…with a more accurate headling, “Parade of box-office flops coming to theaters“.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Democrats insist the policy of separating children from adults is inhumane. I’d like to hear a better policy, one that addresses this situation:
Adult man and little girl are apprehended in Texas walking North, away from the border with Mexico, along with 20 other people. They have no documents aside from a Xerox copy of Refugee Instructions distributed by an open borders advocacy group, printed in Spanish.
The Border Patrol asks the man for his passport and visa to prove he has legal permission to enter the country. He says they were stolen. He claims the girl is his child and they are refugees seeking asylum from persecution in his home country.
The Border Patrol asks the girl “Is this man your Papa?” to which she replies “No, I want my Mama, I want to go home.”
When confronted with the child’s statement, the man says the child’s father was killed by the narco-terrorists who have taken over his village, he is technically the child’s step-father, the child’s mother was travelling with them but was separated from the group when they ran from the Border Patrol, and he is attempting to reach Chicago, where a cousin resides. He’s hoping to be reunited with his wife there.
He also says he’s read the paper from the advocacy group, knows his rights, demands a lawyer, and insists on being released with the child plus provided transportation and food vouchers according to the policies set by the Obama administration.
You are aware of this news article from 2010, and Border Patrol agency reports documenting the problem is on-going.
You are setting policy. What should the Border Patrol do with the man and the child for the next few hours? The next few days? Long term?
Your overthinking it, Joe.
It’s all – every bit of it – about eliciting an emotional response from the ignorant.
Who are the Democrat voting base.
Where San Francisco has gone – a hideously expensive city with plummeting quality of life – New York will soon follow:
Beautiful, hilly San Francisco has become known as the city where 20 pounds of poop were dumped on a sidewalk last week in a clear bag and remained there for hours. As The Post noted, “human waste-related complaints in San Francisco have skyrocketed 400 percent from 2008 to 2018,” and “In 2017 alone, more than 21,000 reports were received.”
What happened in San Francisco is obvious. It stopped prosecuting quality-of-life offenses and, unsurprisingly, the quality of life for the city’s residents and visitors decreased sharply.
In 2015, San Francisco courts stopped enforcing bench warrants for such offenses. Police continued writing up tickets for public drunkenness or sleeping in parks, but when the accused failed to show up to their court appearance a judge simply dismissed the outstanding warrant.
New York started following San Francisco’s lead in 2016 when Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. announced his office would no longer be prosecuting offenses such as public urination. Both cities have accepted that they’ll continue to have a large number of people living on their streets and inevitably using their sidewalks as a toilet.
Progressivism is all about leveling the world out (outside the parts where the kommissars life, anyway); logically, eventually, “leveled out” has to include “…to the level of public rest room”.
Although as Ed Driscoll notes, at least some people are getting their wish:
But as Dan Henninger of the Wall Street Journal warned in 2005, hipsters lamented the loss of the gritty Death Wish/Panic in Needle Park-era Manhattan of the 1970s — and thanks to Mayor de Blasio, they’re getting that city back once again. Good and hard, as Mencken would say.
And since Minneapolis is following the same route – obsessing over virtue-signaling while ignoring quality of life issues – how long until Minneapolis follows suit?
It is your moral duty to pay any price, bear any burden, to make sure this happens.
The Strib’s Jon Bream interviews Bruce Springsteen on his ongoing Broadway performance.
During which nobody ruled out the thought of taking the whole thing out on the road.
Time to start warming up the credit card…
On the one hand, few stories have cranked my claustrophobia to 11 quite like the story of the Thai boys trapped in a cave for…
But as this is written, the staggeringly tricky rescue is finally underway:
Senior officials told Reuters and AFP that six boys had been rescued, but this could not be confirmed.
Rescuers will now need another 10 to 12 hours to get ready for the next stage of the remarkable operation, Narongsak said..
The plan is to take the rest of the group out in batches of four within two days according to the Journal.
All of the rescued were examined and found to be in good health, according to local outlet The Nation.
The governor confirmed this, saying the health of the four boys is “perfect.”
Another local outlet, Kahosod English, said one of the rescued soccer players was being “closely monitored.”
The Thai Navy Seals posted on their Facebook page that four of the boys had been rescued.
Am I the only one who thinks “well, this is the 21st century” on learning the Thai SEALS have a website?
