Shot in the Dark

A Cold Caracas

Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:

Minneapolis is considering an ordinance requiring private landlords to accept Section 8 tenants.  This is the housing analogue of health insurance.  From the comments to the article, it appears there is much confusion about how private enterprise is affected by democratic socialism.  Let me break it down for those who need detailed explanations but have short attention spans.

 Sellers of nice things must charge enough to make a profit, else they go out of business and nobody can have nice things.  But not everybody has the same amount of money, so pricing nice things to keep the seller in business means not all customers can afford to buy nice things.  That results in unequal treatment: some get nice things and some do not. 

Unequal results are unfair.  To Liberals, this is a Law of Nature no less binding than gravity.  Society cannot tolerate unfairness.  Fairness must be imposed by making everyone equally able to afford nice things. 

 Society can achieve fairness by guaranteeing student loans, making income-adjusted forgivable loans for home ownership, subsidizing health insurance, giving away free cell phones with data plans to surf the web . . . all the nice things are then affordable by everyone, including the seller who still makes his profit.  Everyone has nice things.  Results are equal.  Life is fair.  Liberals are satisfied.

 Until it turns out that some renters can afford nice places and others cannot.  Unequal.  Unfair.  Intolerable.  Impose.  Solution: make every landlord accept Section 8.

 But Section 8 is not like the other solutions.  Section 8 is more like wage and price controls.  If you tell the seller he must accept 60% of his cost as payment in full, he cannot afford to cover his mortgage, taxes, insurance, snow plowing, yard maintenance, repairs and still have enough left over to feed himself and his family . . . he goes out of the rental business.  That’s what was happening to medical providers under Medicare, which was a big push to impose Obamacare (which is now seeing the same effect – insurance companies who can’t charge enough for their policies are dropping out of markets, which is the big push for Ryancare).  Wage and Price Controls are why Venezuelans now are starving.

 If Minneapolis adopts the proposed ordinance, some landlords will comply, some will convert their buildings to coops where members buy shares of ownership in the building to qualify for leases, and some will turn them into condos and sell the units instead of renting them.  To the extent private landlords stop renting their units, Minneapolis residents will have even less affordable rental housing than before the solution was imposed.  All renters will suffer.  But they will suffer equally, so it’s still more fair than it was.  Liberals will be satisfied. 

Liberal policies destroy Liberal values.

 Joe Doakes

Except for the whole “getting and holding power” thing.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

9 responses to “A Cold Caracas”

  1. bikebubba Avatar
    bikebubba

    Writing as the son in law of a man who has Section 8 tenants, let’s just say that accepting them is NOT just a question of ability to pay. It is a question of how the tenants will treat the property and their landlord. Many landlords walk away from Section 8 for precisely this reason–not all of them are a bad risk, but a lot of them are on the program for a reason.

  2. Alt-Good Swiftee Avatar
    Alt-Good Swiftee

    The wife and I have been investing in rental properties here in real America. I won’t bore you with how easy it is to deal with the administration in our city, or the fact that we won’t have to deal with this kind of BS in our lifetimes, but this needn’t really be an issue for property owners anywhere. We spent a lot of money to improve our properties and we strive to maintain them in excellent condition. Not surprisingly, the rent is much higher than section 8 would pay. They don’t even call.

    The problem will be for the city itself. If people are forced into renting to feckless wards of the state, they will respond by walking away from the properties (this was an issue in MPLS in the 90’s as I recall), or they will maintain them to the minimum requirement, or as little as they can get away with. That’s the situation that created Cabrini Green and the Robert Taylor homes in Chicago.

    Once again, leftists in charge guarantee failure.

  3. Mammuthus Primigenius Avatar
    Mammuthus Primigenius

    People in city government in Minneapolis will tell anyone who listens how great the city has become since the 1950s — less polluted, more diverse, and of course more city services for its inmates residents. In 1950 there was no Guthrie, no MMA, and no orchestra.
    Yet the population of Minneapolis today is about 20% less than it was in the 1950s. In 1950, more than one out of six Minnesotans lived in the city of Minneapolis. In 2010, fewer than one in twelve Minnesotans lived in Minneapolis. What did they do to drive away so many people? Maybe they were Dayton’s grade B Minnesotans?
    A Cold Omaha indeed.

  4. Alt-Good Swiftee Avatar
    Alt-Good Swiftee

    What did they do to drive away so many people?

    No good comes from advertising on MegaBus, unless you’re a bail bondsman.

  5. Scott Hughes Avatar
    Scott Hughes

    Mammuthus, you make an excellent point. People (probably 30-40 or more that I know personally) that are currently working for the city or are retired from the city (MPD, MFD, street and sewer dept., park board, housing authority, etc.), have moved out of the city. They’ll all say that the reason they moved from the city is the political climate has driven the city into a “crap hole”. Compelling private land owners to accept any and all Section 8 applicants is yet another example of the mindless slide of the city to socialism.

    Too bad Gidden and Warsame can’t be dealt a Section 8 in military terms!

  6. The Big Stink Avatar
    The Big Stink

    I took Section 8 tenants twice and no one, to this day, has ever reimbursed me for the damage done to my property. It’s a major reason my wife and I left the socialist utopia of Minneapolis and took our money to the suburbs.

  7. TheFedSucks Avatar
    TheFedSucks

    This is a great discussion.

    You would think that permanent ***2%*** GDP might be an indicator that social and economic engineering is not fixed by doing more social and economic engineering. It just makes it worse. Seriously that is what is going on.

  8. TheFedSucks Avatar
    TheFedSucks

    Forcing everything, all the time since Woodrow Wilson. Now we enter an era of massive wage and technological deflation that is just complexly screws up the government’s ability to tax, spend, and force. So it gets uglier and uglier.

  9. Mammuthus Primigenius Avatar
    Mammuthus Primigenius

    TheFedSucks on April 1, 2017 at 4:09 pm said:
    This is a great discussion.

    You would think that permanent ***2%*** GDP might be an indicator that social and economic engineering is not fixed by doing more social and economic engineering.

    Left economists’ current belief is that the era of high economic growth, with us since the start of the industrial revolution, is over. Annual global GDP growth of more than 1% is impossible. Not difficult, or requires different policies, it is impossible.
    This means that the job of the political state is no longer to foster economic growth (since there can’t be any), but to focus on division and redistribution of existing wealth and production.
    They were saying the same thing in the 19th century, when global GDP increased by a factor of nearly 20 in on hundred years.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.