I feel so stupid. I completely fell for the tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory that the election was stolen. But as this article makes clear, the election actually was SAVED.
All those unsubstantiated Republican claims that an informal alliance of left-wing activists and business titans got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding; fended off voter-suppression lawsuits; recruited armies of poll workers; successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line; helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks; and after Election Day, monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not challenge the result including pressuring state legislators to certify dubious election results – they’re all true. They did all those things and more. But that’s a Good Thing. Because they saved the election from Trump winning.
I wish I’d understood this last Fall. I wasted so much time fretting over laws of statistics and suitcases of ballot and cardboarded-over windows but none of it mattered. Things went exactly as planned.
So I’m embarrassed at my credulity but one good thing came of it – I won’t have stand in line to cast my vote ever again, not when the big-shots have decided what the outcome should be and taken steps to ensure it. So that’s nice.
Last week on his podcast, Ben Shapiro noted something I’d picked up when late, long-banned, forever-exiled commenter Dog Gone was trying to act as this blog’s “fact checker” – the difference between “true” and “false” usually boils down to whether a conservative or a progressive said it, regardless of the veracity of the fact itself.
Do you know the one thing I always hated about Joe Soucheray’s Garage Logic?
For a show that constantly railed on about the need for individual responsibility, he rattled on an awful lot about “the mystery” and its attendant “mysterians”.
It struck me as a little incongruous – demanding responsibility from everyone else, but blaming the things that vexed “logicians” on some, well, mysterious force above and beyond anyone’s control.
It’s an oddly “progressive” trait – ascribing fault to systems and groups rather than individuals. And not in a good way.
The urge to roll things up in to all-encompassing narratives, and to try to “solve” them with all-encompassing proposals – “The New Deal”, Obamacare, The Great Society, and on and on – has been part of “progressivism”‘s DNA since there was a word for it (other than “Leninism”).
And while I give Trump the credit he’s due, he’s brought out a trait among way too many Republicans to do exactly the same.
Make no mistake – our election system has problems, problems big enough to warrant bringing in the Department of Justice under consent decrees no less drastic than those that governed southern elections after the Civil Rights Act was passed.
And state laws that make corruption almost impossible to identify, much less charge and prosecute, must become an electoral scarlet letter among those who care about the American Experiment.
But let’s stop all this jabbering about “Krakens”. Put up or shut up.
Because the real problem isn’t even hiding. It’s in plain sight, and it’s largely legal.
What happened in 2020 is something more fundamental and profound. What happened in 2020 is cultural and systemic, and sadly, generally legal. Until Republicans, and more importantly Trump supporters, understand what happened to them this year, it will happen again.
Two things happened in 2020. First, COVID led to a dismantling of state election integrity laws by everyone except the one body with the constitutional prerogative to change the rules of electing the president – the state legislatures.
Second, the Center for Technology and Civic Life happened.
If you are focused on goblins in the voting machines but don’t know anything about the CTCL and what they did to defeat Donald Trump, it’s time to up your game.
1. Evolution! – The pollster’s craft hasn’t caught up with the “new normal”, in a society where people legitimately fear being “canceled”, losing jobs, social standing and being targeted for violence because of their beliefs.
That is simultaneously possible, and not mutually eclusive
2. Incompetence! – The pollsters absorbed the lessons of 2016, where they actually did a little better than they did this year…
…and learned nothing.
3. Never Ascribe to Incompetence What Can Be Chalked Up To Malice – I’m going to present three facts and a conjecture:
Fact 1 – On December 1, 2016, representatives of the New York Times and Washington Post newsrooms went on WNYC radio’s “On the Media“ program (syndicated on NPR) and said, In as many words, that was time to change the rules of journalism. It was time to move past “passing the facts on to people and letting them make up their own minds” to “Denormalizing Donald Trump“.
Fact 3 – for the past 30 years, the Star Tribune “Minnesota Poll” has had a fairly clear pattern; the closer a race ended up being, the more wildly distorted pre-election polling numbers were. For example, they showed Tim Pawlenty, Norm Coleman and Tom Emmer getting blown out just before the election. All three races ended up being famously close. On the other hand, they tend to report blowouts pretty accurately; they had Amy Klobuchar and Kurt Bills pretty much dead on.
