Shot in the Dark

The America Last Coalition

Minnesota’s Democrats in Washington are  M doing their best to snatch defeat from the jaws of opportunity:

Democratic Sen. Al Franken, who took office in part thanks to the same wave of support that swept Obama in, said last week that he wants to hear more about the rationale behind the plan before deciding whether to support a larger U.S. combat presence in Afghanistan.

In private meetings with top administration officials, he said, they have impressed on him that the surge may be the last chance to reverse the war’s momentum against the Taliban.

He is still unsure the Afghan government is “willing and able to step up to this,” later adding that he wants “to find out through the hearings how achievable all of this is.”

Perhaps he’s trying to bore the Taliban to death?  It could work.

In a reference to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, Rep. Keith Ellison, a Democrat, said: “It’s not 2001. It’s 2009. We’ve been through a president asking Congress to support him in two wars. One of them never should have been fought, and the other one was fought about as poorly as it could have possibly been. So obviously you’ve got some highly skeptical people to deal with.”

We’ve also got some not very bright congresspeople to deal with.

Congressman Ellison – to paraphrase your own nonsense rhetoric, it’s 2009, not 2006.  We have a choice; let the Taliban set up another safe haven (and allow them to safely consolidate their safer haven in Pakistan), or deny it to them.

None of your baked wind matters.  Ever, indeed, but especially on this issue.

A-Klo:

“For me, the issue is, do we have good enough partners here?” Klobuchar said. “By asking the questions, you’re not just getting the answers, you’re actually pushing this government policy and the Afghan government to [be] better.”

Klobuchar, a Democrat, said she is “open to this military strategy” as long as there is a sufficient partnership with Afghan civilians.

Um, right.

And how do you propose to get “sufficient partnership” with people who know that if they support us, and we pack up and leave (as you and your party wish) with the job half-done, they will be getting their heads sawed off?

Afghan civilians have been through hell, this past thirty years.  For the entire time, they’ve had to either choose – Soviets/muj, then one militia/another militia, then more of the same, and now US and Centeral Government/Taliban – knowing that if they made the wrong call, they and their families would disappear, and be eventually, maybe found with their hands tied behind their backs, their heads blown or sawed off, if they picked the loser.

And what precisely is it that you are trying to make us, Senator Klobuchar?


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

One response to “The America Last Coalition”

  1. nate Avatar
    nate

    Never forget that McCollum has no independent thoughts – every one of her public pronouncements is written at Party Headquarters, along with the other junior flunkies parroting the same line, the Party Line.

    The Party Line is that Barak Obama is a courageous wartime leader willing to take the fight to the enemy, but only if the Afghan government is deemed worthy. If not, then our paramount concern for the safety of our troops compels us to pull them out.

    I estimate the debate on the Afghan Unworthiness Declaration will start around January 2, 2011 and the official announcement will be made on May 5, 2011, just in time to set in motion plans to bring home the troops so Obama can declare Mission Accomplished in time for the elections.

    This is a face-saving Out for a weak President who doesn’t have the balls to either send in the whole world to end the terrorist threat as we did in Iraq, or declare it’s not our fight and abandon the Afghan theatre outright.

    .

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.