And of course, in a world that venerates vacuous celebrity, it’s elevating to know that the world still has some real heroes
Sgt. Major Saman Gunan wasn’t abiding by any orders when he joined the effort to rescue a boys soccer team trapped in a cave in northern Thailand. The 38-year-old retired Thai Navy SEAL did so by choice.
Gunan, who was working as a volunteer, passed out underwater during an overnight mission placing extra air tanks inside the cave, along the route divers use to reach the cavern where the 12 boys and their coach remain stranded and the oxygen in the air is depleting. He couldn’t be revived and was confirmed dead early Friday morning, according to Thai officials.
Hopefully this story will be over, with a happy ending, today.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Residents are fleeing these cities. USA Today says it’s people retiring and moving South, a trend that began decades ago, was interrupted by the Crash and now is resuming.
Really? Why are Mobile and Montgomery, Alabama on the list? Why are Jacksonville and Fayetteville, North Carolina on the list? Why is Sierra Vista-Douglas, Arizona on the list – that’s a stone’s throw from the border with Mexico, state income tax is 5%, ought to be a retiree paradise. Brownsville-Harlingen, Texas? Brownsville is farther south than Arizona and therefore warmer and Texas has no income tax. Why would sun-seekers be leaving those areas? They should be flocking there.
Notice which cities people are not fleeing but instead are the fastest-growing? Boise, Idaho is #1 and Seattle, Washington is #2, ahead of Texas and Florida. Portland, Oregon is #17, Colorado Springs is 18, Salt Lake City is 24. These are not snowbird destinations. Why are they growing?
The climate explanation doesn’t make sense. Try this one instead: the cities people flee are decaying because leftists in charge have destroyed them by pandering to residents who lack the old-fashioned values that were required to take care of a community. Refugees. Illegals. Homeless. Welfare mindset regardless of welfare status – people who expect everything provided for free without lifting a finger.
When your city intentionally sets out to replace the 1950’s nuclear family post-war community with an Obama-era refugee/illegal/welfare community, don’t act all surprised when the 1950’s people move out. Nobody wants to move from safe, clean Roseville to narco-terrorist infested Brownsville or poop-on-the-streets San Francisco, regardless of the year-round climate.
If we just give sclerotic big-city liberal adminstrations enough time, it’ll all work out…
Join me from 1-3PM today on the NARN!
Today on the show:
- Pride (In The Name Of Politics)
- Heads, We Find My Common Ground; Tails, We Don’t Use Yours.
- Moral Arcs
Don’t forget – King Banaian is on from 9-11AM on AM1440, and Brad Carlson is on “The Closer” edition of the NARN Sundays from 2-3PM.
So tune in the Northern Alliance! You have so many options:
- AM1280 in the Metro
- FM107.5 in the West Metro
- Streaming at AM1280’s Website
- Streaming on IHeartRadio
- On Twitter (the Volume 2 show will use hashtag #narnshow)
- Via my UStream video and chat channel.
- Good ol’ telephone – 651-289-4488
- Podcasts are now available; for my show and for Brad’s
- And make sure you fan us on our new Facebook page!
SCENE: Mitch BERG is eating a plate of galbi and kimchi at Mirror of Korea on Snelling Avenue. Lost in a gustatory reverie, he fails to notice Avery LIBRELLE has entered the restaurant.
BERG: (Shaken from his bliss) Oh, hey, Avery.
LIBRELLE: It’s time for us to find common ground on commonsense gun violence legislation.
BERG: Well, that’s great. So what do you propose for that “common ground”?’
LIBRELLE: Our common ground should include background checks, bringing back Obama’s law preventing the mentally ill from easy access to guns, bans on certain types of guns, online restrictions, stop exploiting the Second Amendment.
LIBRELLE: Yes, these would be hard to do but we have to start somewhere.
BERG: OK. Well, one of the important exercises of finding common ground is defining the ground we do not have in common. OK. Let’s go through this one at a time.
Background checks – we already have them. If you’re talking about “universal background checks“, they have two huge problems; people to get guns illegally today, will still get them exactly the same way when they are “universal“. And there is no way for “Universal” background checks to work without a national registry of who has actually taken background checks, and for which firearms. If you want to ask for a registry, say it in is many words – and watch for the consequences.
I’m not sure which Obama era law you’re talking about; there are already laws against violently mentally ill people getting guns. It’s already supposed to be reported in some form to the NICS database. But the reporting is extremely uneven, as are the standards for who is considered “violently mentally ill”. Also, many state level laws have no due process; a malicious denunciation can and does deprive people of their rights. In what other area do people find that acceptable?
