Some animals are just more equal than others.
After a showy but shallow “filibuster”, the Democrats in the Senate moved a bill that would have allowed the government to strip your gun rights (among others) without due process or any means of knowing one was on the list, much less how to get off it.
The orcs of the gun grabber movement put out their calls to their minions.
The Real Americans of the Second Amendment called the good guys to turn out, via phone and email.
The good guys won. For now.
We Real Americans have made a lot of progress in the past 30 years. And for all that, we are one SCOTUS decision, one bad election, away from returning to the hell of the seventies.
For the 22nd year out of the past 22, the Department of Homeland Security warns us that “right-wing extremism” is coming. Boy, howdy, is sure is.
Aaaaaany day now.
Yep! This is the last warning!
No, stop laughing!
And it’s gonna be as bad – no twice…no, eleventy-teen times as bad as Islamic Extremist terror:
Also this week came news of the DHS comments concerning right-wing extremists, which were made during the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s January meeting – only one month after Muslim terrorists Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 Americans in an attack in San Bernardino, California, in December 2015.
“Member [Austin Police Chief Art] Acevedo reminded the Council that the threat from right-wing extremists domestically is just as real as the threat from Islamic extremism,” the official meeting minutes state.
Johnson apparently agreed with Acevedo’s sentiments, the official records noted.
Sometime in the next three months, look for DHS to reclassify Islamic Extremism as “right wing”.
A chain of mediocre coffee shops tells Trump supporters to stay away.
Why, it’s almost like liberals suddenly believe in the concept of “freedom of association” or something.
Representative government requires trust – above all, trust that everyone, king and commoner alike, is equal in the eyes of the law and “the system” – and everyone follows more or less the same rules.
But we’re not doing that anymore. Marc Rich scammed people, and got pardoned for being a Democrat bigwig; Bill Clinton did things that would have gotten a dozen Republicans like Bob Packwood thrown out of Congress; Hillary’s email server issue alone is vastly bigger than the transgression that destroyed David Petraeus’ career (to say nothing of the passive-aggressive institutional arrogance protecting her). And Obama? From nominating a budget chief who owed enough taxes to get a dozen mere middle class mortals jailed, to an Obamacare consultant that tittered like a pajamaboy about lying to the rubes about the costs of the program, to changing the rules and running around the Legislative Branch when Obamacare went up on the rocks, to the lies about the Iran deal, Obama has trampled the rules in a way no citizen ever could ream about.
And as Glenn Reynolds notes in one of his most scathing commentaries ever, that’s a problem, if we care about the kind of society we plan to have:
Being law-abiding for its own sake is a traditional part of bourgeois culture, and our ruling class has lately treated the bourgeoisie with contempt as well. Which raises the risk that this contempt will be returned.
Back in the midst of the financial crisis, Gonzalo Lira looked at how people were responding to the mortgage meltdown and warned of a coming middle-class anarchy. He wrote:
“A terrible sentence, when a law-abiding citizen speaks it: Everybody else is doing it — so why don’t we? … What’s really important is that law-abiding middle-class citizens are deciding that playing by the rules is nothing but a sucker’s game.”
America has been — and, for the moment, remains — a high-trust society. In high-trust societies, people extend trust to strangers and follow rules for the most part even when nobody is watching. In low-trust societies, trust seldom extends beyond close family, and everybody cheats if they can get away with it.
Try life in Romania, Somalia or the Congo if you don’t believe it. Get back to us on that.
High-trust societies are much nicer places to live than low-trust ones. But a fish rots from the head and the head of our society is looking pretty rotten. As Lira says, “I’m likeWayne Gretsky: I don’t concern myself with where the puck has been — I look for where the puck is going to be.” Where will our society be in a decade if these trends continue? And what can we do to ensure that they don’t?
How long can a society stay free without trust? It’s not like trust goes underground or anything…
…that the left is trying to get traditional western culture treated as a thoughtcrime, it‘s really not hyperbole:
Kathleen Taylor, a neurologist at Oxford University, said that recent developments suggest that we will soon be able to treat religious fundamentalism and other forms of ideological beliefs potentially harmful to society as a form of mental illness.
Big deal. Breshnev was claiming the same thing 50 years ago.
Bonus: art imitates life! Kathleen Taylor of Oxford:
Suzanna Hamilton in the movie (or was it?) 1984:
Accidental? I think not.
This is getting very very close.
Today, on the 72nd anniversary of the D-Day landings, I’m genuinely pessimistic that this nation learned – or can learn – one of the most important lessons of the war.
Indeed, it seems that there are those in our society who really don’t want this country to learn it.
Words like “Fascist” and “Brownshirt” have been overused, mainly but not quite exclusively by the left, over the past 4-5 decades One might even say they’ve been devalued, if you’re conspiracy-minded.
