Defeat of the Will
By Mitch Berg
“The only way home is through Berlin”.
The line was Tom Skeritt’s, from Saving Private Ryan. It’s one I’ve repeated during countless intractable crises in my own personal life; it recognizes that the only way to be rid of the problem you face is to beat it, or at least outlast it. The unspoken corollary, of course, is that if you don’t go to Berlin, you won’t go home. And the key criterion in getting to Berlin is the will to do it or die trying.
Victor Davis Hanson on loss of will, and what it means. He describes our enemies not as terrorists, but as agents of a worldview incompatible with the one that spawned this great nation:
But our newest foes of Reason are not the enraged Athenian democrats who tried and executed Socrates. And they are not the Christian zealots of the medieval church who persecuted philosophers of heliocentricity. Nor are they Nazis who burned books and turned Western science against its own to murder millions en masse.
No, the culprits are now more often us. In the most affluent, and leisured age in the history of Western civilization–never more powerful in its military reach, never more prosperous in our material bounty–we have become complacent, and then scared of the most recent face of barbarism from the primordial extremists of the Middle East.
What would a beleaguered Socrates, a Galileo, a Descartes, or Locke believe, for example, of the moral paralysis in Europe? Was all their bold and courageous thinking–won at such a great personal cost–to allow their successors a cheap surrender to religious fanaticism and the megaphones of state-sponsored fascism?
Hansen ponders – has the West lost the will to persevere? The signs are ominous:
Just imagine in our present year, 2006: plan an opera in today’s Germany, and then shut it down. Again, this surrender was not done last month by the Nazis, the Communists, or kings, but by the producers themselves in simple fear of Islamic fanatics who objected to purported bad taste. Or write a novel deemed unflattering to the Prophet Mohammed. That is what did Salman Rushdie did, and for his daring, he faced years of solitude, ostracism, and death threats–and in the heart of Europe no less. Or compose a documentary film, as did the often obnoxious Theo Van Gogh, and you may well have your throat cut in “liberal” Holland. Or better yet, sketch a simple cartoon in postmodern Denmark of legendary easy tolerance, and then go into hiding to save yourself from the gruesome fate of a Van Gogh. Or quote an ancient treatise, as did Pope Benedict, and then learn that all of Christendom may come under assault, and even the magnificent stones of the Vatican may offer no refuge–although their costumed Swiss Guard would prove a better bulwark than the European police. Or write a book critical of Islam, and then go into hiding in fear of your life, as did French philosophy teacher Robert Redeker.
Read the whole, scary thing.





November 30th, 2006 at 2:54 pm
History seems to be repeating itself in the lifecycle of civilzations
Establishment -> growth -> prosperity -> complacency -> defeat.
^
We are here ———————————^ |
|
Quickly heading to here ————————————
November 30th, 2006 at 2:57 pm
bah. that didn’t work at all.
We are leaving prosperity and entering complacency, and quickly heading to defeat.
To fan the flames a bit, why is it that lots of liberals seem to live under the delusion that the Islamofacsists will only kill conservative Republicans who don’t convert?
Talk about head in the sand.
November 30th, 2006 at 10:13 pm
I read the Hanson piece yesterday and sent it around to many people. It’s depressing and terrifying. I think it’s dead-on.
Because, Bill, don’t you know that EVERYBODY hates conservatives?! Who wouldn’t? Surely the Islamofacists do, too. Man. And I can see lots of liberals converting (for one thing they are comprised of a lot of chicken shits who flap their mouths and that’s about it) but mainly, at least Islam isn’t daddy’s religion. Cool.
December 1st, 2006 at 9:17 pm
I think Hanson is a bit too pessimistic. The European experiment in social organization dates to Napolean, and it explicitly endorses Reason as the basis for the political state. The institutions of the modern European state can tolerate Islam on the margins, but will never be transformed by it without revolution.
\Like Hanson, though, I would have been happier if Liberals had realized by now that the Other who threatens to supplant us may have a real, organic existence and not be a mere reaction to the West’s appetite for the raw materials of industry. Fewer people will get killed that way.