Banning certain types of guns – well, then you are anti-gun. “Assault weapon” bans had absolutely zero effect on crime from 1994 to2004; they are used in far less than 1% of all firearm homicides nationwide. It’s security theater and no more.
Not sure what you mean by “exploiting the Second Amendment“; it sounds like another way of saying “stop standing up for your rights”. I’d love a clarification.
Finally – you say “We have to start somewhere” – and we have! Were you aware that firearm homicides are down 50% in the last 20 years? That firearm homicides at schools are down 75%? And that’s almost entirely due to policies the NRA and us law abiding shooters have pressed for.
This is why when people ask for “commonsense gun laws“, I asked if they get into specific policies immediately. None of the ones that people on the left are calling for will do a bit of good. Ever.
LIBRELLE: Typical conservative. I give you some common ground, and you don’t accept it.
BERG: “Common ground” can’t be dictated! But I’ll do my bit, here: how about we start with getting the Department of Justice to take straw buyers seriously, and start intervening with at risk youth before they join gangs, and maybe come up with a “Red Flag” law that doesn’t trample due process?
LIBRELLE: But what do any of those have to do with school shootings?
BERG: School shootings are a tiny fraction of the homicides in this country, compared to gang violence and…
LIBRELLE: I don’t care about any of that. And you’re being a typical conservative. I’ve told you what our common ground will be…
BERG: You’re not “seeking common ground”; you’re trying to…
(But LIBRELLE’s attention has wandered already)
WAITRESS: Hey, si…er, ma’… (Looks at BERG, at a loss. BERG shrugs. WAITRESS continues) Would you like to have a seat?
LIBRELLE: Is your kimchi non-GMO?
PS: Every single one of Avery’s words is a very close paraphrase of something I’ve heard from liberals on social media or in person in the past week.
…that this innovation in weaponry could be pretty earthshaking, if one is fighting an army of fashion designers…
…that is being reported is “A Record Percentage Are Proud To Be American”. That’s the headline that you’re seeing everywhere.
Buried deep in the story:
Currently, 32% of Democrats — down from 43% in 2017 and 56% in 2013 — are extremely proud. The decline preceded the election of Donald Trump but has accelerated in the past year.
Less than half of independents, 42%, are also extremely proud. That is down slightly from 48% a year ago, and 50% in 2013.
As has typically been the case, Republicans are more inclined to say they are extremely proud to be Americans than are Democrats and independents. Seventy-four percent of Republicans are extremely proud, which is numerically the highest over the last five years.
The actual title of the piece should have been “Democrats Continue Pouting About The 2016 Election”.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Gun control advocates insist that if we could have all firearms registered, and government permits for every transfer, then crime would be non-existent. Everyone would register their firearms, non-registered firearms would be confiscated, no guns on the street means no crime. Easy.
In the entire country of Mexico, there are only 3,153 firearms. That’s the total number registered for private individuals to legally own. I suspect that number does explain the violent crime rate in Mexico. But not the way gun controllers believe it does.
And every decade or so, some of them figure it out, and move on to greener political pastures, to be replaced by a new generation that thinks they’ve discovered the holy grail with “common sense gun laws”.
Donald Truimp proposes to separate children of legal immigrants from their parents for 25 hours a week for instruction in American values – including traditions like Christmas, Easter, and of course fluency in English. Spokespeople for the proposal say that if immigrants won’t willingly assimilate to American life, they – or at least their next generation – should be forced to assimilate.
The proposal would also hike sentences for crimes committed in immigrant neighborhoods, and impose potential prison terms on parents who send their kids on extended trips back to the home culture for de-assimilation.
The left is rolling out its big guns against this latest Trump atrocity.
Every so often on social media there will be a flurry of Memes claiming Congress is on the very brink of adopting one owner is United Nations resolution on firearms or another as the law of the land.
On the one hand, it’s never true, as such – at the moment, our Congress, like the Minnesota state legislature, is very lopsidedy controlled by proponents of the Second Amendment.
Which is not to say the United Nations isn’t up to some of their usual bureaucratic, impotent mischief.
Ted Bromund at Forbes attended an event at the UN with her name only and, well, UN bureaucrat could love: the Third U.N. Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects. It is referred to throughout the article as RevCon Three of the PoA.
