Sharks Everywhere!

By Mitch Berg

First things first:  I am pretty ambivalent about the Rest Room crisis.  I’ve joked that it’s a battle between hysterical ninnies on one side, and the smug, arrogant and complacent on the other.

But the “hysterical ninnies” have a point;  ambisexual restroom policies will give society’s thin residue of pervs one more avenue by which to exercise whatever urge overtakes them – in a society that, let’s be honest,  already offers them no shortage of venues.

So there’s a useful discussion to be had.

One of the most useless contributions to this discussion comes from “Dear Creepy Heterosexual Men Guarding Our Bathrooms”  a Facebook post by one Kasey Hodge (which has been breathlessly recirculated by a small army of others).

Sample excerpt:

So to those of you who think you’re being helpful by “protecting” me and my fellow women, you’re like a shark sitting in the Lifeguard chair. I wasn’t uncomfortable until you showed up at the pool and the only potential predator I see is you.

The most is being called “remarkable”, and Hodge “brilliant”, by a whole lot of people that, let’s be honest, we can’t expect to know better.

Now, I don’t disagree with a couple of Brilliant Kasey’s konclusions – that we need to end sexual violence *outside* bathrooms (does anyone seriously argue this?) and stop sexualizing children (some radical feminist agendas *do* dispute this, by the way) and that the restrooms are the least of our problems.    

But Briliant Kasey’s point of view – and the mass of fuzzy-thinkers who are golf-clapping it – concerns me on three levels.  

Four Billion “Sharks”:   Brilliant Kasey’s fear of heterosexual men seems to be misplaced and, let’s be honest, the kind of “overwrought” that takes a formal education to achieve. 

Think about it; when she calls the police, the odds are pretty good it’ll be men answering; the law of averages indicates 97% of ‘em will be heterosexuals (yep, there are female cops; when they wind up  in a jam with a bigger, badder bad guy, it’ll be the male cops who bail ‘em out).  When there’s a fire, it’ll be mostly males who go racing into the smoke (and yep, there are women on the fire department; when they can’t lift Brilliant Kasey’s obese uncle, it’ll likely be a guy who pitches in).  If she goes on a feminist drumming mission to Pakistan and gets kidnapped by the Taliban, it’ll be a bunch of males (straight and otherwise) who tramp through the mountains to find her.  

I have no doubt that she’s had a generation or two of professors and ideological matrons telling her that inside every straight male is a rapist just dying to get out.  

It’s a sick, offensive way of looking at 47% of the world. 

Inner Nature:  No civilized person would dream of telling a gay person to “shut up and act straight”.  Demanding people deny *what they are* is pretty barbaric.  

And yet Brilliant Kasey is mocking and denigrating males (including most gay ones) for exercising something what *they* are wired to be, by tens of thousands of years of evolution.   Evolution pretty much wires women to be nurturers, and men to be guardians (and “pretty much” is a surgically-precise qualifier, in this case; there are exceptions.  Please feel free not to spell them out when responding). 

Is that urge *arguably* misplaced in re the rest room controversy?  Arguably, maybe.   

So make *that* argument, Brilliant Kasey, rather than denigrate a strong plurality of humanity (with the enthusiastic, if deeply confused, agreement of much of this forum).   

Shut Up, Norman Lear:  Brilliant Kasey, apparently a high school student, perpetuates the myth that women are “oppressed” by – you get one guess, here – straight males.  This notwithstanding the facts that:

  • Those straight males grow up in a school system that systematically denigrates, and tries to medicate out of existence, “male” traits – aggressiveness, roughhousing, competition.  Go ahead, look at the Saint Paul Public Schools; “maleness” is a treatable condition in all but name!  Our school system spends 12 years very overtly trying to make boys act like girls.  “But wait!   Look at all the violence in our schools!”, you and Brilliant Kasey may respond.  That’s a *consequence* of this policy!   
  • Brilliant Kasey has a lot of female company at that school of hers; we’re on track to have between 60-66% of college degrees issued to women.   By the time young men decide whether or not to go to college, the education system has long since beaten any love of learning – or at least interest in schooling – out of them.  
  • One of the reasons feminists are bellowing more loudly than usual about “pay disparity” is that the claim has a shelf-life. In part because of the disparity in degrees among millennials, women below the age of 30 are earning *more* than men their age.  
  • While Brilliant Kasey has gone all splotchy with rage over the thoughtcrimes of heterosexual men, many of her sorority sisters are wondering where all the potential mates are.  Young men – disgusted and disillusioned by the social landscape they see – are opting to stay out of the whole “long term relationship” thing.  And getting blamed for it, natch – but by their mid-twenties, they’re pretty much used to that.  Some even revel in it.  
  • Let’s say Brilliant Kasey *does* overcome her fear of heterosexual men, and deigns to marry one.   Her spouse can look forward to a life of being considered guilty until proven innocent of any allegations of domestic abuse (men are guilty until proven innocent, although women initiate every bit as much domestic violence as men do), and, when Brilliant Kasey feels the need to “find herself” (again), an 80+% percent chance of losing his kids and most of what he *has* earned.  

