Unpacking The Invisible NPR Tote Bag

“White Privilege” has been all over the news this last couple of years.

 It’s been there because the Big Left has ordained that it should be.  My theory;  in a nation full of “privilege” – class, racial, academic, social and, let’s be honest, the privilege of being born here rather than Russia or Nigeria or Burma – Big Left needed to focus on racial, “white” privilege to whip up black votes for Hillary Clinton, a geriatric white plutocrat.  As a result, all discussion of other “privilege” is off the table.

Terms, Terms, Everywhere Are Terms: White privilege exists, of course.  It goes hand in hand with the idea of “we-ism” – the idea that everyone on earth is more comfortable around, and accomodating of, people more like them than less.

Beyond that?  In my more sardonic and less cautious days, I defined it as being a descendant of a society from a harsh, lethally inhospitable place that had zero words for “hakuna matata” but more words for “stab him!” than Eskimos have for “snow”; a dour, patriarchal warrior culture that killed everyone that had designs on enslaving them.  As a result, my culture has no commonly-held concept of being enslaved.  We  operate from the standpoint of people who’ve been free (or at least subjects of generally benign monarchs) as far back as our cultural memory goes.  On behalf of all my cultural cousins, I am sorry for those of you who are descended from matriarchal hunter gatherer societies that couldn’t effectively resist the slave merchants, but I can’t change history any more than you can.  Just the present – a present I and my cultural cousins have been trying to change for 240-odd years, now.

More soberly, and after interviewing a representative of Black Lives Matter on my show, I arrived at the idea that “white privilege” is the ability to walk into a room and not have everyone wondering if you’re “one of the good ones”.   It was a little after that that I first encountered the academic paper in which the term “white privilege” was coined, Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh.   It supplied fifty definitions of white (also male) privilege.

Every one of which, by the way ,translates to “freedom”, “justice” and “being accorded the dignity of being treated as an autonomous individual rather than a member of a group” – all of which are supposed to be values near and dear to our Republic and Western Civilization itself, and all of them things we should be working tirelessly to spread to everyone.

And when some mindless Social Justice Warrior jabbers about “smashing white/male privilege”, the proper response is “so – you want to smash freedom, justice and individual dignity?  See you at the barricades”.

Discussion of all other privileges – academic, social, class – were drowned out.  As they were intended to be.

But with the complete subsumation of the left by identity politics, it’s time to return the favor Peggy McIntosh did us; it’s time to define Urban Progressive Privilege.

Unpacking The Invisible NPR Tote Bag:  I’m going to borrow McIntosh’s format – which I suspect was actually tacitly borrowed from Jeff Foxworthy – of the simple list of attributes of Urban Progressive Privilege.

To wit:

Urban Progressive Privilege; Unpacking the Invisible NPR Tote Bag

Mitch Berg

“You were taught to see Urban Progressive Privilege as a bit of talk show rhetoric – not in terms of a very vislble system conferring dominance on my group via a meritless meritocracy”.   

As an urban progressive, you have been taught about “privilege” by others who have that privilege.  Being able to caterwaul about privilege is a prerogative of the privileged.

Like the concept of “white privilege” (which, conventional wisdom tells us, that “whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege”), the first rule of Urban Progressive Privilege is “I don’t believe there is such a thing”; it’s the water in which the Urban Progressive swims.  So I have begun in an untutored way to ask what it is like to have Urban Progressive Privilege. I have come to seeUrban Progressive Privilege as an invisible and group package of unearned assets that I can count on using daily, but about which it’s hard to be anything but oblivious.

Urban Progressive Privilege is like an invisible weightless NPR tote bag of special permissions, immunities, secret handshakes, Whole Foods gift cards, a virtual echo chamber accompanying everyone who has that privilege, filtering out almost all cognitive dissonance about political, social or moral questions, and a virtual “cone of silence” immunizing them from liability for anything they say or do that contradicts the group’s stated principles.  As we in Human studies work to reveal Urban Progressive Privilege and ask urban progressives to become aware of their power, so one who writes about havingUrban Progressive Privilege must ask, “having described it, what will I do to lessen or end it?”