In light of events this past week, they need to be re-valued, and Americans need to get a quick education in political history.
Alliance Für A Better Deutschland: With the collapse of the Weimar Republic, German politics returned to a state that hadn’t been seen since the chaotic late teens and early twenties; political parties retained private groups of thugs to harass, intimidate, and attack political opponents’ demonstrations, meetings and events.
And it wasn’t just eggs and water bottles; in the ’20s, German parties enlisted Freikorps, groups of armed World War I veterans who fought gangland battles and, in some cases, pitched military engagements in the streets of German cities.
The biggest participants were the Communists and and, to a lesser degree, the Socialists on what’s conventionally called “the left”, and their opponents (called “the Right”, although the sought to govern scarcely less as authoritarians and totalitarians than did their opponents), of whom the National Socialists (the Nazis, of course) became the leader.
Like I said, it got bloody . On July 17 1932, “Bloody Sunday”, Communist “direct action” activists attacked a Nazi rally in Altona, Germany, killing 18; revenge and counter-revenge played out across Germany afterwards, as it had before.
This was one of many events that framed the Nazis final ascent to control of the country six months later.
Not only have Americans living today never seen such a thing – groups of thugs acting as a direct action wing of political parties – but in fact the little information they have about this is pollyannaish in the extreme. It wasn’t just Germany, it didn’t end 80 years ago, and it can happen here.
In Poland in 1980,
In Panama in the late eighties,
in Iran in 2008,
And here in the US, today:
There’s precious little difference between the people above and the people below:
And I don’t know that I trust Americans to know this anymore.
Politics + force = where horrible things come from.
Bing – a search engine I rarely use (mostly out of habit) has this as its cover today – June 6, a rather significant date in world, especially Western, history:
Google – which, two weeks ago, honored America-hating radical and Bin Laden supporter Yuri Kochiyama with a Doodle – has this:
Not that Microsoft is a saint in the whole “undercutting America” thing, but it’s getting a little insane.
(Via commenter JustPlainAngry)
Faux Feminist “writer” Lindy West blocks conservatives wholesale on Twitter.
Even lowly little me, Mitch Berg, from the far frontiers of conservatism, am blocked.
I actually feel pretty jazzed about that. Although I shouldn’t; West likely uses some sort of online ‘bot or another to block every account that references conservatism or libertarianism.
I guess I’m not that special after all.
It’s actually a sign of deep intellectual vapidity – being completely unwilling to deal with any form of dissent. And it’s pretty much the norm on the American left’s social media. Go ahead – try to leave a question with any leftist on Twitter.
Or on their blog, Youtube channel, Snapchat…
They want the whole world to be their safe space – or at least the only parts of the world they let near them.
A few weeks ago, Nekima Levy-Pounds went to the Minneapolis park and recreation board, and did what she does best; made a lot of noise, claiming the Park and Rec board was…
wait for it…
wait for it…
Unfortunately – according to the City Pages – the facts don’t exactly bear out her charges of “Racism” against the park board (emphases added):
Parks and Rec breaks down its budget into North, Northeast, South, and Southwest service areas. North has 49 park properties and 59,119 residents, according to the 2010 census. Parks and Rec allocated $243 per person in north Minneapolis from 2010-14…During the same time, Southwest received $85 for each of its 120,376 people, and South received $83 for each of the 136,160 residents
Oh yeah, and the Park Board has big plans – and they don’t include the southside:
While parks all over the city will get some funding to maintain what’s already there, neighborhood parks in areas of concentrated poverty will be the only ones getting any funding for improvements — amenities like playgrounds, wading pools, fields — during the first five years.
Parks in wealthier neighborhoods won’t see a cent more than what it costs to prevent them from breaking down.
I’m not sure what the race-relations version of “all moo / no cow” is, but I’ll be looking for it.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Americans of my generation are dreamers. We grew up believing the future held flying cars, any boy could become President or even better, an astronaut, and we’d eventually find the Perfect Girl. We grew up believing America was the greatest nation on Earth, prosperity was here to stay and things would only get better, for ourselves and for our children.
What do people like that do when flying cars turn out to be crappy little tin cans, when American astronauts have to hitch rides on Russian rockets, when The Girl leaves, taking the children with her? What do we believe in when the President tells us “You didn’t build that,” sends jobs out of the country, brings in millions of welfare leeches and not only lets our sworn enemies have The Bomb, he pays them $100 Billion to do it?
What is left to believe in, when mental illness becomes constitutional right, when a lifetime of savings and equity evaporates, when college students are afraid of chalk and seemingly sensible people can no longer figure out which bathroom to use?
What do you do when your dream dies? White Male suicide is skyrocketing. Is losing the dream, the reason why?
Doesn’t matter – you DESERVE to die. Because Privilege.
And people ask why Trump is doing so very very well these days.
