The Strib wants us to deal with school violence by keeping all the options - as long as they don't trouble any of the sacred cows of the left:
Any comprehensive strategy to curb school shootings should deal with both subjects. Yet the summit did not address why the administration drastically reduced federal safety resources. While lamenting school violence last week, the president and House Republicans were also outlining a budget that would cut school safety funding by 34 percent compared with 2002 levels.Between the federal bureaucracy and the union money pit, federal school funding for whatever purpose disappears down one black hole or another.
But let's be clear here; "spending" doesn't lead to safety. Oh, it might succeed in turning schools into medium-security prisons - it's the trend these days - but the underlying causes of school violence will still be there.
More on that in a bit:
Another topic that was given short shrift during the president's summit was access to guns. The president never mentioned the topic and the First Lady, attorney general and secretary of education talked about it only in passing.But not, apparently, why people who can defend against school shooters can't.It may be that nothing could have stopped the most recent shooters; it is possible that they would have stopped at nothing to get the firearms they needed to commit these evil acts.
Still, any credible discussion of school safety requires raising the question of how and why teenagers can get guns so easily.
Nor can we discuss the most sacred of the cows; why all of this is happening in schools in the first place.
As Luann Walters and I discussed on her show on the past couple of Saturdays, we need to talk about why the factory school model is such a breeding ground for violence and madness:
Star/Tribune - let us know when the MFT and the state's "professional" administrators want to discuss that, mkay?
Posted by Mitch at October 17, 2006 06:50 AM | TrackBack
Guns don't kill people, schools do.
Posted by: angryclown at October 17, 2006 08:15 AMIt sure would be nice if parents had the option to send their kids to a school that 'thought outside the box' when it comes to student safety and education.
Innovation ends where monopolies begin.
Posted by: McGruv at October 17, 2006 09:22 AM"Guns don't kill people, schools do."
Guns don't kill people, clowns do.
What temperature was it in John Wayne Gacy's basement? 33 below.
I have 2 bad jokes about clowns, but I think posting them would earn me a place in SITD hell.
But they make ME chuckle.
Posted by: Bill C at October 17, 2006 09:43 AMMitch, can you explain this claim? "but stupid enough to demand that boys, 50% of the population pretend they're girls."
Posted by: Fulcrum at October 17, 2006 10:48 AMMitch's kids must go to that new transsexual magnet school.
Posted by: angryclown at October 17, 2006 11:52 AMNo, I think Mitch is referring to the fact that boys learn in different ways than girls. They are more active and need more freedom to burn off that energy. Some learn better when active and futzing with manipulatives. They cannot be expected to sit quietly for long periods of time. A lot of girls are have the same issues but it is more prevalent in boys. I have two ADHD boys, and they learn completely differently than their sister.
Posted by: Lori at October 17, 2006 03:12 PMLori basically got it - but there's more to it still.
Girls develop verbal skills earlier than boys. Boys remain tactile and physical longer; they (generally) *need* to be able to run, play, burn off energy, and express themselves physically and through things like head to head competition in ways that girls deal with verbally and socially.
Boys also learn to socialize aggression through physical activity in ways that girls learn through social (verbal) interaction.
Now, if you force boys to try to deal with both their less-developed verbal/social skills in the same way that girls do at young ages, it not only gives them no means of channelling their more-tactile, more-physical need for expression - it also sets them up as inferiors in a system they're not yet developed to operate in.
Which is, as it happens, what the current academic-industrial complex wants. The educational academy as been heavily feminized in the past twenty years, with the result being an ascendant belief that boys' innate behavior is a pathology that needs to be cured, rather than a normal personality trait that needs to be not merely accomodated, but used to the boys' advantage.
Forcing boys to act like girls in the verbal/social sense, while stifling their tactile/physical sense, is no more rational than forcing gay kids to act like straight kids. We know what kind of damage the latter does - but a good part of the academic-industrial complex believes the former is just fine.
It's not. Which is why I've seceded from the public school system.
Posted by: mitch at October 17, 2006 04:20 PMUsed to be that kids who didn't do well in school were called "bad students." I guess even "conservatives" will make with the sociology double-talk where their kids are concerned.
"My kid isn't dumb. He has Understanding Deficit Syndrome."
Posted by: angryclown at October 17, 2006 05:21 PM"Mitch's kids must go to that new transsexual magnet school."
"My kid isn't dumb. He has Understanding Deficit Syndrome."
You're getting tired, aren't you?
Posted by: Kermit at October 17, 2006 10:35 PMHow Ritalin... and other mood-altering drugs are systematically foisted on our kids by teachers who, while they canoften barely teach their own subjects, feel themselves qualified to act as surrogate psychiatrists
That is very accurate from a number of standpoints:
1) State law,thanks to a bill put forth by our current education commissioner as well as Dem Mindy Greiling, requires teachers to obtain "further preparation in understanding the key warning signs of early-onset mental illness in children and adolescents," in order to retain their certification. So, teachers are supposed to learn in an hour or two each year what it takes mental health professionals years to learn and by their own standards admit that their criteria are "subjective" and "value judgments based on culture."
2) There is a 265 page state mental health system transformation plan, knowingly or unknowingly endorsed by our current governor and screening upheld in rulings by Hatch's AG office that calls for, among other things, "Earlier identification and intensive intervention for students with diagnosable mental health disorders;" and "Earlier identification and intervention for students at risk for mental health disorders" and use of a federal grant program that will make sure that "all children ages birth to five are screened early and continuously for the presence of health, socioemotional [mental health] or developmental needs."
3) All of the psychiatric drugs in independent study after study are shown to be ineffective and cause very serious, if not lethal side effects, including psychosis, violence and suicide.
This can be stopped by parents knowing what laws protect them from mental health screening and coerced psychiatric drugging, a summary of which is available at http://www.edwatch.org/updates06/090906-pss.htm
It may also be stopped by holding politicians' of both parties feet to the fire in the election and the next legislative session.
Posted by: Dr. Karen Effrem at October 18, 2006 08:47 AMthanks for the follow up admiral berg
Posted by: fulcrum at October 18, 2006 09:56 AM