So – when assessing Urban  Progressive Privilege, can you say any of the following?:

  1. I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people who believe exactly as I do about politics, society, philosophy, morality and the like, all or nearly all of the time.
  2. I was educated from my earliest years through post-secondary education by people whose political and social beliefs mirrored mine, and who didn’t challenge any of mypolitical, social, philosophical and moral beliefs.
  3. My progressive beliefs were never challenged through four or more years of higher education – indeed, they were reinforced, while competing views were shamed and shouted down.
  4. When I went into the working world, my politics, social background or philosophy were never adversarially questioned.
  5. I work, very likely, in an environment staffed with people who agree with and never challenge my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions.
  6. My social life is made up of people who share, pretty much to a fault, my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptins.
  7. I can avoid, during my daily life, spending time around anyone who will challenge my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions.
  8. My neighbors – the people in my physical community in which I live – share, almost without exception, my political, social, philosophical and moral beliefs.
  9. If someone in  my social or professional life does express a point of view discordant with my and my group’s political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions intrudes into my sphere, I can count on overwhelming support from the rest of my personal, social, professional circles to defend me.  Those who don’t share our beliefs thus either keep quiet, or are shamed into silence.  Thus, their beliefs have no impact in my life. .
  10. My informational world – my news media, my online social circle, my institutional associations (churches/synagogues, my social groups – will not contradict my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions.
  11. I can count on the news media I listen to – my community’s newspapers, TV stations, as well as stereotypical outlets like NPR, PBS and the like – to reinforce my political and social assumptions.
  12. I can count on as the entertainment media not to contradict my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions.
  13. I can count on the education system in my community not to undercut the political, social, philosophical and moral I’ve tried to pass on to my family.
  14. My kids’ schools give them textbooks, lectures and other materials that reinforce, never undercut, my political, social, philosophical and moral worldview and that which I’ve tried to teach them.
  15. I can be fairly certain that when I go to my kids’ school, the principle will not condescend to me based on my perceived academic or social background.
  16. I have never had anyone laugh at the accent or vocabulary of my native spoken English.
  17. I can rest fairly certain that no “well-meaning” pundit or scholar will ever paternalistically castigate me for “voting against my interests” (as determined by the pundit’s / scholar’s political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions) for voting in accordance with my political, social, philosophical and moral beliefs.
  18. I can choose to ignore the parts of our society outside the East Coast, West Coast, and selected “progressive” archipelagos in between, and express not only ignorance but mockery of the rest of the country, without being seen, shamed, and scorned as a provincialist.
  19. I can express scorn for individuals, groups, religions and social classes that don’t share my political, social, philosophical and moral beliefs, accents and worldviews, entirely based on those beliefs, and not be shamed and labeled as a bigot.
  20. I can make racist, sexist and classist statements about people who do not share my community’s political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions, and rest assured I will not be castigated for violating community standards.
  21. I have never been treated as a foreign culture in my own country; I have never had journalists, academics or pundits dispatch a special group to research, analyze and report on why my social circle believes and votes as they do – because the media, academics and punditry are from my class, and share my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions; the more aware ones would be offended by being subjected to such a condescending, patriarchal bit of cultural chauvinism.
  22. My children and family are safe, almost entirely, from the economic, social and criminological  consequences of my political, social, philosophical and moral beliefs; indeed, I personally am almost entirely insulated from them.
  23. I can simultaneously say “I believe in science, and have a fact-based worldview” – while never being corrected, much less called out or scorned, for expressing beliefs that have no scientific basis (belief that there are no evolutionary differences between men and women, believe a human isn’t a human until it emerges from the birth canal, believe that there’s scientific evidence that homosexuality is genetic).
  24. I can simultaneously eschew racism and racists, even as I gang up with others like me to oppress black, latino, asian and females who disagree with my political, social, philosophical and moral assumptions.  I can say things like “That’s not a real, authentic (Black, Latino, Asian) person!” and not get scorned as a racist and patriarch.
  25. I can exhibit ghastly contradictions in my world view and be reasonable sure that nobody in my regular social circle is going to say or do anything about it; if I call someone I disagree with a “fascist” or “patriarch” or “1 percenter” while displaying Che Guevara memorabilia or studiously intoning approval for “Chavezism”, nobody in my social or professional life is going to castigate me for it.
  26. I tut-tut about the virtues of Western civilization and praise Multiculturalism – but do so entirely from a perspective that could not exist outside of Western civilization.  Nobody in my personal or profession or social circles ever brings this up, because they all believe the same thing.