You might recall Minneapolis City Councilor Alonda Cano; last winter, she was abusing her access to city data to “shame” people who criticized her support for Black Lives Matter. Then, when called for alleged laziness by (of all outlets) the City Pages, she…
Tuesday evening, it was Cano’s turn to join the public conversation, doing so in the form of a Facebook post on her city council page. Cano wrote it was “hurtful and disappointing” to read the words “lazy,” “always late,” and “clueless” used to describe her work ethic on the council.
“It is important to illuminate,” Cano went on, “that these words, when used to frame women and people of color, carry a history of coded language that serve to create negative racial stereotypes.”
That could be.
Those words, when referring to someone who’d rather grandstand than learn their damn job, are also not-coded-at-all terms to refer to lazy, inconsiderate people who don’t do their homework, whatever their skin color.
Cano wrote that the negative story “weighed on me heavily,” and she went back and forth on whether she should respond to it. After all, she and her south Minneapolis constituents in the Ninth Ward have far greater concerns: wage theft, slumlords, a lack of paid sick time for workers, even working moms.
Which Cano, apparently, isn’t doing jack for.
“However,” Cano continued, “when loaded and biased attacks occur, it is vital that we stand up and speak the truth. In this case, this story was racist, sexist, and it was an attempt to smear all of the things I stand for.
Well, no. It was an attempt to tell the public that Cano – who reportedly has ambitions to run for Mayor or the Legislature – isn’t doing a very good job, when her job doesn’t involve granstanding, or taking spiffy trips on the taxpayer’s dime.
I want you to know that I am unabashed in my commitment to continuing to advance a racial and social justice agenda no matter the backlash.”
Let’s take a moment to go over what just happened. Alondra Cano – an elected member of a power bloc with absolute one-party control of a major city, a person with in effect a lifetime sinecure either in government or non-profits for her and (likely) her entire family, one who wields the kind of power that mere citizens don’t even know how to dream of – is trying to paint herself as a victim.
Cano – like Nekima Levy-Pounds, another person with immense power and privilege herself – is perfectly fine using her position to shame critics who don’t buy newsprint by the trainload; when someone – even the lowly City Pages – comes along and hits her from the level, she cries “victimization”.
Question, Minneapolis: Do you deserve better, or not?
I finally found a “public servant” I can get behind; Minneapolis Park Board member Liz Wielinski cut Nekima Levy-Pounds off at the knees when the local NAACP leader interrrupted, out of order, at a Park Board meeting:
“I’m tired of this. You keep interrupting our meetings,” Wielinski shouted after Levy-Pounds began to speak. “You’re a crude, interrupting adult.”
Any bets on how Levy-Pounds responded?
I never get any bets on the response.
With good reason (emphasis added):
Levy-Pounds, who has been involved in multiple protests over racial disparities in recent months, accused Wielinski of exercising white supremacy and speaking to her as a slave. The exchange was recorded on video and later posted on Facebook.
“I’m not your child. Don’t ever talk to me like that again,” Levy-Pounds, a law professor, told Wielinski.
Levy-Pounds is a child; more accurately, a spoiled, entitled teenager, used to stomping over whatever she wants and crying “racist” at anyone who raises a finger at her.
“I was berated and yelled at like a child,” Levy-Pounds said Thursday.
As for Wielinski? She’s go the right perspective:
Wielinski said Thursday that she has apologized to the board for an exchange she compared to “The Jerry Springer Show,” but said she has no apology to make to Levy-Pounds. She said Levy-Pounds and others could avail themselves of the board’s regularly scheduled public comment period at other meetings.
“I think I shouldn’t have lost my temper, but we were within our rights to ask people to respect the process,” she said.
One wonders how Ms. Levy-Pounds would react if someone interrupted an NAACP meeting.
Last week, I bagged on Senator Ron Latz for – forget manners for a moment – lying about gun crime in Minnesota.
To readers of this blog, it’s no surprise that it was, to a geometric point, baked monkey doodle – so much so that an entire catagory on this blog is dedicated to their serial fabulism.
It’s from the top down, of course:
Our postmodern president, a good friend of mine points out, has proved that facts don’t matter. The weakest economic recovery in post-World War II history has been sold as a rousing success.
We increased our troop levels in Iraq, but miraculously we still don’t have any “boots on the ground.” The man who told his supporters, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” was sold to America by the New York Times, the New Yorker, and the networks as a post-partisan—one who somehow found a way to blame Republicans for all the country’s ills. Obama also showed that bullying the Supreme Court—calling them out for their Citizens United decision in a State of the Union address—could pay dividends down the road. An intimidated Chief Justice John Roberts used pretzel-like logic to redefine the Obamacare mandate as a tax, though the administration had insisted that it was nothing of the kind.
What is it called when “fact-checking” exists to support factlessness?