Because there’s always something to learn, especially for me – because while the flurry of photo Memes claiming the UN is on the brink of banning guns in the knighted states are always wrong, it’s not for lack of trying on the part of, well, the UN and American gun grabbers:
On Thursday, 17 nations, including Mexico, proposed including civilian possession in the PoA. Last Friday, we had a visit from Wear Orange, of Everytown for Gun Safety, financed by Michael Bloomberg. They clearly see the PoA as relevant to domestic gun control. The best illustration of why came on Wednesday, when in a side event on domestic gun control laws an Australian representative stated that “every gun shop that disappeared was a point from which guns could no longer be diverted.” In other words, according to the gun controllers, the way to control the illicit arms trade is to make sure there are no legal places to buy guns, which will ensure that no legal guns exist to become illegal. The Australian representative went on to point out that the most important source of crime guns in Australia is thefts from legal gun owners. That sums up their point of view nicely: legal gun owners should be deprived of their right to buy a gun so that, when a thief invades their house, they will not have a gun that can be stolen. Also, they will be defenseless. The problem, by this way of thinking, is not the thief: it is the law-abiding gun owner, who should be punished accordingly.
In other words – well just about everything you read on social media is false, that doesn’t mean it’s not necessarily true.
I’ll have to work on that sends to help it make more sense.
Last year saw Gawker Media spin into oblivion.
With a little luck, we’ll be seeing the same from Vice before too long.
As I wait for the bonfire, I’ll refer you to this memorable parody of Vice…
…from the parody series “Documentary Now” – which as been one of Netflix’s better offerings in the past couple years.
A friend of the blog writes:
I notice this is getting a lot of attention on the FB pages of my progressive acquaintances.
The campaign to urge Democrats to “walk away” from the party – well, it’s just crazy enough to work, around the margins anyway.
It probably doesn’t qualify as a “Berg’s Law” because it may not be absolute and universal – but for the most part, if you scratch the surface of an American “Democratic Socialist”, you’ll find a rich kid with daddy issues.
So, it seems, with current socialist wunderkind Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Last week’s big primary winner in a Congressional district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens highlighted the 29 year old “community organizer”, who will likely be going to Congress, and her “Jenny from the Block” story. Listening to her before the election, I caught myself humming “It’s A Hard Knock Life” more than a few times.
So was it baked wind?
What do you think? Remember – it’s almost a Berg’s Law:
Around the age of five, Alexandria’s architect father Sergio Ocasio moved the family from the “planned community” of Parkchester in the Bronx to a home in Yorktown Heights, a wealthy suburb in Westchester County. The New York Times describes her childhood home as “a modest two-bedroom house on a quiet street.” In a 1999 profile of the area, when Ocasio-Cortez would have been ten years old, the Times lauded Yorktown Heights’ “diversity of housing in a scenic setting” – complete with two golf courses.
Westchester County – which the Washington Post, in a glowing profile on Ocasio-Cortez, describes as only “middle class” – ranks #8 in the nation for the counties with the “highest average incomes among the wealthiest one percent of residents.” According to the Economic Policy Institute, the county’s average annual income of the top one percent is a staggering $4,326,049.
Yorktown Heights, specifically, offers a sharp contrast from Bronx living. According to USA.com, the town’s population is 81 percent white, and median household income is $96,413 – nearly double the average for both New York state and the nation, according to data from 2010-2014.
I interviewed for a job in Westchester County thirty years ago; the program director basically told me there was no way I could live in the area on what they could payme (here was the story).
Not that there’s anything wrong with doing well; but not only didn’t Ocasio-Cortez earn it, she wants to make it harder for others to do it.
(Even as she, beyond a doubt, gets ready to make a couple million in honoraria from liberals with deep pockets over the next few years, much like the Bern she no doubt felt).
It is your duty as a virtue-signalling progressive to indulge this urge at all costs, whatever it takes.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Sarah Hoyt asks the right question: what’s the margin of civilization?
Look, pretty much any organization can carry one freeloader. Usually, it’s the boss’s nephew. Certain union shops and government offices seem to have more of them because productivity isn’t tied to profit.
