The Eternal Game of Telephone

One of the reasons I always liked being a solo blogger (until Johnny Roosh joined the staff last summer) was that miscommunications among contributors were pretty rare.

Of course, with bigger blogs, it’s not always quite so easy.

Over at True North, I comment on a flap between two of my favorite regional bloggers; my friend and NARN colleague (for the rest of the week, anyway) Michael Brodkorb, and Col. Joe Repya.  The flap grew into a few questions about how True North does business – partly with the prodding of some Twin Cities leftybloggers who, like addled kittens who see a shiny bit of foil, are trying to romp and cavort about the “story”.

I try to answer them.

41 thoughts on “The Eternal Game of Telephone

  1. I love to read the comment threads in your blog, Mitch, especially when you bitchslap your detractors. but Dayum! I guess I need to look true north more often. 😀

  2. Good post, Mitch. MB and Joe both have roles to play, but we have to pick our battles. And getting internecine is never a good idea.

  3. Wow are there some whoppers in your post, but I’ll agree with D, it was well written.

    Whopper One – you don’t engage in rumor mill mongering – yeah – tell that to your little bird, or for that matter, the little bird that uses reposts from other not-so-center-right hate blogs.

    Anyway, I hope your troubles get sorted out – sounds like they have. I know Joe Repya from the Reserves if I recall correctly- and I like him. I hope he’s not upset – sounds like you didn’t mean to cause offense, though often what we mean, and what we do, don’t align. The question then becomes, should we have reasonably seen that what we did was likely to NOT result in what we wanted?

  4. Tolo: Yes, you do! (And I don’t byotchslap…do I?)

    D: Exactly.

    Peev: please try to distinguish between Shot In The Dark – which, superior product that it is notwithstanding – is a personal with all that implies – and TN, which is a group blog that has an agenda and some standards.

  5. Mitch, I would have thought that a simple “our blog, our rules” would have been sufficient. I don’t care who it is, even me, we owe it to try to stick to the facts or, at least, what is clearly stated as personal opinion.

  6. Peev,
    I demand (DEMAND!) that you actually point out to evidence, quotes, links, etc. to what ever in the flaming hootie-hoo it is you are talking about.

    After all, if you want to call Mitch out on telling lies (LIES!) and turn as many folks in his blog-audience to join you in your horde… um, modest collection… uh, pair of solitary gang of counter-Mitchs… we’d blindly follow you if you would simply stop your asinine finger-pointing, loud-mouthing, posturing, and jackassary and support what you claim.

    You ignorant slut.

    Remember… I’m demanding this of you. If you fail in your duty (DUTY!) to put your money where your mouth is… we’ll start continue saying that you are:

    all talk and no trousers.

  7. not-so-center-right hate blogs
    Why is it I can’t imagine Peev not being able to distiguish between “not-so-center-right” and “hate”?

    Rhetorical question.

  8. Mitch:
    “Now, as a matter of policy we’re not big into posting rumors – and while Joe Repya is quite confident in the veracity of his sources, he doesn’t name them.”

    Did not seem to stop you when you passed along Repya’s ‘news’ about the big anti-shoe thrower rally in Dearborn (that never happened).

    It is not Repya’s fault for assuming you will print any old fantasy he passes along.

  9. That’s what I was thinking, RickDFL. The phony massive Dearborn rally gets passed along, undigested, regardless that it was manifestly unlikely and easily checked. And no correction follows.

    By contrast, when one member of the wingnut family goes after another, all of a sudden Marquis of Queensbury rules apply. No rumors posted here!

  10. “…all of a sudden Marquis of Queensbury rules apply…”

    Pffft. I’ll take you on anytime AC….street rules.

    You: Seltzer and floppy shoes.

    Me: Bare hands and superior intellect.

  11. BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    AC & Tricky Rick are all the sudden concerned about accuracy & truth!

    OH let the hilarity begin!!!

    OH MAN! I can barely catch my breath!