Conjecture: It’s not an “accident”, or a learning error, that polling predicting a landslide up until election day was completely wrong.
I was 24th in line at Saint Paul Ward 4 Precinct 14 when the polls opened at 7AM this morning.
It was brisk, but a beautiful morning.
How did I vote? A straight second amendment ticket. The right to keep and bear arms is the canary in the human rights coal mine. A politician who holds your *God-given right* to defend yourself, your family, your property, your community and your freedom with contempt, will eventually show their spots on all the other liberties.
I voted for Jason Lewis, naturally.
And even though I’m still sore for him somehow beating Sia Lo in the primary, and thought for a while about using CD4 as my write-in vote for a third party (there was a pot party candidate as well), I voted for Gene Rechtziegel for Congress, because while I have no idea where he got the money, he must have spent well into five figures in ads at the Pioneer Press in this past week That’s commitment. Here’s hoping Sia Lo comes back in 2022.
I’ve been doing these since 2004. It’s a different list every time. More different than most, this year.
So without further ado – 101 Reasons I’m Voting GOP.
Because most of politics is local…
…and locally, the DFL has made a hash of both cities at every level.
And although I can’t vote in CD5, replacing Ilhan Omar with Lacy Johnson would shake Minneapolis’s smug, sclerotic establishment to its core.
Ditto, replacing Foung Hawj with Alexander Buster Deputie.
Double-ditto Diane Napper vs. Patricia Torres Rey in SD63. Torres Rey has benefitted from the sandbagging of her district for long enough.
Because Amy Wazlawik thinks she can just say “it’s not my job, man” when her party’s hateful inner id comes roiling out. Elliot Engen will actually represent District 37B.
Speaking of the DFL’s inner id – a good chunk of my neighborhood got burned, looted and covered in graffiti…
…and the drug store I’ve been doing to for decades, which has done business in my neighborhood for over 100 years, got burned to the ground…
…and because one of the shops I take my guitars to got burned and looted…
…and the powers that be in this city seem to be trying to benefit from it.
Because the two businesses in my neighborhood that actually decided to put on a show of force to try to deter the Democrat mob – one run by immigratns, the other by a black family, by the way – were more likely to get punished within an inch of their lives than anyone doing the actual burning and looting.
Because of March 4, 2017, when a bunch of “Anti”-Fa attacked a Republican rally.
And one of them turned out to be the son of Hillary’s VP nominee.
And they didn’t even whisper “slap” at his precious widdle wrist. There are two justice systems in Minnesota.
Because the Minneapolis City Council believes that “law and order” is racist, and “expecting the police to provide the public order that is local government’s one unambiguously valid reason to exist” is “privilege”.
And they’re right. It’s a “privilege” every single taxpayer and voter deserves to get, because they trade not only their tax dollars but a little bit of their inalienable freedom to get it. Government had %$#@ best deliver.
Becasue it is a fact that until the President started talking and tweeting about sending in the 82nd Airborne or the 10th Mountain Division, Governor Klink was playing passive-aggressive games with Mayor McDreamy with the Minnesota Guard. Suddenly, once the President started flexing, the Guard showed up.
Because Governor Klink plays passive aggressive games with every f****ng aspect of government…
…while Trump plays aggressive-aggressive games with government. I’ll take aggressive aggression every single time.
Because instead of peace and order, our tax dollars are getting us social engineering and city goverment as tinker toy set for the political class.
And I’m not a ^%$#@ tinker toy.
Because the DFL has had sixty years of unfettered control in both Minneapolis and Saint Paul. There is nobody to blame but them.
And because the only thing they do besides yap about “privilege” is call for bike lanes and trains.
Because you – whoever you are, whatever your ethnicity or gender or orientation or whatever – are being gaslit.
If you’re white, you’re being gaslit to try to get you to think you’re not only a racist, but that your “whiteness” is a pathology of which racism is only one of an endlessly growing litany of symptoms.
