From The “Being A DFLer Requires Suspending Logic And Reason, If You Ever Had Any” Files

Just a quick reminder as to the level of intellectual acuity the DFL is bringing to this session.

9 thoughts on “From The “Being A DFLer Requires Suspending Logic And Reason, If You Ever Had Any” Files

  1. Doctors believe that if you take the vaxx, you’ll be safe from Covid.
    Teachers believe that if you pay them more, kids will get smarter.
    Legislators believe that if you pass a law, people will obey it.
    None of those things are true.
    Everybody has a blind spot.
    Mine is thinking anybody cares what I write on SITD
    or that my post will change his/her/their/its mind

  2. And I thought that Rep. Paymar’s idiocy about guns was bad. 64B really traded down for Rep. Pinto.

  3. The people who are deepest in the left wing bubble have the most bizarre ideas about what guns are, how they work, and the laws that govern their purchase, possession, and use. This explains the bizarre statements about current gun laws in the US you get from far-left politicians and op-ed writers.

  4. Case in point. Some fellow named Peter Arenella just posted a quote he claims originated with a Scottish woman who refuses to visit the US because of our lax gun laws. The quote is “Your country seems to have a terrible mass shooting daily and all over the country.I do not understand why your Congress has done nothing about it, not even banning machine guns that are only appropriately possessed and used by the military under war like conditions.”
    Who is Peter Arenella? According to his twitter bio, Arenella is “ucla criminal law Prof, former TV legal analyst ABC news, love dogs, young children, Redsox, father of 1 boy 3 girls, former Public Defender, Blue, BLM”
    The question is: does Arenella, who proclaims that he is a criminal law prof at UCLA, aware that posession of machine guns by ordinary citizens is illegal in the United States?

  5. Perhaps Rep. Pinto actually believes that, or perhaps he’s a good liar who has other motives behind his bill. Like making gun ownership so onerous for the law-abiding that they don’t bother anymore.

    I know, I know, Hanlon’s razor “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”, but it’s getting harder and harder for me to believe that the left truly believes that felons are going to start behaving simply since misbehavior is against the law.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.