If He Were The King, I’d Be The Revolutionary

Brian Lambert, on what he’d do if he were king.

I’ll hold off on jokes about “every liberal’s inner authoritarian” for now:

ONE: Restoration of The Fairness Doctrine. When The Fairness Doctrine was abandoned back in the last hours of the Reagan administration it took about a week before 500 dweebs who couldn’t get dates in high school decided they could become as rich as Rush Limbaugh just by telling misanthrophic nerds like themselves that liberals were the reason why they spent Friday nights playing Donkey Kong instead of making out with a cheerleader. In an instant the public airwaves were choked with enough ad hominem vitriol and persistent errors of fact to drive any self-respecting copy editor to alcohol-assisted suicide.

For starters: Way to avoid the “ad hominem vitrol”, Mr. “can’t get a date on Friday night”.
Second:  Condolences to the survivors of all of Lambert’s old copy editors; Limbaugh’s success cut down the number of people in the business.  They just made spectacularly more money at it.

At least, the ones that succeeded did.  That doesn’t include Lambert, who – unlike the whole conservative format – didn’t exactly connect in the market as a talk show host.  (Note to the copy editor who may not have known about Lambert’s past, and thus couldn’t pass it on to the audience; don’t do it.  Life’s still worth living).  [*]

The in-coming Obama administration has no interest in requiring people holding radio licenses to provide counter-arguments to the likes of Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Jason Lewis, etc. (Perhaps because time and events have effectively marginalized that cast of characters to a still profitable-but-truly-dingbat core audience.) But as King, I order that each troll-kissing radio jock be required to defend his bumper sticker logic against a live, equally well-remunerated liberal for 15 minutes every hour. And we’re not talking Alan Colmes. Think more like Glenn Greenwald or Katrina vanden Heuvel across the desk from El Rushbo three times every show. Tell me that wouldn’t be fun? (And the King likes fun.)

Tell Glenn and ‘Trina to come on the NARN with us.  Or maybe drop by yourself sometime; you’ll be “remunerated” equally with Ed and I.

You can explain where there’s any shortage of opinion out there, among other things.

No, really.

Oh, it gets worse:

FIVE: A non-profit news consortium shall take control of Minnesota reporting and commentary functions. The King is busy with many other aspects of state — war-mongering and arranging marriages — otherwise he would act as a one-person consortium and make all significant news decisions. And he may yet. But first he will test a system whereby a modest state “information tax” is imposed to staff an organization at least the size of the Star Tribune circa 2004, with no fear of commercial penalties if they investigate the fortunes of local HMO tycoons, football team owners or close friends of any public official. Editorial control will rest in a rotating triumvirate of demonstrably talented journalists. We will begin with MinnPost publisher Joel Kramer, ex-City Pages editor Steve Perry and U of M prof Jane Kirtley.

So in other words, welfare for people who can’t make it in the real world.

No, Mr. Copy Editor!  Back away from the ledge!

SIX: MPR with jokes.  Whatever happened to intelligent satire? …But come on. Can’t we do better than fart jokes on morning drive radio? The King decrees a new radio format be foisted upon the vassals — “Some College Education Required News Talk … with Jokes”. Imagine if Kerri Miller were permitted to play with her guests, needle them and tease them to effect?

Good times.

Good times.

The kingdom will be a better more peaceful place for all this.

Just like  Ukraine  in 1933.

[*] Yes, I know – Lambert doesn’t have “copy editors” any more than Nick Coleman does.  Work with me, here.

11 thoughts on “If He Were The King, I’d Be The Revolutionary

  1. “Whatever happened to intelligent satire? …But come on. Can’t we do better than fart jokes on morning drive radio?”

    (forehead slap) Ahhh, sure. That’s what’s missing! We need the Al Franken satire hour; brought to us by Powder Milk Biscuits.

    Sometimes, these idiots are so far removed from the merest shred of rationality I wonder if they consist of a wholly different species of homo sapiens.

  2. ‘Just like Ukraine in 1933’

    The man is in fact a closet Stalinist, and not a ‘Democrat’. His writings are typically peppered with subtle Marxist rhetorical flourishes.

  3. “Think more like Glenn Greenwald or Katrina vanden Heuvel across the desk from El Rushbo three times every show. Tell me that wouldn’t be fun? ”

    Yes, it would be indeed. Not for the reason he thinks, though.

    related thought, is there such a thing as a sock voice?

  4. Free speech advocates on the left never seem to have a problem with dictating the political content of public discourse.

  5. Stalinist is right, Buzz. Limbaugh’s audience is blue collar. Very few of them read The Nation or Slate. Lambert also references his desire for “Some College Education Required News Talk … with Jokes”.
    Lenin was aware that the leadership of his Communist Party dominated by intellectuals rather than workers. He undertook a lot of effort to justify this. Even Lenin (as far as I know) never dared to take the line that actual workers were too stupid to rule their own lives. Lenin’s justification for rule of the party was that the interests of individual worker organizations were too self-oriented and that a common leadership (supplied by the Party) was necessary to safeguard their interests.

  6. Well, Lambert has had some kind of a show… and try as he might, he could never craft a show that was “smart… with jokes”.

    For two reasons. 😉
    His comments weren’t smart… his jokes weren’t funny.

  7. That’s *Senator* Franken to you, Shiftee.

    Just like it was “President” Bush to you.

  8. I, for one, vow to refer to Bama in no less respectable terms than peev & AC used to describe Bush. Nor will I question the sincerity of his religious beliefs any more than peev & co questioned the sincerity of Bush’s religious beliefs.

  9. Calling him Hitler couldn’t possibly be worse than using the KKK approved word — cover your ears, kiddies — “Obammy” to refer to our coming Posterior In Chief.
    Personally I believe that Obama should be referred to as “The Grandson of a Hottentot Goat Herder” or “The scion of Land Grabbing Jayhawk Scum”.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.