Even though bloggers won some of the same protections from speech-rationing laws that the dead tree media enjoys (and, hello John McCain and Russ Feingold, that the First Amendment supposedly grants all of us), some local agendabloggers apparently are pining for the soothing balm of government intervention to do their work for them.
Eva Young over at The Dump (a site that has featured crude photoshops of Senator Bachmann in Nazi regalia, and which is more given to ad-hominem than discussion) notes the creation by a group of District Six bloggers (Winger, Jules, and the indispensible Jeff Kouba and Andy "Triple A" Aplikowski) of the "Bachmann Vs. Wetterling blog - an indepenent, grass-roots effort by a group of citizens, some of whom are GOP activists - and plaintively asks "Will Bachmann v Wetterling Show Up on Bachmann's FEC Reports".
Then, after an off-topic wander through an unrelated Jeff Kouba statement, she asks again: "Will any of the bloggers show up on Michele Bachmann's FEC reports?"
Well, since the FEC has ruled that blogs don't count as campaign contributions, I'd suspect not.
But since Eva and the rest of the Dump crowd are running and tattling to teacher bringing it up, I have to ask: have Bachmann's various opponents listed The Dump as a contribution? And since The Dump is so conscientious about these things on the parts of other bloggers, have the Dumpers declared themselves a contribution, since they are no less so than the campaign groupblog?
And why is The Dump advocating censorship? Because listing blogs as a campaign contribution, and making them subject to the FEC's burgeoning array of speech rationing laws most certainly is censorship, albeit wityh a dull, bureaucratic face rather than a black marker.
Patty Wetterling: Do you favor subjecting your opponents to speech-rationing laws, as your de facto supporters suggest?
Enquiring minds may or may not want to know - but I bet they don't get their answers at The Dump (beyond the inevitable rambling ad-hominem).
Posted by Mitch at May 19, 2006 08:16 AM | TrackBack
Curious.
Whiner Berg has an unhinged screed about me. I am going to go right 10 posts about it right now during my cofee brake.
How rediculous!
Developing...
Posted by: Eva Young at May 19, 2006 09:40 AMYoung calls Mitch "Whiner Berg". But now Young is whining.
I guess since "Whiner" is taken, that makes her "Sniveler Eva", huh?
Posted by: AK at May 19, 2006 09:58 AMThe Dump. . . *snort*
Posted by: Ryan at May 19, 2006 11:17 AMMitch, just out of curiosity do you think that anything written at the Dump warrants being noticed much less merits a response? It seems to me that the best way to handle these morons is to simply ignore them and let them fester alone in the sewer they’ve created rather than wade in with them.
Posted by: Thorley Winston at May 19, 2006 02:31 PMThorley,
I went back and forth on it, to tell the truth. I should probably not have. But observing "look, a sewer" isn't quite the same as wading in.
Or is it?
OK. That'll be the last of it.
Posted by: mitch at May 19, 2006 02:47 PMNo problem Mitch, but it's just that (a) when more credible bloggers link to the fool's website to tell their readers what an idiot she is, it probably drives half of her traffic, (b) it validates her existence, and (c) your comment section begins to get clogged with very unfunny parodies of the idiot in question.
Posted by: Thorley Winston at May 19, 2006 06:38 PMgirls in white pantyhose tawnee stone pantyhose
Posted by: Xcfr at October 9, 2006 12:24 AMuncensored japanese movies free fucking movies
Posted by: Hqeannbd at October 10, 2006 12:45 PMuncensored japanese movies free fucking movies
Posted by: Hqeannbd at October 10, 2006 12:49 PMglory holes cum shots hot teen cum shots
Posted by: Elqaj at October 29, 2006 11:22 PMmanga books erotic free slut girl manga
Posted by: Vfqabxjsunn at October 30, 2006 06:41 PM