And what happens after that lifetime of being denigrated, medicated, undereducated, underpaid, castigated, and legally excoriated?  Brilliant Kasey and her ideological wardens probably aren’t aware that male life expectancy has held steady, while it’s risen steadily for women.  It’d disrupt their narrative to note that while life is getting pretty good, or at least longer, for women, something’s amiss among the guys. 

If I were a betting man, I’d wager serious money that most responses to this will involve some variation on saying I’m “angry”, “fearful” or some such.  Just you watch.

I’m already laughing.  You’re been warned.  

9 Responses to “Sharks Everywhere!”

  1. kel Says:

    Brilliant Kasey = Shrew!
    see Shakespeare “The Taming of The…”

  2. Joe Doakes Says:

    Fine. Chump don’t want no hep, chump don’t get da hep. Just don’t come crying to me when something bad happens. The legal phrase you’ll hear is “voluntary assumption of the risk.”
    .

  3. bikebubba Says:

    Hyphenated last name is always a good sign of a lack of connection with reality born of living in an upper class neighborhood, going to upper class private schools, and never having really had to face the realities of life. Her writing, and her Facebook likes for that matter, are a litany of stereotypes of the right, really.

    God help her when she finds herself in a situation where not everybody has a background check before being admitted.

  4. swiftee Says:

    I’d bet next weeks pay that Brilliant Kasey wouldn’t be raped on a bet. Most of these screeching shrews are just angry because they know they will probably die with unused snappers unless they pay a man to throw it in.

  5. swiftee Says:

    BTW. Joe slips in some jive for a bonus!

  6. Bento Guzman Says:

    According to the feds, men and boys may menstruate, become pregnant, and give birth to children. To believe otherwise is to be a bigot.
    I wonder what technique the JD’s lawyers believe is used to separate ‘people whose biological sex differs from their orientation’ from people who are simply insane? Or who are pretending to be transgender for some other reason?
    If we judge by the occasional Lefty commenter here, they have a very poor understanding of what is meant by the term ‘sexual orientation.’ If you have a biological condition that results in your being sexually attracted to persons of the same sex, why can’t you have a biological condition that results in your being attracted to animals? Or children?

  7. bikebubba Says:

    You know, if one can simply assert that one is black, or female, the entire method behind Affirmative Action is gone. This could have at least one positive effect…

  8. Bento Guzman Says:

    Here is the ‘dear colleague’ letter wherein the federal government, acting by fiat, declares that biological males must be treated as biological females if they prefer to be treated as female:
    http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201605-title-ix-transgender.pdf
    This means that if the school district offers feminine hygeine products to girls, they must also offer them to biological males who self identify as female.
    Note the insane definition of gender, utterly unhinged from reality:
    “Transgender describes those individuals whose gender identity is different from the sex they were assigned at birth.”
    People are not ‘assigned’ a sex at birth. What the hell does the doctor or nurse tell a pregnant woman who wants to know what sex her baby is? “We don’t know yet because its sex won’t be assigned until birth”?
    The Chinese problem of unbalanced male-female births has been solved by civil rights lawyers at the US justice department. Simply assign sex at birth to maintain a 50/50 ratio!
    I believe that most liberals know that this is insane. They know that their child was did not magically become a biological male or female when the hospital filled out the birth certificate. But they have been trained to accept lies to avoid being one of, you know, those non-liberal, conservative people.

  9. Bento Guzman Says:

    And here we go . . .
    Rep. Lofgren Calls Civil Rights Commissioner ‘Ignorant Bigot’ for Criticizing Bathroom Mandate
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/lauretta-brown/rep-lofgren-calls-us-civil-rights-commissioner-ignorant-bigot-over
    ““We are teaching young people a terrible lesson.” Heriot said in her written testimony as quoted by Lofgren. “If I believe that I am a Russian princess, that doesn’t make me a Russian princess, even if my friends and acquaintances are willing to indulge my fantasy. Nor am I a Great Horned Owl just because—as I have been told—I happen to share some personality traits with those feathered creatures.”
    . . .
    “I think you’re a bigot, lady,” Lofgren interrupted. “I think you’re an ignorant bigot. I think you’re an ignorant bigot and…”
    . . .
    “Mr. Chairman, it is my time, and I would just like to say that we allow witnesses to say offensive things, but I cannot allow that kind of bigotry to go into the record unchallenged. Now, I don’t want to get into a debate about it,” Lofgren said.
    “Does that mean you think I am a Russian princess?” Heriot asked.
    “I have no idea,” Lofgren replied and then questioned another witness.”

    Now, of course, it is a fact that Heriot is not Russian princess, and it is merely Lofgren’s opinion that Heriot is an ignorant bigot.
    Brought to you by the party of science and the self-declared ‘reality based community.’

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->