The Elmer Gantries

When it comes to Second Amendment rights groups, I’ve always said “let a thousand flowers bloom”.

You prefer to fight the national fight by proxy?  Send your $35 to the NRA.  Want to get more into the thick of things nationally?  Contribute to the Second Amendment Foundation.

Wanna affect what happens in the Minnesota legislature?  Support GOCRA.  Wanna affect who gets elected to the Legislature?  Support MNGOPAC.  Feel like taking it to the streets?  The Twin Cities Carry Forum is the place to go.

If you want to donate money to an organization that seems to have little tie to Minnesota, that is closely linked to a network of similar organizations that seem to do more harm than good in the legislature in other states (Iowa, Colorado and Mississippi), which probably means it’s a good thing all that Minnesota fundraising has no visible impact in the Legislature itself?

A bipartisan group of pro-Second-Amendment legislators would like to have a word with you about that:


This bipartisan group of legislators, most of whom have been key leaders in pushing back the Bloomberg-financed gun grab bills, are urging you not to be fooled.

Now, I’ve written a bit about “Minnesota Gun Rights”, as well as “Iowa Gun Owners” and the “National Association of Gun Rights” in the past year and a half.  And I get two questions about the subject:

  • “Berg, aren’t you connected with GOCRA?  Isn’t this just trying to thin out the competition?”:  I’m “connected” with just about everyone in the Second Amendment movement.  I network like a madman.  Hello – I’m a blogger and talk show host; I go where the info is. And no – “competition” is good, where the goal is “who can be the first to drag Governor Flint-Smith kicking and screaming to the table to sign the legislation we want”.  As I believe I and the sixteen oversigned legislators have established, MGR isn’t really competing on that front.
  • “MGR stands for Constitutional Carry – GOCRA, the NRA and MNGOPAC don’t.  If we pass Constitutional Carry, we won’t need any of the other legislation.  Why waste time?”:  That’s a little like saying I’m swearing off dating until Morena Baccarin returns my calls.  I mean, if I get into a position where Morena Baccarin returns my calls, great – but until I do (and I’m not), what then?    Saying “We’ll accept nothing but Constitutional Carry, and any lesser legislation merely accedes to government’s power to regulate  your God-given right to self-defense”.  Which is true – in a philosophical sense.  The law is not philosophy.  If the Minnesota gun movement had adopted that idea in 1994, we’d still be begging our police chiefs for carry permits, mostly in vain.  And the simple fact is, until we get a pro-Second Amendment governor, and legislatures that are not just mostly pro-Second Amendment (as they are today) but very strongly so, we’re not going to get Constitutional Carry.  Minnesota is not Arizona or Wyoming or Alaska.  By the way, passing Constitutional Carry won’t solve many of the other gun related issues – like reciprocity, the Capitol felony trap, or the right to purchase in non-contiguous states.  It just won’t.
  • “Isn’t ‘Shall Issue’ just a moneymaker for the carry permit instructors that run GOCRA?”:  No more so than fund-raising over a pie-in-the-sky proposal that is years away from passage, assuming everything goes perfectly from an electoral perspective (which Minnesota Gun  Rights is doing absolutely nothing to assure).

More later.

9 thoughts on “The Elmer Gantries

  1. Aren’t you worried Scarlett Johansson will find out you’re stepping out on her? This can’t end well, Mitch.

  2. MGR didn’t mention a thing about MNGOLD, or any of the pro gun bills. All they did was post false info about anti gun bills, and cause good people to neglect the good bills during a year of us being on the offensive. They also keep emailing me false info about what is happening at the Capitol.

    Even if we had constitutional carry there are many unrelated fights that we have to win.

    The only advantage for a group like MGR to push for constitutional carry or unseating Senator Latz (who has a super majority of votes) now is that no one can tell how much or little anyone contributes to the cause because we know the bill and Senator won’t go anywhere. If MGR was an actual legitimate “loud checkers” player and not a fraud they would have at least accidentally helped gun rights at least once by now.

  3. “If we pass Constitutional Carry, we won’t need any of the other legislation. Why waste time?”
    The Minnesota constitution is much more plastic than the federal constitution. It has been changed 120 times in the last century and a half, e.g, once every fifteen months or so on average. Don’t waste your time trying to ‘set concealed carry in stone’ with a constitutional amendment.

  4. Pingback: Perfect Is The Enemy Of Good | Shot in the Dark

  5. Pingback: Pod And Fury… | Shot in the Dark

  6. Pingback: Amateur Hour | Shot in the Dark

  7. Pingback: Iowa “Minnesota” Flim-Flammers | Shot in the Dark

  8. Pingback: Drama | Shot in the Dark

  9. Pingback: Lie First, Lie Always: The Reverend Nancy Nord Bence Can’t Seem To Tell The Truth. Ever. | Shot in the Dark

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.