  12. Dear Rick “Sending troops out into the Iraqi countryside is a suicide mission” DFL:

    Hah.

    Sincerely,

    etc etc

  13. I’m outraged. OUTRAGED!!!
    I demand an anti-anti-shoe-throwing rally post RIGHT NOW to satisfy some strange, obsessive need I have to make a completelty irrelevent point!
    Be sure to spell my name right.

  14. AC:
    “all of a sudden Marquis of Queensbury rules apply”
    In this case, to apply the M of Q rules, you would need to be able to tell the difference between rumor and well-reported fact. I don’t think they can tell the difference between the two anymore. They simply believe what they want to believe. When faced with a conflict between two equally desirable sources, they have no rational method to resolve the dispute. Instead, they wring their hands and say we love you both.

  15. I don’t think they can tell the difference between the two anymore. They simply believe what they want to believe.

    MAN you’re killing me!

    You are the same RickDFL that tried to tell us that Sarah Palin was raising her daughter’s illegitimate child as her own, right? Or the line that Palin was a secret secessionist from the Alaskan Independance Party?

    DUDE! I’m telling you, you’re making my sides hurt!!!!

  16. Good work on the post, Mitch. Brodkorb is the guy who unearthed Franken’s inability to pay taxes and workers comp, and Joe is the guy who made Liberate Iraq lawnsigns appear all across the Twin Cities.
    Both are valuable to the conservative cause, and defusing a fight between them was a win for our side.
    As for RickDFL, Joe’s report came from an Iraqi. I’ve yet to see any burden of proof from the AP or the networks when it comes to the claims of any Iraqi about US military (insert abuse or torture claim here).

  17. “I don’t think they can tell the difference between the two anymore.”
    This is the same RickDFL who believes that a utility bill should be enough to prove your ID when you go to vote but it is unreasonable to suspect that it could lead to fraudulent voting.
    It goes without saying that RickDFL is the only regular commenter at SITD who chooses to use the name of a political party as part of his moniker.

  18. You know, no one has ever publicly claimed to be Rick DFL. And quite honestly he can be so ridiculous, it’s hard to believe that he’s true… Could it be that “RickDFL” is actually Micheal Broadkorb? Think about it! If all DFLer’s were as incompetent as the Rickster, there would be a lot more demand for their incompetence to be exposed, wouldn’t there?

  19. Oooh, an Iraqi! Well then it must be true, Dave Tool.

    Of course there should be a couple thousand more Iraqi’s, Lebanese, Syrians and US of A Americans out there too, if there really was a “massive” anti-shoe rally.

  20. AC,

    Pot meet Kettle, Kettle this is Pot!
    Most of your reality is made up on the fly, & you have no room to talk.

    Oh yeah… & who the hell cares????

  21. Wow. The SITD crowd comes through again.

    Terry:
    “RickDFL who believes that a utility bill should be enough to prove your ID”
    Never said that. A utility bill proves your address. That is why MN law requires a photo ID and the last 4 digits of your SSN to establish your ID.

    Mr. Shirt:
    “RickDFL that tried to tell us that Sarah Palin was raising her daughter’s illegitimate child as her own” Never said that. Never even addressed the topic that I can remember.
    “Or the line that Palin was a secret secessionist from the Alaskan Independance Party?” Never said that either. I said her husband was a member and she addressed their convention, which are both true.

    You guys would use a wet umbrella to prove it was sunny outside.

  22. I said her husband was a member and she addressed their convention, which are both true…

    …to try to reinforce a dishonest meme about Palin.

    Obtuse AND dishonest. Add “condescending” and you’ll have what we now call the Rickfecta.

  23. “to try to reinforce a dishonest meme”
    I know you post-modernists love hermeneutics, but try to master the simple art of making true statements first.