If you’re black, you’re being gaslit to believe the only way you can succeed is by exhibiting “unity” with your race…
…but only the parts of that race that vote Democrat. Because your contribution to Democrat power as part of your identity group is the only thing that matters about you.
Same for Latinos – provided, again, that you vote Democrat.
Same for Asians. Except the work ethic that makes up a big part of the cultural stereotype about you will be turned against you when it becomes inconvenient – say, when assessing who benefits from affirmative action.
And that gaslighting is being weaonized to not only minimize and dehumanize people, but to manipulate and control them.
Because my old neighborhood, South Minneapolis, looks like Beirut in 1982, but is probably not quite as safe for civilians…
…and people in Beirut in 1982 could at least defend themselves.
Because businesses in Minneaolis and Saint Paul are boarding up again, even as I write this…
…and it ain’t because they’re worried about Trump supporters rioting.
Because I’d like to stop worrying about whether my mom is OK in a long term care center in Minnesota…
…and Governor Klink is worthless in that regard. Utterly worthless.
What Governor Klink is, is an arrogant little man who runs an executive branch that thinks peasants should know their place and not get all uppity about “checking the “experts” work” and all that smart-people stuff.
Because Governor Klink’s “health economist” thought the “Model” – which predicted 70 times as many deaths as happened by July – was too complicated for mere peasants to look at.
Because the Iron Range deserves to go back to work, in actual mines, making real money. Not stocking shelves and cashiering at casinos, to make metro environmentalists feel better.
Because Governor Klink (and, let’s be honest, the state’s real co-governors, Peggy Flanagan and Melissa Hortman) play relentless identity politics.
Seirously – it’s literally the only message any of them have. Competence? Value for tax dollar? Check your privilege, peasant!
Because Ilhan Omar is so corrupt, Chicago called and said “dial it back, toots”.
Because if my stance helps deliver Lacy Johnson to Congress, it’ll be time well spent.
And if that helps Kendall Qualls beat Rotgut Dean, that’ll be almost as awesome.
And if Tyler Kistner sends Angie Craig back to Human Resources, where she blongs, so much the better.
Because there is no way CD 7 should be represented by a Pelosi-upsucking turncoat like Collin Peterson. The Dakotas chucked their Democrats; it’s time for CD7 to do it too.
And because I want to make Pete Stauber the first of what I hope to help turn into a safe GOP district for a few generations.
Because sending Jim Hagedorn back to Congress is not just right for southern Minnesota…
..but would be q wonderous slap in the face for Kim Norton, mayoro of Rochester and a woman who would be more in place in some central American banana Republic.
Because the DFL has its crosshairs on gun rights in Minnesota.
And they work for the same people that’ve promised to use “red flag” laws to harass gun owners.
Because all of Joe Biden‘s “plans“ – curing the epidemic, create 5 million jobs – reek of unicorn farts.
And in normal times, government making vapid promises it can’t possibly deliver on isn’t a bad thing…
…but getting the Democrats into complete control of the wheels and levers of government at any level is going to be a disaster…
Because the Demorat party at all levels is talking about “Unity” – the dumbest, most facile cliche in an industry built on facile cliches…
…but it’s more toxic than just a cliche. The unspoken codecil to “Unity” is “behind our beliefs, only, peasant”.
Because the Democrats had a chance to exploit whatever anti-Trump sentiment is out there by meeting disaffected Republicans halfway…
…and stuck with tax hikes
…and gun control…
…and the destruction of healthcare…
…and abortion on demand up until birth…
…and even after…
…and the further dilution of whatever’s left o education…
…and “the Green New Deal” – aka “an untrammeled transfer of wealth and power”
…Because their “Unity” means your subjugation.
Because Joe Biden is a delivery system for Kamala Harris
And Kamala Harris is a delivery system for The Squad
And The Squad is a delivery system for Bernie Sanders and his pack of apparatchiks.
And Bernie is a delivery system for socialism.
Because of the Venezuelan restaurant owner that tossed Kamala Harris from his establishment.
