It’s a good thing we’ve got our major media superiors…
…to keep us safe from “misinformation“.
Layers And Layers Of Gatekeepers
by
Tags:
Comments
68 responses to “Layers And Layers Of Gatekeepers”
-
If Trump would walk into that committee hearing room, drop trou, bend over and tell the members to kids his ass, he’d guarantee 2 more terms for himself.
If he turned around and said “impeach deez nuts”, he’d have a shot at the first US President for life.
-
. . . and now it appears that in her testimony Cassidy Hutchinson misidentified Trump aide Justin Clark for DOJ attorney Jeff Clark, resulting in a trademark FBI raid on Jeff Clark’s home and the seizure of his cell phones, computers, etc.
The comedy hits from the Jan 6 hearing clown show just keep coming. -
In the meantime, truth slowly seeps out of the swamp, drip by drip. But never let a partisan, corrupt, deranged narrative get in the way of truth, and for layers and layers of gatekeepers to ever acknowledge it. Because, Insarekshun and no mean twits!
It was all a setup. Trump supporters were framed by FBI and government operatives and BLM and Antifa terrorists. A leaked internal memo revealed that the US Capitol Police intel unit warned that BLM from Baltimore was bussing in rioters for January 6th protests. According to the memo the rioters were going to blend in. Via investigative reporter Paul Sperry: “BLM/Antif will wear MAGA hats, wear camo,and attempt to blend in with MAGA crowd” so violence blamed on Trump supporters attending Trump rally. [Tweet] Antifa was actively involved in the January 6th protests and riots.
-
So many men so afraid of Trump they left it to aides like Cassidy Hutchinson to speak out. That “under oath” part is really causing some consternation for SiTD commenters and others in MAGA world.
-
Cassidy Hutchinson was such a lousy witness — hearsay with the principles denying the truthfullness of her testimony — that the committee members are now making excuses why they didn’t vet it better before putting her on the stand.
-
^ woolly on TikTok 🤡
-
^^More gibberish.
This bit, from the Trump-hating WaPo, is revealing:
So far, no one has publicly corroborated [Hutchinson’s} account of a struggle between Trump and the Secret Service in his presidential SUV, but nor is anyone known to have disputed it under oath. Officials have said anonymously that the Secret Service agents involved are prepared to contradict Hutchinson in sworn testimony, although they do not appear to have done so.
What, exactly, has Hutchinson testified to under oath?
That someone told her some things.
Let me go boldly out on a limb and predict the Jan 6 committee will not allow any testimony that contradicts Hutchinson’s hear say. I know, it is crazy, but I don’t think that the Jan 6 committee is interested in the truth. They are interested only in exercising their Trump hatred.
Maybe the Jan 6 committee will next hear testimony that the witness read somewhere that Trump laundered the money of Russian oligarchs?
The WaPo speaks the quiet part out loud with this:
“By rolling the dice, the committee attracted the attention it has sought for its message that Trump’s role in precipitating the Jan. 6 attack was illegal, unconstitutional and disqualifying for any future bid for public office.”
So the Jan 6 committee is driving the Titanic into the iceberg. Anyone with a lick of common sense could have seen, months ago, that these goals were unachievable, given the many, many instances of Dems disputing elections that they clearly lost.
Gotta feel a little bad for those guys. They can’t let Trump run again because he would beat Biden (so say the polls), and they have become so nutty that they believe that allowing the people to vote for the person who is best able to lead the country is anti-democratic. -
Hopefully, the new year will bring “the January Committee” to look into among other things, members of Congress who have married their brothers.
-
Lol, I just saw a DNC fund raiser commercial with Adam Schiff. Schiff said that if Trump is elected in 2024, we need a Dem congress to counter this “most dangerous president.”
So much for Schiff’s belief in democracy. -
More LOL…
The January 6 committee’s key witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, called the committee “bs” in a text message obtained exclusively by the Daily Caller. On Feb 1. Hutchinson sent a text to a conservative activist with connections to the First Amendment Fund, which is a group started by the American Conservative Union that helps Trump officials cover costs for Jan. 6 lawyers. Matt Schlapp said Hutchinson approached CPAC for help through the First Amendment Fund. Schlapp said he is happy they did not end up assisting her because she was relaying White House “hallway gossip as fact.”
-
Mitch McConnell will come to the rescue and contend that a president is allowed to unleash an armed mob at the Capitol during the last year of his administration.
Never realized Republicans were so weak on crime.
-
unleash an armed mob at the Capitol – Avery
Perhaps Avery can provide links to photos of January 6 protesters brandishing “arms”.
Or perhaps, he/she/they is referring to the horns on the hat of Buffalo Guy. Quite lethal in a head-down charge.
I mean, gosh, I feel compelled to ask was anyone carrying the Molotov cocktails that were so popular among the mostly peaceful protesters of Minneapolis?
Only by twisting the English language, as well as logic and common sense could one suppose that perhaps some protesters may have been carrying their legal and licensed holstered pistols as is common on every street in almost every town in Redstate America.
-
“Take the f’ing mags away, they aren’t here to hurt me, they can march to the Capitol after the rally’s over.” ~ Donald Trump Jan 6
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-28/trump-urged-followers-to-capitol-despite-warnings-of-weapons -
^^Still believing the hear say from Hutchinson.
And still can’t explain his description of the January 6 rioters as an “armed mob.”
The only person killed in the riot was an unarmed woman protester who was shot by a government agent. -
Cassidy Hutchinson told the House Jan. 6 committee that Trump ahead of his rally that day was unhappy that SOME of his supporters weren’t able to get in and blamed magnetometers set up by the Secret Service.
So “Cassidy Hutchinson said” is sufficient evidence that the “mob was armed”.
Notice the word “some”,
Hold that thought.
Yesterday, thousands of Abortion Rights protesters marched across the country. Since, to my knowledge, none of them were required to pass through the field of a magnetometer, we don’t know if any of them were carrying legal conceal weapons.
But odds are, that “some” of them were.
Does that imply that Abortion Rights protesters constitute an “armed mob”?
According to Avery’s twisted logic and tortured language it does.
So think about it.
They could be coming to a city near you.
-
Again Avery, the photo of armed Jan. 6 protesters please…..
And no, she said she heard is not good enough.
-
Courageous woman. I wish more of her colleagues would be willing to tell the truth.
-
Still waiting for the photos of armed Jan. 6 protesters.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.