    Can you point to anything that makes Repya’s Dearborn rumor less credible than his Brodkorb rumor? Indeed, given that Repya is a Minnesota Republican activist he would presumably be better informed about the latter. Nothing distinguishes the two, other than that you were a willing dupe in the first case and an unwilling dupe in the second.

  24. “RickDFL that tried to tell us that Sarah Palin was raising her daughter’s illegitimate child as her own” Never said that. Never even addressed the topic that I can remember.
    “Or the line that Palin was a secret secessionist from the Alaskan Independance Party?” Never said that either. I said her husband was a member and she addressed their convention, which are both true.

    Then you either have a very short memory, or you repress the moments when you roundly embarrass yourself in public. You & I went back & forth on these issues here on SITD.

    Still laughable!

  25. After I disproved EVERYTHING you were trying to state in the comments of that post you only had the ability to cling to the fact that her husband had been a part of that party, but you continued to say that that implied that Palin herself also supported the AIP.

  26. other than that you were a willing dupe in the first case and an unwilling dupe in the second.

    Speaking of dupes, have you heard that your messiah now thinks he’s Lincoln?

    BWAHAHAHAHHAHA!

  27. “You & I went back & forth on these issues here on SITD.”

    Care to provide a link with me saying anything about the maternity of Palin’s child?

  28. We’ll wait for that link, eh Rick? Think it’ll come before or after any evidence of that massive anti-shoe rally?

  29. not-so-center-right hate blogs.

    In peev’s BDS addled mind, any blog that doesn’t bring it’s own kneepads when it has to “service” leftism, is a hate blog.

  30. RickDFL wrote:
    Terry:
    “RickDFL who believes that a utility bill should be enough to prove your ID”
    Never said that. A utility bill proves your address. That is why MN law requires a photo ID and the last 4 digits of your SSN to establish your ID.

    After he wrote:

    I can’t say for HI, but in MN (call 651-297-3298 to confirm), while you can have the DL mailed to a PO Box, the DL must list your resident address. A PO Box does not count as a resident address. I bet the same holds for a utility bill, because it must list the address at which service is being billed. So when using either to register to vote, you would have to register at your resident address.

    http://www.shotinthedark.info/wp/?p=3941#comment-43189

    The only reason I even read your comments anymore is that I groove on the bathos.

  31. RickDFL pithed: “Nothing distinguishes the two, other than that you were a willing dupe in the first case and an unwilling dupe in the second.”

    Exactly right. Well put, RickDFL.

  32. Terry:

    From the same post you linked to:
    “You need a current utility bill, plus a Photo ID, plus the last 4 of your SSN.”

    In the section you quote, we were arguing about how MN established that an address on a voter reg application actually existed.

    “The only reason I even read your comments anymore is that I groove on the bathos”
    I guess that explains why you never get any smarter. I actually enjoyed your moronic comments on MN election law. I had to look a few things up and ask some questions of elections officials. As a result, I learned a few things. Try it sometime.

  33. RickDFL said:

    “I actually enjoyed your moronic comments”

    That makes sense, since you seem to love making your own.

  34. “In the section you quote, we were arguing about how MN established that an address on a voter reg application actually existed.”
    Wrong again, o member of the Reality-Based Community. We were arguing about whether or not the state of MN occasionally audited addresses to see if they really existed. You tried to make the point that since the state mails a registration confirmation form to a new registrant that is the same as the audit procedure Bike Bubba wanted to see implemented. I argued that you were being ridiculous, since (among other things) people get mail addressed to them at places other than their legal residence.
    Then you started flailing, asserting that a utility bill with a name & address on it was proof that a voter had the same legal residence as appeared on the utility bill.
    You are still in the uncomfortable position of claiming that there is no trade off between ease of registration & voting and secure elections.

  35. Terry:

    Nothing in the above involves me asserting a utility bill can be used to prove ID in a voter registration application. A utility bill is proof of residence and address (both of which are audited by mailing a voter reg card to that address). If you use a utility bill to prove residence, you must supplement it with a Photo ID to prove your ID.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.