And the reasons he did it.
Because I’m a Second Amendment activist – and whatever “progressives” are condescending cooing these days, they are coming for the second amendment.
Because while I’ve been a Trump skeptic, at best, for a generation – literally – the alternative is worse.
Because the “never Trump” movement, given a chance to provide a genuine conservatisve third way between Trumpism and (let’s be honest) Communism, chose to enable Communism.
Because the Lincoln Project is to “conservative principles” what Vox.com is to “Journalism”.
Indeed, because many of Trump’s enemies are people and organizations I respect far, far less even than Trump.
Because while I was juuuust this side of “Never Trump”-ism four years ago, and he’s got immense flaws as a conservative and as a President, he’s accomplished far more than I had hoped in the past four years.
And I’m a principles voter – and my principle is “screw up the country less than the opponent”. It’s a low bar. Biden doesn’t surmount it.
Because of Justice Gorsuch.
And Justice Kavanaugh.
And Justice Coney Barrett
And the possibility – admittedly slim – that yet another seat might come up for grabs in the next four years.
Because the Democrats have said plainly (or been quite plain in their selective silence) that they plan to pack the Supreme Court…
…and otherwise gut checks and balances on executive power.
Because blue half of our country sees the red half of our country as a little less human, and that must not be rewarded…
…much less put in a position where they can give that attitude teeth.
Because Democrats are calling for a “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” – in other words, they want to settle scores for the impudence of defeating Hillary.
Because of every smug little progressive prick who yaps about red voters “voting against their interests”…
…without how the policies and politics that gave us Newark, Detroit, Baltimore, NOLA, Cleveland, Chicago, Cincinnati, Saint Louis, Stockton, Camden and North Minneapolis are “in our best interests”.
And because every time I ask progs to answer that for me, they skip away in a cloud of deflection and ad homina.
Because of the Vietnamese, Cambodian, H’mong, Polish, Russian, Cuban and other immigrants who came her to escape communism, socialism, warlordism and all manner of other high-and-low-brow authoritarianism…
…and keeping it from happening here.
Because I believe in the best of western civilization.
And while Donald Trump may not be the finest example of the western intellect at work, he at least respects Western Civilization, with all its imperfections and (this is important) incredible successes on behalf of humanity.
And modern progressivism repudiates it.
And western civilization is worth fighting for. Preferably peacefully – and voting against the death of western civilization is better than literally going to war.
I have been confidently assured there is no ballot fraud. I’m dubious.
The Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion in DSCC v. Simon, court file A20-1017. It’s eye-opening.
Minnesota law has long allowed a voter to have someone help them mark their ballot. It’s historically been used by the blind or disabled, given by a friend or family member, and done inside the polling booth. The opportunity for fraud or mistake exists, but it’s a single vote. The law allows one person to help no more than three voters.
The Democrat party asserted they had the right under federal law to “help” an unlimited number of voters mark their ballots off-site, and then to deliver all those marked ballots to the polling place. Democrats asserted the Minnesota law that allows one person to “help” no more than 3 voters, and to deliver the ballots of no more than 3 voters, was a violation of federal voting rights law.
The Secretary of State disagreed (amazingly). The Republican party joined the suit to object. The trial court agreed with the Democrats and issued a temporary order allowing the practice. The Supreme Court disagreed, slightly.
Democrats can “help” an unlimited number of people mark their ballots, but no one person can deliver more than three of the marked ballots to the polling place. No more bringing in boxes full of marked ballots from the trunk of your car. Instead, Democrats must recruit more runners to deliver all the marked ballots.
It’s probably just me, but if I were of a mind to cheat the vote, I could think of a way to do it under this system. Able marks hundreds of ballots in the names of blind, disabled, elderly, dead, and non-English speaking voters. Baker, Charlie, David, Emily, Frank and many more, earn a few bucks delivering three ballots to each of Ramsey, Hennepin, Dakota, Carver, Wright, Sherburne, Anoka, Isanti and Washington counties. Better still, they earn no money, they get class participation credit for their college Political Science course. The odds of counties comparing names is nil. Multiply by 86 counties and the chance to influence the results is . . . significant.
