Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
In December, “Dangerous” was the number one bestselling book on Amazon. It sold enough copies to make the New York Times bestseller list. And the book hadn’t even been published – those were advance sales of a book due to be released in March.
The book won’t be published at all. Simon & Schuster has canceled the book due to a relentless campaign of protests, violence, and boycotts orchestrated by the Left to prevent the author’s message from being heard.
I know what you’re going to say. The author is a Bad Man who has done Bad Things; therefore, any message he might spread must be a Bad Message which should not be heard, but should be ruthlessly suppressed to protect innocent minds from being corrupted.
Of course, that’s merely the Ad Hominem logical fallacy used to apply Alinksky’s Fourth Rule, which is standard fare for Liberals who believe the ends justify the means, I get all that. Here’s my question: does it matter whether the Bad Message is suppressed Before it’s published or After it’s published? Is censorship worse than intimidation? Is banning better than burning? Because that’s the side you’re on, Liberals. You’re standing with the book burners.
Are you proud of it?
Joe Doakes
To the left, there is neither pride, nor good, nor bad. There is merely power and control. All else is a sideshow.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.