I’m looking for more examples.  Keep ’em generic – not related to any specific issue.   .

39 thoughts on “Unpacking The Invisible NPR Tote Bag

  1. “White privilege” is a technique some white people use to make themselves, once again, the most important person in the room. “White privilege” makes what a white person thinks of himself or herself and you much more important than what a non-white person thinks of him self or herself and you.

  2. Trying to think of how to phrase it without being too specific about an issue, and keep coming up with: I am immune to cognitive dissonance.

    Specific instances that lead to this belief:
    1) Support of civil liberties. Except for that pesky 2nd Amendment.
    2) Keep the government out of my body – it’s my choice. Government should pay for abortions and birth control.
    3) Police are bad. No one needs to have guns except the police.
    4) Business shouldn’t have the right to refuse something that goes against their personal beliefs, like baking a wedding cake. It’s great that all the performers said they wouldn’t perform at Trump’s inaguration.
    5) People shouldn’t be allowed to disrespect Islam. Did you see the guy dressed as the Virgin Mary being a whore? That was hilarious.

  3. Every escapee from some third world shit hole enjoys white privilege the second they get off the plane, boat or bus. They might notice it first when the customs agent doesn’t ask for a bribe. They will definitely notice it when they go to collect charity; no AK47 toting storm troopers will show up to take everything feom them in the name of the local warlord.

    The shelter they are provided, for free, will be heated, and the lights will work when the switch is flipped….yup, white privilege.

    When they show up to their first protest, that is after white leftists instruct them on how to demand more white privilege, they will see it when the same AK47 toting thugs that didnt take everything feom them earlier, dont show up to gun them down.

    They will smell the white privilege on streets that are not covered with trash, dog corpses and human waste….take a deep breath Abdl; White Privilege, baby.

    America is built by whites who were privileged enough to build the greatest country on the planet using technology, science and Engineering from their white, Western forebears.

    Yup, White Privilege…get ya some.

  4. Been awhile since I ended up in moderation purgatory…like what they’ve done with the place…

  5. “I don’t have to watch what I say because I confidently assume everybody I meet shares my worldview.”

    Example: I sat down in the Health Partners waiting room, noticed a woman reading the newspaper, and asked if I could borrow the funny pages. She offered me the news section and said “Well, there’s some funny stuff in there about President Trump and the Civil War.”

    She didn’t know me from Adam. She saw that I was a middle-aged White male, dressed for office work, and blithely assumed that I was just like her because, why wouldn’t I be? Isn’t everyone? Well, not those nasty rednecks in their checkered shirts missing teeth, but everyone who matters.

  6. Swiftee: Crude, but brilliant. I’d call it “Western Civilization Privilege”, but you nailed it.

    Re Mod Purgatory: I really don’t control much about that; it’s a plugin. Not sure why you keep getting put in the queue.

  7. I got a problem with 1 and 2. Everybody is born free. Nobody is born a progressive or a conservative. It is the indoctrination and brainwashing that makes one either loose their brains, or start using them.

