When Second Amendment human rights activists saw the movie Groundhog Day, we had two reactions:
- How the hell was it that Andie McDowell was the big break-out actress from the movie Sex, Lies and Videotape, and Laura San Giacomo languished in obscurity on LIfetime movies and the series “Just Shoot Me”? [*]
- This isn’t a comedy. This is a documentary.
Repeating the same day over and over and over and over and over and over again – it’s sort of what we Second Amendment activists do. Only the cycle, at least in terms of the media’s approach to the issue, runs about every five years or so.
Because there are no new questions on this issue. Since the 1960s, it’s been the same tiny set of points, accusations, strawmen, red herrings and the odd honest question, over and over and over again.
I’ve been active in the Second Amendment human rights movement since the eighties. I’ve been through a series of cycles in media and astroturf interest in the subject; the wave of post-office mass murders in the eighties (whose main vestige today is the phrase “going postal”), the Florida “shall issue” bill, the Stockton schoolyard massacre, the Luby’s massacre and a few copycat episodes, the Shall Issue debate in Minnesota, Columbine and the small wave of copycat school shootings (including the Red Lake massacre in Minnesota), Virginia Tech, and finally the three big shootings of this past year and a half, the Giffords, Aurora and Newtown shootings (but never, it seems over Washington DC or Chicago).
Each of the episodes had a different story. But each of them brought out basically the same set of questions, largely from media people who thought they were the first to ask the questions. They start with the simple, situational questions – “why does anyone need a thirty round magazine?” – and graduate to The Big Questions, “what does the Second Amendment really mean, and do we need it at all?”.
Every. Single. Time.
Anyway – Eric Black at the MinnPost spun the wheel this past week, writing a three part iteration of a whole long slew of the same questions about the Second Amendment that, depending on how long you’ve been a Second Amendment human rights activist, you might have lost count of the times you’ve answered.
But the goal, always, for the Second Amendment human rights supporter, isn’t to do the end-zone happy dance over past triumphs. It’s about convincing and persuading successive generations of people about the rightness of the cause.
And so as this week progresses I’ll be addressing the points in Black’s series.
Stay tuned through the week.
[*]That may have been more “me” than “Second Amendment Activists”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.