Good thing there is no ballot fraud.
Strap in. This next two months may well make us pine for the good times back in 2000.
That’s the sound of DFLers realizing they’re going to have to jam ten days worth of fraud into one evening.
And they’re not happy about it.
The 8th Circuit returned a decision in Carson v. Simon yesterday. The presser from the Minnesota Voters Alliance explains:
The 8th Circuit reversed a lower court decision which authorized the Minnesota Secretary of State to accept ballots seven days after the election, and required an injunction against Simon for extending the statutory deadline for election day for receipt of absentee ballots.
In our view, this was a scheme concocted by Secretary Simon in the first place, where he identified and encouraged his allies to file a lawsuit against him, knowing all along that he would enter into a consent decree with them just to circumvent the legislature and the will of the people. We can not prove that of course, but in our view, that is exactly what happened.
To sum it up:
“Progressive” “group” “files” a “suit” against a “progressive” Secretary of State.
The SOS “settles out of court”, signing a consent decree with his allies signed off on by a “progressive” judge.
Presto change-o. Law changed by executive fiat (under cover of a convenient bit of “litigation”), without any pesky “checks and balances” or “legislatures” getting in the way.
It’s an end-run around state law, and due process.
And it’s a foreword to what we can expect – well, expect much more of – if the Democrats win on Tuesday, or whenever the actual decision is announced.
The DFL PR nomenklatura are doing their best to obscure the facts:
Could Murphy have gotten anything about the story less right?
The problem isnt that Trump hasn’t condemned racism and “white supremacy”.
In fact, here we see him do it 38 times:
The problem is that it isn’t literally the first and last thing out of his mouth whenever he speaks, which Democrat messaging seems to assume puts it outside the attention span of the typical Democrat voter.
I have two observations about Joe Biden’s performance in last Thursday’s debate.
First – his campaign is all platitudes. He has a “plan” for everything. A government “plan” and three bucks will get you a cup of Caribou. It’s all there to gull the gullible.
Second – like all Democrats, he can pretty much say any billshut he wants, because his voters are all low-information drones who have the critical thought skills of herd animals, and the media like it that way.
There were many examples of this during the debate on Thursday – “I never said I’d ban fracking”, “nobody lost their plan to Obamacare”, and on and on.
The one that made me jump out of my seat with the most incredulity? “We had a great relationship with Hitler before he invaded Europe”.
He was half right. The US had a lousy relationship  with the Nazi regime – to FDR’s rare credit
The U.S. didn’t have a good relationship with Hitler before he “invaded Europe. The German dictator was, however, beloved in certain quarters, including the editorial offices of the New York Times.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt didn’t attack Hitler directly before the war began, but relations between the U.S. and Nazi Germany were by no means good. In September 1938, Roosevelt sent a telegram to Hitler lecturing him about the importance of keeping the peace and stating: “The conscience and the impelling desire of the people of my country demand that the voice of their government be raised again and yet again to avert and to avoid war.” Implying that Hitler was a warmonger was hardly a hallmark of cordial relations between the two countries.
Failing to get a satisfactory response from Hitler, on October 11, 1938, Roosevelt announced that he was increasing national defense spending by $300 million (over $5 billion in today’s dollars). No one thought that money was going to build up our defenses against Britain and France.
But the New York Times? They loved them some Hitler:
The historian Rafael Medoff recently noted that on July 9, 1933, just over five months after he became Chancellor of Germany and years after his virulent anti-Semitism and propensity for violence had become notorious worldwide, the New York Times published a fawning puff piece on Hitler that rivals even today’s media adulation of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Nancy Pelosi in its one-sidedness, myopia, and disdain for essential facts.
Pulitzer Prize-winning “journalist” Anne O’Hare McCormick traveled to Berlin to become the first reporter from an American news outlet to interview the new chancellor, and she was an intriguing choice for the Times editors to make to conduct this interview, as in the presence of this man whose name has become justly synonymous with evil, she was decidedly starry-eyed: “At first sight,” McCormick gushed, “the dictator of Germany seems a rather shy and simple man, younger than one expects, more robust, taller. His sun-browned face is full and is the mobile face of an orator.”
