Wanted: Horse Traders

Setting a single, no-haggle price was a great publicity point for the late, great Saturn marque of cars.

Of course, they are a late, great marque of cars.

I’m not sure if no-haggle pricing was the issue; GM’s bad management had a lot more to do with it.

But whatever no-haggle pricing had or had not to do with Saturn’s demise, it may have been a mistake in this past legislative session.

John “Shabbosgoy” Gilmore at Minnesota Conservatives would have preferred some smash-mouth haggling; I”m inclined to agree:

…[R]epublicans find themselves boxed into a budget corner of their own making. Having won both the House and Senate, the latter for the first time since the 1970’s, they should have been able to advance their core principles in a manner that consistently gave them the upper hand, despite the executive branch being controlled by the opposition. Instead, republicans find themselves on the defensive and playing a poor hand largely dealt to them by themselves.

The shortest analysis is that the republicans erred badly in sending only one “this is it we really mean it!” budget to the Governor and expecting him to roll over.

I’m also not a bit puzzled by the fact that the GOP jumped immediately to the “spend the available revenue/live within our means” budgets, expecting to put it out there and then hold on through the gale of union-and-Dayton-family-funded astroturf advertising and pro-DFL, biased media coverage.   The current proposal – the $34 billion budget that uses new revenue from the February forecast – would have been an acceptable ending point, the place the DFL would fall back to to compromise.

Even that truncated analysis, however, obscures other problems with the manner in which the republican majority has performed. For example, running uniformly on a platform of bringing down government spending while not increasing taxes, one might plausibly have expected them to produce a budget that actually cut spending. Not a budget that was signed into law by the Governor, mind you. No, one that actually required of the majority some intestinal fortitude and made cuts to the bloated mess that is Minnesota state government. The idea that there isn’t largess is laughable. The fact that the Minnesota government is the state’s single largest employer is shameful.

We need more freshmen in the GOP caucus.

3 thoughts on “Wanted: Horse Traders

  1. Maybe the GOP caucus needs to adopt the Pawn Stars style of haggling:

    Leg: 32 billion?

    Dayton : 34 billion!

    Leg: OK – 30 billion.

  2. Great idea, Loren.

    Better conversation;

    Zellers: How much did you want for this?

    Dipstick Dayton: $36 Million!

    Zellers: I was thinking like $31 Million.

    Dipstick Dayton (on the verge of tears): Can’t you go $35 Million?

    Zellers: I can go $33 Million. That’s my bottom line and I really shouldn’t even do that:

    Dipstick Dayton (obviously rattled): Oh, forget it! You bleep, bleep stupid peasant!

  3. As has been suggested before on a national level, maybe the Republicans’ problems are due to lack of experience of being in charge? Now that they’re there, they just don’t know how to maintain control of their agenda.

    Or maybe the state Republican leadership still needs to grow a pair (with “not entirely applicable” apologies to Sen. Koch.)

    But yeah, I can agree with Shabbosgoy. Maybe they should have started at 2006 spending levels ($26B? $28B?) and ended up at $32-34B.

    Then again, even tho politics is the “art of compromise”, I’ll echo what I said earlier: Dayton won by 8700, the Lege flipped in a historic mandate. The compromising should be 90/10 Dayton/lege.

    (on a slightly related side note, I am VERY pessimistic about the US Congress. I imagine more economic demagoguery from hell from the left and Boehner, possibly lacking a pair, caving on the debt ceiling while not demanding draconian spending reductions. I pray I am wrong but I’m not hopeful)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.