Rethinking The Seventies: The Eagles

If I’ve learned one thing after leaving my post-adolescent years, it’s that there are few things in the world more useless than rock critics.

Not every rock critic.  Not all the time.  But as a job classification, rock critics are somewhere between supermodels and professional reality-TV contestants in terms of useful output generated per unit of input.

Of course, part of my emnity with rock critics is embarassment over the way the adolescent Mitch ate up the crap they were peddling.   I managed to evade some of the more embarassing adolescent gaffes of the eighties, of course – photos of me with a frizzy seventies perm, or supporting Gary Hart – but I sure did drink up the whole jug of “rock critic as social commentator” koolaid.

I’ll forgive myself for missing it, of course, because like any teenager, my perspective started in junior high; nothing that came before counted, naturally.  Even moreso – growing up in rural North Dakota, my main window into pop culture, and pop counterculture, was through the issue of Rolling Stone that came to the Jamestown Library every week.

And in RS, every week, the “great” critics of the day – Dave Marsh, Robert Christgau, Cameron Crowe – and the not so great (the execrable Parke Puterbaugh) held forth on the changing culture…

…through the medium of the album review.  The self-important, “English majors gone wild”-style attempts to turn snark about this week’s entertainment product into commentary on Deep Thoughts-style reviews that you went to Rolling Stone for.

Anyway – the geist of that particular zeit, was “old is bad – new is good”.

Same as it ever was and ever shall be, of course.

And so by the time I became aware of the musical world outside Jamestown, the new and loud and snotty – the Ramones, the Sex Pistols, the Clash, reggae, ska, punk in general – was in.  The old and measured and, worst of all, commercial – everything from Led Zeppelin and Bad Company to Linda Ronstadt and Elton John – was out.

And one of the big losers in that calculus was The Eagles.

And truth be told, I was always fine with that.

Don’t get me wrong; I’ve always had a few Eagles songs that, deep in the back of my musical consciousness, I’ve loved.  “Take it to the Limit” is one of my favorite last-call songs ever.  “Already Gone” is one of my favorite guitar raveups – I’ve always wanted to play it in a cover band.  And the guitar player in me has spent hours dissecting all of the glorious technical nuance in “Hotel California”.

Last week, I wound up watching the movie “History of the Eagles”, covering the band’s story up through their breakup in 1980 (and the sequal, covering their various solo careers and reunions after 1994).

Lessons learned:

  • The re-united Eagles are an extraordinarily un-compelling band whose muse has left them.
  • But that implies that the Eagles had a muse to lose.  And up through about 1977, they did.

The snotty teenage Mitch chose to ignore the latter point – and never really stopped until last weekend.

But the more I learn – or re-learn – about the Eagles in their original incarnation, the more I think I may have short-changed my adolescent self.

Videos below the jump.

Truth be told, even when I was in the worst throes of my “too good for anything before punk” teenage wasteland years, I secretly loved the sh*tkicker anthem “Already Gone”, here in a gloriously sloppy :

And then there’s “Take It To The Limit”.  Sung by original bass player Randy Meissner, for my money it’s behind only “Hearts of Stone” as the best last-call song in the history of pop music:

And then there’s “Hotel California” – the song that, along with “Stairway to Heaven” and “Baba O’Riley” (and, yes, “Can’t Get Enough”), launched the entire “Classic Rock” genre.


Forget all of the Eagles social and historical overhead, though.  Just focus on two things:

First: The guitar interplay between Don Felder and Joe Walsh.  It’s so well-known it’s become something of a musical cliche, like the first eight bars of “Stairway to Heaven” or the riff to “Won’t Get Fooled Again” or “Sweet Home Alabama” – the musical equivalent of saying “Y’know what I mean”, and they do.

But listen to it; the intro, with Don Felder’s capoed 12-strong with the chiming harmonics; Felder and Joe Walsh’s almost orchestral harmony behind Henley’s vocal in the second half of each verse; and, of course, the call and answer guitar solo with Felder and Walsh at the end of the song.  Like “Sweet Child of Mine” or “Just Between You And Me”, it’s one of those guitar parts that’s a rite of passage for pretty much everyone that plays the instrument (or at least those of us who started playing between 1977 and 1995; I have no idea what the kids learn today, if anything).

Second, and even more interesting?  Watch and listen to the interplay between Randy Meissner’s bass and Don Henley’s drums.  That’s right; a song that was the nucleus of American “classic rock” of the Seventies was a reggae song.  Or at least had a thick but nuanced reggae influence in the rhythm.

 

7 thoughts on “Rethinking The Seventies: The Eagles

  1. Eagles playing reggae??!! Next you’ll be telling me that Steely Dan played some blues tunes! hehe

  2. The Eagles, to my mind, rank with Bob Seger and Tom Petty — good but not great. And there’s nothing wrong with that. All of them have their moments but they all are a bit overfamiliar at this point, since their music has been in rotation on classic rock stations for 40 years or more.

  3. I think the first song I learned to play on the guitar was Take It Easy, but Already Gone was one of the most fun my friends and I would play. If only we’d had someone who could carry a tune we’d have been a real band… (Don’t look at me, I can’t carry a tune in a bucket, but I could play quite a number of instruments.)

    I always rated The Eagles as good, but not great. There are things that I liked a lot more when I was younger but haven’t aged anywhere nearly as well as Eagle’s tunes.

  4. When it came to rock critics, NOYBODY held a candle to Lester Bangs.
    Having him played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman was the icing on the cake.
    RIP to both…

  5. Witchy Woman was also a favorite of mine. When they reunited, I thought maybe a little bit of politcal realism had crept in with Get Over It .

  6. I didn’t care for the early Top 40 Eagles songs such as “Tequila Sunrise” from the 70s. Then somebody got me to listen to the Desperado album all the way through, which led to me listening to more of their early stuff. I didn’t like “Sunrise” because it was just too commercial. They obviously got a lot better in manipulating their commercial style, as epitomized by the Hotel California album, but there was also a lot of interesting commentary worked into their lyrics, and based on his solo efforts, I think most of it came from Henley. If there is ever a sequel to the movie “Coffee and Cigarettes”, I’d love to see Henley and another drummer, Neil Peart, sit down together.

  7. I caught The History of the Eagles earlier this year when it ran on one of the pay channels. While I’m no Eagles fan, I too really (and grudgingly) like a lot of their stuff. The show also provided a good genogram on who they were during the hungry years before they were a band, who they were as a band, and who the band is now. Lots of very good details and apparently “inside” info.

    However, what still really baffles me is how well-documented the group was, even in the earlier years before the members united into the Eagles. Solo acts, various combinations of members, supposedly “private moments,” all caught on tape.

    If they were just a bunch of starry-eyed, random musicians who just happened to come together to form a major rock band, how and why did all the small details, as well as major moments, just happen to get taped, recorded, and saved? Particularly in an era where, unlike now, the recoding of music, let alone video, was technologically difficult and required some pretty (for the time) complicated, unwieldy, and expensive equipment; both to own and operate.

    Is it possible that they were pegged and groomed from the start as a super group and bankrolled by someone with both music and investment savvy who made sure all the “good stuff” was staged, copied, and archived? Sort of a later day “Monkees” with tons of talent and their own instruments.

    Maybe I over thought all this. However, most bands I’ve seen, heard, or even have been part of, barely had time and money enough to practice, let alone keep the cameras rolling from start to break-up.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.