of me and my audience, and to ensure that your puerile "point" is turned into an even bigger joke than you could manage! Count on it!

However, I can count on two hands the posts I've materially altered. I've banned exactly two people from my blog, which is a fraction of the number a lot of lesser blogs have blackballed.

MDE was nice enough to add:

Getting compared to Mitch Berg is a huge compliment.
Well, not so much - but thanks!

And all you DUllards out there; you're dumber than the rest of us.

Posted by Mitch at 04:55 AM | Comments (8) | TrackBack

October 11, 2005

Small World?

I was surfing some new local blogs, and I noted the "Viking Underground" blog, written by a Brian Maas. Brian is also co-proprietor of "Four Hoarse Men", which delves into non-sport stuff (or so they say).

Maas, if memory serves (and his profile pic sure looks like the right guy, as far as I can tell), is a fellow alum of Jamestown High School, and is married to a fellow grad of Jamestown College.

So go visit the blog - assuming you remember the Minnesota Vikings, who are, I am told, still the NFL franchise in this area.

Posted by Mitch at 06:38 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack

Miers: Elitism

I still haven't completely come down one way or another on the Harriet Miers nomination.

I'm inclined to be disappointed; I had hoped for a Rogers Brown or a McConnell. This is the moment we conservatives have been waiting on since David Souter pulled off his prosthetic head to reveal he was really Abbie Hoffman.

Hugh Hewitt makes a semi-convincing case that Miers is not a disaster, that she has definite good points; that her lack of judicial experience can be a good thing (I didn't need Hugh to tell me that, but the reminder was nice), that her background with Bush is probably a good sign that she's not going to Souter us. His other point - that the Senate GOP caucus might not have the votes to overcome a filibuster - is up for debate (with my thesis being "Why not find out with a real conservative first? I mean, use your damn mandate, Mr. President!).

Her opponents, likewise, make some good points.

But while the points against Miers join with my disappointment at not getting a died-in-the-wool conservative to make me generally down on the nomination so far, there's point that Miers' opposition consistently makes, then tries to dodge.

You can not tell me that there's not a healthy slathering of elitism in the opposition.

This piece by Brendan Miniter distills not so much the tone of the opposition as of so much of the opposition's subtext. Miniter, as an intellectual exercise, compares the pedigrees of Miers and talk host and former Supreme Court clerk Laura Ingraham:

Miers's undergraduate education was completed at Southern Methodist University in Dallas in 1967. Ingraham graduated from Dartmouth College, in Hanover, New Hampshire. That's not to say an Ivy League education is a prerequisite for Supreme Court service. It's not. But as one of many details in one's background, a highly selective admissions process is not nothing.
It's not nothing?

What it is, is evidence that at age 15 or 16, someone or something got through to Laura Ingraham that prompted her to start playing the paper chase, to get Big Grades so she could get into a Big University with a Big Name. That is all a "highly selective admissions process" means in the life of a normally-formed adult; an early-formed ability to say, do, and score whatever is needed to get selected. I've known Ivy Leaguers; I've worked for them, competed against them for jobs (and won more than I lost), known them socially, filled in on their talk shows; being "selected" is much more a commentary on someone's application than on their intelligence or capacity to think, reason and learn.

How about life experience?:

Clerked for federal judge? Yes, Miers clerked for a U.S. District court judge Joe E. Estes in Dallas. Ingraham clerked for judge Ralph K. Winter on the second circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Clerked for U.S. Supreme Court? Miers did not, while Ingraham researched for Justice Clarence Thomas.

So Ingraham is marinaded in "the system"; Miers is not.

Sorry, Brendan. It's not something that's going to turn me against Miers.

The Supreme Court (really, much of the federal judiciary) today is a lot like the major media; both see themselves oracles, bodies of high priests of their order (interpretation of the law or passing on information, as the case may be); they have their own initiation rituals, they disdain accountability to anyone but themselves; they can't imagine anyone else doing their job.

Bloggers and the new media are starting to puncture the media's sense of exceptionalism; in a body where seven of the eight currently-sitting justices went to Harvard, Yale or both (and the other went to Northwestern and the U of Chicago), and several spent much of their careers as professors rather than lawyers (to say nothing of hoi-polloi citizens), perhaps it's time for someone to do the same for the SCOTUS. Perhaps the President should find a brilliant, conservative-enough trial lawyer who graduated from the U of New Mexico school of law, and has been practicing law ever since.

Is Miers that person? My jury is still out, as it were. But arguments based on Miers' undergraduate pedigree aren't going to sway this particular voter.

Posted by Mitch at 12:42 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Fast Eddie Schultz: Big Talk, Little Guts

You have to figure that anyone who could say this...:

I challenged this hate merchant to a debate, apparently he accepted but never contacted us about accepting. He now frames the spin saying I won't debate him. This is so typical of the right! Change the subject, attack, and misinform.
...about Dennis Prager is about as credible as, say, Atomizer at a temperance meeting, or JB Doubtless at an assertiveness class.

But, surely enough, the Fraters have the story; ostensible lefty blowhard talk show host Fast Eddie Schultz, after flexing on Dennis Prager by demanding a debate, is ducking out; Prager - both the least hateful man in talk radio and the foremost intellectual in the business, praising with faint damnation though that be - called Schultz' bluff.

Schultz tries to parse the situation and escape on a technicality:

Repeatedly he tells his audience I'm a whacked out lefty from Air America. Do some homework guy! I'm not syndicated or associated with AA.
Who cares? Same echo chamber.

Fear not. Neither Schultz nor any other Air America "personality" (to say nothing of KTNF's trite, flyweight local "personalities") will ever meet a conservative talk show host in a fair debate on neutral ground. None of them has the guts to even try. Franken? Mike Malloy? Wild Wendy? Carla "Don't Let Anyone Tell You The Hurricane Wasn't About Race And Class" Kjallberg? Pffft. Mark my words: None of them will ever come out to play. Never.

I'd ask my Fargo-area readers to call KFGO and ask why Fast Eddie's being such a gutless jag. But there's really no point to it; being a liberal talker is about having absolute control of your message, screening out disagreeing callers, and making sure the questions never touch the echo chamber's delicate ears.

Dennis? It's over. You won. Just don't expect Fast Eddie to say so.

Posted by Mitch at 12:34 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

Viking Sex Cruise

Last night, I broke (to the best of my knowledge) the story of the Vikings Sex Cruise.

KARE11 has the story this morning; they have some more details:

The Hennepin County Sheriff's office is investigating reports that a party on a pair of cruise boats, arranged by a Minnesota Vikings player, included nudity, lewd behavior and sex acts.

While a prominent Viking reportedly organized the cruise, KARE 11 is not naming names because no one has been charged with a crime and the Viking in question was not available for comment.

The Sheriff's Office acknowledges detectives are actively investigating what they call a case of possible disorderly conduct on Lake Minnetonka.

The Sheriff's office is keeping mum about the identity of the Viking; as I noted last night, nobody has been charged of anything yet.
A lawyer for Al and Alma's, a company that charters cruises on the lake, confirmed a Vikings player set up the party that took place on two boats last Thursday night.

"There was some physical contact," Stephen Doyle said, "some sexual contact that was troubling to one or more of the crew members."

More later.

Posted by Mitch at 07:42 AM | Comments (37) | TrackBack

Halbleben

I've been wanting to write a commentary on Germany's Bush-v-Gore-like election, and the lousy compromise it's brought to German government.

First Ringer did a perfectly fine job of it, though:

Most bad decisions at least look good on paper; this alliance doesn’t even have that. How exactly a government is going to function with such a disparate coalition of ideologies in control of branches within the same administration will be a fascinating experiment to observe. Certainly coalition governments are nothing new in Europe, but rarely has there been a coalition this wide that it covers both the entire left and right. Imagine an American cabinet divided between the major parties and wonder how much stability could be brought in executing administration policy, let alone forming that administration policy between two stark views of the issues and their solutions. And in Germany’s case, why even attempt to make policy when both sides can agree to a no-confidence vote and resolve what September 18th couldn’t?
I always get exasperated when Americans - invariably far-left ones - mewl and phumpher about how nice it'd be to switch to a parliamentary system. It's hard to explain how lousy the idea is.

Germany today is a case in point.

Posted by Mitch at 07:32 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

"World Ending: Women and Children Most Affected"

Today's Strib editorial almost reads like the classic parody of desperate social muckracking headlines:

Once again the world is reminded that many of its poorest people live in areas most vulnerable to natural disasters.
Damn that Halliburton.

For starters, it's not really true; Los Angeles and Tokyo, both prone to horrible quakes, reportedly have a buck or two to rub together.

And on the other hand, duh. Places without resources can become wealthy (Hong Kong), but places without the rule of law and free markets rarely do; when a lawless, market-less, resource-free place is also prone to horrendous natural disasters, what's the motivation to create wealth (other than via corruption)?

Strib: Master of the bleeding obvious.

Posted by Mitch at 06:02 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

October 10, 2005

Role Models

A source close to law enforcement in the western suburbs of the Twin Cities says a group of local professional athletes chartered a couple of boats on Lake Minnetonka last Friday.

