Antisocial
By Mitch Berg
Rob Port at Say Anything on Mitch Daniels’ soft-footing social issues:
Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels is pro-life and a Christian but wants focus on fiscal rather than social issues given the state of the nation’s economy and budget.
Does this kill off his hopes for a candidacy in 2012?
Beyond the debt and the deficit, in Daniels’s telling, all other issues fade to comparative insignificance. He’s an agnostic on the science of global warming but says his views don’t matter. “I don’t know if the CO2 zealots are right,” he said. “But I don’t care, because we can’t afford to do what they want to do. Unless you want to go broke, in which case the world isn’t going to be any greener. Poor nations are never green.”
And then, he says, the next president, whoever he is, “would have to call a truce on the so-called social issues. We’re going to just have to agree to get along for a little while,”
I think that’s the big lesson of the Tea Party so far, not to mention of the Reagan administration: if you don’t conquer government’s addictions to spending and taxes, then we’re screwed on the social issues anyway – and as luck’d have it, most candidates that are conservative on spending and taxes are on the right side of the social issues anyway.





June 11th, 2010 at 8:20 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by . said: […]
June 11th, 2010 at 11:27 am
“Republicans have a solid and increasing bench from which to launch such a campaign, and Daniels would be a welcome and worthy addition.”
Daniels is a guy of substance over style, he has a quite the track record of accomplishments. If family considerations don’t hold him back I’d love to see him campaign for president. I would encourage anyone to read the Weekly Standard article on Daniels.
June 11th, 2010 at 11:51 am
I’m not so willing to forgo the link between the religious and the fiscal deficit hawks.
For example, I’d support the canonization of anyone who could make the Federal government work efficiently since it would clearly be a miracle of the first class.
June 11th, 2010 at 4:06 pm
Fiscal conservatism and social liberalism are not compatible.
At least not until the State stops subsidizing broken families and drug addicts.