But at some point, if all you hire are Pajama Boys and Diversity Coordinators, who’s doing the welding? Who’s going to climb the power pole during the thunderstorm to reconnect the cables? Who’s going down in the manhole – ooops, sorry, person hole – to shovel the clogged sewage? Who’s the roughneck throwing the chain around the drill pipe when you’re coming out of the hole in the Badlands of North Dakota? Who’s the cop wading into the bar fight? Who’s the firefighter climbing down the ladder with my fat a** slung over the shoulder?
Diversity is a fact, not a goal. At least, not for long. After the collapse of civilization, it will be a curse word.
As Glenn Reynolds says, things that can’t be sustained, won’t be. Probably holds true for people, too.
None of that will be heard cascading down from Mounds Park this July 4 – at least, not on the city’s dime.
Mayor Carter is declining to spend tax dollars on fireworks:
Mayor Melvin Carter announced on his Facebook page Wednesday that he would be scrapping the annual fireworks display, stating he believes there are better uses for tax dollars.
In his post he writes, “As I’ve considered the budgetary priorities we manage across our city in the first year of my administration, I’ve decided I can’t in good conscience support spending tax dollars on a fireworks display in Saint Paul this year.”
The budget hawk in me applauds – until he realizes that the Saint Paul City Councijl will find much dumber uses for any money saved.
More philosophically? I support the Mayor’s decision. I’m a patriotic American who believes in the ideals of the state that was founded in 1776; a celebration by a government that eschews those ideals, in favor of (at best) those of the Swedish or Danish (or Venezuelan) social welfare states is an appropriation of my culture.
There. There’s your fireworks.
(Although watching liberals heads exploding over the Kennedy retirement might just be a better display anyway).
Can you – the relatively normal reader – imagine treating something like this as an accomplishment?
Did I ever tell ya about when Harvey Weinstein told me to make sure I shook his hand at a charity event, so I stopped in the mens room and pissed all over my hand, then went straight up to him on the receiving line? I think about that every time lil donnie opens up his KFC.
— Ron Perlman (@perlmutations) June 25, 2018
It’s Ron Perlman – a great actor and supremely weird but impeccably hard-left person.
Reason’s Damon Root on the Kennedy retirement:
That influence came with a certain price. Over the years, Kennedy has been denounced by every major faction in American politics. In conservative circles, for example, he has been keelhauled as a reckless judicial activist who “invented” a right to gay marriage. Liberals, meanwhile, have burned him in effigy as the unwitting mouthpiece for corporate oligarchs thanks to his majority opinion in the Citizens United case. And among libertarians, Kennedy has been damned as the fair-weather federalist who torpedoed the rights of local medical marijuana users in favor of a federal drug control scheme. Libertarians will also point out that Kennedy joined the majority opinion that unleashed the forces of eminent domain abuse in Kelo v. City of New London (2005).
To say the least, Kennedy’s jurisprudence defies easy categorization. Legal scholars will be arguing about it for a long time to come….In short, thanks to Kennedy’s retirement, all hell is about to break loose.
And the media is already counting the receipts.
But when it comes to our spoiled, entitled left’s whining, whinging, childish mewling over the retirement of Anthony Kennedy – the worst I’ve heard since election night?
Literally in tears. Haven’t felt this hopeless in a long time. With Justice Kennedy leaving, we now have two options as Americans: get fitted for your Nazi uniform or report directly to your death camp. How do you fight the darkness without light? My spark is going out. #SCOTUS
— Matthew K. (@mattiek17) June 27, 2018
…the more I read…
Stock up on abortions now. Roe v. Wade is gone.
— Michael Ian Black (@michaelianblack) June 27, 2018
…and the harder I laugh…
Fuck you, Tony Kennedy
— Mara “Get Rid of the Nazis” Wilson (@MaraWilson) June 27, 2018
…not to mention their selective grasp of reality…
“Elections have consequences.” —President Obama, January 23, 2009 https://t.co/WPm5Eg377c
— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 27, 2018
…Well, I have to say…
I was wrong. I do love schadenfreude.
And, added Rasmussen, 31 percent believe “it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years.”
The new polling evidence of fear in the country over political division follows the harassment of three top Trump aides, including spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, ordered out of a southern Virginia restaurant, and senior adviser Stephen Miller whose condo drew protests from liberals.
It also follows a call by liberal California Rep. Maxine Waters to bring pressure to Trump officials when in public and urgings from legal experts for Trump aides to apply for concealed carry permits and buy guns.
Having seen “Anti-Fa’s” handiwork – un-“othering” political violence for the left – I am becoming more and more inclined to agree.