Allegedly, according to the source, the party involved prostitutes, drugs and public sexual activity.

I'm being a little cryptic - I'm going off of one source here. But the source is both reliable and well-placed.

Further details as I can confirm them.

UPDATE: A check of Hennepin county jail records show none of the principals have been arrested.

Posted by Mitch at 10:16 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part VI

It was the final week of my getting ready to move to the Twin Cities, after my rash promise a little over a week earlier.

I got up every morning to go to my job, which was...

...well, not the worst roofing and siding job ever; the weather was gorgeous, and it didn't involve hot tar or metal shingles.

I drove with my boss (and contractor, and only other guy on the site) out to a garage in Cleveland, North Dakota, about 20 miles from Jamestown, every morning around 7, roofed and sided and did other miscellaneous carpentry work until about fivish. Then we drove home.

It was a September and early October a lot like this one, actually; it started out very, very hot in mid-late September, blazingly warm and, by North Dakota prairie standards, humid. By early October, a little nip crept into the air, and by the near-eve of my move, mornings were downright cold, and mid-days were a little chilly. And it was North Dakota, so always, always, the wind.

The garage belonged to a woman who was the ex-wife of one of Jamestown's great guitar players, and (I learned while taking a break in her living room) mother of one of my best friend's girlfriends, although I didn't know it at the time. See, I told you it was a small town...

As I worked, I plotted and planned. And when I say "plan", it was less a matter of making plans I could use to actually make life easier when I got to Minneapolis. No, it was more like "Xtreem Daydreaming. The thoughts centered around a couple of things: the job I'd get, the place I'd live in, the life I'd have.

The job was the hard part. The 10-12 days since I'd told everyone in the world I was moving to Minneapolis hadn't brought me any revelations. My daily trawls through the Star/Tribune at the bookstore found me a few intrigueing leads, to which I promptly dispatched my groaningly florid resume - but nothing really jumped out at me, because at 22 I really had no idea what I wanted to do with my life. I had a degree in English, with minors in History and German, and enough credits for minors in Music and Theatre (but they were almost all performance, so it didn't count) and one course shy of a minor in Computer Science. This last had been a long journey in college; I'd actually double-majored in English and Computer Science until the end of my junior year, when I realized with impeccable timing that I hated Computer Science. I dropped, knowing full well that I was never going to pass "Operating Systems", much less figure out a Senior Project that would interest me, much less anyone else. But I figured - more a vague sense than a plan - that with my background in journalism and the added computer experience, I could get a job as a technical writer. To the extent that I thought at all, that was my "plan".

One thing I knew; my career would not be radio. At 22, I'd worked at three stations since I was 16. I hated spinning records, and knew I'd never get a news gig in a big market. I kissed my radio "career" goodbye.

The place I'd live? That was easier. A cool place. I figured once I got a job, I'd get a cool, funky apartment over some store somewhere (although not in Saint Paul. I only got the vaguest sense of Saint Paul from the maps I daily pored over. The city was an inscrutable enigma to me until long after I moved). Everyone had told me those were the coolest apartments. I'd get a two-bedroom; one for me, one for a home-made "quiet" recording studio that I planned to build, with (I had it all sketched out in my head) an Ensoniq Mirage sampler board, a Yamaha D-9 synth, a Mesa Boogie (that I'd only play at gigs) and a couple of Scholz Rockman and Bassman boxes to run into the four-track cassette deck (and eventually eight-track tape deck) on which I was going to record all the music I was writing.

But my life? That, I had figured out. I knew that once I landed a place, I was going to crank into full song-writing mode - and once I got a job, I was going to start a band, and embark on the real reason for the move; becoming the next Paul Westerberg-via-Joe Grushecky. I didn't know Phillips from the Near North Side, but I knew that the big three bars were the First Avenue, the Uptown and the Cabooze - and exactly who to talk to to get bookings at each. I had no idea what I was going to do for a living, but I knew exactly what I was going to do for a life.

(And the girlfriend I was gonna meet, too; I had her figured out down to a T. Not tall, not blond, not the kind of girl you find in North Dakota. A mixed grab-bag of brunette and auburn hair, brown eyes, darker-veering-toward-olive skin and a bunch of other non-Scandinavian traits danced through my head as I hammered shingles into that cold roof in Cleveland, ND.

I got a lot of daydreaming done that week.

Cleveland was a little town of about 100 or so people in 1985; it's probably not that big now, although I'm sure its cheap property has made it a desirable exurb for people who want to work in Jamestown, so who knows. One thing it had was a gorgeous view of the prairie, since nothing really separated it from the land; it was really an island of little wooden houses and eighty-year-old, mostly-deserted brick storefronts in the middle of a sea of cut stalks and dirt.

My "boss" and I worked late that last Thursday, October 10, 1985, so that Friday - my last day on the gig - wouldn't hold any surprises for us. It was getting late when we packed up; the first purple tinges of the autumn sunset were starting to leak out over the prairie as I gathered the last of my tools and craps from the roof. I sat back for a moment as my "boss" jawboned with the owner of the house (as he seemed to do a lot), and looked into the infinite sky to my west, and felt the wind - 15 gusting to 25, as usual on the prairie - in my face. It was those moments when I felt the place tug on me; sitting in the rawish open air, the wind in my face, the smell of loam and diesel and manure and sawdust on the air, that I forgot my plans for a moment and felt some connection with my anscestors, the Norwegians who climbed off trains in northeastern North Dakota and went on to raise (so the family legends tell me) bumper crops of rocks, decade in, decade out, looking at the same sunset in October, smelling the same smells, feeling the same eternal wind. It's a feeling I still occasionally get when I'm up there, this time of year, that kind of night.

We drove home. The tang of fall was in the evening air; a tang that had told me, the four previous years, "Somewhere, in some dorm, there's gonna be a party going on!"

I think I went to bed early that night.

Posted by Mitch at 06:24 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

"You Must Not Ask Questions. It Is Imperative That You Continue Making Your Payments."

The Strib's institutional editorial this mornng gives its customarily-muted praise for the President's 2.6 billion dollar effort to help public schools educate the school-age refugees from Hurricane Katrina.

But only the right kind of help, mind you.

Can't be getting uppity, here:

Although the spirit is right, a major provision of the aid plan is questionable. The Bush administration wants $488 million of the aid package for private school vouchers of about $7,500 per student. That makes it appear that the administration is using this crisis to advance an idea it could not get through Congress under normal circumstances.

This is no time to sneak in a major policy change; the president and his majority party should not take advantage of a natural disaster to rush through such a plan.

On the contrary - this is the perfect time to try this. The public schools of the Gulf states were among the consistently lowest-achieving schools in the country; Florida, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana's schools have been congenital disasters for decades - and the refugee children have been scattered hither and yon among schools largely in states that those who follow public school performance consistently deride. These are schools that were in trouble before the hurricanes.

So, in a rational world - why not give privatization and vouchers a shot? What could they possibly screw up?

That question, of course, is predicated on "the good of the students" being ones' primary motivation:

Though there are limited voucher experiments underway in a handful of U.S. cities, including Washington, both Congress and many public opinion polls reject the idea of a national voucher program. Any attempt to direct nearly a half-billion federal dollars to private and religious schools deserves full debate and discussion.
Remember this; the Strib wants a debate and discussion.

Both of those, by definition, require two side.

In terms of the Strib's discussion of school choice and privatization, that'd be a first.

An estimated 60,000 Katrina kids were private school students before the hurricane hit. But that doesn't mean they should now receive taxpayer dollars for educations they had financed themselves or through scholarships before.
Really?

Why not? What is it about their private-school status in and of itself that disqualifies them from assistance? Especially the kids from families without the means to continue paying for their private education - and a huge number of private school kids, especially in the inner city, are poor kids with very motivated families.

Look at that sentence backwards, and answer this: Why should the disaster be used to suck more kids into the public school morass?

Nor should public money be used for students and families who now want to give private school a try.
Which is the Strib's stock answer, always, to this issue...
Channeling millions to private programs would take much-needed federal help from many already financially strapped public schools. They are the schools equipped and required to accept all students.
Then why not use the vouchers to take some of the refugee load off of the most heavily-burdened public districts? And at a bargain rate, too - a $7500 voucher is about $3,000 a year cheaper than a year in a Saint Paul public school, for one example.
Private schools, on the other hand, can pick and choose students based on their ability, background or religion. To their credit, many private institutions (such as DeLaSalle in Minneapolis) have generously opened their doors to Katrina victims without the expectation of federal reimbursement.
So let me get this straight; big bad private schools - which are usually cheaper per year than public schools, are not to be supported because they can pick and choose students - but then we see a school that did exactly not that?

We're near the bottom of the editorial - which is where the real point lies:

Leaders of the National Education Association suggest a practical alternative to vouchers. Under current law, many public school districts provide services such as transportation or free and reduced-price lunches for low-income private students. Why not use that same program to assist evacuee students?
Aaaah.

That's right. Why not, indeed, increase the headcounts of the sorts of programs that cement dependence on public schools, and all other forms of public assistance?

Cynicism, thy name is Strib.

