May, 2005: Chris Dykstra, in New Patriot, on Norm Coleman's investigation of the Oil For Food scandal:
British legislator George Galloway ran Norm Coleman around in circles Thursday. Gallowway spared no one, especially are very own Normy, who could only muster a squirmy smile in the face of such a barrage. At least someone put the lie to Coleman's stupid posturing. Coleman obviously picked on the wrong guy to shore up his transparent attempt to advance his career by pounding the UN-is-a-bogeyman drum. A Galloway sampling:In the attendant comment thread:"I met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him," Mr Galloway went on. "The difference is that Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns, and to give him maps the better to target those guns.Now, I know that standards have slipped over the last few years in Washington, but for a lawyer, you're remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice.
"I gave my heart and soul to stop you committing the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq. Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong.
ME: "No offense, but I have to ask: Did you watch/read the actual questioning from Coleman and Levin? I mean, *any* of it? Or did you just get the rundown from Kos?"Cuz I iz just a dum wingnut, I gues.DYKSTRA: "Mitch - did you watch any of it? or just get the rundown on FR? Because I don't know how you can watch it, read about it or read the transcript and draw a different conclusion. "
Or...not?
Christopher Hitchens, naturally, delivers the news with a rhetorical kick to Galloway's tender bits:
1) Between 1999 and 2003, Galloway personally solicited and received eight oil "allocations" totaling 23 million barrels, which went either to him or to a politicized "charity" of his named the Mariam Appeal.Here's the whole thing, in convenient PDF format!2) In connection with just one of these allocations, Galloway's wife, Amineh Abu-Zayyad, received about $150,000 directly.
3) A minimum of $446,000 was directed to the Mariam Appeal, which campaigned against the very sanctions from which it was secretly benefiting.
4) Through the connections established by the Galloway and "Mariam" allocations, the Saddam Hussein regime was enabled to reap $1,642,000 in kickbacks or "surcharge" payments.
Hitch, with emphasis added by me:
The evidence presented suggests that he lied in court when he sued the Daily Telegraph in London over similar allegations (and collected money for that, too). It suggests that he lied to the Senate under oath. And it suggests that he made a deceptive statement in the register of interests held by members of the British House of Commons. All in all, a bad week for him, especially coming as it does on the heels of the U.N. report on the murder of Rafik Hariri, which appears to pin the convict's badge on senior members of the Assad despotism in Damascus, Galloway's default patron after he lost his main ally in Baghdad.In closing:
Yet this is the man who received wall-to-wall good press for insulting the Senate subcommittee in May, and who was later the subject of a fawning puff piece in the New York Times, and who was lionized by the anti-war movement when he came on a mendacious and demagogic tour of the country last month. I wonder if any of those who furnished him a platform will now have the grace to admit that they were hosting a man who is not just a pimp for fascism but one of its prostitutes as well.Good question.
Mr. Dykstra?
Galloway was"running circles" around Norm Coleman during last May's hearings; he was pulling out all the rope Norm was giving him.
(By the way - has anyone gotten a recording of that stupid stoopid Wendy Wilde song, to the tune of "Mr. Postman", about the whole Coleman/Galloway thing? The one where she scolds Coleman for persecuting the poor benighted Galloway? Because that could become a real collector's item, if ya know what I mean).
As a fan of rhetoric in general and british accented rhetoric in particular, I can understand a certain amount of Galloway's appeal. That he wraps his dulcet and cultivated tones around the most ridiculous sophistic tropes of the Worldwide Anti-American has got to send a tingle through the trousers of your garden-variety self-loathing American.
Not being of that ilk, however, all I can really add is, what a codpiece.
Posted by: Brian Jones at October 26, 2005 01:02 PMYes, he's quite Shakespearean.
Shakespearean in the sense of "a tale told by an idiot - full of sound and fury yet signifying nothing..."
Posted by: Jay Reding at October 26, 2005 01:35 PMFrankly, evidence gathered by Normy is about as believable as evidence gathered by O.J. Simpson, or for that matter, Bush's Intell folks prior to Iraq.
Having said that, if Gallway lied, shame on him, but you know, he's not a U.S. Citizen, he had no obligation to even come here. I think his point was that you screwed the pooch Normy, stop blaming me for oil allocations.
Regardless, it was instructive to watch a real politician eat up a pretty typical conservative (Norm). I don't condone Gallway's alleged lies, if the British Governement would allow it, prosecute him.. prove the case folks - I don't think Norm could do that. Moreover, considering the fact that you all don't consider lying to Congress really a crime, perhaps you should judge by your own standard... This whole investigation has been a witch hunt to discredit the UN from the start. It's a waste and a distraction.
PB
Posted by: pb at October 26, 2005 11:23 PM"This whole investigation has been a witch hunt to discredit the UN from the start. It's a waste and a distraction."
The oil for food scandal is a witch hunt and a wate of time? Does that include all the corruption discovered by Claudia Rosett as well? The Volcker Commission? Wow, what a sad, pathetic, hateful little person PB is.
Posted by: JamesPh. at October 26, 2005 11:44 PMGee, what a fine motto that is; "My U.N., right or wrong!"
Posted by: Will Allen at October 27, 2005 12:36 AM"Regardless, it was instructive to watch a real politician eat up a pretty typical conservative (Norm). ...prove the case folks - I don't think Norm could do that."
Er, Norm's been doing that.
By the way, that "eating up" you talk about? That was Coleman paying out miles of rope and letting Galloway hang himself. Or, to put it your way, "instructive to watch a prosecutor deal with a typical liberal blowhard (Galloway)."
Posted by: mitch at October 27, 2005 07:43 AMRegardless, it was instructive to watch a real politician eat up a pretty typical conservative (Norm).
Posted by pb at October 26, 2005 11:23 PM
Calling Norm a "lick-spittle senator" passes for debate in your world eh?
Posted by: Kermit at October 27, 2005 08:20 AMIt is a trueism: You should always keep one liberal around so everyone can see just how stupid they are.