As if that weren’t enough, she continues with a description of the Führer as outlandish and adulatory as likening the supremely zaftig Stacy Abrams to a supermodel: “His eyes are almost the color of the blue larkspur in a vase behind him, curiously childlike and candid. He appears untired and unworried. His voice is as quiet as his black tie and his double-breasted black suit.”
This, of course, as Walter Duranty was all but french-kissing Joseph Stalin. The NYTimes were equal-opportunity up-suckers.
That choice abided by the dictum of TIME founder Henry Luce, who decreed that the Man of the Year — now Person of the Year — was not an honor but instead should be a distinction applied to the newsmaker who most influenced world events for better or worse. In case that second criterion was lost on readers, the issue that named Hitler dispensed with the portrait treatment that cover subjects typically got. Instead he was depicted as a tiny figure with his back to the viewer, playing a massive organ with his murdered victims spinning on a St. Catherine’s wheel.
Which, in context, makes sense.
Moreso than the NYTimes’ excuse, anyway.
 Speaking generally in re the government, of course. Some in the government – Ambassador Joseph Kennedy, Ambassador to the UK, Democrat eminimento and father of progressive icons John F. and Robert F. Kennedy – spent the early years of the war pulling for the Nazis to conquer the Brits, whom he hated.
Usual disclaimers about “the only poll that counts is on November 3  inserted here.
But pessimist that I am, I really didn’t see this coming
KSTP/SURVEYUSA: Tina Smith 43%; Jason Lewis 42%; 12% undecided; 3% people other. Confidence Interval +/- 5%. Smith had 11-point lead in September and 7-point lead earlier this month. pic.twitter.com/mX91q0MI6X
Polls finding more-likely voters, ones who’ve actually been paying attention?
I’ve heard more than a few fellow D-list pundits exclaim disbelief at “12% undecided”. I’m going to chalk that up to some misdirected Pauline Kael syndrome, from people who “write”/tweet about politics constantly, thinking everyone is the same as they are. Smith has tried hard to follow A-Klo’s model of being innocuous and invisible. We’ll see if it works.
Lewis beating the Butcher Of Vandalia would be an early Christmas present.
 And, let’s be honest, as we saw in 2008 and 2010, it still may not count, really, but let’s try not to go completely down the rabbit hole.
As a typical rural scandinavian by upbringing, “optimism” comes hard for me.
This election is no exception.
Same as the last one, really. Those who were listening to the NARN on election night 2016 may recall that when I saw Wisconsin drop in the hoop for the President, I was briefly speechless, and my head started swimming. Being speechless is a bad thing on talk radio – so I said the only thing I could think of: “I think someone slipped LSD in the cucumber water, here at the Radisson Blu”.
Such was the cognitive dissonance.
Anyway – call it being of Norwegian descent; call it the political fatalism that comes from being a conservative in a moldy blue city for 35 years; call it whatever you want. I see the evidence of the enthusiam gap in Trump’s favor – but am sort of wired, by this point, to think that whatever the transiet passions of suburban soccer moms don’t screw up, the Democrat fraud machine will.
And that bothers me a lot more this year than it did four years ago, because as awful a president as Killary would have been, she was a known-ish quantitiy. If you liked Slick Willy with a dose of hectoring harpy on top, you could deal with her.
Slow Joe? He’s nothing but a delivery system for The Squad, via their competent aunt Kamala.
But it’s a lost cause. The polls prove it! NPR keeps saying so.
Trafalgar tries to avoid so-called weighting to get the partisan mix of respondents right. A traditional pollster might want to get, say, 35 percent Republicans to have a balanced survey, but he comes up short because Republicans are less likely to respond. If only, say, 22 percent of Republicans answer, they are given additional weight to make up for the shortfall.
“The better you do at getting an even sample,” according to Cahaly, “the less weighting you have to do.”