Posted by Mitch at 12:57 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Earthquake

Like all too many such events in parts of the world where people are too busy feeding themselves to worry about things like building codes and engineering, the death toll in Pakistan's earthquake is ghastly:

In the shattered streets of Muzaffarabad, where at least 11,000 people died, an Associated Press reporter saw shopkeepers scuffle with people trying to break into businesses. They beat each other with sticks and threw stones, and some people suffered head wounds. No police were nearby.

Residents of Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan's portion of divided Kashmir, said looters also targeted deserted homes. Survivors lacked food and water, and there was little sign of any official coordination of relief in the devastated city of 600,000.

That damn Bush and his FEMA; they just hate Urdu people, don't they?

Sarcasm aside; in events like this, one clings to the little bits of hope:

British rescuers on Monday unearthed a man trapped in rubble for 54 hours, while residents using their bare hands freed two girls buried in a collapsed school.
And this could be the start of a good thing:
Setting aside decades-old rivalries, Pakistan said it would accept earthquake aid from India. Authorities in New Delhi promised delivery "on a very urgent basis.''Fifty-four hours. Makes me wonder not whether we'll see an affirmation of < a href="http://www.shotinthedark.info/archives/006505.html">Berg's Second Law, but how big of one.

Cross-denomination prayers for the whole region...

Posted by Mitch at 12:21 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Chris Coleman's Kerryesque Flipflop

Randy Kelly is persona non grata in the Saint Paul DFL.

This, of course, is not news. Last year Randy Kelly committed a sin far worse to the Saint Paul DFL than being pro-life, pro-Second-Amendment, pro-growth; he was an apostate. He endorsed George W. Bush for President.

Despite three decades of staunch service to the DFL, Randy Kelly is getting relentlessly harangued by the DFL (and the local media, who would seem to be in thebag for Chris Coleman. The one thing the "big tent" Democrats can't stand it someone having enough of a brain to color outside the party-issued lines.

But according to a pamphlet shown to me by a source in the Saint Paul DFL, they're apparently pretty selective about their indignation.

According to the pamphlet, Chris Coleman has:

  • Opposed endorsed DFL candidates. Coleman worked against endorsed DFL candidates Betty McCollum in 2000, Jay Benanav in 2001 (not a big black mark in my book - but then, I'm not someone who pours my heart and soul and shoe leather out for endorsed DFLers, as do, say, Saint Paul DFLers) and Dave "No Smoking" Thune.
  • Endorsed Randy Kelly himself!. I loved this quote, from a 2001 "Kelly For Mayor" brocure: "Randy Kelly will put aside partisanship to build the kind of partnerships that will keep our city strong. The key to our city's future is a mayor who will work with everyone who is committed to making out city a better place to live, work and raise a family".
So - since the mayor's actual opponent called Randy Kelly the best man for the job, and Kelly has largely delivered on his campaign promises, what's the problem?

When you talk about the mayoral race with liberal Saint Paul DFLers, they grumble that there's little to choose from between Chris Coleman and Randy Kelly; both proclaim to the "moderate" pro-business DFLers.

But it looks like at least Kelly will be saying the same things in four years that he's saying today. Unlike Coleman.

Posted by Mitch at 12:12 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

More Later

I must have needed the extra two hours of sleep.

Blah.

More later today.

Posted by Mitch at 07:06 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 08, 2005

Everything Ed Says Is A Lie

I'm still at the "Ante up for Chelsea" poker tournament - well, physically. After an amazing run, I crapped out on the final table, coming in #6 out of 90 contestants, not bad for a game I've never played, methinks. Happy to say, though, that Matthew - who came to the tourney after seeing the invite on this site - is still in the in the final three, so I consider it a moral victory.

By the way, don't believe anything Ed said about the 12 year old girl. She was like a poker version of the attack rabbit in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Have I mentioned Ed is wearing the same Notre Dame jersey he was wearing last week? Give it a civilized burial, Morrissey!

Anyway, it's all for a great cause. There's talk of making it an annual event. Deal me in.

Just don't sit me next to Ed...

During one of the breaks, I walked out to the little vestibule next to the cash bar. They had a table with a display of photos of Chelsea Decker with her late father, Charles. Sobering, to be sure. Any guy who's got a daughter knows there's something special about the relationship between a father and his little girl (as well as with one's son, but the relationships, equal as they are, are very different). And as a girl grows up, she learns so much about what a guy is supposed to be, using her father as the model to which they all compare; without a father in her life, life is that much harder. The system does so much to wrench fathers from childrens' lives; it'd be nice if fate would take a holiday. Alas, it doesn't.

So I was happy to help; if anything about this evening's festivities someday help a little girl feel some bit of her father's presence in her life, it was a well-spent evening.

And kicking some butt helps too...

Posted by Mitch at 11:52 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Join us this evening for the "Ante Up For Chelsea" benefit. It starts at 7 at the Clarion - 494 and France in Bloomington.

Posted by Mitch at 08:28 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

October 07, 2005

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part V

It was Monday, October 7, 1985. One week until I was going to leave for the Twin Cities.

One more week to kill.

Killing time back then was harder than ever. Two nights a week, "Fred's Den" - a bar on mainstreet in Jamestown - had Open Stage nights. Mondays was acoustic night, while Wednesdays they'd drag up a drum kit and some amps and guitars, and people'd jam all night. The whole panoply of Jamestown musicians would show up, if they didn't have a paying gig (and most of them were in that awkward time when they were starting to realize that an A and R man from Epic Records wasn't going to drop through Jamestown, North Dakota and catch their gig at the Albatross or the Gladstone or Fred's in Jamestown, or the T&T or Mick's in Fargo, or any of the other places they'd gig; they were starting to ponder the notion of getting straight jobs they'd actually have to keep. They were some amazing nights out, by the way - I'd be playing on stage with Bill Weber and the Gilbertson brothers (Ken and Paul) and the host, a guy who'd attended Berkeley (in Boston, not the Bay area) for voice and hung around the songwriter scene in Manhattan with the likes of Springsteen in the early seventies (but had apparently had drug problems or mental illness or something, and had come back to North Dakota, as so many people did who left town), and even the legendary Don Salting on guitar, the great Tim Cross on drums, Ken Aune on a beat-up old upright piano, and...

...well, finding a bass player was always tough. Usually it was some guitar player who'd fudge it. I was probably better than most at that - 12 years of playing cello gave me a pretty fair idea about holding down the bottom of a group. But by this point I was sneaking my pal Scott Massine in - he was 19, but hey, the bartender was a musician, too, and he knew how bad the joint needed a real bass player.

And we'd jam. And jam and jam and jam. We did all the standards; "12 Bar Blues in E", "12 Bar Blues in A", "12 Bar Blues in G" (I had a "C" Marine Band harmonica, so I could actually blow some harp on that one), and one magical evening, "12 Bar Blues in F". Occasionally we'd do actual songs - "All Along the Watchtower" was a regular, and Scott and Tim and I did a pretty mean "I Will Follow" - but actual "songs" made a lot of the guys uncomfortable. They just wanted to jam - none of that silly singing, y'know.

So we jammed.

To this day, playing on a stage with a bunch of other musicians - no matter what the genre - is one of my favorite things in the world. In some ways, Mondays were even better; I'd bring a "wood" (or borrow the host's Martin D-45) and play and sing a couple of songs on my own. The deal was this; everyone got three songs, no questions asked (unless you sucked and got booed off the stage, although let's be clear - this was not the club scene in Eight Mile - although I do remember the bartender, Blaine Steller, jumping up an the bar and yelling at some old railroad guy who'd started the same song four times and kept forgetting the words and singing out of key, "You F*****g Suck, Get Off The Stage"). Then you got a drink; after a few weeks, they limited it to beers and weak bar pours, after a few unfortunate incidents with people who played five sets and got "paid" in Long Island Teas.

I usually played a couple of covers and, if I was feeling brave and the crowd was either good or too sparse or drunk to care, one of my own songs.

I went up there that last Monday in town, October 7. As I was walking past the stage, Don Salting said "I'm gonna play a Bruce Springsteen song". "Which one?" I shouted. "Thunder Road".

"Mind if I join you?"

He didn't. I grabbed a guitar, and for once in my life hit all the harmony parts, dead-on (or so my memory tells me). It rocked.

I got another set, and I played a couple of songs; as I sat, figuring out what was going to be #3, somebody yelled out of the dark "Play Darkness On The Edge Of Town". It was a song I'd been doing as a solo number off and on for months. I was kind of amazed that anyone had heard me at all.

Boded well, I thought, for my move to the Twin Cities, where the plan was to become the next Paul Westerberg. So far so good.

Today, Tim Cross is a high school music teacher in southwestern North Dakota. I think Ken teaches music somewhere, too. Don Salting is, I think, a computer guy, and plays some bagpipes as well - birds of a feather, I suppose. Blaine the bartender married a girl I'd had a mondo crush on in high school, and moved to Montana, where I hear they still live, building log cabins for superstars (or, again, so my memory says). Most of the rest of the guys are at the town's State Hospital - mostly as orderlies and attendants. It's been the town's biggest employer for a while now. I don't know if any of them plays anymore.

