Our Passive-Aggressive Overlords

I went down to the Capitol last night for a 6PM hearing on SF2639 – Senator Ron Latz’s bill to punish people accused but not convicted of domestic abuse by confiscating their guns and keeping them confiscated, innocence notwithstanding. 

We started out on a high note; Michael Paymar’s attempt to create a felony trap for law-abiding gun owners in Capitol-complex buildings got turned into a fairly innocuous tweak to the existing notification law.  The law, by the way, dates to 1994, and is utterly obsolete, a relic of a time when law enforcement still kept records on paper files.  The notification law is obsolete and needs to be gutted and tossed entirely – but for now, it’s no big deal.

So I showed up at the Capitol.   As usual, I was among plenty of friends:

The nose count, last I checked, was 70-75 civil rights supporters to about a dozen civil rights opponents.

I did a nose-count; Real Americans outnumbered people there for “Protect MN”, as usual, by a lopsided margin.  

So we waited.  

Strategizing got done…:

GOCRA leaders churning on strategy.

…but for the most part, everyone waited.  And waited some more.

There were several updates from security; they were busy with other bills; they were going to get through a few more and then take a half hour break before getting to 2639.

So we waited some more. 

A few cases of water bottles, courtest of GOCRA, made the rounds. It was warm in there.

GOCRA brought water and granola bars, which theypassed out up and down the line (including to the anti-rights people; I had the singular pleasure of giving water and a granola bar to Rep. Martens).

They took the half-hour break – which ran more like an hour.  And then they re-convened – and addressed the Fetal DNA bill.  For an hour.

I had to leave; I was fighting a cold, and had to work this morning.

Latz didn’t bring up his gun-grab bill until nearly 11 – after he’d let Heather Martens and her friends in through the back door, essentially packing the hearing room with his supporters.  Latz has set himself apart, along with Reps. Paymar, Hausman and Martens, as one of the most virulently anti-civil-rights people in the Legislature; he quite clearly passive-aggressively used his power as committee chair to make the hearing as difficult as possible for the unruly peasants who had the affrontery to oppose him. 

Rob Doar, the VP of Government of Affairs for the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, summed it up about the same way: “Senator Ron Latz is wll established as one of the most anti-rigths legislators in Minnesota.  Under his leladership of the Jundiciary Committee, we’ve come to expect he’ll use every tool at his disposal to make hearings as difficult as possible for anyone who opposes his agenda”. 

At the end of the evening, the bill passed from the Judiciary Committee. 

Which is no surprise; the bill was going to pass Senate Judiciary no matter what; Michael Bloomberg invested a LOT of money in this session, and there needed to be something to keep the metrocrat troops rallied, for all that investment; the Metrocrats control the Judiciary Committee.  When Bloomberg says “speak”, Latz will bark on command. 

Now, reality sets in.  There needs to be a companion bill in the House; the House DFL caucus is panic-stricken about their chances this fall, and getting saddled with one of Latz’s gun-grab bills would be poison for a couple of outstate DFLers that are already fighting for their lives.  And Tom Bakk – who is an Iron-Range union guy who loves his big-game hunting – knows what long memories us civil rights advocates have.    If I had to bet, I’d say this bill dies in committee without getting to the floor, or at the very worst, in conference. 

Which is not another way of saying “relax for the rest of the session”.  There will be more hearings, more amendments, more attempts to weasel legislation through the system.

You need to call your legislators.  Thank the good guys.  Politely urge the ones who are wrong to reconsider.  Urge the fence-sitters to throw a vote for freedom. 

We can win this round.  Indeed, we can humiliate the bad guys, just like last year.

4 thoughts on “Our Passive-Aggressive Overlords

  1. Matt Sepic at MPR is quoting Rep Martens “This has nothing to do with the Constitution.”

  2. I just hope that we can return the favor of making the ORCS wait for one of their causes, when sanity finally returns to Minnesota and the GOP gets control again. I would say mining near the Boundary Waters would be a good place to start.

    On another note; Mitch once asked all of us to patronize Starbuck’s in appreciation for Howard Schultz’ (Starbuck’s CEO) stand for 2nd Amendment rights. Well, in case any of you had not seen this, Mr. Schultz has stepped up to the plate again. Not only has he pledged to hire 10,000 veterans and/or their spouses, he has just donated $30 million to returning veterans, primarily for research into traumatic brain injuries.

    Apparently, his pledge to hire veterans is why he’s also supporting raising the minimum wage. I don’t know why he has to push that though, because he can set his own for his business.

  3. Didn’t hear it until 11pm, and let supporters of his bill in through the back door? Let’s have pictures, and let’s get them in for this fall’s commercials. “If you vote DFL this fall, this kind of behavior is what you are voting for.”

    And it strikes me that if you’re up past midnight, and you’re not at home with your wife, nothing good is likely to happen. Latz is working overtime to prove this.

  4. Much of what’s proposed in the domestic abuse bill is current law or current practice. That struck me as odd. What would the grabbers have to gain by enacting this tripe?

    Best answer I could arrive at were the storage requirements during the required gun abstinence period. Specifically the limited options offered; police or FFL holder. The second option could be quite expensive, assuming that the FFL holder would even offer the service to the general public. Usually, a responsible party will be named by the court (friend, family member, etc.) to take temporary custody of them.

    However, I wonder what the law enforcement response to this is? Taking custody of a rather large collection of guns, ammo, knives, bows, etc (these orders often specify “all weapons”) involves a lot more than just stacking them in a locked room for a few days.

    Someone who has had that experience on the law enforcement end would likely agree that it is almost as terrible a pain in the neck for them as it is the owner. Not an easy process. Fortunately, state statute requires that those storing the property take reasonable care of it. However, absent the “all cops are thieves” crowd, I’d think the law enforcement option would be the best choice. It may even result in their lobbying for a law change.

    Hopefully this will also be pointed out by the pro-gun faction as this law is being debated. I am confident that most property room supervisors would not support that part of the law. Particularly for the 10-day period between when the OFP is served and the first hearing is held (aka ex-parte). The second hearing is where the respondent can contest the order, the judge can hear the facts, or the issue can be dropped. This happens frequently.

    Like potato chips, it’s hard to stop at just one; many gun enthusiasts have lots of guns, ammo, knives, etc. This part of the bill could result in a lot of pointless busy work for them. Or, perhaps the OFP respondent will be required to pay storage costs. Watch out for that one. Even $10 per gun could be a significant expense to more people than the public would assume.

    I believe that the storage provisions of this bill is where the devil lies. I hope that part has been taken into account.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.