  8. It strikes me, per Swiftee’s comments on white privilege, that the places where you’ll find human waste on the streets and the like are almost all liberal enclaves. It also strikes me that when I visited Singapore and Malaysia, they were having the same discussion, except it was “Chinese privilege” instead of “white privilege.” And it wasn’t in Singapore that I witnessed bribes and trash on the streets.

    Civilization isn’t about money. It’s about habits.

  9. What about Liberal, Academic privilege? (Pretty much the same thing). There the privileged are happy to make a show of welcoming the oppressed du jour – as long as that minority toes the doctrinal line. Depart from it and it is back to the outer darkness with you.

    This is the privilege that allows great shows of public piety and virtue signaling at alleged persecution, and when the offense is proved to be a hoax perpetrated by one of its own acolytes, closes ranks around the offender and protectively shields his/her/its identify from prosecution – a privilege not extended to an offender from a differs tribe.

    Say, has anyone seen any more reporting on the St. Olaf hoax after the one day of sound and fury? No follow up reports, any FOI requests, any demands for the public’s right to know? “Federal privacy laws” shield the offender, but apparently don’t extend to the CEO of al company who donates a private sum to an unflavored organization.

  10. Pingback: In The Mailbox: 05.17.17 : The Other McCain

  11. Great question on St. Olaf, NW. I’ve been monitoring the Manitou Messenger, the student newspaper at Olaf, and there’s been no additions to the website in more than a week. It’s radio silence, really. I do see that Amy Klobuchar is the commencement speaker at Olaf this year; perhaps she’ll mount a stirring defense of free speech and the importance of treating those you disagree with in a civil manner. More likely, she’ll pass out vanilla fluff for everyone!

  12. Amy Klobuchar as commencement speaker – thats like hiring the neighbor’s black lab as commencement speaker.

  13. If Al Franken were the commencement speaker, there would be a two-drink minimum and one of the drinks would be prune juice with a chaser of bile.

  14. JD:

    She offered me the news section and said “Well, there’s some funny stuff in there about President Trump and the Civil War.”

    At least she called him President…

  15. “White privilege” -a narrative people create for themselves to explain away their own failings.

  16. I’ll mention, once again, that the greatest privilege of all is the ability to bestow and revoke privilege. This is what it means to be a member of the ruling class.

  17. Pingback: There Was A Time When Might Have Cracked Wise… | Shot in the Dark

  18. Pingback: Urban Progressive Privilege, Explained | Shot in the Dark

  19. Pingback: If All You See… » Pirate's Cove

  20. Pingback: A Short List Of Honkeys Who Should Yield Their Privilege, Shut Up, And Listen | Shot in the Dark

  21. Pingback: Open Letter To Kathy Griffin | Shot in the Dark

  22. Pingback: It’s The Hypocrisy, Stupid | Shot in the Dark

  23. Pingback: I’m Not Saying The Strib Editorial Board Seeks A Totalitarian Government. | Shot in the Dark

  24. Pingback: The Ultimate Urban Progressive Privilege… | Shot in the Dark

  25. Pingback: Unpacking Peggy McIntosh | Shot in the Dark

  26. Pingback: White Liberal Gilt | Shot in the Dark

  27. Pingback: The Future Is Orwellian | Shot in the Dark

  28. Pingback: Expectations | Shot in the Dark

  29. Pingback: Let Them Eat DoorDash | Shot in the Dark

  30. Pingback: Cultural Appropriation For Ye, But Not For We | Shot in the Dark

  31. Pingback: Reagan Spoke Too Soon | Shot in the Dark

  32. Pingback: I Heard It On The (Sunday) NARN | Shot in the Dark

  33. Pingback: Take Your Pick | Shot in the Dark

  34. Pingback: “Mitch, What Does Urban Progressive Privilege Look Like?” | Shot in the Dark

  35. Pingback: I Don’t Want To Speak Too Soon | Shot in the Dark

  36. Pingback: Bigotry Of Bizarre Expectations | Shot in the Dark

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.