Fred's Den became a teen club a year or so later, and has sat largely defunct for most of these last twenty years. The current owner - she runs a couple of restaurants next door - rents it out as a banquet hall and party room. Four years ago, my high school graduating class had its twentieth reunion party there.

I was doing the "entertainment" (A game of The Weakest Alumnus, which was a gas, although I'm sure the fact that most everyone was bombed didn't hurt). I stood on that same stage, looking at about half of my class gathered in the booths, and flashed briefly back to a darker, smokier time.

In the past twenty years, my sense of place has pretty much moved to the Twin Cities. But that night, on that stage, a little of it flickered for my old hometown.

But that was all 16 years in the future. In October of 1985, I had a move to plan.

"Plan". Heh.

Posted by Mitch at 07:40 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack

Rhodes: No Scholar

Via Brian Maloney: Randi Rhodes casts the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon as a comedy bit:

"Except Bush appropriates $4 billion for flu prevention, but gives it to the Pentagon. I don't get it.

"I saw a bird fly into the Pentagon once, it wasn't a chicken, it was a commercial airliner.

"Actually, I didn't see it. But I heard about it."

You can listen< if you prefer.

Oh, she also thinks the President should boost the Democrats' plan for dealing with Avian Flu:

"I don't understand this, why don't the Republicans ever have a plan? I mean even if they're as smart as everyone thinks they are, wouldn't they have stolen the Democrats' plan?

"Cause you know, we do have one, our Senate Democrats are going to Asia, they're going to talk to the best scientists, they're going to find out (laughter) everything they can about Avian Flu and they'll bring that knowledge back. We'll be fine.

Got that?

Democrat Senators are going to talk with scientists and solve the problem ("We'll be fine). So that means Joe Freaking Biden and Barbara Boxer are going to trot out the keen intellects they exhibit elsewhere, and go and gnosh with a bunch of the world's smartest people, and solve the problem?

I almost wish we got Rhodes in the Twin Cities.

Posted by Mitch at 07:31 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Katrina Blog Relief Wrapup

I checked out the final results for the "Liberal Blogs for Hurricane Relief" effort.

About $180K. Hey, every penny counts.

Good thing it wasn't a bunch of heartless, self-absorbed conservative bloggers.

No, I'm not trying to be catty. I kid because I can. And $180K ain't chump change, and it's all for a good cause.

But if we conservative bloggers' drive had squibbed, you know dang well we'd have heard about it...

Posted by Mitch at 06:15 AM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Signs of Teflon?

Probably not.

But I can't help but notice that Pawlenty Exposed, one of the worst-written lefty anonyblogs out there, has not bothered to post anything since early June.

Maybe once conservatives started pushing back on Pawlenty's cave-in to the "moderates", he figured there was nothing else to do?

Just a theory.

Posted by Mitch at 06:09 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

All Drama And No Comedy Makes Jack A Dull Star

Via Lileks and Althouse on...

...oh, just watch it. It's a re-cutting of the trailerto pitch "The Shining" as a feel-good movie (Links to a Quicktime movie, :30 seconds).

True story: I'm sitting watching the first 20 seconds, and I'm thinking "There's gonna be a Peter Gabriel song coming up". Hollywood's got it into the formula, I think: "Solsbury Hill" for feel-good, "In Your Eyes" for romantic, "Big Time" for gratingly ironic...

Posted by Mitch at 06:00 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

@ The Brink

Disclaimer: Languages fascinate me.

Computer geekery, as a rule, does not.

But the subjects cross paths in this piece by Nancy Szokan on the lowly "@" sign around the world.

I'm talking on the phone to an Israeli writer who goes by the nickname Winkie, and I want to send him some information. "What's your e-mail?" I ask.

"Winkie M, Strudel, Yahoo dot com," he says.

"Strudel?" I said. "As in the pastry?" (I'm thinking: Maybe he has a little bakery on the side?) "You mean WinkieM, then s-t-r-u-d- ... "

"No, no -- it's strudel, that little A sign," he says. "I think you call it 'at'?"

Szokan goes on to explain how the lowly "at" is named around the world:
In Russia, for instance, it seems that the most common word for the @ is sobaka (dog) or sobachka (doggie) -- apparently because a computer game popular when e-mail was first introduced involved chasing an @-shaped dog on the screen...Apparently it reminds a lot of people around the world of a monkey with a long and curling tail; thus, their e-mail addresses might include variations of the word for monkey. That's majmunsko in Bulgarian, malpa in Polish, majmun in Serbian and shenja e majmunit ("the monkey sign") in Albanian. Or they might call it an "ape's tail": aapstert in Afrikaans, apsvans in Swedish, apestaart in Dutch, Affenschwanz among German-speaking Swiss. (Many Germans apparently used to say Klammeraffe, meaning "clinging monkey," or Schweinekringel, a pig's tail -- though these days it's usually just "at.") In Croatian, they call the sign "monkey," but they say the word in English. Go figure.

Does the sign make you think of a snail? That's what you might get in Korean (dalphaengi) or Italian (chiocciola) or sometimes Hebrew (shablul, when they're not saying strudel). The French apparently flirted briefly with escargot. "Yes, it looks like a snail," noted one amused Korean. "But isn't it funny and ironic, since 'snail mail' is opposed to e-mail in English?"

Do you see the @ as a curled-up cat? That's why it's sometimes kotek or "kitten" in Poland and miuku mauku in Finland, where cats say "miau."

And on, and on.

She also notes that, unfortunately, "At" is taking over and driving out the local appelations.

Bummer. I may have to adopt one the the endangered words, in the spirit of conservation.

I'm torn between "Dalphaengi", "Chiocciola" and "Kotek".

Posted by Mitch at 05:20 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Lewis, Redux

Two sources with knowledge of the situation say that Jason Lewis will return to KSTP-AM in the mid-day shift, basically replacing Rush Limbaugh.

This of course trashes my prediction, but whatever.

It seems a curious decision; mid-days don't generate all that much ad revenue. With Limbaugh, it wasn't a problem - the station paid nothing for Limbaugh's show (Limbaugh's salary came entirely from network spots); every nickel in advertising the station sold went to the station. Now, they have to cover a good-sized nut in a time of day that just doesn't generate that much money.

Again - still in the realm of rumors, but the story seems to be firming up.

Posted by Mitch at 05:14 AM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

October 06, 2005

Good News, Bad News

There's good news and bad news in this story on Teen trends.

Good news: "Teenagers are turning from hip-hop ..."

Bad news: "to prep".

Worse news: "The runaway leader in teen fashion is Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co., which also owns the Hollister brand. Hollister and A&F were the top two clothing brands among teens, said Jeffrey Klinefelter, a senior analyst at Piper Jaffray."

Much Worse News, with two teenagers in the house: "New fashion means new shoes, as teens look for footwear to match different styles. Teens are planning to boost their footwear spending this year by about 34 percent, according to the survey."

I never minded hip-hop music - at least back during the glory days of NWA and Public Enemy, when one could tell one song from another - and I still love, say, Eminem. But the fashions - especially the baggy pants halfway down the kids' butts that were en vogue when my stepson was in high school - gave me a headache.

Almost as big a headache as prep clothes gave me, when they were vogue-y when I was in college.

I, by the way, was grunge before grunge was cool. Like, seven years before it was cool.

Posted by Mitch at 03:26 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

Over Carolla'd

Years ago, if I was up late at night, I'd flip on Loveline, a late-night talk radio show where "Doctor Drew" Pinsky and one Adam Carolla dispensed advice - amid jokes, ridicule and the occasional nugget of wisdom - about love, sex and relationships.

Pinsky is a fine radio talent. Carolla is a wisecracking morning guy transplanted to the Advice beat. And suddenly he's everywhere on TV, and I've pretty much had enough of him.

Jess agrees:

Now, Adam Carolla has not one but TWO shows on television. And he's no longer a sidekick or a co-host. He's running the show. And this disturbs me, as he is neither funny nor clever, and his voice makes the hair on my arms stand up when I have to hear him for longer than ten minutes.

TV network executives, especially those at Comedy Central and TLC but really, all of you, I think I speak for viewers everywhere when I say that the world does NOT need more Adam Carolla.

And you can knock off the Jimmy Kimmell, too.

Posted by Mitch at 12:06 PM | Comments (20) | TrackBack

Bleagh

Not feeling well today. Light posting until probably noonish.

Posted by Mitch at 06:51 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Coming Up Short on Context

The media is in full "spike the ball in the end zone" mode; the Army missed its recuiting goal for the year.

Disaster, right?

Stephen Spruiell says "not so fast":

First, the primary reason for the shortfall is the fact that the Army was trying to grow this year. According to AP reports, several members of Congress believe the Army needs to expand by 50,000 soldiers in order to take some of the burden off of those currently serving in the Middle East. In pursuit of this goal, the Army increased its recruiting goal this year to 80,000 from 72,000 last year. This 8,000-recruit increase puts the 7,000 recruit shortfall into a context that many media accounts are missing.

