shotbanner.jpeg

June 21, 2005

Why Should The Irish Have All The Fun

It occurred to me as I was reading with envy Red's account of her annual Bloomsday revel - in which James Joyce fans worldwide celebrate Ulysses in a variety of ways - that there's no reason the Irish should have all the fun.

Indeed, why not get together on September 7 for Borodino Day? Read some Tolstoy, drink some vodka, plot some court intrigue?

I'm tellin' ya, it'd rock.

Do Svedanya Rodina!

Posted by Mitch at June 21, 2005 08:35 AM | TrackBack
Comments

How can we take you seriously, Mitch, after the bombshell you dropped last Saturday? You hate Pink Floyd? What are ye....a COMMIE? HAHAHA.

Posted by: Dave at June 21, 2005 10:06 AM

Hey, I didn't say I hated Pink Floyd. Just most of their albums.

Details!

Posted by: mitch at June 21, 2005 10:16 AM

Mitch: You have to do this!! It could sweep the nation!

Posted by: red at June 21, 2005 02:26 PM

Borodino doesn't do that much for me, sorry. The problem is that its significance is only in that the French didn't win big a enough victory to meet their strategic objectives, though they did win the battle. It would be sort of like celebrating the battle of Smolensk in 1941.

Now Leipzig, 16-19 October, 1813 could be a good excuse for a week-long party, if you want a Napoleonic theme. It has the advantage that nearly everybody was there, giving you more choices in celebration fun. And it marked the end of the real Napoleonic French army.

Or maybe Breitenfeld, 17 September, 1631, without which Europe would have developed in an entirely different direction.

Or if you'd rather celebrate the Swedes losing than winning, maybe the Battle of Poltava, which marked the end of the Swedish empire and rise of the Russian empire -- not my choice, but hey. That has the advantage that you could celebrate twice, on June 28 (the date of the battle in the old calendar) and July 8 (the date in the new calendar).

Still, I suppose Borodino is as good an excuse as Cinco de Mayo, though that is faint praise indeed.

Posted by: Doug Sundseth at June 21, 2005 04:19 PM

Doug,

It's not supposed to be purely history-based. In keeping with the parallel with Ulysses, the whole thing is a "War and Peace" reference - and Borodino is an event of immense importance in the book.

In short - it's a Literature major party, not a History major party.

And it's an excuse to hang out at Moscow on the Hill, on Selby, on a beautiful fall evening. Or, for the evening, "Moskva Na Gora".

Posted by: mitch at June 21, 2005 04:44 PM

...and listen to the 1812 overture -- I understand (and understood).

But Russian literature has never done much for me (I'd apologize, but I don't feel especially bad, sorry*), and the underlying reason would distract me. It's hard to get worked up for, "Woo hoo, we didn't lose as badly as we could have!"

I still think that a four-day** "Battle of Nations" party that travelled from one ethnic establishment to another could be at least as attractive, though perhaps louder. My opinion doesn't matter much, though, since I'm unlikely to be in either NYC or Mpls this fall, more's the pity.

*I suppose that's a sort of meta-apology; perhaps that will suffice.

** Or longer, the 16 of October is a Sunday this year, so the party would end on Wednesday, then the party remembering the celebration of the victory could last through the weekend.

Posted by: Doug Sundseth at June 21, 2005 05:25 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi