Shot in the Dark

Blood On The PC Merchants’ Hands

In 1994, in a church parking lot off of Sixth and Arcade on the East Side of St. Paul, Guy Harvey Baker, a deranged Gulf War veteran, shot and killed a Saint Paul police officer – Ron Ryan Jr.

Baker then drove towards a woman, standing in the door of the nearby apartment building across the parking lot, to eliminate the only eyewitness.

A man in an apartment building across the street, Lyle Granlund, who happened to be an expert marksman – and had a loaded handgun at hand – considered shooting the murderer.  But then, he reconsidered – thinking that Tom Foley, the Ramsey County attorney and Wahhabi DFLer – would likely prosecute him with just as much zeal as he would the cop killer.

So instead, Granlund shot to mark the car – putting rounds through the back windshield, lodging them quite intentionally in the dashboard and glove box, saving a round in case Baker came after him next.  Baker took off, to be found later that day (via the broken back window), leading to a further shoot out that killed another St. Paul policeman, Officer Tim Jones, as well as his dog Laser.  Had Granlund not feared prosecution (quite legitimately – Foley did, in fact, try to prosecute him, and stopped only when the St. Paul police refused to cooperate), Baker would have ended his spree in that parking lot, with one dead, and Officer Jones would have lived to serve another day.

Political correctness killed a police officer.

And it’s tragic to see that we have learned absolutely nothing from the event. It’s entirely likely that 14 people are dead in San Bernardino because people fear politically correctness-induced repercussions is on the part of the authorities more than they do criminals.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

4 responses to “Blood On The PC Merchants’ Hands”

  1. Bento Guzman Avatar
    Bento Guzman

    This kind of PC nonsense doesn’t bother me nearly as much as when the same policies are deployed at the federal level. Local governments should have wide latitude to pass and enforce local laws. If a city decides to ban possession of handguns and ban ammunition sales within its jurisdiction, fine. People will vote with their feet.

  2. The Big Stink Avatar
    The Big Stink

    To a corpse, hindsight is no big deal. Better to let a few innocents populate a slab than to offend an overly-sensitive weenie. Right?

  3. Bento Guzman Avatar
    Bento Guzman

    When exchanging comments with Emery the other day, I had the opportunity to research the gun laws in Israel. It really is apples and oranges. Getting a handgun is restricted more than in the US, but every member of the armed forces is issued an assault rifle and ammunition, trained in its use, and is expected to keep it close at hand while in the armed forces or reserves (until middle age for many).
    Anyway, one interesting restriction the Israelis place on hand gun owners is that they get to buy and keep at home 50 rounds/year. If you go to the shooting range, you buy the ammunition and use it at the range.
    Now I understand that there are many loopholes to these rules. Maybe they are out of date, or not as I have described them.
    But back in the days when I kept a handgun, I had about 50 rounds on hand for it. Couldn’t see the reason for having more. The zombie apocalypse is not a real thing, after all. I only had one magazine, and that held seven rounds (magazines that hold more than ten are illegal in my state).
    I would be happy at keeping 50 or 100 rounds in my possession, as long as I could buy more as needed at the shooting range.
    On the other hand, a 50 or 100 round possession limit wouldn’t keep psychotic killers and terrorists from getting more, and 100 rounds is enough to kill 100 people.

  4. mnbubba Avatar
    mnbubba

    “The zombie apocalypse is not a real thing, after all”. And you know this how…?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.