Second, media accounts have focused on the war in Iraq as the main cause for the recruiting shortfall. Evidence indicates that the strong economy was a more influential factor. The Army last missed its recruiting goals in 1999, coming up 6,290 recruits short. There was no war in 1999. Rather, the economy was growing and providing competitive opportunities for people who would otherwise consider enlisting.

Don't be silly - it happened more than thirty days ago. It's off the radar.

Posted by Mitch at 06:50 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

October 05, 2005

OKC Suicide Bomber

The guy who blew himself up at last weekend's Oklahoma football game? Just a depressed student.

Well, that's the media's official word.

According to Michelle Malkin, there's more to it than that:

Hinrichs reportedly tried to buy ammonium nitrate. Gateway Pundit Jim Hoft has details....

Channel Oklahoma reported last night that Hinrichs' bomb contained TATP, the same substance used by shoebomber Richard Reid...Experts say it is made by mixing common household items such as drain cleaner and bleach to create a white powder with a strong smell...

NewsOK.com confirms that Hinrichs tried to buy a "large quantity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer" at a Norman, Ok., feedstore four days before the bombing and reports that Hinrichs attended the same Norman mosque once attended by Zacarias Moussaoui.

Look for the major media to spring into action...

...to hide and deny the existence of any of this evidence.

Posted by Mitch at 12:22 PM | Comments (12) | TrackBack

Hpp Brthd, Vclv Hvl! (N Czch!)

Two of my heroes of the eighties and nineties (after Reagan, Thatcher and the Pope) were Lech Walesa and Vaclav Havel.

It's Havel's birthday today.

Red has a great post on his significance, and her reaction to him as a playwrite, speaker and leader.

Posted by Mitch at 12:11 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part IV

Resumes in hand - and an actual job lead clipped from the Sunday Star/Tribune (which, I didn't yet know, didn't put all of its job leads in the outstate edition), I set my date: Monday, October 14.

I had a couch or two to stay on. I had a company in the Twin Cities that was interested in talking with me when I got to town.

I had a goal!

I had nine days to kill before I could blow out of town, outside of work (which at that time was doing roofing and siding in the tiny town of Cleveland, North Dakota). But I had a little spring in my step that I hadn't had before my impulsive decision to move.

Did I mention that I had nine days to kill?

I spent part of it working on my car.

Of course, my car needed at least that long to be ready to go.

I was driving my first car at this point - a 1973 Malibu that I'd bought from my pal Rich Larson. I'd paid $125 and a case of beer for it. (Don't laugh - I think at that point North Dakota title transfer forms had space for things like beer and cattle along with money). It had been a "farm car" in Northern Minnesota (from whence Rich hailed). This was important; in the winter, Minnesota salted its roads, while North Dakota used some sort of chemical or another. As a result, fifteen year old cars in North Dakota were frequently pretty pristine, while Minnesota cars tended to get mottled with rust. The Malibu? Well, it has gotten me through a year and a half of college, and even a couple of trips to Fargo - 90 miles, no accidents or breakdowns. She ran great, but rust had eaten most of the side panels up to the two foot level. The driver's side door panel flapped in the breeze; if I got going much more than 20 miles per hour, it picked up a bit of an airfoil effect; I'm sure if I could have gotten it up to 150 it might have taken flight (and rolled me over clockwise, since the left door panel was either fine or completely rusted away; I can't remember).

But it had a 350, and it could still go plenty fast. Although the tires were bald and, not being much of a mechanic, the thing was pretty much running on faith.

I bought a couple of new used tires, changed the oil, and got 'er ready for the trip.

Posted by Mitch at 06:48 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Duluth Justice

A while ago, a couple of kids vandalized a new building at the U of M/Duluth.

As the buildings are completed - with millions of dollars in repairs due to the vandalism - Swiftee notes:

The new science building at UofM (Duluth) opened last week, after having completed an additional $8 million dollars in repairs that were necessitated when two drugged-out morons wrecked the place earlier this summer.

You might think that the responsible party's would be receiving their mail at the Stillwater Correctional Institution, but you'd be wrong....hang on to your bloomers:

With bloomers in hand, run to Swiftee's site for the answer...

Posted by Mitch at 06:19 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

October 04, 2005

Three Canards

In a previous thread, commenter "Teena" - who seems a thoroughly well-meaning sort - listed three canards of the (I'll be charitable) anti-war left that I think need to be examined more closely.

I'm going to quote "Teena" for each of these canards - but she obviously didn't originate any of the ideas.

Canard 1: "Invasion and occupation never works to the benefit of the people of the victimized country." - This is the more-detailed cousin of that oldie-but-goodie, "War Isn't The Answer". It's also just as inaccurate; war is sometimes the lesser of the evils confronting one. And occupation has worked to the occupee benefit many times:


  • Japan - If there was ever a country that seemed less amenable to democracy than the world of extremist Islam, it'd be Japan. Its State Shinto religion was as insane as extreme Wahabbism, and it controlled an entire nation, complete with one of the most modern militaries on earth. It preached suicide bombing and rule by terror as effectively as the worst of Islam. And there was no "moderate shinto" nation to counter it, as with Indonesia or India or Senegal or Mali. And yet our occupation created, in one generation, a democracy from one of the most insular, clannish, warlike, chauvinistic, hive-like societies on earth. Because of occupation, not in spite of it. Which led directly to...
  • South Korea - Former Japanese territory, we occupied it - by Teena's standards, we still do. The ROK has had its rough spots, but - here's the important part - somehow, the love of and belief in democracy survived and throve during the years of military rule and chap-sae leadership. Occupation wins another.
  • Germany - In one generation, the occupation of Germany created a pacifistic, pluralistic nation with a thriving democracy - from a nation that had bought en masse into one of history's most evil regimes. Because of occupation, not in spite of it. This occupation led directly to the liberation of...:
  • East Germany, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Albania (and God willing, soon, again, Romania) - No, we never occupied these nations. But each of them threw off their Soviet occupiers and joined the "occupation" force, NATO, led by the US and UK - the chief "occupiers" of Germany. The "onerous occupation" that "solves nothing" was joined by ten (technically 11, with the breakup of Czechoslovakia, and hopefully soon 11 after Romania rebels again) nations, not just voluntarily but with great enthusiasm. Another problem solved by invasion and occupation.
  • Austria - Occupied by the Allies, Austria is a thriving democracy.
  • Italy - Occupied by the Allies (technically still occupied - US troops are based there, as in Germany), the Italians not only built a thriving (if bumptuous) democracy, but absorbed its lessons well enough to fight for that democracy against a near-insurgency in the seventies.
  • The Philippines - We occupied the Philippines in 1900, and promised them independence and democracy. And then we delivered - on our promise to withdraw, anyway. Ferdinand Marcos was an evil dictator - we must have done a lousy job. Right?

    Wrong. Among the Filipino people there grew a regard for democracy that survived and eventually sent Marco to history's ash heap. The Phillipines faces challenges - huge ones - but they have the benefit of having learned what democracy was about.

  • India - India was occupied for hundreds of years by the British. Gaining independence from Britain was difficult; gaining it from socialism was harder (socialism exacerbated India's endemic problem with famine). But the subcontinent developed a liberal tradition that has seen it through, and has put it on its way - in a generation or two - to genuine democracy.
  • Afghanistan - Another nation with huge challenges - but that would seem to be off on the right foot.
So while the left says "invasion and occupation never work", I've just given you 18 nations that are free and self-determining - or on their way - as a direct result of invasion and occupation.

By the way, Iraq will also succeed.

Canard 2: "People in this country, for the most part, do not want our troops to be in Afghanistan or Iraq" - Polls are funny things. If someone were to ask me if I want the troops, home, I'd say "Yes", too. People I know have lost relatives. And a pollster who wanted to could take that response and count me among the Americans who wants to cut and run - but it'd be misleading. As are, I suspect, the polls that lead to that conclusion. I suspect if you asked Americans how they felt about leaving Iraqis before they're ready to govern themselves, the answer would be different. Different still if they were to actually get accurate news from Iraq.

Canard 3: "They want justice, peace, equality." - Those are platitudes, not goals. "Justice" is issued by kings just as surely as courts. "Peace" reigns in cemeteries as much as it does in the meadow. All are equal - equally worthless - where tyranny reigns. Too much of the left doesn't distinguish between them, though. As, indeed, Teena seems not to.

Posted by Mitch at 12:14 PM | Comments (62) | TrackBack

Petraeus

Via the Powerguys, I saw Tigerhawk's coverage of a speech at Princeton by Lt. General David Petraeus.

Petraeus is the former commander of the Multi-National Security Transition Command and NATO Training Mission in Iraq, and before that commanded the 101st Airborne during the liberation of the country. We've met him before in this space.

He chops up a number of the fantasy-based community's favorite dreams about the war.

Interesting stuff; read the whole thing, naturally (Tigerhawk did a great job).