One problem with weighting is that Republicans “who don’t like Trump can’t wait to answer a poll,” he says. “So immediately, within the 22 percent, they’ve probably overrepresented it, the anti-Trump Republicans, the Never Trumper types. Well, when you weight that up from 22 to 35, now you have skewed an already bad representation sample. So that’s kind of inherently how they can be so off.”
Joe Biden’s really plastering the airwaves with ads. Saw another one. Did you know Trump gave tax cuts to the rich? Yep. Said it right in the ad, so it must be true.
I wonder . . . what are the qualifications to get that tax cut? My wife and I got a check earlier this Spring – $1,200 apiece – was that the tax cut for the rich? I think we also got a bigger refund last year. Maybe that was it?
I have my taxes done by HR Block. You’d think they would have mentioned if I could take advantage of a tax cut. Maybe I’m not rich enough? How rich do you have to be? If Biden is going to take away tax cuts, that means somebody is paying higher taxes. Is it going to be me?
You know, Joe, before I fill in the box next to your name, I’m going to want a few more details on which tax cuts you’re taking back. Care to be more specific?
While I remain resolutely apathetic about celebrities’ political opinions, let’s look below the surface. Say what you will about rap , but at a time in the election season when celebs are supposed to be threatening to move to France, you’ve got three incredibly successful black men, actively telling their own community that the party that has considered their votes their property for two generations, doesn’t deserve ’em.
So what? Other than a lot of adenoidal progressive white and academic black critics saying Cube, Kanye and Fifty Cent were never all that good anyway, , I mean?
I’m wondering if part of the reason Biden – who, the media polls tell us, has an eleventy-teen digit lead over Trump in Minnesota – is spending to much money in an ostensibly safe state is the Democrats are worried about the black vote slipping away?
Remember – it’s been estimated that if the Dems’ take of the black vote ever drops below 80%, they are sunk nationwide. Not the whole black vote; one in five.
Saw another Biden ad. Did you know Trump plans to eliminate Social Security? Really. But never fear, Joe Biden’s got a plan to save it. Good for him. You go, Joe!
Except. . . what, exactly, is that plan? Everybody knows Social Security is insolvent, but as far as I know there are only three solutions and all of them suck, which is why nobody in Washington is pushing them, not even Trump.
We could raise the retirement age high enough that people die before collecting. That would save money.
We could cut benefits low enough that there’d be enough for everybody to get a check, though maybe not enough to live on.
We could raise taxes on our kids’ incomes high enough to fund current benefits and current retirement age, but that would leave our kids destitute.
You know, Joe, before I pull the lever for you, I’m going to need some more details on this ‘plan’ of yours. Care to be more specific?
I keep yelling that at my TV/computer, several times a day.
Their pollsters just have to know that “Joe has a plan!” can only resonate with idiots.
I saw an ad on television. Donald Trump only cares about the stock market. He gave tax cuts to the rich. Joe Biden will fix all that.
Stock market – fat cats – rich people. Yeah, screw ’em. Not like it’ll affect my family at all. Go for it, Joe!
Well, except for that IRA that I had from private practice. And my kid’s 401k. My wife’s Deferred Compensation and Health Care Savings Accounts. Those are all invested in the stock market. And they’re not insured like bank accounts so if the market tanks, they lose everything.
Not me. I’m a government employee. We have defined benefit pensions through Minnesota State Retirement, Public Employees Retirement, or Teacher’s Retirement, all of which are administered by the State of Minnesota and prudently invested in . . . the stock market. Which Biden’s going to tank to punish the rich.
It’s gotten to the point where you hope Biden’s ads are just chanting points to con the gullible.
When Harris gets elected and her first Executive Order bans all guns, will the New York Times headline read, “Women and Minorities Hardest Hit”?
Should Harris/Biden win, and the Senate flip, and given the left’s predilection to overreaching when they get power, I suspect the first mid-term is going to get pretty sporty for any Democrats outside major metro areas.
I suspect that’s why Big Left has been trying to beat down the NRA, frankly. Not that that’ll help ’em much.