Tuesday, while participating in a dog and pony show for a Gabby Giffords visit to support gun grab legislation that was dead weeks ago in the legislature, Ron “I Went To Harvard. You Do What Harvard Is”” Latz introduced things with eleven seconds of distilled fabulism.
Courtesy of MNGOC, here it is:
As befits a DFL / Minnesota Left statement about guns, the Second Amendment, gun control and gun owners, it’s a lie.
Because remember: their motto is “Lie First, Lie Always” 1.
Minnesota is in such a “gun crime crisis” that the gun murder rate has dropped to its lowest level in decades. In fact, if you leave out DFL-strangled North Minneapolis, with its Baltimore-like murder rate, from the state figures (a third of the state’s murders happen in Near North), Minnesota has a murder rate half that of Norway. Competitive with the rural west.
I could write “It’s low and dropping” 250 more times – or capture the whole thing in a 1000-word picture:
And except for the DFL-addled inner cities, it’s continuing its drop, as the number of carry permittees in Minnesota rockets toward and past a quarter million.
More such crises, please.
And stop lying, Senator Latz.
1 Well, no – it’s not literally their motto; they didn’t pick it. I wrote it for them. But they observe it in every particular. Every time. And it’s been keeping this blog in material for years.
Ever notice how many liberals say they’re “moving to Canada” if Trump wins?
Why do none of them say “I’m moving to Mexico?”
(Hat tip to a meme from Facebook)
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Whole Foods suing the hoaxer who lied about the cake.
It was all a lie, just like “hands up don’t shoot” or “he was cuffed when they shot him.,” Why does the media believe it’s okay to substitute a desired result for objective truth?
I’m not talking about mindlessly parroting The Narrative on climate change, or gun control. We expect that. I’m talking about breathlessly reporting gay-threatening rainbow nooses (turned out to be an art project to raise awareness of LGBT suicide) or campus rape hoaxes, like Mattress Girl. Their attitude seems to be that the fact the incident did not occur doesn’t mean it might not have occurred. So falsely accusing someone of rape is simply a way to raise awareness of a problem that doesn’t exist, but could exist.
Same idea with forged documents claiming Bush not serving in the military – fake but accurate, per Dan Rather.
And now gay-slur cakes. Same idea. Didn’t happen. But could have. So it’s all good. The fact that an honest business had its reputation trashed doesn’t even cross their radar.
Liberals seem to believe an untruth told in furtherance of The Narrative is not a lie, it’s a Greater Good than the actual, verifiable truth, so you should be happy to be slandered.
I hope Whole Foods pounds this guy into the dust for spreading lies about their business.
I expect an eventual, not-too-onerous settlement. Fellow travelers and all.
A friend of this blog writes:
So there was a letter to the Villager editor, which I thought made quite a bit of sense regarding paid family leave. Then, I happened to see a discussion on Twitter about that letter. The responses on Twitter seem to be what is wrong with the entitlement generation/class. (I suspect the discussion is by mostly millennials.)
The most striking comment from the person who assumes that she pays twice as much in student loan debt as the money the editorial writer set aside to raise a family. This from a person who, per her Twitter account, is a lawyer and who apparently owns a house not just in St Paul, but also in Mexico.
But, all of the comments assume we have no choice in how we spend our money. The entitled confuse needs with wants, lack control in their own lives. It is where they decide the rest of us need to be in the cycle of debt in which they find themselves.
Misery loves company.
“Democratic” socialist misery requires it.
Remember way back, when the left wanted the government out of people’s bedrooms?
Either does the Left. A liberal legal conclave is debating moving “affirmative consent” laws off of campus and to the general population:
The American Law Institute will vote in May on whether to adopt a model penal code that would make “affirmative consent” the official position of the organization. Affirmative consent — or “yes means yes” — policies have already been adopted by many colleges and universities, and have been passed as law in California and New York.
In my dreams, Hillary Clinton appoints Melissa Click as Attorney General…
A longtime friend of this blog writes re Keith Ellison’s recent op-ed in the MinnPost:
“Long airport-security lines are a symptom of Congress’ budget-cutting mantra” 
Hmm. Doesn’t look right.
“Long airport-security lines are a symptom of Arabs hijacking aircraft and blowing them up”
Terrorist attack led to concern for security, which led to government seeing a new opportunity for graft, which led to a permanent bureaucracy which does little to secure air travel but very much does want to get paid, and paid well.
There. Now we’re all ship-shape.
Sure enough, government functionaries will start a black market in graft to sell those rights to the highest bidder.
Sanders campaign tries to get a restraining order against a parody:
Yesterday, April 14th, the Bernie Sanders campaign sent a cease and desist letter claiming that I am unlawfully selling my parodies because they used the likeness of the official Bernie Sanders for President logo in this shirt.
Here’s the satirical image (with a click-through to the site where you can buy this samizdat classic):
What next: Book-Berning?