But a few points I think bear calling out:


  • The "Only One Iraqi Battalion Ready for Combat" Canard - The media and the left have been harping on this as a sign of failure, without really knowing what they're talking about. Says Petraeus: "Level 1 is fully independent, “capable of planning and executing operations, and sustaining itself, without coalition support.” This is a very high standard, and because it requires no coalition support in combat, whether logistical or in the form of indirect fire support. As reported this week, only one battalion operates at this level now, but the press accounts did not make clear what a difficult standard this is. Indeed, two other battalions had reached this level but were downgraded because of personnel changes (my sense was that a key officer was transferred)." A question I'd love to ask Petraeus; "Level 1" means a unit that can plan its own missions, supply itself in action, and take on the enemy without any Coalition support, including no artillery, artillery, or "fire brigade" of US troops standing by to bail them out, as gauged by similar standards to the US military. How many of the NATO units in Kosovo would fit that description? How many French and German non-special-forces units - the ones that John Kerry was so hot for the US to wait on - could meet that standard? Petraeus notes that the media misses the huge success story - the huge preponderance of the Iraqi military that operates at Level 2 (independant, but need help with logistics and artillery support) and Level 3 (fully capable of fighting alongside US troops and being more dangerous to the enemy than themselves).

  • The "We Shouldn't Have Disbanded the Iraqi Army" fallacy - Petraeus' position is a bit nuanced here: while there should have been a better plan for employing the troops and junior officers, the Iraqi Army that existed before 2003 was largely useless: "I do not necessarily accept the idea that we should not have disbanded that Iraqi army. It was bloated with general officers – there were 1100 generals in one province alone, each one of whom expected us to do what they wanted – and it was an army that had not fought." Petraeus details the difficulties of training troops from the old Iraqi military - which never taught marksmanship - to US standards.
  • The One-Sidedness of the Media's Coverage - Petraus hasn't much good to say about the mainstream media's coverage of Iraq: "General Patraeus said that they have given the media an enormous amount of information, including countless important metrics for measuring progress, but that it is largely ignored. He observed that the enemy “On many days it is impossible to break through the steady drumbeat of sensational attacks occurring in Baghdad throughout the country. The opening of the new military academy got no coverage at all, even though it was a big event with the whole Iraqi government in attendance." Tigerhawk adds "Patraeus is obviously extremely unhappy with the monomaniacal press coverage.
You could do worse than reading the whole thing.

Posted by Mitch at 07:16 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

For the 14th Time...

...Kate at Yucky Salad with Bones is turning 24.

Congrats!

Your brother in law is still wrong about Little Steven and the Disciples of Soul, though.

Posted by Mitch at 06:47 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Miers: My Theory

Everyone who knows anything has already sounded off about Harriett Miers.

Now it's the turn of all of us who don't really know jack.

The WaPo says:

IN REPLACING Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, President Bush could have opted for ideological confrontation and an automatic confirmation battle. His nomination of Harriet Miers, his White House counsel, may save the country from that ugly outcome.
I think the only ugliness that the WaPo cared about was a repeat of the humiliation of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committe; a Janice Rogers Brown would have finished the job Roberts started.

But seriously - here's what I think. Bush has driven the court a bit right in replacing Rehnquist with Roberts. Not much, but enough.

My hunch - and it's just a hunch, although it seems good enough for Hugh Hewitt - is that the President knows Miers well enought to know that, despite dalliances with the Democrats, she's reliably conservative enough in her legal views to be an improvement over O'Connor. He's learned a lesson from the failures of his father, who nominated a dark horse more or less unknown to him in David Souter.

With this, Bush:

  • Conserves political capital for the battles he's fighting right now - over the war and hurricane recovery
  • Moves the court incrementally to the right. Think about it; is a court with Roberts and Miers more conservative than one with Rehnquist and O'Connor?
  • Saves political capital for the battle over the Stevens seat, which may well open up later in his term, and will constitute a battle royale. Stevens, a paleoliberal nominated by Woodrow Wilson Jimmy Carter, is a seat the Dems know they have to keep rigidly left of center.
That's what I'm thinking at the moment, anyway.

Posted by Mitch at 06:43 AM | Comments (18) | TrackBack

October 03, 2005

Implausible Deniability

Jerry Springer tries to claim he's only a little bit pregnant not really that much of an Air America personality.

Brian Maloney transcribes a call between Springer and a caller that apparently snuck past Air America's screeners:

Okay, uh, honestly. Uh, on some of the stations around the country, I’m on Air America. On some of the stations around the country, I’m not on Air America. So, uh, I, you know, I can’t answer that because the truth is I don’t know. Once I find something out about it, I’m willing to address it. I’m not dodging it all. Uh, but, you know, again, most of the people listening to me are not listening to me on Air America, so I can’t deal with that…
I'd figured that Springer had a chance to succeed with FrankenNet; I'd figured that he had at least some daily broadcasting chops. I haven't heard the show yet, but if Maloney is correct (read the post), I missed a key point; doing TV, even crazy TV, is very, very different than live talk radio. (Just as it's very different than doing public radio, as a lot of FrankenNet's people are starting to figure out). Springer's been able in his TV career to just sit back and let shows "spontaneously" erupt into spasms of mayhem, with plenty of help from the TV editing process. You don't get that break on talk radio.

Oops.

The funny part, of course (again, read Brian's piece) is the way the kinder, gentler, duller radio Springer is crabwalking away from Air America...

Posted by Mitch at 12:49 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part III

It was a little afternoon on Wednesday, October 3, 1985. I drove up to my old college - where I'd graduated about five months earlier - and saw the "career counselor", Mrs. Gump (the name has been changed, not so much to protect her identity as because I've completely forgotten it).

Mrs. Gump was a flinty, late fortyish woman who had a reputation as a businesswoman; she'd worked for several years for a regional clothing chain based in Fargo. She was working at the college part-time, after having moved to Jamestown to...

...well, that part of the story was a little fuzzy.

But I went in feeling very confident; while I didn't have a lot of work experience (a couple years at three radio stations, three years as a stagehand at the college theater, two years as a computer tutor, two more as a remedial english tutor, and a bunch of odd jobs), I at least knew how to write. If nothing else, I figured I could write a pretty mean resume.

The woman tore my typewritten rough draft to shreds. The red ink on my draft resume looked like the Valentine's Day Massacre. Worse, I made the mistake - according to Mrs. Gump - of writing in fairly natural English. Her suggested rewrites...

...sounded like something out of a nineteenth century broadsheet. Lots of passive tense, lots of referring to myself in the third person ("Mr. Berg is considered an excellent..."), lots of superlatives that, in her examples, seemed to dangle in sentences for no more reason than, say, Kevin Federline's existence ("Excellent references available upon request") - the sort of stuff that made my news-writing head spin.

"The people you're writing to aren't news people. They're business people. They write and read different", said Mrs. Gump.

"Like what? Like extras in a community theatre melodrama?" I silently wondered.

So I rewrote my resume. She gave it her stamp of approval, and I walked down to the local printer to get them photocopied on heavyweight paper ("Absolutely vital!", said Mrs. Gump. "If you don't use 60-pound ivory-laid paper, you'll never even get an interview!") at about a hard-earned buck a pop.

And I looked at them, when they came back the next day (!) and thought "I'm a fine candidate for a Horace Greeley review, anyway...". And I rewrote my resume in regular English, just to be safe...

Posted by Mitch at 12:11 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

Sins of Omission

Zombietime hammers the SanFranChron in its wonderful analysisAnatomy of a Photograph.

This is the photograph:

Says the zombie:

The San Francisco Chronicle featured the original photograph on its front Web page in order to convey a positive message about the rally -- perhaps that even politically aware teenagers were inspired to show up and rally for peace, sporting the message, "People of Color say 'No to War!'" And that served the Chronicle's agenda.

But this simple analysis reveals the very subtle but insidious type of bias that occurs in the media all the time. The Chronicle did not print an inaccuracy, nor did it doctor a photograph to misrepresent the facts. Instead, the Chronicle committed the sin of omission: it told you the truth, but it didn't tell you the whole truth.

Because the whole truth -- that the girl was part of a group of naive teenagers recruited by Communist activists to wear terrorist-style bandannas and carry Palestinian flags and obscene placards -- is disturbing, and doesn't conform to the narrative that the Chronicle is trying to promote. By presenting the photo out of context, and only showing the one image that suits its purpose, the Chronicle is intentionally manipulating the reader's impression of the rally, and the rally's intent.

Such tactics -- in the no-man's-land between ethical and unethical -- are commonplace in the media, and have been for decades. It is only now, with the advent of citizen journalism, that we can at last begin to see the whole story and realize that the public has been manipulated like this all along.

Read the whole thing; it's a textbook example of major-media deception and - in the postscript - arrogance.

Posted by Mitch at 07:20 AM | Comments (17) | TrackBack

Another Reason Elections Matter

On The World Wide Rant (Via LGF) - the BBC polled people to get their votes for a hypothetical (?) world government.

The winners?

1 - Nelson Mandela
2 - Bill Clinton
3 - Dalai Lama
4 - Noam Chomsky
5 - Alan Greenspan
6 - Bill Gates
7 - Steve Jobs
8 - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
9 - Richard Branson
10 - George Soros
11 - Kofi Annan
But who actually voted?

Silly people:

And two religious leaders, both associated with challenges to dominant authority, found a place in the winning line-up - the Dalai Lama in third and Archbishop Desmond Tutu in eighth. Pope Benedict XVI came 28th.

