Par

Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:

President Obama refuses to faithfully uphold United States immigration law, so the local sheriff in Arizona has been doing it.  Then Obama’s Justice Department sued, saying nobody else could enforce the law the feds were ignoring. But the sheriff kept enforcing the law. The sheriff is up for re-election. What can Obama’s team do to stop this guy from doing their jobs?

Lawfare.  Loudly trumpet criminal charges, just before the election.  It begins.

And what is Hillary’s position on prosecuting local law enforcement who enforce existing immigration law?  Do Democrats believe they can – and should – transform America into a Sanctuary Nation simply by refusing to enforce the border?  I’d like to see that discussed in the next debate.

.joe doakes

That’d involve Trump preparing for the debate…

2 thoughts on “Par

  1. Maybe you will backstop me here Joe, but I’m thinking intent IS required for a contempt conviction, while it ISNT required for a conviction of violation of the National Security Act.

    Is that right?

  2. If Congressional Republicans had a pair, Obama would be the second Democratic President in a row to be impeached. It’s not even funny anymore how he’s “guiding” the legal process–lady justice’s blindfold is not just off, but burned.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.