Politicians miss out

Perhaps the biggest surprise was the success of the American linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky, who came fourth. Another outspoken American, Michael Moore, was 15th.

Other placings included Osama bin Laden, at 70th, and Harry Potter author JK Rowling, who was 49th...U2 frontman Bono came in at 14th, while Pele was the highest scoring sportsman at 25th.

Footballer David Beckham limped in at number 72, with Kylie Minogue five places below him. Jennifer Lopez was almost at rock bottom in 92nd place.

Europeans are so much more sophisticated than Americans, doncha know?

Posted by Mitch at 05:50 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Doug Runs for the Border

Doug from Bogus Gold explores the inner zen of Taco Bell:

Years of exhaustive first-hand field research of this sort has finally allowed me to pierce the veil of mystery and explain the eternal question: "What's up with the seeming randomness of getting your hot sauce at a Taco Bell drive thru window?"

The first thing to recognize is that there are three distinctive types of Taco Bell locations: The well-oiled machine, the incompetent, and the clueless.

Doug explains the difference.

But, I must ask, to what avail, when Taco Johns is available?

Of all the world's great holy wars (Smalltalk vs. Java, RUP versus MSF, Saint Paul vs. Minneapolis, Islam vs. Christianity, "Tastes Great" vs. "Less Filling"), the one between Tacos John and Bell might be the most savage; partisans of one rarely allow that the other has a reason to exist.

To me, though, the argument breaks out like this:

  • Taco John's - Ersatz Mexican Food.
  • Taco Bell - Cardboard replicas of ersatz Mexican food
In proof that the universe is unjust, I live mere blocks from the nearest Taco Bell, but eight road miles from the nearest Taco Johns. Doug, however, lives mere moments from one of the finest T. Johns in the metro - and yet, on he gabbles about the loathsome Bell.

Note to Taco Johns' management; since you tore down your Western Avenue store in 1988, I've stuck with you. But you need to give a guy some sugar.

Er, salsa.

Posted by Mitch at 05:37 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

100 Essential Country Songs

JB Doubtless (a freelance blogger who writes occasionally for Fraters and Nihilist) and I have been in an ongoing debate about music. Sort of.

Anyway, I was driving around last night and I caught a show on MPR - didn't catch the name - hosted by Rodney Crowell. Crowell is one of the best songwriters in any American music genre of the past 30 years; a former son-in-law of the late Johnny Cash (a status that is it's own great genre; Marty Stuart, another of my favorite c&w artists, is another), Crowell is amazing.

The show was on the legacy of Cash. It was all good - especially a segment where Crowell interviewed his ex-wife Roseanne Cash.

Roseanne noted that when she turned 18 and evinced an interest in a career as a c&w musician, her father gave her a list of 100 essential country western songs. Learn these, Cash related her father telling her, and you'll have a solid basis in the whole style. The list was not some museum archive, either - according to Ms. Cash, the list was classics and old Carter Family tunes, plus country protest songs, plus newer stuff. Also, the list is missing. Ms. Cash hopes to find it someday.

So what's on the list?

What are the 100 essential country/western songs?

I'll take a whack at a few, from my perspective of having worked at a couple of c&w stations and listened to some of the genre:

  • I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry - Hank Williams (which was, in fact, on the original list).
  • Blue Eyes Crying In The Rain - Willie Nelson, duh.
  • Boulder To Birmingham - Emmylou Harris
  • Wayfaring Stranger - Trad.
  • Wreck On The Highway - Roy Acuff...OK, that's five. We need 95 more.

    I hereby disqualify "I'm Gonna Hire A Wino to Decorate Our Home" by David Frizzell.

    Or not.

    Anyway - leave a comment!

    Posted by Mitch at 05:09 AM | Comments (11) | TrackBack

RIP Living Constitution

The big casualty of the Roberts hearings?

According to Curt Levey, it's the concept of the "Living Constitution"

While liberals have traditionally embraced the living Constitution, conservative legal thinkers abhor it. They see it as nothing more than an excuse for judges inventing law — like the Supreme Court's Miranda warnings and the "right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, [and] of the universe."

Given the dependence of the liberal judicial agenda on a living Constitution, it is telling that the term and its equivalents were used only once by a Democratic senator during the Judiciary Committee's five days of hearings and voting. Dahlia Lithwick of Slate reports a similar abandonment in the literature. One can only conclude that liberals now feel the need to distance themselves from the concept. Deprived of the unabashed support of its biggest fans, the living Constitution’s best days are likely behind it.

Adios, Living Constitution.

Even if George Bush accomplishes nothing else in his two terms (and that will not be the case), if the idea of the "living constitution" dies on his watch, it will be a fine accomplishment.

Posted by Mitch at 04:47 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Odd

If you read blogs, this story isn't much of a surprise:

U.S. troops battled insurgents holed up in houses and driving explosives-laden vehicles in a town near the Syrian border, killing at least 28 of them Sunday in an expansion of their two-day-old offensive against Al-Qaida fighters along the Euphrates River valley, the military said.
The part that's almost disconcerting is that it appears in the Star/Tribune, under the headline:
U.S., Iraqi forces flush out insurgents; 28 killed
A change in the Strib's philosophy in covering the war?

Or is some copy editor's head gonna roll?

Posted by Mitch at 04:25 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack

August Wilson

August Wilson - who lived in Saint Paul for 12 yearsa while he wrote most of his decalogue on the black experience in America - died yesterday:

August Wilson, the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright whose celebrated epic cycle chronicled the lives of blacks in 20th-century America, succumbed to liver cancer Sunday at Swedish Hospital in Seattle, where he has lived since 1990. Before that, he lived in St. Paul, starting in 1978, and wrote most of his oeuvre in the Twin Cities.

His death at age 60 was announced Sunday by personal assistant Dena Levitin. "He was surrounded by family," she said.

I don't suspect a lot of people know what we've lost:
"Radio Golf," the last of the 10 plays of his cycle, premiered at the Yale Repertory Theatre in April, some two decades after his 1984 breakthrough work, "Ma Rainey's Black Bottom," premiered at the same venue.

In June, he was diagnosed with the advanced liver cancer that would silence the breath of the man who gave the world such masterworks as "Fences" and "The Piano Lesson," both Pulitzer winners, as well as "Joe Turner's Come and Gone,"Jitney" and "Seven Guitars."

"Each work stands on its own as an important accomplishment, but taken together they are a singular body of achievement," said director Marion McClinton, nominated for a Tony Award for staging Wilson's "Gem of the Ocean" in New York. "I was lucky enough to have spent four days over the Labor Day weekend with him. It was obvious that he was sick, but his wit, his moral outrage, the lyrical storytelling, the love of his people were all there."

Posted by Mitch at 04:17 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack

October 01, 2005

I'm Not Sure...

...what astounds me more; the story that the feds never delivered $100,000,000 worth of ice intended to help out Katrina victims...:

Ninety-one thousand tons of ice cubes, that is, intended to cool food, medicine and sweltering victims of the storm. It would cost taxpayers more than $100 million, and most of it would never be delivered.
...or that it's possible to spend a tenth of a billion dollars on ice in the first place.

That comes to just short of $1,100 a ton, 55 cents a pound.

Posted by Mitch at 06:57 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

Ante Up

Make sure you attend next weekend's "Ante Up for Chelsea" next Saturday (October 8) at 7pm at the Clarion Hotel in Bloomington. $20 gets you in for an evening of texas hold-em, free beer and snacks, and more. It's all for a great cause - read Ed's post for the details.

I'll see you there.

Posted by Mitch at 02:58 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

It Was Twenty Years Ago Today, Part II

After the little outburst on Friday, September 28, 1985, I had a weekend to think about it.

I didn't. I did the whole homecoming thing. I told everyone that I thought would care about the plans (which amounted to maybe 15 people).

But now it was Monday, October 1. It was back to work.

I set to things with a resolution I'd gotten out of the habit of, during the past five months. I gave notice at my various jobs. I figured out what kind of money I had. I got my car - a very beat-up '73 Malibu that was, in retrospect, not even roadworthy - ready for the drive. I called my friends in the Cities, arranging couches to crash on.

And I went to the library to look at the Sunday Star/Tribune's want ads, looking for anything an English major with a putative talent for writing could do - and came away feeling just a tad depressed.

I needed a resume.

Now, my obscure little college wasn't much on career counseling - a sore spot among a lot of graduates of the day. The college was, to be fair, trying to stay solvent (it came within 24 hours of closing the following year). But they had just hired a woman to help out in that department - a woman who had had an executive job at a small clothing-store chain in Fargo, and so knew the world of business. She worked like ten hours a week, out of a little office in the back of the cafeteria.

I made an appointment for Wednesday to get a resume whipped into shape.

Posted by Mitch at 09:52 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

JB Doubtless: Slave to Marketing

I heard this conversation before a meeting the other day:

Chuck: "I like Coca Cola".

Barry: "I did - until I saw Pepsi's can."

Chuck: "Er, whaddya mean?"

Barry: "What color is Coke's can?"

Chuck: "Er...red and white?"

Barry: "Exactly. Pepsi is red, white AND blue."

Chuck: "So?

Barry: "So Pepsi's more patriotic!"

Chuck: (Whacks self upside head) "WHAT? Are you NUTS? That was just a marketing decision! Some corporate executive thought it'd make the right impression..."

Barry: (Slurping down a Pepsi).

Chuck: "Never mind".

========

So Over the years, I worked at 2.1 country western stations (KDAK in Carrington, ND, WDGY in Minneapolis, and one day at KQDJ-FM in Jamestown, ND, before I quit).

In that time, I learned a few things about country/western music:

  1. When it's bad, it's very, very bad.
  2. When it's mediocre, it's very, very bad.
  3. When it's good, it's very, very good.
  4. If you hear it on mainstream country radio, it's probably mediocre. At best.
Now, I did learn to like quite a bit of country; I love Emmylou Harris, Rodney Crowell, Steve Earle, Clint Black, Dwight Yoakam, Roseanne Cash, Willie Nelson. As a rule, I love the older stuff; the twangier the better. And there is some great songwriting out there, all cliches aside.

The worst thing about country/western? While all popular music, whether rock, hip-hop, country, R&B, pop or what-have-you is controlled by corporations who very carefully market music to their selected audience segments, no genre of mass-market popular music is more a creation of marketing than mainstream country/western music.

It's safe to say that almost nothing gets on country-western radio without the express blessing of one of a couple of dozen executives on Music Row in Nashville (or Los Angeles) - and no genre depends more on airplay than Country. And it's not like those couple of dozen execs are especially creative, either; when Kenny Rogers went pop in 1977, suddenly country radio was clogged with slick pop-crossover music. In the early '80s, when Randy Travis and "Urban Cowboy" made honky-tonk hip, the airwaves were overrun with interchangeable Randy Travis clones (Ricky Van Shelton, anyone?).

When Garth Brooks came upon the scene and conquered all before him with his back-to-the-roots style, laconic delivery and showbiz savvy, Music Row began turning out cheap copies like a Chinese toy factory stamping out Happy Meal prizes (anyostene remember Doug Stone, Randy Collie and...jeez, I used to be able to name like twenty of them off the top of my head)

Today, country fans are somewhere between the Country Diva trend (Faith Hill, Shania Twain, Martina McBride, Reba, Wynonna Judd and the like) and White Trash Chic, with the likes of Big and Rich, Toby Keith, Alan Jackson (himself one of the last survivors of the "Mini-Garth" genre). But you may rest assured that if a black rasta lesbian in a stetson sold a million copies of a country-reggae-hop single, Nashville will follow up with an avalanche of alternative lifestyle worldbeat/western, just as soon as Nashville's most elite market research companies held enough focus groups and market tests to know exactly how world-beaty, black, female and lesbian they could be to maximize sales.

JB and I have been going back and forth on the subject of music (and, in a broader sense, art) and politics for years now. Despite being the most conservative person I personally know - or perhaps because of it - I enjoy a lot of different types of art, much of it by artists who happen to be grossly left-of-center.

JB responds that there's a "price" one "pays" when listening, say, to music (even non-political music) by liberals like Springsteen, U2, Steve Earle, Emmylou Harris, the Clash, although he's never gotten around to telling us what this "price" is; since my musical tastes haven't gotten any less ecumenical in thirty years, but my politics have swung from smug-left to solid right, the "price" must indeed be a subtle one.

But no matter; as Exhibit B, JB posits a country-western song by one Gretchen Wilson in response, as example of what music should be.

Well, alrighty then.

Ms. Wilson, who leapt to popularity with the single "Redneck Girl", with its messages glorifying alcohol abuse, fornication, dissipation, class stereotyping and senseless violence - really, a hip-hop song done with steel guitars and a twang - is country's latest "it" girl. JB nods approvingly to her latest single, "Politically Uncorrect" (and grammatically, er, uncorrect as well). JB notes with favor (and, apparently, no irony intended) that the song features a cameo by Merle Haggard.

Now, bear in mind that Haggard - one of the very, very few genuine originals to have broken through Music Row's monopoly and still maintain some semblance of a career - couldn't get airplay for a new single of his own if he walked into the studios with a baseball bat - because like most of the genuine originals whose genres have faded from commercial favor, hardly anyone on Music Row remembers him (Suzy Bogguss, anyone? Holly Dunn? Roseanne Cash? Dwight Yoakam? Steve Earle?). But like all of the real things - Willie Nelson, Loretta Lynn, any of the Hank Williamses still in single digits) he gets trotted out for about the same reason Paul Prudhomme trots out the Cayenne pepper - to give whatever product Music Row is shovelling out a thin veneer of authenticity.

But no matter - JB's mainly interested in the song itself, which contains references to "soldiers who fight for this land", bibles, flags, "...the forefathers' plan", yadda yadda. Which is fine, as far as it goes.

But you know damn well - or, if you don't know how Nashville and country radio work, you should know - that before a song invoking soldiers, bibles, flags and constructionism was allowed on the air, there was meeting somewhere in Nashangeles that went a little something like this:

BIG EXECUTIVE: "OK, so how does this "Politically Incorrect" song play?

JUNIOR EXEC 1: "Market research shows that its positives to negatives are 55-45 overall...

BIGEX: "Not NEARLY good enough. Maybe add a NASCAR reference...?

JUNIOR EXEC 1: "Er, NASCAR only adds two points if you refer to flags, bibles and soldiers"

JUNIOR EXEC 2: "But we're ahead of that one; they said that if it sounded more colloquial and less formal, it'd jump by 15 points.

JUNIOR EXEC 3: "We ran it by the folks in Downhomization, and they suggested "de-literizing" it a little bit.

BIGEX: "Right, adding some fake illiteracy. What do you have?"

JUNIOR EXEC 2: "We're thinking maybe Political Incorrect..."

JUNIOR EXEC 3: "...but that only added five points".

JUNIOR EXEC 4: "How about Politically Redicuous?

BIGEX: "We said "colloquial", not illiterate"

JUNIOR EXEC 3: "How about "Politically Uncorrect".

BIGEX: "Hmmmmm - I like it. Maybe toss in Merle Haggard?"

ALL JUNIORS: "Who?"

BIGEX: "Er, he was a big star in the seventies."

JUNIOR EXEC 2: "Oh, I have his research on my Blackberry. He adds 25 points among 45+ year old veterans, bikers and blue collar workers!"

BIGEX: "Do it!"

JUNIOR EXEC 1: "Perfect!

But at least Gretchen Wilson's heart is in the right place. Right?

Maybe, but with country, you don't know from the songs an artist does - because unlike the world of rock and roll, most country songwriters are just voices and faces, selected to sing other peoples' music; most of the music you hear on the likes of K102 is written by a small crowd of Music Row songwriters, working in a system as tightly closed as anything the Brill Building put out in the glory days of Sedaka, Diamond and King. The Music Row executives control everything to do with their artists' presentation - their image, their style, their distribution, and of course their producers, who in turn pick the music their singers will record.

Right now, among Country's audience, God and the bible and the troops are hot (and God bless Country's audience!). But if Music Row discovered tomorrow that the Bible wasn't testing so hot, but Jews were, you'd start to see a flood of songs about God, the Bible and the Old Country.

So for all we know, Gretchen Wilson could be a wobbly from Soho who hangs out with Moby; doubtful, but possible. But she and her music - like that of almost all mainstream country music - are product, marketed with no less targeting and cynicism than any other product.

So Gretchen Wilson is standing at the bar singing about bibles and soldiers and the founding fathers with Merle Haggard? Nashville's waving the flag? Big deal - in the days after 9/11, so were the networks.

JB says:

I await a popular rock song to have lyrics that are even 10% as right on in terms of a worldview as these. U2 aint writin' 'em, Bruce sure as hell aint.
For one thing, JB, I already have a worldview. I don't need to have it validated by artists...no. I have world view that I don't need to have reinforced by the carefully-marketed product of a bunch of executives. I don't need Gretchen Wilson to make it OK for me to be a constructionist; I certainly don't need her to explain it to me. I don't need Lee Greenwood or Bono or Michael Stipe or Moby to agree with me to make anything OK and valid, because it is anyway.

(Oh, and if you read this blog, you needn't "await" that popular song; Franky Perez' wonderful debut album had plenty of 'em - Laura Ingraham uses him for bumper music - and was a self-written indy effort to boot.

What's the "price", JB? What's the worry - that if you listen to "leftist drivel", you'll turn into a drivelling leftist? I refute you this; Me. I knew REM before they were superstars, I love the Clash and the Pretenders and even the Dixie Chicks. And yet I remain the single best conservative either of us knows.

And I don't need anyone on Music Row's OK for that!

The lesson - think for yourself! You don't need a corporation, whether it's WalMart or Ben and Jerry's or Columbia Records - to give you permission to think!

Break away, JB! Free your mind, and the rest will follow! If you're a real conservative, you'll have nothing to fear - and if you're not, well, I'll wave to you as you pass in your Volvo with the "What Would Wellstone Do" sticker - the one that the secret groove on the Moby disk made you buy...

Posted by Mitch at 06:18 AM | Comments (15) | TrackBack